바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

ISSN : 1229-0653

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.25 No.4
Citation Share

국내 살인범죄의 현장행동분석

Crime Scene Behavior Analysis on Homicide in Korea

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격 / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2011, v.25 no.4, pp.41-60
https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2011.25.4.003
고선영 (서울지방경찰청)
이수정 (경기대학교)
고선영, & 이수정. (2011). 국내 살인범죄의 현장행동분석. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 25(4), 41-60, https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2011.25.4.003
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수
PDF 다운로드

초록

모든 주요범죄 중 하나인 살인 수사는 경찰력의 가장 커다란 노력이 요구된다(Becker, 2000). 본 연구는 범죄현장에 임장하는 수사관들의 직관에 의한 불확실성의 오류를 줄이고자 국내 살인범들의 현장행동과 관련된 정보를 기초로 범죄현장행동의 구성요소가 무엇인지, 그러한 행동변수가 어떤 테마의 요소로 묶이는 지 살펴보았다. 2006년부터 2010년까지 971건의 살인 및 살인미수 사건을 33개의 행동변인으로, 범죄현장에서 자주 함께 나타나는 행동 변인들이 가상의 공간에서 한 지역을 형성하고, 다른 일련의 변인들이 형성하는 지역과는 구분되어 각각의 범죄형태로 통계적 공간에 거리로 나타내는 최소공간분석(Lingoes, 1973)을 사용하였다. 연구결과, 기존의 선행연구와 동일하게 2개영역(도구적 vs 표출적)으로 구분하기보다는 3개의 영역으로 구분하는 것이 가장 적합한 것으로 나타났다. 사례의 대부분을 포함하면서 범행도구 및 상해부위 등의 행동변수가 특별한 구별 없이 공존하는 표출_비체계적인 살인영역, 표출적 동기에 해당하지만 범죄자가 어느 정도 피해자와의 부딪힘을 예상했거나 과거 폭력적 대결 경험이 있는 범죄자들에 의한 살인 범죄에 해당하는 행동변인으로 구성된 두 번째 영역, 성적 행동과 관련되어 살인이 일어나는 도구적 살인현장 행동이 반영된 세 번째 영역이다. 국내 살인 자료를 3개의 영역으로 구분함에 있어 견인차 역할을 한 행동변수는 법적 인식행동으로, 이 행동은 과거 도구적 공격성의 행동변수로만 여겨져 왔다. 하지만 CSI나 Law and Order와 같은 TV쇼의 영향을 따지지 않더라도 현대인들은 이런 법적 기술에 대한 인식을 지니게 됐으며(Stevens, 2008), 법적 인식 행동이 살인범죄에 대한 탈억제효과로 작용될 수 있음(Beauregard & Bouchard, 2010)이 국내 자료로 증명된 셈이다. 결과적으로, 법적인식에 대한 보편화는 국내 살인범죄의 현장행동을 기존의 연구 결과들과 개념적으로나 수사적인 면에서의 구분을 가능하게 해 주었다.

keywords
범죄자 분류, 살인범죄 현장행동, 표출적 및 도구적 살인, 법적 인식, 탈억제 효과, Offender classification, Crime scene behavior of Homicide, Murder of expressive vs instrumental, Forensic awareness, the effect of disinhibitor.

Abstract

Of all major crimes, homicide investigation requires the greatest effort on the part of the Police(Becker, 2000). This study aim that what’s component of crime scene behavior of homicide in Korea, how can separate in thematic behavior from crime scene behavior of homicide, For decrease errors of uncertainty of investigators that turn crime scene out. Data for analysis use 971cases of murder and attempted murder, 2006-2010 and analysing execute by crime scene behavior variable of 33. As result, it’s appropriate distribution of three region rather than distribution of two region(expressive vs instrumental) consistent with previous studies. First is the Expressive_Disorganized Homicides, including most of cases and it’s not different in murder weapon and injury position. Second, it’s include motive of expressive, but offender may have been anticipating a confrontation with the victim and/or had previous experience relating to violent confrontation. This region shall be called Expressive_Organized Homicides. Last is the Instrumental Homicides with Sexual crime. Distributing on three region of data, forensic awareness play the role of locomotive. This action have been regard as instrumental action. But wether or not influenced by TV shows such as CSI or Law and Order, contemporary people is now more aware of these forensic techniques(Stevens, 2008). This study prove forensic awareness behavior is able to affect the effect of disinhibitor(Beauregard & Bouchard, 2010). In other words, it can be increase that possibility,general people do homicide. Consequentially, generalization of this behavior can distribution between Korea’ crime scene behavior of homicide and the others, in theoretical and investigative.

keywords
범죄자 분류, 살인범죄 현장행동, 표출적 및 도구적 살인, 법적 인식, 탈억제 효과, Offender classification, Crime scene behavior of Homicide, Murder of expressive vs instrumental, Forensic awareness, the effect of disinhibitor.

