바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology

ISSN : 1229-0653

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.29 No.3
Citation Share

Self-Enhancement Bias and Academic Achievement: A Negative Quadratic Relation

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2015, v.29 no.3, pp.151-164
https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2015.29.3.008


& (2015). Self-Enhancement Bias and Academic Achievement: A Negative Quadratic Relation. Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 29(3), 151-164, https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2015.29.3.008
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

This study examined the relation between self-enhancement bias and academic achievement. A total of 135 undergraduate students in the United States completed an online questionnaire battery during the first month of the semester. We asked participants to rate their academic ability relative to their high school and college peers and also retrieved their high school GPA and ACT scores. Participants also completed a measure of narcissism and rated how important it is to academically succeed. Self-enhancement bias was then calculated by the discrepancy between self-perceived academic ability and actual academic ability as assessed by high school GPA and ACT. Academic achievement was assessed by college GPA at the end of the semester. Self-perceived academic ability was positively related to academic achievement. However, self-enhancement bias had a negative curvilinear relation with academic achievement. In other words, perceiving oneself in an overly positive or negative manner was associated with low academic achievement. This relation remained significant controlling for narcissism and importance of academic success. This study demonstrated that self-enhancement bias and positive self-perception are two different concepts that led to different results. The importance of distinguishing self-enhancement bias from positive self-perception is discussed.

keywords
자기지각, 자기고양편향, 긍정적 착각, 학업성취, self-perception, self-enhancement, positive illusion, academic achievement

Reference

1.

고명자 (2013). 중학생의 긍정적 착각과 학업성취 및 방어기제의 관계. 충북대학교 일반대학원 석사학위논문.

2.

고재홍, 전병우 (2003). 두 자기평가 편향과 자존감간의 관계. 한국심리학회지: 사회및성격, 17(2), 1-16.

3.

노연희, 손영우 (2011). 자기고양과 적응 간의 관계. 한국심리학회지: 사회및성격, 25(4), 61-76.

4.

백수경, 고재홍 (2007). 자기고양편향이 행복감과 인기도에 미치는 효과. 한국심리학회지: 사회및성격, 21(1), 88-104.

5.

홍애순, 조규판 (2012). 초등학생이 지각한 사회적 지지, 학교행복감, 긍정적 착각이 학업성취도에 미치는 영향. 아동교육, 21(3). 81-95.

6.

ACT. (2007). The ACT technical manual. Iowa City: IA: ACT Inc.

7.

Asendorpf, J. B., & Ostendorf, F. (1998). Is self- enhancement healthy? Conceptual, psychometric, and empirical analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 955-966.

8.

Baumeister, R. F. (1989). The optimal margin of illusion. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 8, 176-189.

9.

Camara, W. J., & Echternacht, G. (2000). The SAT I and high school grades: Utility in predicting success in college. College Board Research Report, 10. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.

10.

Campbell, D., Stanley, J. C., & Gage, N. L. (1966). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally.

11.

Colvin, C. R., Block, J., & Funder, D. C. (1995). Overly positive self-evaluations and personality: Negative implications for mental health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 1152- 1162.

12.

Colvin, C. R., & Griffo, R. (2008). The psychological cost of self-enhancement. In E. C. Chang (Ed.), Self-criticism and self-enhancement: Theory, research, and clinical implications (pp.123-140). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

13.

Felson, R. B. (1984). The effect of self-appraisals of ability on academic achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 944-952.

14.

Gosling, S. D., John, O. P., Craik, K. H., & Robins, R. W. (1998). Do people know how they behave? Self-reported act frequencies compared with on-line codings by observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1337-1349.

15.

Gramzow, R. H., Elliot, A. J., Asher, E., & McGregor, H. A. (2003). Self-evaluation bias and academic performance: Some ways and some reasons why. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(2), 41-61.

16.

Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., & Elliot, A. J. (2002). Predicting success in college: A longitudinal study of achievement goals and ability measures as predictors of interest and performance from freshman year through graduation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 562-575.

17.

Irwin, J. R., & McClelland, G. H. (2003). Negative consequences of dichotomizing continuous predictor variables. Journal of Marketing Research, 40(3), 366-371.

18.

Jahoda, M. (1958). Current concepts of positive mental health. New York: Basic Books

19.

John, O. P., & Robins, R. W. (1994). Accuracy and bias in self-perception: Individual differences in self-enhancement and the role of narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 206-206.

20.

Kim, Y-H., & Chiu, C-Y. (2011). Emotional costs of inaccurate self-assessments: Both self-effacement and self-enhancement can lead to dejection. Emotion, 11, 1096-1104.

21.

Kim, Y-H., Chiu, C-Y., & Zou, Z. (2010). Know thyself: Misperceptions of actual performance undermine subjective well-being, future performance, and achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 395-409.

22.

Krueger, J. I., & Wright, J. C. (2010). Measurement of Self-Enhancement (and Self-Protection). In Alicke, M. D., & Sedikides, C. (Eds.). Handbook of self-enhancement and self-protection. New York: Guilford.

23.

Kwan, V. S., John, O. P., Robins, R. W., & Kuang, L. L. (2008). Conceptualizing and assessing self-enhancement bias: A componential approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(6), 1062-1077.

24.

Marsh, H. W. (1990). Causal ordering of academic self-concept and academic achievement: A multiwave, longitudinal panel analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 646-656.

25.

MacCallum, R. C., Zhang, S., Preacher, K. J., & Rucker, D. D. (2002). On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 19-40.

26.

Park, S. W., & Colvin, C. R. (2014). Narcissism and discrepancy between self and friends' perceptions of personality. Journal of Personality, 82, 278-286.

27.

Paulhus, D. L. (1998). Interpersonal and intrapsychic adaptiveness of trait self-enhancement: A mixed blessing?. Journal of personality and social psychology, 74(5), 1197-1208.

28.

Pelham, B. W., & Swann, W. B. (1989). From self-conceptions to self-worth: On the sources and structure of global self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(4), 672-680.

29.

Raskin, R., & Terry, H. (1988). A principal- components analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory and further evidence of its construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 890-902.

30.

Robins, R. W., & Beer, J. S. (2001). Positive illusions about the self: Short-term benefits and long-term costs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 340-352.

31.

Rothstein, J. M. (2004). College performance predictions and the SAT. Journal of Econometrics, 121, 297-317.

32.

Shedler, J., Mayman, M., & Manis, M. (1993). The illusion of mental health. American Psychologist, 48, 1117-1131.

33.

Svenson, O. (1981). Are we all less risky and more skillful than our fellow drivers? Acta Psychologica 47(2), 143-148.

34.

Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193- 210.

35.

Taylor, S. E., Lerner, J. S., Sherman, D. K., Sage, R. M., & McDowell, N. K. (2003). Portrait of the self-enhancer: Well adjusted and well liked or maladjusted and friendless?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1), 165-176.

36.

Willingham, W. W., Lewis, C., Morgan, R., & Ramist, L. (1990). Predicting college grades: An analysis of institutional trends over two decades. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

37.

Wright, S. S. (2000). Looking at the self in a rose-colored mirror: Unrealistically positive self- views and academic performance. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19, 451-462.

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy