바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

  • P-ISSN1229-0653
  • KCI

ISSN : 1229-0653

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.25 No.2

Citation Share

자기고양과 배우자고양이 행복감과 부부관계의 질에 미치는 효과

Self - and Spouse - Enhancement, Subjective Happiness, and Martial Quality in Married Couples

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격 / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2011, v.25 no.2, pp.167-182
https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2011.25.2.009
김영남 (경남대학교)
고재홍 (경남대학교)
김영남, & 고재홍. (2011). 자기고양과 배우자고양이 행복감과 부부관계의 질에 미치는 효과. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 25(2), 167-182, https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2011.25.2.009

초록

본 연구에서는 257쌍의 부부들을 대상으로 유능성과 따뜻함의 두 차원에서 자기고양과 배우자고양을 살펴보았다. 부부들은 4가지 대상(자신, 배우자, 평균적인 남편들, 평균적인 부인들)을 평가하였고, 이를 근거로 자기고양과 배우자고양 크기를 산출하였다. 그런 다음 두 고양 중 어느 것이 주관적 행복감과 부부관계의 질에 더 중요한 역할을 하는지 알아보았다. 또한 부부들의 두 고양이 문화성향과 어떤 관련이 있는지를 살펴보았다. 주요결과는 첫째 부부들은 자기고양보다 배우자고양을 더 많이 하는 것으로 나타났다. 구체적으로는 유능성 차원에 비해 따뜻함 차원에서 부부들은 자기고양과 배우자 고양을 많이 하고 있었다. 둘째, 남편은 자기고양보다는 배우자고양이 클수록 행복감이 높았으며, 관계만족도도 높았다. 반면 부인은 자기고양과 배우자 고양이 클수록 행복감이 높았고, 배우자고양이 클수록 관계만족도가 높았다. 셋째 논란의 여지는 있지만 대체로 개인주의 성향은 자기고양을 매개로 행복감에 영향을 주고 있었으며, 집합주의 성향은 배우자고양을 매개로 부부관계의 질에 영향을 주고 있었다.

keywords
자기고양, 배우자고양, 행복감, 부부관계의 질, 개인주의-집합주의, self-enhancement, spouse-enhancement, happiness, marital quality, individualism-collectivism

Abstract

This study investigated the self-enhancement and spouse-enhancement of 257 married couples on the two dimensions of competence and warmth. The couples were asked to evaluate themselves, spouses, husbands in general, and wives in general. Based on their responses, the magnitude of self-enhancement and spouse-enhancement was computed in order to determine which of the two enhancement factors plays a more significant role in the subjective happiness and marital quality, and how the two enhancements are related to individuals' cultural disposition. The major findings of the study were as follows: First, the couples enhanced their spouse rather than themselves, in particular, on the measure of warmth. Specifically, the couples were shown to demonstrate more of self-enhancement and spouse-enhancement on warmth than on competence. Second, the happiness of the husband was affected by spouse-enhancement, not by self-enhancement, increasing the relational satisfaction as well. However, the happiness of the wives was influenced by self-enhancement and spouse-enhancement with the relational satisfaction being improved by spouse-enhancement. Third, the couple's individualistic propensity exerted an influence on their happiness mediated by self-enhancement and their collectivistic disposition impacted the marital quality mediated by spouse-enhancement.

keywords
자기고양, 배우자고양, 행복감, 부부관계의 질, 개인주의-집합주의, self-enhancement, spouse-enhancement, happiness, marital quality, individualism-collectivism

참고문헌

1.

고재홍(2001). 집합주의-개인주의 성향에 따른 분배규범의 선호차이. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격,15(3), 1-16.

2.

고재홍, 전병우(2003). 두 자기평가 편향과 자존감간의관계. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 17(2), 1-16.

3.

김정식, 송유진, 이성수(2008). 문화점화가 자기평가에미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 22(1),177-194.

4.

김향련, 고재홍(2007). 부부간 상호지각의 일치도와 결혼만족간의 관계. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격,21(2), 89-105.

5.

김혜숙(1995). 귀인상황의 공개성과 (집단)자아존중이자기고양 귀인과 집단고양 귀인에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 9(1), 45-63.

6.

김혜숙, 고재홍, 안미영, 안상수, 이선이, 최인철(2003).다수집단과 소수집단에 대한 고정관념의 내용: 유능성과 따뜻함의 차원에서의 분석. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 17(3), 121-143.

7.

김희진(2005). 결혼초기 부부관계 향상 프로그램 개발에 관한 연구: 긍정주의 심리치료 접근 중심으로.한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 17(4), 877-906.

8.

백수경, 고재홍(2007). 자기고양편향이 행복감과 인기도에 미치는 효과. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격,21(1), 89-104.

9.

백혜영, 신희천(2007). 애정관계에서의 낙관성이 관계만족에 미치는 영향: 긍정적 평가의 매개효과. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 22(3), 1-14.

10.

조긍호(1982). 지적 평가정보와 사회적 평가정보가 호오차원 인상과 화친차원 인상에 미치는 영향의 차이. 사회심리연구, 1, 78-100.

11.

조긍호, 김소연(1998). 겸양 편향자의 선호 현상. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 12(1), 169-189.

12.

최진희, 구민경, 최인철(2002). 관계고양지각이 관계만족도에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 16(3), 53-74.

13.

Abby, A., & Andrews, F. M. (1985). Modeling thepsychological determinants of life quality. SocialIndicators Research, 16, 1-34.

14.

Acitelli, L. K., Rogers, S., & Knee, C. R. (1999). Therole of the identity in the link between relationship thinking and relationship satisfaction.Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 16,591-619.

15.

Alicke, M. D. (1985). Global self-evaluation asdetermined by the desirability and controllabilityof trait adjectives. Journal of Personality andSocial Psychology, 49, 1621-1630.

16.

Bogart, L. M., Benotsch, E. G., & Pavlovic, J. D.(2004). Feeling superior but not threatened: Therelation of narcissism to social comparison. Basicand Applied Social Psychology, 26, 35-44.

17.

Boyd-Wilson, McClure, J., & Walkey, F. (2004). Arewellbeing and illusory perceptions linked? Theanswer may be yes, but. Australian Journal ofPsychology, 56, 1-9.

18.

Brown, J. D. (1986). Evaluations of self and others:Self-enhancement biases in social judgments.Social Cognition, 4, 353-376.

19.

Crohan, S., & Veroff, J. (1989). Dimensions of maritalwell-being in black and white newlyweds. Journalof Marriage and the Family, 51, 379-383.

20.

Cross, P. (1977). Not can but will college teachersbe improved? New Directions of HigherEducation, 17, 1-15.

21.

Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Lasen, R. J., & Griffin,S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale.Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75.

22.

Erdelyi, M. H. (1974). A new look at the new look:Perceptual defence and vigilance. PsychologicalReview, 81, 1-25.

23.

Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). Amodel of(often mixed) stereotype content:Competence and warmth respectively follow fromperceived status and competition. Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902.

24.

Funder, D. C., & Doborth, K. M. (1987). Differencesbetween traits: Properties associated withinterjudge agreement. Journal of Personality andSocial Psychology, 52, 409-418.

25.

Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R. W. (2000). Thetiming of divorce: Predicting when a couple overa 14-year period. Journal of Marriage and theFamily, 62, 737-745.

26.

Greenwald, A. G., & Pratkanis, A. R. (1984). Theself. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.),Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 3, pp.129-178). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

27.

Hall, J., & Taylor, S. E. (1976). When love is blind.Human Relations, 29, 751-761.

28.

Headey, B., & Wearing, A. (1987). The sense ofrelative superiority-central to well-being. SocialIndicators Research, 20, 497-516.

29.

Heine, S. J. (2008). Cultural psychology. NY: Norton.

30.

Heine, S. J., & Lehman, D. R. (1997). The culturalconstruction of self-enhancement: An examinationof group-serving biases. Journal of Personalityand Social Psychology, 72, 1268-1283.

31.

Helgeson, V. S., & Taylor, S. E. (1993). Socialcomparisons and adjustment among cardiacparents. Journal of Applied Social Psychology,23, 1171-1195.

