바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

ISSN : 1229-0653

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.25 No.4
Citation Share

범인음성식별절차에 있어서의 언어장막효과(Verbal Overshadowing Effect)와 눈감기 효과

Verbal Overshadowing Effect and the Benefits of Eye-closure in Audio Line-up

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격 / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2011, v.25 no.4, pp.77-92
https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2011.25.4.005
이윤 (한림대학교)
조은경 (한림대학교)
이윤, & 조은경. (2011). 범인음성식별절차에 있어서의 언어장막효과(Verbal Overshadowing Effect)와 눈감기 효과. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 25(4), 77-92, https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2011.25.4.005
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수
PDF 다운로드

초록

범죄사건의 목격자가 범인의 음성만을 들었을 경우, 음성식별절차를 통해 용의자와 범인의 목소리가 동일한 지 판단하게 된다. 음성식별절차 전에 목소리 목격자는 자신이 들은 범인 음성의 특징을 언어적으로 묘사하도록 요구받을 것이다. 그러나 범인음성의 언어적 묘사는 식별정확성을 감소시키는 언어장막효과를 유발할 위험이 있다. 이는 언어 묘사와 인출의 두 수행과제 간 지각양식의 차이 때문이다. 본 연구에서는 식별절차에 사용되는 대상음성과 들러리음성들이 서로 다른 내용으로 구성되어 있더라도 언어장막효과가 유발되는지 여부와 눈을 감고 수행하라는 지시에 식별정확성을 높이는 효과가 있는지를 확인하고자 하였다. 또 식별절차에서 목소리 목격자에게 눈을 감으라고 지시할 경우 언어장막효과를 극복할 수 있는지도 확인하고자 하였다. 피험자들에게 동영상으로 모의 강도 범죄 상황을 보여주고 조건별(언어묘사, 통제) 과제를 수행하게 한 후 조건별로(눈감기, 통제) 음성식별을 하게 하였다. 결과는 예상과 달리 언어묘사집단에서 언어장막효과가 유발되지 않았다. 그러나 눈을 감고 식별절차를 수행한 집단은 예상한 바와 같이 통제집단보다 범인 음성을 더 정확히 식별하였고, 잘못된 식별은 더 적었다. 다만 눈감기 지시가 언어장막효과를 극복할 수 있는 효과가 있는지는 확인하지 못하였다. 향후 범인음성과 음성샘플이 동일한 내용인지에 따라 언어장막효과 유발에 미치는 효과에 차이가 있는지와 성별 눈감기 효과의 차이에 대한 반복검증이 필요하다.

keywords
언어장막효과, 눈감기 효과, 목소리 목격자, 음성식별절차, 수사, verbal overshadowing effect, eye-closure effect, earwitness, audio line-up, investigation

Abstract

If a witness heard just an offender’s voice, the witness would identify the offender’s voice in audio line-up. But before the audio line-up, earwitnesses are usually asked to verbally describe the offender’s voice. Verbal description of offender’s voice bears risk to the verbal overshadowing effect(VOE) which reduces identification accuracy because of the disparity of perceptual modality of two tasks(verbal description and retrieval). In this study, three hypotheses were tested. The first hypothesis was that although the target voice and the foils were made of different contents in audio line-up, verbally describing the offender’s voice might induce the VOE. The second hypothesis was that eye-closure instruction would make the accuracy rate of identification higher. The third hypothesis was that eye-closure instruction to earwitness in audio line-up could make him/her overcome VOE. In our experiment participants saw a mock robbery crime scene in a video clip. Then they performed different tasks(verbal description, control) and audio line-up in different conditions(eye-closure, control). Results were that verbal description didn’t induce VOE contrary to our expectation, and that eye-closure group was more accurate in identifying the offender’s voice than control group. But it was not clear whether or not eye-closure instruction made earwitnesses overcome VOE. Future research directions are discussed.

keywords
언어장막효과, 눈감기 효과, 목소리 목격자, 음성식별절차, 수사, verbal overshadowing effect, eye-closure effect, earwitness, audio line-up, investigation

참고문헌

1.

권순민 (2009). 라인업 절차의 합리적 운영방안에 대한연구, 형사법연구 제21권 제4호, 통권 제41호,429-458.

2.

김지영 (2007). 범인식별의 정확성을 높이기 위한 심리학적 제언. 형사정책연구소식, 통권 제101호, 15-19.

3.

민영성 (2004). 목격자에 의한 범인식별진술의 적정한신용성평가를 위한 담보방안. 저스티스 통권 제79호, 78-101.

4.

백승민 (2008). 형사절차에 있어서 범인식별에 관한 연구. 저스티스 통권 제102호, 135-151.

5.

조광훈 (2008). 수사기관의 범인식별진술 및 절차의 문제점과 개선방안. 연세대학교 법학연구 제18권 제1호, 통권 제37호, 193-244.

6.

Anderson, R. C., & Pichert, J. W. (1978). Recall ofpreviously unrecallable information following ashift in perspective. Journal of Verbal Learningand Verbal Behavior, 17, 1-12.

7.

Bartlett. J., Searcy, J. H., & Abdi, H. (2003). Whatare the routes to face recognition? In M. A.Peterson, & G. Rhodes (Eds.), Perception offaces, objects and scenes(pp. 21-52). New York:Oxford University Press.

8.

Brandimonte, M. A., Schooler, J. W., & Gabbino, P.(1997). Attenuating verbal overshadowingthrough color retrieval cues. Journal ofExperiment Psychology: Learning, Memory, andCognition, 23(4), 915-931.

9.

Bull, R., & Clifford, B. (1984). Earwitness voicerecognition accuracy. In G. Wells & E. Loftus(Eds.), Eyewitness Testimony: PsychologicalPerspectives (pp. 92-123). New York: CambridgeUniversity Press.

10.

Clare, J., & Lewandowsky, S. (2004). Verbalizingfacial memory: Criterion effects in verbalovershadowing. Journal of ExperimentPsychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,30(4), 739-755.

11.

Devlin, Lord P. (1976). Report to the Secretary ofState for the Home Department of theDepartmental Committee on Evidence ofIdentification in Criminal Cases. London: HerMajesty’s Stationery Office.

12.

Ellis, H. D., Davies, G. M., & Shepherd, J. W.(1978). A critical examination of the PhotoFITsystem for recalling faces. Ergonomics, 21,297-307.

13.

Finger, K., & Pezdek, K. (1999). The Effect of theCognitive Interview on Face IdentificationAccuracy: Release From Verbal Overshadowing.Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(3), 340-348.

14.

Hunt, L. J., & Harris, C. M. (2002). Verbalovershadowing in voice recognition. AppliedCognitive Psychology, 16, 973-980.

15.

Melcher, J. M., & Schooler, J. W. (2004). Perceptualand conceptual training mediate the verbalovershadowing effect in an unfamiliar domain.Memory and Cognition, 32(4), 618-631.

16.

Macrae, C. N., & Lewis, H. L. (2002). Do I knowyou? Processing orientation and face recognition.Psychological Science, 13(2), 194-196.

17.

Malpass, R. S., & Devine, P. G. (1981). Guidedmemory in eyewitness identification. Journal ofApplied Psychology, 66, 343-350.

18.

Meissner, C. & Brigham, J. (2001). A meta-analysisof the verbal overshadowing effect in faceidentification. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15,603-616.

19.

Meissner, C. (2002). Applied aspects of theinstructional bias effect in verbal overshadowing.Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 911-928.

20.

Nolan, F. (2003). A recent voice parade. ForensicLinguistics, 10, 277-291

21.

Perfect, T. J., Hunt, L. J., & Harris, C. M. (2002).Verbal overshadowing in voice recognition.Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 973-980.

22.

Perfect, T. J., Wagstaff, G. F., Moore, D., Andrews,B., Cleveland, V. Newcombe, S., Brisbane, K-A.& Brown, L. (2008). How can we help witnessesremember more? It’s an (eyes) open and shutcase. Law and Human Behavior, 32, 314-324.

23.

Philippon, A., Cherryman, J., Bull, R., & Vrij, A.(2007). Lay people’s and police officers’ attitudestowards the usefulness of perpetrator voiceidentification. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21,103-115.

24.

Ryan, R. S., & Schooler, J. W. (1998). Whom dowords hurt? Individual differences insusceptibility to verbal overshadowing. AppliedCognitive Psychology, 12(Special Issue), 105-125.

25.

Schooler, J. W. (2002). Verbalisation produces atransfer inappropriate processing shift. AppliedCognitive Psychology, 16(8), 989-997.

26.

Schooler, J. W., & Engstler-Schooler, T, Y. (1990).Verbal overshadowing of visual memories: somethings are better left unsaid. CognitivePsychology, 22, 36-71.

27.

Schooler, J. W., Fiore, S. M., & Brandimonte, M. A.(1997). At a loss from words: verbalovershadowing of perceptual memories. ThePsychology of Learning and Motivation, 37,291-340.

28.

Smith, M. (1983). Hypnotic memory enhancement ofwitnesses: Does it work? Psychological Bulletin,94, 387-407.

29.

Smith, S. (1979). Remembering in and out of context, Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Learning and Memory, 5, 460-471.

30.

Tanaka J. W., & Farah M. J. (1993). Parts andwholes in face recognition. Quarterly Journal ofExperimental Psychology: Human ExperimentalPsychology, 42, 225-245.

31.

Vanags, T., Carroll, M., & Perfect, T. J. (2005).Verbal overshadowing: A sound theory in voicerecognition?, Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19,1127-1144.

32.

Wagstaff, G. F., Brunas-Wagstaff, J. Cole, J.,Knapton, L., Winterbottom, J. Crean, V. &Wheatcroft, J. (2004). Facilitating memory withhypnosis, focused meditation and eye closure.International journal of Clinical andExperimental Hypnosis, 52, 434-455.

33.

Wilcock. R, Bull. R, & Milne. R. (2008). Witnessidentification in criminal cases: Psychology andPractice, New York: Oxford University Press.

34.

Yarmey, A. D. (2007). The psychology of speakeridentification and earwitness memory. In R.Lindsay, D. Ross, J. D. Read & M. Toglia (Eds.)Handbook of Eyewitness Psychology, Volume 2,Memory For People, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum,101-136.

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격

논문 투고 OA 정책