바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology

ISSN : 1229-0653

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.25 No.4
Citation Share

Implicit Motivation to Control Prejudice and Exposure to Counterstereotypic Instances Reduce Spontaneous Discriminatory Behavior

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2011, v.25 no.4, pp.107-120
https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2011.25.4.007

(University of California at Berkeley)
& (2011). Implicit Motivation to Control Prejudice and Exposure to Counterstereotypic Instances Reduce Spontaneous Discriminatory Behavior. Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 25(4), 107-120, https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2011.25.4.007
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

We examined joint influences of Implicit Motivation to Control Prejudice (IMCP) and exposure to counterstereotypic stimuli on spontaneous racial bias. Participants performed a Shooter Task (Correll, Park, Judd, & Wittenbrink, 2002) wherein the ratios of stereotypic (i.e., armed Black) and counterstereotypic targets were manipulated. Then all participants performed the standard Shooter Task with equal ratios of targets. Those higher in IMCP showed less bias, as did participants in the Counterstereotypic condition. The pattern of results also suggests that the counterstereotypic exemplar effect on Shooter Bias was larger for those relatively high in IMCP.

keywords
implicit motivation, race and ethnic discrimination, self control, social cognition, 암묵적 동기, 인종 차별, 자기 통제, 사회 인지

Reference

1.

Bargh, J. A., Gollwitzer, P. M., Lee-Chai, A.,Barndollar, K., & Troetschel, R. (2001). Theautomated will: Nonconscious activation andpursuit of behavioral goals. Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology, 81,1014-1027.

2.

Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1996). Automaticactivation of impression formation andmemorization goals: Nonconscious goal primingreproduces effects of explicit task instructions.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,71, 464-478.

3.

Correll, J., Park, B., Judd, C. M., & Wittenbrink, B.(2002). The police officer’s dilemma: Usingethnicity to disambiguate potentially threateningindividuals. Journal of Personality & SocialPsychology, 83, 1314-1329.

4.

Correll, J., Park, B., Judd, C. M., & Wittenbrink, B.(2007). The influence of stereotypes on decisionsto shoot, European Journal of Social Psychology,37, 1102-1117.

5.

Correll, J., Park, B., Judd, C., Wittenbrink, B., Sadler,M. S., & Keesee, T. (2007). Across the thin blueline: Police officers and racial bias in thedecision to shoot. Journal of Personality andSocial Psychology, 92, 1006-1023.

6.

Correll, J., Wittenbrink, B., Park, B., Judd, C. M., &Goyle, A. (2011). Dangerous enough: Moderatingracial bias with secondary threat cues. Journal ofExperimental Social Psychology, 47, 184-189.

7.

Cunningham, W. A., Preacher, K. J., & Banaji, M. R.(2001). Implicit attitude measures: Consistency,stability, and convergent validity. PsychologicalScience, 12, 163-170.

8.

Dasgupta, N., & Greenwald, A. G. (2001). On themalleability of automatic attitudes: Combatingautomatic prejudice with images of admired anddisliked individuals. Journal of Personality andSocial Psychology, 81, 800-814.

9.

Dovidio, J. F., Kawakami, K., Johnson, C., Johnson,B., & Howard, A. (1997). On the nature ofprejudice: Automatic and controlled processes.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33,510-540.

10.

Dunton, B. C., & Fazio, R. H. (1997). An individualdifference measure of motivation to controlprejudiced reactions. Personality and SocialPsychology Bulletin, 23, 316-326.

11.

Fazio, R. H., Jackson, J. R., Dunton, B. C., &Williams, C. J. (1995). Variability in automaticactivation as an unobstrusive measure of racialattitudes: A bona fide pipeline? Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology, 69,1013-1027.

12.

Fishbach, A., & Dhar, R. (2005). Goals as excuses orguides: The liberating effect of perceived goalprogress on choice. Journal of ConsumerResearch, 32, 370-377.

13.

Förster, J., Liberman, N., & Higgins, E.T. (2005).Accessibility from active and fulfilled goals.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41,220-239.

14.

Glaser, J., & Banaji, M. R. (1999). When fair is fouland foul is fair: Reverse priming in automaticevaluation. Journal of Personality and SocialPsychology, 77, 669-687.

15.

Glaser, J., & Kihlstrom, J. F. (2005). Compensatoryautomaticity: Unconscious volition is not anoxymoron. In R. Hassin, J. S. Uleman, & J. A.Bargh (Eds.), The New Unconscious. New York:Oxford University Press.

16.

Glaser, J., & Knowles, E. D. (2008). Implicitmotivation to control prejudice. Journal ofExperimental Social Psychology, 44, 164–172.

17.

Moskowitz, G. B., Gollwitzer, P. M., Wasel, W., &Schaal, B. (1999). Preconscious control ofstereotype activation through chronic egalitariangoals. Journal of Personality and SocialPsychology, 77, 167-184.

18.

Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. K.L. (1998). Measuring individual differences inimplicit cognition: The implicit association test.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,74, 1464-1480.

19.

Greenwald, A. G., Oakes, M. A., & Hoffman, H.(2003). Targets of discrimination: Effects of raceon responses to weapons holders. Journal ofExperimental Social Psychology, 39, 399-405.

20.

Greenwald, A.G., Poehlman, T. A., Uhlmann, E., &Banaji, M.R. (2009). Understanding and using theImplicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis ofpredictive validity. Journal of Personality &Social Psychology, 97, 17-41.

21.

Inquisit 3.0.3.0 [Computer software]. (2008). Seattle,WA: Millisecond Software LLC.

22.

Kawakami, K., Dovidio, J. F., Moll, J., Hermsen, S.,& Russin, A. (2001). Just say no (tostereotyping): Effects of training in the negationof stereotypic associations on stereotypeactivation. Journal of Personality & SocialPsychology, 78, 871-888.

23.

Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2001). The go/no-goassociation task. Social Cognition, 19, 161-176.

24.

Park, S., Glaser, J., & Knowles, E. D. (2008).Implicit Motivation to Control Prejudicemoderates the effect of cognitive depletion onunintended discrimination. Social Cognition, 26,379-398.

25.

Plant, E. A., & Devine, P. G. (1998). Internal andexternal motivation to respond without prejudice.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,75, 811-832.

26.

Plant, E. A., Peruche, B. M., & Butz, D. A. (2005).Reducing implicit racial stereotyping: Makingrace irrelevant. Journal of Experimental SocialPsychology, 41, 141-156.

27.

Shah, J. Y., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2003). Whenopportunity knocks: Bottom-up priming of goalsby means and its effects on self-regulation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,84, 1109-1122.

28.

Snyder, M., & Swann, W. B. Jr. (1978). Hypothesis-testing processes in social interaction.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,36, 1202-1212.

29.

Wyer, N. A. (2004). Not all stereotypic biases arecreated equal: Evidence for a stereotypedisconfirmation bias. Personality and SocialPsychology Bulletin, 30, 706-720

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy