바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology

ISSN : 1229-0653

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.30 No.3

Citation Share

The Application of Moral Foundations Questionnaire for Korean Adults

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2016, v.30 no.3, pp.47-61
https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2016.30.3.003

(University of Missouri)


& (2016). The Application of Moral Foundations Questionnaire for Korean Adults. Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 30(3), 47-61, https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2016.30.3.003

Abstract

The moral foundations questionnaire developed based on the moral foundations theory (Haidt & Joseph, 2004) was validated in the western culture. However, it is equivocal wether the foundations are applicable in Korean culture since the moral foundations vary across cultures. Therefore, this study, undertaken with Korean adults (N = 327, Mage = 35.83), validated the moral foundations questionnaire using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. The results of factor analyses yielded a 11-item questionnaire with three factors (respecting group norms, harm/care, and fairness/reciprocity) compared to five factors (harm/care, fairness/reciprocity, authority/respect, in-group/loyalty, and purity/sanctity) of original version. The results of correlation analyses, with measures of value orientations and political inclination, partially supported both the convergent and criterion-related validities of the Korean moral foundations questionnaire. Based on this results, the implications and limitations were discussed.

keywords
moral foundations theory, moral foundations questionnaire, scale validation, political inclination, 도덕적 기반 이론, 도덕적 기반 질문지, 타당화, 정치적 성향

Reference

1.

박명호 (2012). 정치적 태도의 연속성과 변화에 관한 연구-세대와 고령화를 중심으로-, 국제지역연구, 15(4), 145-162.

2.

이재호, 조긍호 (2014). 정치성향에 따른 도덕판단기준의 차이. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 28(1), 1-26.

3.

정은경, 손영우 (2011). 진보와 보수의 도덕적 가치 판단의 차이: 간통죄를 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 30(3), 727-741.

4.

정은경, 정혜승, 손영우 (2011). 진보와 보수의 도덕적 가치 판단의 차이: 용산 재개발 사건을 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 25(4), 93-105.

5.

최유정, 최샛별 (2013). 연령대별 세대 의식과 정치적 태도를 통해 본 세대의 경계: 정치적 세대의 가능성에 관한 시론. 사회과학 연구논총, 29(2), 159-201.

6.

홍세희 (2000). 특별기고: 구조 방정식 모형의 적합도 지수 선정기준과 그 근거. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 19(1), 161-177.

7.

Cameron, C. D., Brown-Iannuzzi, J., & Payne, B. K. (2012). Sequential priming measures of implicit social cognition: A meta-analysis of associations with behaviors and explicit attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 330-350.

8.

Graham, J., Haidt, J., Koleva, S., Motyl, M., Iyer, R., Wojcik, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2013). Moral Foundations Theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 55-130.

9.

Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 96, 1029-1046.

10.

Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of personality and social psychology, 101, 366-385.

11.

Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. Journal of personality and social psychology, 74, 1464-1480.

12.

Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of personality and social psychology, 85, 197-216.

13.

Greenwald, A. G., Poehlman, T. A., Uhlmann, E. L., & Banaji, M. R. (2009). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 17-41.

14.

Haidt, J. (2008). Morality. Perspectives on psychological science, 3, 65-72.

15.

Haidt, J., & Graham, J. (2007). When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research, 20, 98-116.

16.

Haidt, J., Graham, J. (2009). Planet of the Durkheimians, where community, authority, and sacredness are foundations of morality. Social and Psychological Bases of Ideology and System Justification, Oxford University Press.

17.

Haidt, J., & Joseph, C. (2004). Intuitive ethics: How innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues. Daedalus, 133, 55-66.

18.

Haidt, J., & Joseph, C. (2008). The moral mind: How five sets of innate intuitions guide the development of many culture-specific virtues, and perhaps even modules. The innate mind, 3, 367-391.

19.

Karpinski, A. (2004). Measuring self-esteem using the Implicit Association Test: The role of the other. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 22-34.

20.

Kim, K. R., Kang, J. S., & Yun, S. (2012). Moral Intuitions and Political orientation: similarities and differences between south Korea and the united states. Psychological reports, 111, 173-185.

21.

Kline, T. J. (2005). Psychological testing: A practical approach to design and evaluation. Sage Publications.

22.

Lewis, G. J., & Bates, T. C. (2011). From left to right: How the personality system allows basic traits to influence politics via characteristic moral adaptations. British Journal of Psychology, 102, 546-558.

23.

Oswald, F. L., Mitchell, G., Blanton, H., Jaccard, J., & Tetlock, P. E. (2013). Predicting ethnic and racial discrimination: A meta-analysis of IAT criterion studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 171-192.

24.

Schein, C., & Gray, K. (2015). The Unifying Moral Dyad Liberals and Conservatives Share the Same Harm-Based Moral Template. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, doi: 10.1177/ 0146167215591501.

25.

Schwartz, S. H. (2007). Value orientations: Measurement, antecedents and consequences across nations. In Jowell, R., Roberts, C., Fitzgerald, R., & Eva, G. (Eds.), Measuring attitudes cross-nationally: Lessons from the European Social Survey(pp. 161-193). London: Sage.

26.

Turiel, E. (1983). The development of social knowledge: Morality and convention. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

27.

West, S. G., Finch, J. F., & Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables: Problems and remedies, In Hoyle, R. H. (Ed), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications(pp. 56-75). CA: Sage Publications.

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy