바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

ISSN : 1229-0653

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.29 No.3

Citation Share

무관 정서의 점화가 체제 정당화 정도에 미치는 영향

The Effects of Priming Incidental Emotions on System Justification

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격 / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2015, v.29 no.3, pp.111-127
https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2015.29.3.006
김현정 (충북대학교)
박상희 (충북대학교)
김현정, & 박상희. (2015). 무관 정서의 점화가 체제 정당화 정도에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 29(3), 111-127, https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2015.29.3.006

초록

사람들은 자신이 사는 세상과 체제가 정당하다고 합리화하고 싶은 동기를 가지고 있으며(Jost & Banaji, 1994), 이 체제 정당화 수준이 높은 사람일수록 사회 변화를 지지하지 않는다. 한편 대상과 전혀 관련이 없는 정서가 그 대상에 대한 지각과 판단에 영향을 미칠 수 있다(Lerner & Keltner, 2000). 그러므로 체제와 관련 없이 점화된 정서가 체제 정당화 정도에 영향을 주고, 그에 따라 체제에 대한 저항 의지를 변화시킬 가능성이 있다. 본 연구에서는 이를 검증하기 위해 동영상을 통해 참가자들에게 기쁨, 슬픔, 분노, 공포의 네 가지 기본 정서 중 하나를 점화한 후 체제 정당화 정도와 현 사회 체제에 저항하고자 하는 의지를 측정하였다. 연구 결과, 예측한 대로 분노 정서가 유발된 참가자들은 공포와 기쁨 정서가 유발된 참가자들에 비해 체제를 덜 정당화하는 것이 관찰되었다. 또한 각 정서 조건 별 저항 의지의 차이는 없었으나 정서에서 체제 정당화를 통해 저항 의지로 이어지는 매개 효과는 유의미하였다. 이 결과는 특정한 정서가 구체적인 현실에 대한 평가와 현실을 변화시키려는 동기에 영향을 미칠 수 있다는 것을 확인한 것이다.

keywords
system justification, incidental emotion, willingness to protest, emotion priming, 체제 정당화, 무관 정서, 저항 의지, 정서 점화

Abstract

People are motivated to rationalize the world and the system that they live in (Jost & Banaji, 1994), and those with higher levels of this system justification motive are less likely to support social change. Meanwhile, primed emotions unrelated to a given target can influence perceptions and judgments involving that target (Lerner & Keltner, 2000). Therefore it is possible that primed emotions unrelated to the system affect the degree of system justification, and in turn change the willingness to protest against the system. To test this, we had participants watch a short video clip to induce one of four emotions (anger, sadness, happiness, and fear), and measured system justification as well as the willingness to protest against the status quo. As predicted, anger-induced participants justified the system less than those who were primed with fear or happiness. Although the direct effect of emotion priming on the willingness to protest was not significant, the indirect effect through system justification was. The result confirms that incidental emotions can influence how people construe the reality and the motivation to change it.

keywords
system justification, incidental emotion, willingness to protest, emotion priming, 체제 정당화, 무관 정서, 저항 의지, 정서 점화

참고문헌

1.

박광배 (2003). 변량분석과 회귀분석. 서울: 학지사.

2.

박영옥 (2012). 공감능력에 따른 안면근육운동 및 자율신경 반응성의 차이. 충북대학교 석사학위 논문.

3.

장은혜, 석지아, 엄진섭, 손진훈 (2005). 시청각 동영상(Audio-visual Film Clips)을 이용한 정서유발프로토콜 개발. 한국심리학회지: 실험, 17(1), 69-84.

4.

Blanchette, I., & Richards, A. (2010). The influence of affect on higher level cognition: A review of research on interpretation, judgement, decision making and reasoning. Cognition and Emotion, 24(4), 561-595. doi:10.1080/02699930903132496

5.

Bower, G. H. (1981). Mood and memory. American Psychologist, 36(2), 129-148. doi:10.1037/0003- 066X.36.2.129

6.

Davis, D., & Silver, B. (2004). The threat of terrorism, presidential approval, and the 2004 election. In Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. Chicago, IL.

7.

Ekman, P., Friesen, W. V., & Ellsworth, P. (1982). What emotion categories or dimensions can observers judge from facial behavior? In P. Ekman (Ed.), Emotion In The Human Face (pp. 39-55). New York: Cambridge University Press.

8.

Forgas, J. P. (1999). On feeling good and being rude: Affective influences on language use and request formulations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(6), 928-939. doi:10.1037/ 0022-3514.76.6.928

9.

Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76(4), 408-420. doi:10.1080/03637750903310360

10.

Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: The Guilford Press.

11.

Inquisit 2.0.5.0 [Computer software]. (2006). Seattle, WA: Millisecond Software.

12.

Johnson, E. J., & Tversky, A. (1983). Affect, generalization, and the perception of risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(1), 20-31. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.1.20

13.

Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33(1), 1-27. doi:10.1111/ j.2044-8309.1994.tb01008.x

14.

