A Validation Study of KASI in Differentiating Pedophiliac Sex Offenders out of Non-Pedophiliac Child Molesters

본 연구에서는 국내에서 최초로 소아기호를 지닌 성범죄자들을 선별해내기 위한 도구인 KASI(Korean Assessment of Sexual Interest; 이수정, 2011)의 변별타당도를 확인하기 위하여 정신장애 진단기준에 근거하여 소아성애자로 규정된 아동대상 성범죄자(Pedophiliac Sex Offenders)와 소아성애를 지니고 있다고는 보기 힘든 아동을 대상으로 한 일반 아동치한범(Non-Pedophiliac Child Molesters)의 소아성애적 경향성을 비교하였다. 그 결과 개인내간에서 상대적으로 평가된 4가지 자극군(여아 자극, 남아 자극, 여성 자극, 남성 자극)에 대한 반응시간 상의 선호도에서 소아성애 집단은 일반 아동치한범에 비하여 여자 아동을 대상으로 하여 성적 매력도를 평가하라고 하였을 때 다른 자극군에 대하여서보다 상대적으로 반응시간이 더 길어지는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 KASI 검사의 Rule-of-thirds 방식을 적용하여 소아성애 대한 판단을 내린 결과는 정신장애 진단기준에 근거하여 소아기호로 판단한 결과와 통계적으로 유의한 수준의 일관성을 지니는 것으로 확인되었다.

keywords: sexual deviation. viewing time measurement. Korean Assessment of Sexual Interest, 일탈적 성적 기호. 시각 반응 측정. 한국판 성적기호 평가도구

Abstract

This study searched for the validity evidences of KASI(Korean Assessment of Sexual Interest; Lee, 2011) in discriminating pedophiliac sex offenders from non-pedophiliac child molesters. Pedophiliac subjects who participated in this study were 7 patients of a psychiatric unit and 5 inmates of a prison diagnosed as pedophile based on DSM-Ⅳ. 31 non-pedophiliac child molesters participated in a control group. Relative preference toward stimuli among 4 groups of pictures(pictures of girls, boys, women, and men) were measured by within-subject standard scores of viewing time by KASI. Repeated measures of ANOVA revealed that pedophiliac sex offenders had relatively longer viewing time onto the pictures of girls. Also, it was found that rule-of-thirds principle of KASI had significant consistency with the membership decision of criterion groups made by the DSM-Ⅳ.

keywords: sexual deviation. viewing time measurement. Korean Assessment of Sexual Interest, 일탈적 성적 기호. 시각 반응 측정. 한국판 성적기호 평가도구

참고문헌

고려진 (2009). 시각 반응 시간(VRT) 측정 방식을 통한 아동 대상 성범죄자들의 성적 기호 평가에 대한 연구. 경기대학교 박사학위논문.

이수정 (2011). 시각반응검사도구(KASI)의 활용에 관한 연구. 법무부.

Abel, G. G., Jordan, A., Hand, C. G., Holland, L. A., & Phipps, A. (2001). Classification models of child molesters utilizing the Abel Assessment for Sexual Interest. Child Abuse and Neglect, 25, 703-718.

Abel, G. G., & Wiegel, M. (2009). Visual reaction time: Development, theory, empirical evidence, and beyond. In F. M. Saleh, A. J. Grudzinskas, Jr., J. M. Bradford, & D. J. Brodsky (Eds.), Sex offender: Identification, risk assessment, treatment, and legal issues (pp. 101-118). New York: Oxford University Press.

Cortoni, F. (2009). Factors associated with sexual recidivism. In A. R. Beech, L. A. Craig, & K. D. Browne (Eds), Assessment and treatment of sex offenders: A Handbook (pp. 39-52). London: Wiley-Blackwell.

Craig, L. A., Beech, A. R. & Harkins, L. (2009). The predictive accuracy of risk factors and frameworks. In A. R. Beech, L. A. Craig, & K. D. Browne (Eds), Assessment and treatment of sex offenders: A Handbook (pp. 53-74). London: Wiley-Blackwell.

Finkelhor, D. (1984). Child sexual abuse. New York: Free Press.

Fischer, L., & Smith, G. (1999). Statistical adequacy of the Abel Assessment for Interest in paraphilias. Sexual Abuse: Ajournal of Research and Treatment, 11, 195-205.

Gray, S. R. & Plaud, J. J. (2005). A comparison of the Abel Assessment for Sexual Interest and Penile Plethysmography in an outpatient sample of sex offender. Journal of Sexual Offender Civil Commitment: Science and the Law, 1, 1-10.

10.

Gress, C. L. Z. (2005). Viewing time measures and sexual interest: Another piece of the puzzle. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 11, 117-125.

11.

Groth, A. N., Hobson, W. F., & Gary, T. S. (1982). The child molester: Clinical observations. In J. Conte & D.A. Shore (Eds.), Social work and child sexual abuse. New York: Haworth.

12.

Hanson, R. K., & Bussière, M. T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 348-362.

13.

Hanson, R. K., & Morton-Bourgon. K. (2005). The characteristics of persostent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 1154-1163.

14.

Hall, R. C. W. & Hall, R. C. W. (2007). A profile of pedophilia: Definition, characteristics of offender, recidivism, treatment outcomes, and forensic issues. Mayo Clinic Proceeding, 82, 457-471.

15.

Kalmus, E., & Beech, A. R. (2005). Forensic assessment of sexual interest: A review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10, 193-217.

16.

Roberts, C. F., Doren, D. M., & Thornton, D. (2002). Dimensions associated with assessments of sex offender recidivism risk. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29, 569-589.

17.

Rosenzwing, S. (1942). The photoscope as an objective device of evaluation sexual interest. Psychosomatic Medicine, 4, 150-157.

18.

Sachsenmaier, S. J., & Gress, C. L. Z. (2009). The Abel Assessment for Sexual Interests-2: A critical review. In D. Thornton & D. R. Laws (Eds). Cognitive Approaches to the Assessment of Sexual Interest in Sexual Offenders (pp. 31-57). London: Wiley-Blackwell.

19.

Schwartz, B.K. (1995). Characteristics and typologies of sex offenders. In B. Schwartz (Ed.), The sex offender: Corrections, treatment and legalpractice, Vol. 3. New Jersey: Civic Research Institute, Inc.

20.

Smith, G., & Fischer, L. (1999). Assessment of juvenile sexual offenders: Reliability and validity of the Abel Assessment for Interest in Praphilias. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 11, 207-216.

21.

Terry, K., & Tallon, J. (2004). Child sexual abuse: A review of the literature. The Nature and Scope of the Problem of Sexual Abuse of Minors by Priests and Deacons, 1950–2002 Washington, D.C.: United States Conference of Catholic Bishops.

22.

Zamansky, H. S. (1956). A technique for assessing homosexual tendencies. Journal of Personality, 24, 436-448.

바로가기메뉴

논문 상세

Vol.26 No.3

일반 아동치한범과 소아성애 성범죄자들에 대한 KASI의 변별타당도 연구

A Validation Study of KASI in Differentiating Pedophiliac Sex Offenders out of Non-Pedophiliac Child Molesters

초록

Abstract

참고문헌

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격