바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

창조성의 사회심리학적 연구: 개념, 방법, 흐름과 주제

Social Psychology of Creativity: Concept, Methods, Trends and Topics

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격 / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2012, v.26 no.4, pp.51-72
https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2012.26.4.004
김명철 (서울대학교)
민경환 (서울대학교)
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

초록

인간의 근본 욕구이자 최적 경험이며 자기실현인 창조성은 그 중요성과 사회적 관심에 비해 과학적 심리학의 연구주제로서는 위상이 낮은 편이다. 그 중요한 원인 중 하나는 연구자들이 창조성 개념의 정의와 그 측정 방법의 타당도에 확신을 갖지 못하는 것인데, 이는 창조성을 확산적 사고 능력, 즉 창의성(創意性)으로 정의하는 심리측정론적 개념과 그 방법의 타당성 문제에 상당 부분 기인한다. 반면 사회문화적 맥락에서 새롭고 유용하다고 합의되는 산물을 생산하는 개인과 창조과정의 특징으로 창조성(創造性)을 정의하는 창조성의 사회문화적 정의 및 방법은 과학적 연구 주제로 타당하며, 특히 이러한 개념과 방법에 따르는 창조성의 사회심리학적 연구는 창조성에 대한 온전한 이해에 독특하게 기여한다. 이에 본 논문은 창조성에 대한 사회심리학적 연구의 활성화와 발전을 위해 창조성의 사회문화적 개념과 그 연구방법을 살펴보고, 창조성의 사회심리학적 연구 흐름을 개관한다. 특히 각 연구의 함의에 주목하여 (1) 창조과정의 절차적 전체성에 주목하고 창조의 사회적 체계를 강조하는 ‘과정과 체계의 창조성 이론’, (2) 내적 동기 및 몰입을 중심으로 창조자의 동기와 정서가 창조성에 미치는 영향을 파악하고, 창조에 적합한 마음 상태를 만드는 환경요소를 탐구하는 ‘맥락과 동기의 창조성 이론’, 그리고 (3) 2인 이상의 창조자가 관여하는 창조과정에 주목하여 집단의 효과적 기능 조건을 탐구하는 ‘집단 과정의 창조성 이론’의 세 가지 흐름으로 구분하여 각 연구주제를 개관하였다. 마지막으로 세 가지 흐름의 상호관련성을 바탕으로 창조성의 사회심리학적 연구가 창조성의 넓고 깊은 이해에 기여하는 바를 강조하고, 한국사회의 창조성 연구에 대한 함의를 논하였다.

keywords
창조성, 창조과정, 창의성, 창조성의 사회심리학, 창조성의 사회문화적 정의, creativity, creating process, social psychology of creativity

Abstract

Creativity is one of the most profound needs of humanity as it allows realization of optimal experience and self-actualization. However, despite its social interest and acknowledged importance, creativity has been underinvestigated as a scientific research topic in the field of psychology. One main reason for this disregard is that researchers are suspicious of the validity of the definition and of its methodology which is largely grounded on the psychometric tradition of creativity research where creativity is defined as a divergent thinking ability. On the other hand, the concept and methodology of creativity that is defined in the sociocultural context as a creative process and the individual who produces both nevel and useful products are appropriate as a scientific research topic. Especially, social psychological research of creativity that follows this sociocultural concept and methodology contributes to the comprehensive understanding of creativity in its own special way. In this article,we describe definition, methodology and research trends of social psychology of creativity in attempt to contribute to the advancement of this field of study. We review social psychology of creativity in a special attention to the meaning of each study as we structuralize its trends as (a) Theories for process and system, focusing on creating process' temporal and procedural integrity and its social system; (b) Theories for context and motivation,covering the effect and context of creator's state motivation, flow and emotion; and (3) Theories for group process, focusing on creating process where more than one creator is involved, that define factors that make a group become creative in an effective way. Finally, based upon the relation between three trends, we discussed the contribution of social psychology of creativity to understand creativity itself as a whole and to understand korean creativity.

keywords
창조성, 창조과정, 창의성, 창조성의 사회심리학, 창조성의 사회문화적 정의, creativity, creating process, social psychology of creativity

참고문헌

1.

김영록, 이순묵. (2004). 한국판 창의적 산물 평가도구의 개발 및 구조확인. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 17, 305-327.

2.

민경환, 김지현, 윤석빈, 장승민. (2000). 부정적 정서조절 방략에 관한 연구: 정서 종류와 개인 변인에 따른 정서조절 양식의 차이. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 14, 1-16.

3.

신민희, 구재선. (2010). 행복과 창의력의 관계: 행복한 사람이 더 창의적이다. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 24, 37-51.

4.

이순묵, 최인수, 여성칠. (2008). 산업조직에서의 창의성에 대한 개념적 및 경험적 접근. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 21, 151-178.

5.

이신동. (2003). 창의성 검사의 문제점과 과제. 영재와 영재교육, 2, 제 2주제 발표.

6.

장재윤. (2000). 전자 브레인스토밍: 집단 창의성 기법으로서의 허와 실. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 14, 79-108.

7.

장재윤, 박영석. (2000). 창의적 작업 환경 측정용 KEYS 척도의 타당화 연구: 한국 기업조직을 대상으로. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 13, 61-90.

8.

최인수. (1998). 창의성을 이해하기 위한 여섯 가지 질문. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 17, 25-47.

9.

최인수. (2011). 창의성의 발견: 창의성은 언제 어디서 무엇에 의해 어떻게 발현되는가. 서울: 쌤앤파커스.

10.

최일호, 최인수. (2001). 새로운 생각은 어떻게 가능한가: 전문분야 창의성에 대한 학습과정 모형 접근. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 20, 409-428.

11.

Amabile, T. M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 997-1013.

12.

Amabile, T. M. (1983). Social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 357-377.

13.

Amabile, T. M. (1985). Motivation and creativity: effects of motivational orientation on creative writers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 393-399.

14.

Amabile, T. M. (1993). Motivational synergy: Toward new conceptualizations of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in the workplace. Human Resource Management Review, 3, 185-201.

15.

Amabile, T. M. (2010). 창조의 조건 [Creativity in Context] (고빛샘 역). 파주: 21세기북스. (원전은 1996에 출판).

16.

Amabile, T. M., Barsade, S. G., Mueller, J. S., & Staw, B. M. (2005). Affect and creativity at work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 367-403.

17.

Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1154-1184.

18.

Amabile, T. M., Hill, K. G., Hennessey, B. A., & Tighe, E. M. (1994). The work preference inventory: Assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 950-967.

19.

Anderson, N. R., & West, M. A. (1998). Measuring climate for work group innovation: Development and validation of the team climate inventory. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 235-258.

20.

Baer, J. (1993). Creativity and Divergent Thinking: A Tesk-specific Approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

21.

Berns, G. (2008). ICONOCLAST: A Neuroscientist Reveals How to Think Differently. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.

22.

Besemer, S., & O'Quin, K. (1986). Analyzing creative products: Refinement and test of a judging instrument. Journal of Creative Behavior, 20, 115-126.

23.

Canli, T., Zhao, Z., Brewer, J., Gabrieli, J., & Cahill, L. (2000). Event-related activation in the human amygdala associates with later memory for individual emotional response. Journal of Neuroscience, 20, RC99.

24.

Cattell, J. M. (1903). A statistical study of eminent men. Popular Science Monthly, 62, 359-377.

25.

Choe, I. S. (2006). Creativity - A sudden rising star in korea. In J. C. Kaufman, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The International Handbook of Creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.

26.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond Boredom and Anxiety: Experiencing Flow in Work and Play. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

27.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg(Ed.), The Nature of Creativity (pp. 325-339). New York: Cambridge University Press.

28.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Finding Flow. New York: Basic Books.

29.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2003). 창의성의 즐거움 [Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention] (노혜숙 역). 서울: 북로드. (원전은 1996에 출판).

30.

Dacey, J. S., & Lennon, K. H. (1998). Understanding Creativity: The Interplay of Biological, Psychological, and Social Factors. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

31.

Dacey, J. S., & Packer, A. (1992). The Nurturing Parent: How to Raise Creative, Loving, Responsible Children. New York: Simon & Schuster.

32.

Dawkins, R. (2010). 이기적 유전자 [The Selfish Gene] (홍영남과 이상임 역). 서울: 을유문화사. (원전은 1976에 출판).

33.

De Bono, E. (1985). Six Thinking Hats. Boston: Little, Brown.

34.

De Bono, E. (1992). Serious Creativity: Using the Power of Lateral Thinking to Create New Ideas. New York: HarperCollins.

35.

deCharms, R. (1968). Personal Causation: The internal affective determinants of behavior. New York: Academic Press.

36.

Deci, E. L., Eghrari, H., Patrick, B. C., & Leone, D. R. (1994). Facilitating internalization: the self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality, 62, 119-142.

37.

De Dreu, C. K. W., Baas, M., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). Hedonic tone and activation level in the mood-creativity link: Toward a dual pathway to creativity model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 739-756.

38.

Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 350-383.

39.

Eysenck, H. (1993). Creativity and personality: An attempt to bridge divergent traditions. Psychological Inquiry, 4, 238-246.

40.

Ekman, P. (1994). All emotions are basic. In P. Ekman & R. J. Davidson (Eds.), The Nature of Emotion: Fundamental Questions. New York: Oxford University Press.

41.

Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance, Psychological Review, 100, 363-406.

42.