Jost, J. T., Chaikalis-Petritsis, V., Abrams, D., Sidanius, J., van der Toorn, J., & Bratt, C. (2012). Why men (and women) do and don’t rebel: Effects of system justification on willingness to protest. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(2), 197-208. doi:10.1177/ 0146167211422544

15.

Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 339-375. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.3. 339

16.

Jost, J. T., & Hunyady, O. (2003). The psychology of system justification and the palliative function of ideology. European Review of Social Psychology, 13(1), 111-153. doi:10.1080/10463280240000046

17.

Jost, J. T., & Hunyady, O. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of system-justifying ideologies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(5), 260-265. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00377.x

18.

Jost, J. T., Pelham, B. W., Sheldon, O., & Ni Sullivan, B. (2003). Social inequality and the reduction of ideological dissonance on behalf of the system: Evidence of enhanced system justification among the disadvantaged. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33(1), 13-36. doi:10.1002/ejsp.127

19.

Jost, J. T., & Thompson, E. P. (2000). Group-based dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of self-esteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among African Americans and European Americans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36(3), 209-232. doi:10.1006/jesp.1999.1403

20.

Kay, A. C., & Friesen, J. (2011). On social stability and social change: Understanding when system justification does and does not occur. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(6), 360-364. doi:10.1177/0963721411422059

21.

Kay, A. C., Gaucher, D., Napier, J. L., Callan, M. J., & Laurin, K. (2008). God and the government: Testing a compensatory control mechanism for the support of external systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(1), 18-35. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.18

22.

Kay, A. C., Jimenez, M. C., & Jost, J. T. (2002). Sour grapes, sweet lemons, and the anticipatory rationalization of the status quo. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(9), 1300-1312. doi:10.1177/01461672022812014

23.

Kay, A. C., & Jost, J. T. (2003). Complementary justice: Effects of “poor but happy” and “poor but honest” stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(5), 823-837. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022- 3514.85.5.823

24.

Kay, A. C., Jost, J. T., Mandisodza, A. N., Sherman, S. J., Petrocelli, J. V., & Johnson, A. L. (2007). Panglossian ideology in the service of system justification: How complementary stereotypes help us to rationalize inequality. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 38, pp. 305-358). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

25.

Kay, A. C., Jost, J. T., & Young, S. (2005). Victim derogation and victim enhancement as alternate routes to system justification. Psychological Science, 16(3), 240-246. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956- 7976.2005.00810.x

26.

Keltner, D., Ellsworth, P. C., & Edwards, K. (1993). Beyond simple pessimism: effects of sadness and anger on social perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(5), 740-752. doi:10. 1037/0022-3514.64.5.740

27.

Kruglanski, A. W., Webster, D. M., & Klem, A. (1993). Motivated resistance and openness to persuasion in the presence or absence of prior information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(5), 861-876. doi:/10.1037/0022- 3514.65.5.861

28.

Lerner, M. J. (1965). Evaluation of performance as a function of performer’s reward and attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1(4), 355-360. doi:10.1037/h0021806

29.

Lerner, J. S., & Keltner, D. (2000). Beyond valence: Toward a model of emotion-specific influences on judgement and choice. Cognition & Emotion, 14(4), 473-493. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.64.5.740

30.

Lerner, J. S., & Keltner, D. (2001). Fear, anger, and risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(1), 146-159. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.146

31.

Owuamalam, C., Issmer, C., Zagefka, H., Klaßen, M., & Wagner, U. (2014). Why do members of disadvantaged groups strike back at perceived negativity towards the in-group?: Meta- stereotyping and expressions of discontent. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 24(3), 249–264. doi;10.1002/casp.2165

32.

Roseman, I. J. (1984). Cognitive determinants of emotion: A structural theory. Review of Personality & Social Psychology, 5, 11-36.

33.

Roseman, I. J., Spindel, M. S., & Jose, P. E. (1990). Appraisals of emotion-eliciting events: Testing a theory of discrete emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(5), 899-915. doi:10. 1037/0022-3514.59.5.899

34.

Scherer, K. R. (1988). Criteria for emotion-antecedent appraisal: A review. In V. Hamilton, G. H. Bower, & N. H. Frijda (Eds.), Cognitive Perspectives on Emotion and Motivation (pp. 89-126). Dordrecht, Holland: Nijhoff.

35.

Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(3), 513-523. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.3.513

36.

Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.

37.

Smith, C. A., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1985). Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(4), 813-838. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.48.4.813

38.

Smith, C. A., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1987). Patterns of appraisal and emotion related to taking an exam. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 475-488. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.475

39.

Tesser, A. (1990). Smith and Ellsworth’s appraisal model of emotion: A replication, extension and test. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16(2), 210-223. doi:10.1177/0146167290162003

40.

Waters, E. A. (2008). Feeling good, feeling bad, and feeling at‐risk: A review of incidental affect’s influence on likelihood estimates of health hazards and life events. Journal of Risk Research, 11(5), 569-595. doi:10.1080/13669870701715576

41.

Wegener, D. T., & Petty, R. E. (1994). Mood management across affective states: The hedonic contingency hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(6), 1034-1048. doi:10.1037/ 0022-3514.66.6.1034

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격

논문 투고 OA 정책