참고문헌

1.

강은영, 박형민 (2008). 살인범죄의 실태와 유형별 특성: 연쇄살인, 존속살인 및 여성살인범죄자를 중심으로. 한국형사정책연구원.

2.

고선영 (2011). 살인범죄자 프로파일링을 위한 현장행동특성 고찰. 한국심리학회: 법정, Vol.2, No. 2,135-158.

3.

김경옥 (2009). 방화범죄자의 프로파일링을 위한 연구-범죄현장 행동 특성을 중심으로. 경기대학교 박사학위 논문.

4.

김윤희 (2009). 살인사건의 시체에 나타난 손상패턴에관한 연구-살인범의 특성에 따른 공격도구․부위․횟수분석. 경기대학교 석사학위논문.

5.

민인식, 최필선 (2009). STATA 기초통계와 회귀분석.한국 스테이타학회. 한국STATA학회 출판부.

6.

박광배 (2001). 다차원척도법. 서울: 교육과학사.

7.

이수정 (2010). 최신범죄심리학(제2판). 북카페.

8.

이순묵 (2010). 요인분석의 기초. 교육과학사.

9.

장익진 (1998). 다차원 척도 분석법. 서울: 연암사.

10.

한국심리학회 (1997). 현대심리학의 이해. 학문사.

11.

경찰백서 (2009).

12.

Alison, Laurence. J., & Stein, Kristin. L. (2001).Vicious circles: accounts of stranger sexualassault reflect abusive variants of conventionalinteractions. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry,Vol. 12, No. 3, 515-538.

13.

Almond, L., Duggan, L., Shine, J., & Canter, D.(2005). Test of the arson system model in anincarcerated population. Psychology, Crime &Law, 11, 1, 1-15.

14.

Amar, R. (2005). Hudap manual. Israel. The HebrewUniversity of Jerusalem Computation Authority.

15.

Baumgartner, K., Ferrari, S., & Palemo, G. (2008).Constructing Bayesian Networks for criminalprofiling from limited data. Knowledge-BasedSystem, 21, 563-572.

16.

Block, C. R. (1986). Homicide in Chicago. Chicago:Loyola University, Center for Urban Policy.

17.

Block, C. R., & Christakos, A. (1995). Inmate partnerhomicide in Chicago over 29 years. Crime andDelinquency, 41(4), 496-526.

18.

Brog, I., & Lingoes, J. C. (1987). Facet theory:Form and content. New York: Springer-Verlag.

19.

Canter, D. (2004). Offender profiling andinvestigative psychology. Journal of InvestigativePsychology and Offender Profiling, 1, 1-15.

20.

Canter, D., & Fritzon, K. (1998). Differentiatingarsonists: A model of firesetting actions andcharacteristics. Legal and CriminologicalPsychology, 3, 73-96.

21.

Canter, D., & Heritage, R. (1990). Multivariate modelof sexual offence behaviour: developments inoffender profiling: Vol. 1. Journal of ForensicPsychiatry, 1, 185-212.

22.

Chambliss, W. (1967). The Negative Self: AnEmpirical Assessment of a TheoreticalAssumption. Sociological Inquiry, 34, 108-112.

23.

Clarke, Ronard., & Dreck B. Cornish. (1985).Modeling Offenders’ Decisions: A framework forResearch and Policy. MichaelTonry and NorvalMorris(Eds). Crime and Justice: An AnnualReview of Research. Vol, 6, 170-171.

24.

Cornish, D. B., & Clarke, R. V. (2002). Analyzingorganized crimes. In a. R. Piquero & S. G.Tibbetts(Eds.), Rational choice and criminalbehaviour: recent research and futurechallenges(41-63). New York: Routledge.

