바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

ISSN : 1229-0653

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.25 No.1

Citation Share

단축형 행복 척도(COMOSWB) 개발 및 타당화

A Concise Measure of Subjective Well-Being(COMOSWB): Scale Development and Validation

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격 / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2011, v.25 no.1, pp.95-113
https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2011.25.1.006
서은국 (연세대학교)
구재선 (중앙대학교)
서은국, & 구재선. (2011). 단축형 행복 척도(COMOSWB) 개발 및 타당화. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 25(1), 95-113, https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2011.25.1.006

초록

본 연구의 목적은 간략하여 사용이 간편하면서 동시에 문화적 공정성을 지닌 행복 척도를 개발 및 타당화하는 것이었다. 이를 위해서 주관적 안녕감의 핵심요소인 삶의 만족, 긍정적 정서, 부정적 정서를 측정하는 단축형 행복 척도(COMOSWB: Concise Measure of Subjective Well-Being) 9문항을 개발했다. 삶의 만족은 자신의 개인적 측면에 대한 만족 외에 대인관계와 소속집단에 대한 만족도를 측정하는 문항을 포함했고, 정서적 행복은 2회의 경험적 연구를 통해 행복과 밀접한 관계가 있는 각성수준 고, 중, 저의 긍/부정적 정서 경험으로 문항을 구성했다. 이렇게 개발된 단축형 행복 척도(COMOSWB)는 문항수가 적음에도 불구하고 높은 신뢰도와 타당도를 보였다. 구체적으로 새로운 행복 척도는 적절한 수준의 내적 일치도와 검사-재검사 신뢰도, 구인타당도, 수렴 및 변별 타당도가 있었고, 친구들의 행복 평가와도 일치하는 양상을 나타냈다. 끝으로 새롭게 개발된 단축형 행복 척도(COMOSWB)가 갖는 의의에 대해 논의했다.

keywords
행복, 주관적 안녕감, 척도 개발, 타당화, happiness, subjective well-being, scale development, validation

Abstract

A concise, culturally nuanced 9-item subjective well-being scale is introduced. The measure includes 3 positive and negative emotion items, respectively, representing high, medium, and low levels of arousal. Satisfaction is measured in three separate domains of life—personal, relational, and collective. This Concise Measure of Subjective Well-Being (COMOSWB) shows strong levels of reliability (internal, test-retest) and clear patterns of convergent and discriminant validity. Compared to existing measures of happiness, the COMOSWB adds interdependent aspects in measuring satisfaction and includes emotion items that are more balanced in terms of arousal level.

keywords
행복, 주관적 안녕감, 척도 개발, 타당화, happiness, subjective well-being, scale development, validation

참고문헌

1.

구재선, 김의철(2006). 심리적 특성, 생활경험, 행복의통합적 관계. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 20,1-18.

2.

김명소, 김혜원, 차경호, 임지영, 한영석(2003). 한국 성인의 행복한 삶의 구성요인 탐색 및 척도개발. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 8, 415-442.

3.

김완석, 김영진(1997). 주관적 안녕 척도: 공동생활 및행동과의 연관. 한국심리학회지: 사회문제, 3,61-81.

4.

박윤창, 이미경, 윤진(1995). 자극추구동기가 청소년 비행에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 사회문제, 2,53-64.

5.

이현희, 김은정, 이민규(2003). 한국판 정적 정서 및 부적 정서 척도(Positive affect and negative affectschedule: PANAS)의 타당화 연구. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 22, 935-946.

6.

임낭연, 이화령, 서은국(2010). 한국에서의 Diener의 삶의 만족 척도(Satisfaction with Life Scale:SWLS) 사용 연구 개관. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 29,21-47.

7.

Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976). SocialIndicators of well-being: America's perception of life quality. NY: Plenum Press.

8.

Berry, J. W. (1989). Imposed etics-emics-derivedetics: The operationalization of a compelling idea.International Journal of Psychology, 24, 721-735.

9.

Bradburn, N. M. (1969). The structure of psychological well-being. Chicago: Aldine.

10.

Cantril, H. (1965). The pattern of human concerns.New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

11.

Chiasson, N., Dube, L., & Blondin, J. (1996). A lookinto the folk psychology for four cultural groups.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 27,673-691.

12.

Costa, P. T. & McCrae, R. R. (1980). Influence ofextraversion and neuroticism on subjectivewell-being: Happy and unhappy people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54,296-308.

13.

Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being.Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542-575.

14.

Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin,S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale.Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75.

15.

Diener, E., Sandvik, E., & Pavot, W. (1991).Happiness is the frequency, not the intensity ofpositive versus negative affect. In F. Strack, M.Argyle, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Subjectivewell-being: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp.119-139). Oxford: Pergamon Press.

16.

Diener, E., Smith, H., & Fujita, F. (1995). The personality structure of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 130-141.

17.

Diener, E., & Suh, E. M. (2000). Culture and subjective well-being. Cambridge, MA: MITPress.

18.

Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L.(1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276-302.

19.

Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi.D., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2009). New measures of well-being: Flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 39, 247-266.

20.

Emmons, R. A. & Diener, E. (1985). Personality correlates of subjective well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 89-97.

21.

Fordyce, M W. (1988). A review of research on thehappiness measures: A sixty second index ofhappiness and mental health. Social IndicatorsResearch, 20, 355-381.

22.

Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B. Jr.(2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Fivepersonality domains. Journal of Research inPersonality, 37, 504-528.

23.

Kemper, T. (1984). Power, status, and emotions: Asociological contribution to a psychophysiologicaldomain. In K. Scherer & P. Ekman (Eds.),Approaches to emotion (pp. 369-383). NY:Erlbaum.

24.

Kim, U. Park, Y. S., & Park, D. (2000). Thechallenge of cross-cultural psychology: The roleof the indigenous psychology. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 63-75.

25.

Kitayama, S., & Markus, H. R. (2000). The pursuitof happiness and the realization of sympathy:Cultural Patterns of self, social relations, andwell-being. In E. Diener & E. M. Suh (Eds.),Culture and subjective well-being (pp. 63-86).London: The MIT Press.

26.

Kitayama, S., Markus, H. R., & Kurokawa, M.(2000). Culture, emotion, and well-being: Goodfeeling in Japan and the Unitied States.Cognition and Emotion, 14, 93-124.

27.

Kwan, V. S. Y., Bond, M. H., & Singelis, T. M.(1997). Pancultural explanations for lifesatisfaction adding relationship harmony toself-esteem. Journal of Personality and SocialPsychology, 73, 1038-1051.

28.

Lee, D., Park, S., Uhlemann, M., & Patsula, P.(1999). What makes you happy? A comparisonof self-reported criteria of happiness betweentwo cultures. Social Indicators Research, 50,351-362.

29.

Lu, L. & Gilmour, R. (2004) Culture and concept ofhappiness: Individual oriented and social orientedSWB. Journal of Happiness Studies, 5, 269-291.

30.

Lucas, R. E., Diener, E., & Larsen, R. J. (2003).Measuring positive emotions. In S. J. Ropez, &C. R. Snyder (Eds.), Positive psychologicalassessment: A handbook of models andmeasures (pp. 201-218). Washington, DC:American Psychological Association.

31.

Lucas, R. E., Diener, E., & Suh, E. M. (1996).Discriminant validity of subjective well-beingmeasures. Journal of Personality and SocialPsychology, 71, 616-628.

32.

Lybomirsky, S., & Lepper, H. S. (1999). A measureof subjective happiness: Preliminary reliabilityand construct validation. Social IndicatorsResearch, 46, 137-155.

33.

Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture andthe self: Implications for cognition, emotion, andmotivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.

34.

Morey, L. C. (1991). Personality AssessmentInventory: Professional Manual. Florida:Psychological Assessment Resources Inc.

35.

Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex mode of affect.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,39, 1161-1178.

36.

Russell, J. A. (1983). Two pan-cultural dimensionsof emotion words. Journal of Personality andSocial Psychology, 45, 1281-1288.

37.

Scollon, C. N., Diener, E., Oishi, S., &Biswas-Diener, R. (2004). Emotions acrosscultures and methods. Journal of Cross-CulturalPsychology, 35, 304-326.

38.

Sedikides, C., & Brewer, M. B. (2001). Individualself, relational self, collective self. Ann Arbor,MI: Taylor & Francis.

39.

Steger, M. F., Frazier, P., Oishi, S., & Kaler, M.(2006). The meaning in life questionnaire:Assessing the presence of and search formeaning in life. Journal of CounselingPsychology, 53, 80-93.

40.

Suh, E., Diener, E. & Fujita, F. (1996). Events andsubjective well-being: Only recent events matter.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,70, 1091-1102.

41.

Triandis, H. C. (1989). The self and social behaviorin differing cultural context. Psychologicalreview, 96, 3, 506-520.

42.

Tsai, J. L., Knutson, B., & Fung, H. H. (2006).Cultural variation in affect valuation. Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology, 90, 288-307.

43.

Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988).Development and validation of brief measures ofpositive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,54, 1063-1070.

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격

논문 투고 OA 정책