Feist, G. J. (1999). Affect in artistic and scientific creativity. In S. W. Russ (Ed.), Affect, Creative Experience, and Psychological Adjustment. Philadelphia: Brunner/Mazel.

43.

Frijda, N. H. (1986). The Emotions. New York: Cambridge University Press.

44.

Fredrickson, B. L., & Joiner, T. (2002). Positive emotions trigger upward spirals toward emotional well-being, Psychological Science, 13, 172-175.

45.

Gardner, H. (1993). Creating Minds. New York: Basic Books.

46.

Gardner, H. (1999). 비범성의 발견 [Extraordinary Miinds] (문용린 역). 서울: 해냄. (원전은 1997에 출판).

47.

Gagne, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 331-362.

48.

George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2002). Understanding when bad moods foster creativity and good ones don't: The role of context and clarity of feelings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 687-697.

49.

Grant, A. M., & Berry, J. W. (2011). The necessity of others is the mother of invention: Intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective taking, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 73-96.

50.

Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444-454.

51.

Guilford, J. P. (1967). The Nature of Human Intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.

52.

Gyurak, A., Gross, J. J., & Etkin, A. (2011). Explicit and implicit emotion regulation: A dual-process framework. Cognition and Emotion, 25, 400-412.

53.

Helson, R. (1996). In search of the creative personality. Creativity Research Journal, 9, 295-306.

54.

Hennessey, B. A. (2003). Is the social psychology of creativity really social? Moving beyond a focus on the individual. In P. B. Paulus and B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), Group Creativity: Innovation Through Collaboration. New York: Oxford University Press.

55.

Hirt, E. R., Devers, E. E., & McCrea, S. M. (2008). I want to be creative: Exploring the role of hedonic contingency theory in the positive mood-cognitive flexibility link. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 214-230.

56.

Isen, A. (1999). Positive affect. In T. Dagleish and M. Power (eds.), Handbook of Cognition and Emotion. New York: Wiley.

57.

Isen, A. M., Daubman, K. A., & Nowicki, G. P. (1987). Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1122-1131.

58.

James, K., Brodersen, M., & Eisenberg, J. (2004). Workplace affect and workplace creativity: A review and preliminary model. Human Performance, 17, 169-194.

59.

Jung, C. G. (2006). 영웅과 어머니 원형 [Heros und Mutterarchetyp] (한국융연구원 C. G. 융 저작 번역 위원회 역). 서울: 솔출판사. (원전은 1985에 출판).

60.

Kaufman, J. C. (2009). Creativity 101. New York: Springer.

61.

Kaufman, J. C., Baer, J., Cole, J. C., & Sexton, J. D. (2008). A comparison of expert and nonexpert raters using the Consensual Assessment Technique. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 171-178.

62.

Kaufman, J. C., Lee, J., Baer, J., & Lee, S. (2007). Captions, consistency, creativity, and the consensual assessment technique: New evidence of validity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2, 96-106.

63.

Kaufmann, G. (2003). Expanding the mood-creativity equation. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 131-135.

64.

Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and Adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.

65.

Lepper, M. R., & Greence, D. (1975). Turning play into work: effects of adult surveillance and extrinsic rewards on children's intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 479-486.

66.

Lubart, T. I. (1990). Creativity and cross-cultural variation. International Journal of Psychology, 25, 39-59.

67.

Ludwig, A. M. (1992). Creative achievement and psychopathology: Comparison among professions. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 46, 330-356.

68.

Martin, L. L., Ward, D. W. Achee, J. W., & Wyer, R. S. (1993). Mood as input: People have to interpret the motivational implications of their moods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 317-326.

69.

Maslow, A. H. (2009). 동기와 성격 3차 개정판 [Motivation and Personality, 3rd Edition] (오혜경 역). 파주: 21세기북스. (원전은 1987에 출판).

70.

McLeod, P. L., Lobel, S. A., & Cox, T. H. (1996). Ethnic diversity and creativity in small groups. Small Group Research, 27, 248-264.

71.

Milliken, F. J., Bartel, C., and Kurtzberg, T. (2003). Diversity and creativity in work groups: A dynamic perspective on the affective and cognitive processes that link diversity and performance. In P. B. Paulus & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), Group Creativity: Innovation Through Collaboration. New York: Oxford University Press.

72.

Mullen, B., Johnson, C., & Salas, E. (1991). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: A meta-analytic integration. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 12, 3-23.

73.

Nachmanovitch, S. (2008). 놀이, 마르지 않는 창조의샘 [Free Play] (이상원 역). 서울: 에코의서제. (원전은 1990에 출판).

74.

Nemeth, C. J., Rogers, J. D., & Brown, K. S. (2001). Devil's advocate vs. authentic dissent: Stimulating quantity and quality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 707-729.

75.

Osborn, A. F. (1963). Applied Imagination (2nd ed.). New York: Scribner.

76.

Paulus, P. B., & Brown, V. R. (2003). Enhancing ideational creativity in groups: Lessons from research on brainstorming. In P. B. Paulus and B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), Group Creativity: Innovation Through Collaboration. New York: Oxford University Press.

77.

Pirola-Merlo, A., & Mann, L. (2004). The relationship between individual creativity and team creativity: aggregating across people and time. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 235-257.

78.

Plucker, J. A., Behgetto, R. A., & Dow, G. T. (2004). Why isn't creativity more important to educational psychologists? Ptential, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist, 39, 83-96.

79.

Plucker, J. A. & Makel, M. C. (2010). Assessment of creativity. In J. C. Kaufman and R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.

80.

Rhodes, M. (1962). An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan, 42, 305-311.

81.

Runco, M. A., & Albert, R. S. (1985). The reliability and validity of ideational originality in the divergent thinking of academically gifted and nongifted children. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, 483-501.

82.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78.

83.

Sawyer, R. K. (2006). Explaining Creativity: The Science of Human Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.

84.

Sawyer, R. K. (2008). 그룹 지니어스 [Group Genius] (이호준 역). 서울: 북섬. (원전은 2007에 출판).

85.

Schaller, M. (1997). The psychological consequences of fame: Three tests of the self-consciousness hypothesis. Journal of Personality, 65, 291-309.

86.

Schwarz, N. (1990). Feeling as information: Informational and motivational functions of affective states. In R. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of Motivation and Cognition: Foundations of Social Behavior (Vol. 2.). New York: Guilford Press.

87.

Simonton, D. K. (1975). Sociocultural context of individual creativity: A trans-historical time-series analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 1119-1133.

88.

Simonton, D. K. (1979). Multiple discovery and invention: Zeitgeist, genius, or chance? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1603-1616.

89.

Simonton, D. K. (1990). Psychology, Science, and History: An Introduction to Historiometry. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

90.

Simonton, D. K. (1991). Latent-variable models of posthumous reputation: A quest for Galton's G. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 607-619.

91.

Simonton, D. K. (1992). Leaders of American psychology, 1879-1967: Career development, creative output, and professional achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 5-17.

92.

Simonton, D. K. (1994). Greatness: Who Makes History and Why. New York: Guilford Press.

93.

Simonton, D. K. (1999). Origins of Genius: Darwinian Perspectives on Creativity. New York: Oxford University Press.

94.

Simonton, D. K. (2009). Genius 101. New York: Springer.

95.

Stasser, G., & Stewart, D. (1992). Discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: Solving a problem versus making a judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 426-434.

96.

Stasser, G., Vaughan, S. I., & Stewart, D. D. (2000). Pooling unshared information: The benefits of knowing how access to information is distributed among members. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82, 102-116.

97.

Sternberg, R. J. (2004). 지혜, 지능 그리고 창의성의 종합 [Wisdom, Intelligence and Creativity Synthesized] (김정희 역). 서울: 시그마프레스. (원전은 2003에 출판).

98.

Sternberg, R. J. (2006). Itroduction. In J. C. Kaufman, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The International Handbook of Creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.

99.

Sternberg, R. J. (2007). A systems model of leadership: WICS. American Psychologist, 62, 34-42.

100.

Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1992). Buy low and sell high: An investment approach to creativity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 1-5.

101.

Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1996). Investing in creativity. American Psychologist, 51, 677-688.

102.

Taylor, D. W., Berry, P. C., & Block, C. H. (1958). Does group participation when using brainstorming facilitate of inhibit creative thinking? Administrative Science Quarterly, 3, 23-47.

103.

Thompson, L. (2003). Improving the creativity of organizational work groups. Academy of Management Executive, 17, 96-109.

104.

Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Norms-technical manual. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.

105.

Torrance, E. P. (1995). Why Fly? A Philosophy of Creativity. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

106.

Torrance, E. P., & Cramond, B. (2002). Needs of creativity programs, training, and research in the schools of the future. Research in the Schools, 9, 5-14.

107.

Wallas, G. (1926). The Art of Thought. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace.

108.

Weisberg, R. W. (1992). Creativity: Beyond the myth of genius. New York: Freeman.

109.

West, M. A. (1990). The social psychology of innovation in groups. In M. A. West & J. L. Farr (Eds.), Innovation and Creativity at Work: Psychological and Organizational Strategies. Chichester, UK: Wiley.

110.

West, M. A. (2002). Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation in work groups. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51, 355-387.

111.

West, M. A. (2003). Innovation implementation in work teams. In P. B. Paulus & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), Group Creativity: Innovation Through Collaboration. New York: Oxford University Press.

112.

Winner, E. (1996). Gifted Children: Myths and Realities. New York: Basic Books.

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격