25.

Davies, A. (1992). Rapists’ behaviour: A three aspectmodel as a basis for analysis and theidentification of serial crime. Forensic ScienceInternational, 55, 173-194.

26.

Decker, S. H. (1996). Deviant homicide: A new lookat the role of motives and victim-offenderrelationships. Journal Res Crime Delinquency,33, pp. 427-449.

27.

Douglas, J. E., Ressler, R. K., Burgess, A. W., &Hartman, C. R. (1986). Criminal profiling fromcrime scene analysis. Behavioral Science and theLaw, 4, 401-421.

28.

Einhorn, H., & Hogarth, R. (1978). Behavioraldecision theory: Processes of judgement andchoice. In M. Rosenzwlig & L. Poter(Eds.),Annual Review of Psychology. Palo Alto. CA:Annual Reviews.

29.

Eric Beauregard, & Martin Bouchard. (2010).Cleaning up your act: Forensic awareness as adetection avoidance strategy. Journal of CriminalJustice, 38, 1160-1166.

30.

Ericsson, K. Anders, & Simon, Herbert A. (1980).Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review,87(3), 215-251.

31.

Fagan, J. (1990). Intoxication and aggression. In M.Tonry, & J. Q. Wilson(eds.), Crime and Justice:A review of research, Chicago: University ofChicago Press, 13, 241-320.

32.

Fisher, B. A. J., & Baca, L. D. (2004). Techniques ofcrime scene investigation. seventh edition. CRCPress LLC.

33.

Fisher, Bary A. J. (2004). Techniques of CrimeScene Investigation. Boca Raton, London, NewYork, Washington, D.C.: CRC Press.

34.

Fiske, S. T. (1980). Attention and weight in personperception: The impact of negative and extremebehavior. Journal of Personality and SocialPsychology, 38, 889-906.

35.

Fiske, S. T., & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuumof impression formation, from category-based toindividuating processes: Influences of informationand motivation of attention and interpretation. InM. P. Zanna(Eds.). Advances in experimentalsocial psychology(Vol. 23, p. 1-73). New York:Academic Press.

36.

Fritzon, K., Canter, D., & Wilton, Z. (2001). Theapplication of an action system model todestructive behaviour: the examples of arson andterrorism. Behavioral Science and the Law, 19,657-690.

37.

Häkkänen, H., Puolakka, P., & Santtila, P. (2004).Crime scene action and offender characteristicsin arson. Legal and Criminological Psychology,9, 197-214.

38.

Hill, R. W., Langevin, R., Paitich, D., Handy, L.,Russon, A., & Wilkinson, L. (1982). Is arson anaggressive act or a property offence? acontrolled study of psychiatric referrals. CanadianJournal of Psychiatry, 27, 648-654.

39.

Howitt, D. (2002). Forensic and criminal psychology.Pearson Education.

40.

K. Polk. (1994). When men kill: scenarios ofmasculine violence. Cambridge University Press.

41.

Kenneth A. H., Rober D. K., & Joseph G. W. (1997).Case management for missing children homicideinvestigation. Christine O. Gregorie attorneyGeneral of Washington & U.S. Department ofJustice Office Juvenile Justice and Delinquencyprevention.

42.

Kocsis, R. N., Cooksey, R. W., & Irwin, H. J. (2002).Psychological profiling of sexual murder: AnEmpirical Mode. International Journal ofOffender Therapy and Comparative Criminology,46(5), 532-554.

43.

Kruskal, J. B. (1978). Factor Analysis and PrincipalComponents: Blinear Methods. In InternationalEncyclopedia of Statistics. Edited by W. H.Kruskal & J. M. Tanur. Free Press.

44.

Lingoes, J. C. (1973). The Guttman-LingoesNon-Metric Program Series. Ann Arbor, MI:Mathesis Press.

45.

Myers, D. (1990). Social Psychology(3rd ed.), New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.

46.

O’Sullivan, G. H., & Kelleher, M. J. (1987). A studyof firesetters in the South-West of Ireland.British Journal of Psychiatry, 151, 818-823.

47.

Paese, P. A., & J. A. Sniezek. (1991). Influences onthe appropriateness of confidence in judgment:Practice, effort, information and decision-making.Organizational Behavior and Human DecisionProcesses, 48, 100-130.

48.