32.

Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences:International differences in work-related values.Beverly Hills. CA: Sage.

33.

Hong, Y., Benet-Martinez, V., Chiu, C., & Morris,M. W. (2003). Boundaries of cultural influence:Construct activation as a mechanism for culturaldifferences in social perception. Journal ofCross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 453-464.

34.

Hong, Y., & Mallorie, L. M. (2004). A dynamicconstructionist approach to culture: Lessonslearned from personality psychology. Journal ofResearch in Psychology, 38, 59-67.

35.

John, O. P., & Robin, R. W. (1994). Accuracy andbias in self-perception: Individual differences inself-enhancement and the role of narcissism.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,66, 206-219.

36.

Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (1995). Thelongitudinal course of marital quality andstability: A review of theory, method, andresearch. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 3-34.

37.

Kenny, D. A. (1994). Interpersonal perception. NY:Guilford.

38.

Kernis, M. H. (2001). Following the trail fromnarcissism to fragile self-esteem. PsychologicalInquiry, 12, 223-225.

39.

Kobayashi, C., & Brown, J. D. (2003). Self-esteemand self-enhancement in Japan and America.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34,567-580.

40.

Kuiper, N. A., Olinger, L. J., MacDonald, M. R., &Shaw, B. F. (1985). Self-schema processing ofdepressed and nondepressed content: The effectsof vulnerability on depression. Social Cognition,3, 77-93.

41.

Lyubomirsky. S. (2001). Why are some peoplehappier than others? The role of cognitive andmotivational processes in well-being. AmericanPsychologist, 54, 239-249.

42.

Lyubomirsky. S., & Lepper, H. S. (1999). A measureof subjective happiness: Preliminary reliabilityand construct validation. Social IndicatorsResearch, 46, 137-155.

43.

Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture andthe self: Implication for cognition, emotion, andmotivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.

44.

Miller, D. T., & Ross, M. (1975). Self-serving biasesin attribution of causality: Fact or fiction?Psychological Bulletin, 82, 231-225.

45.

Myers, D. G., & Diener, E. (1995). Who is happy?Psychological Science, 6, 10-19.

46.

Robin, R. W., & Beer, J. S. (2001). Positive illusionabout the self: Short-term benefits andlong-term costs. Journal of Personality andSocial Psychology, 80, 340-352.

47.

Rosenberg, S., Nelson, C., & Vivekananthan, P. S.(1968). A multidimensional approach to thestructure of personality impression. Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology, 9, 282-294.

48.

Rosenblatt, R. (1993). The 11th commandment.Family Circle, 25, 30-32.

49.

Seligman, M., & Chikszentmihalyi, M. (2000) Positivepsychology. American Psychologist, 55, 5-14.

50.

Srivastava, S., McGonigal, K. M., Richards, J. M.,Butler, E. A., & Gross, J. J. (2006). Optimism inclose relationships: How seeing thing in apositive light make them so. Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology, 91, 143-153.

51.

Sternberg, R. J., & Kolligan, J. (1990). Competenceconsidered. CT: Yale University Press.

52.

Stucke, T. S., & Sporer, S. L. (2002). When agrandiose self-image is threatened: Narcissismand self-concept clarity as predictors of negativeemotions and aggression toward ego threat.Journal of Personality, 70, 509-532.

53.

Takata, T. (2003). Self-enhancement and selfcriticismin Japanese culture: An experimentalanalysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,34, 542-551.

54.

Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion andwell-being: A social psychological perspective onmental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103,193-210.

55.

Triandis, H. C. (1990). Cross-cultural studies ofindividualism and collectivism. In J. J. Berman(Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol.36, pp. 41-133). Lincoln: University of Nebraska.

56.

Triandis, H. C., & Gelfand, M. J. (1998). Convergingmeasurement and horizontal and verticalindividualism and collectivism. Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology, 74, 118-128.

57.

Wojciszke, B., Bazinska, R., & Jaworski, M. (1998).On the dominance of moral categories inimpression formation. Personality and SocialPsychology Bulletin, 24, 1251-1263.

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격

논문 투고 OA 정책