Parker, R. N., & Smith, M. D. (1979). Deterrence,poverty, and type of homicide. American Journalof Sociology, 85, 614-624.

49.

Pinizzotto, A. J., & Finkel, N. J. (1990). Criminalpersonality profiling-an outcome and processstudy. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 215-232.

50.

Roberts, A. R., Zgoba, K. M., & Shahidullah, S. M.(2007). Recidivism among four types of homicideoffenders: An exploratory analysis of 336homicide offenders in New Jersey. Aggressionand Violent Behavior, 12, 493-507.

51.

Ronald Becker. (2000). Criminal Investigation.Southwest Texas State University San Marcos,Texas, Aspen Publishers, Inc.

52.

Rossomo, D. K. (2000). Geographic profiling. BocaRaton, FL: CRC Press.

53.

Salfati, C. G. (2000). The nature of expressivenessand instrumentality in homicide: Implications foroffender profiling. Homicide Studies, Vol. 4, No.3, 265-293.

54.

Salfati, C. G. (2003). Offender interaction withvictims in homicide: A multidimensional analysisof frequencies in crime scene behaviors. Journalof Interpersonal Violence. Vol. 18, No. 5,490-512.

55.

Salfati, C. G., & Dupont, F. (2006). CanadianHomicide: An investigation of crime-sceneactions. Homicide Studies, Vol. 10, No. 2,118-139.

56.

Salfati, C. G., & Haratsis, E. (2001). Greek homicide:A behavioral examination of offendercrime-scene actions. Homicide Studies, Vol. 5,No. 4, 335-362.

57.

Salfati, C. G., & Taylor, P. J. (2006). Differentiatingsexual violence: A comparison of sexualhomicide and rape. Psychology, Crime, & Law,12, 107-125.

58.

Sampson, R. J., & Wilson, W. J. (1995). Toward atheory of race, crime, and urban inequality. In J.Hagan & R. D. Peterson(Eds.), Crime andinequality(37-54). Stanford, CA: StanfordUniversity Press.

59.

Santilla, P., Häkkänen, H., Alison, L., & Whyte, C.(2003). Juvenile fire-setters: crime scene actionsand offender characteristics. Legal andCriminological Psychology, 8, 1-20.

60.

Santtila, P., Canter, D., Elfgren, T., & Häkkänen, H.(2001). The structure of crime-scene actions inFinnish homicides. Homicide studies, Vol. 5, No.4, 363-387.

61.

Santtila, P., Pakkanen, T., Zappalà, A., Bosco, D.,Valkama, M., & Mokros, A. (2008). Behavioralcrime linking in serial homicide. Psychology,Crime & Law, Vol. 14, No. 3, 245-265.

62.

Smith, M. D., & Parker, R. N., (1980). Type ofhomicide and variation in regional rates. SocialForces, 59, 136-147.

63.

Smith, M. D., & Zahn, M. A. (1999). Homicide: Asourcebook of social research. Sage Publications,Inc.

64.

Sniezek, J. A., Henry, R. (1990). Revision, Weighting,and commitment in consensus group judgement.Organizational Behavior and Human DecisionProcesses, 45(1), 66-84.

65.

Stevens, D. J. (2008). Forensic science, wrongfulconvictions, and American prosecutor discretion.The Howard Journal, 47, 31-51.

66.

Wachi, T., Watanabe, K., Yokota, K., Suzuki, M.,Hoshino, M., Sato, A., & Fujita, G. (2007).Offender and crime characteristics of femaleserial arsonists in Japan. Journal of InvestigativePsychology and Offender Profiling, 4, 29-52.

67.

William J. Chambliss. (1969). Crime and the LegalProcess. New York: McGraw-Hill, pp. 360-378.

68.

Williams, A., & Thomas A. W. (1977). A survey orjudges’ responses to simulated legal cases:Research note on sentencing disparity. TheJournal of Criminal Law & Criminology, Vol. 68,No. 2, 306.

69.

Williams, K. R., & Flewelling, R. L. (1988). Thesocial production of criminal homicide: Acomparative study of disaggregated rates inAmerican cities. American Sociological Review,53, 421-431.

70.

Wolfgang, M. E. (1958). Patterns in criminalhomicide, Philadelphia. PA: University ofPennsylvania Press. 254.

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격

논문 투고 OA 정책