바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

The Higher Vulnerability in the Weness Mode of Relationship

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2016, v.30 no.4, pp.51-79
https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2016.30.4.004
(University of the Philippines-Diliman)

Abstract

This study verified whether self-esteem will be damaged more in the weness mode of the relationship than in the mode of individuality if people receive inconsiderate behavior and negative comments from their partners. In order to do this, the Implicit Association Test was created to evaluate towards oneself and another person. In Experiment 1, we examined whether the implicit attitude towards others has changed after priming weness and individuality. It was found that the interpersonal distance was reduced in the weness primed condition but was marginally increased in the individuality primed condition. The interaction effect between priming conditions and factor of repeated measure was significant. After activating weness and individuality relationship by priming, Experiment 2 detected changes in implicit self-esteem and interpersonal distance after participants were treated one of three different ways (including unequal allocation of reward, negative comments, and control condition). After the unequal allocation, participants showed a significant drop of self-esteem and a marginal increase of the interpersonal distance in the weness primed condition, but no changes were detected in the individuality primed condition. Meanwhile, after the negative comments, self-esteem was slightly increased and the interpersonal distance was greatly increased in the weness primed condition, but neither of them changed in the individuality primed condition. These results show that, in the weness mode of the relationship, participants were sensitive to their partners' negative comments and inconsiderate behaviors and it can possibly hurt their self-esteem and increase the interpersonal distance. On the other hand, in the mode of individuality, self-esteem and the interpersonal distance would not be greatly affected even if people received negative comments or inconsiderate behaviors. This study acquires significance because it verified that self-esteem can be influenced by the level of expectation of receiving consideration from others.

keywords
weness, individuality, self-esteem, interpersonal distance, Implicit Association Test, 우리성, 개별성, 자존감, 거리감, 암묵적 연합검사

Reference

1.

고려대학교민족문화연구원 (2009). 고려대 한국어대사전. 서울: 창작마을.

2.

고재홍 (2001). 집합주의-개인주의 성향에 따른 분배규범의 선호차이. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 15(3), 1-16.

3.

김기범, 김미희, 최상진 (2002). 한국인의 대인관계에서의 기본도덕으로서의 의리분석: 한국인에게 진정한 친구는 의리있는 친구인가. 한국심리학회지: 사회문제, 8(1), 79-101.

4.

김기범, 최상진 (2002). 정(情) 마음 이야기(Narrative) 분석. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 16(2), 29-50.

5.

김민정, 이기학 (2014). 외현적․암묵적 자존감과 분노 상황에 따른 공격성 차이 연구. 상담학연구, 15(4), 1343-1363.

6.

김민정, 현명호 (2010). 스트레스, 사회적 지지 및 자아존중감과 남성 화병 증상의 관계. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 15(1), 19-33.

7.

김정식, 송유진, 이성수 (2008). 문화점화가 자기평가에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 22(1), 177-193.

8.

김진숙 (2011). 부부 불만족 지각 척도의 개발. 한국심리학회지: 여성, 16(2), 179-196.

9.

나은영, 권준모 (2002). 암묵적 연합 검사에 의한 지역 편견의 강도 측정 및 응용: 사투리 음성자극의 효과를 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 16(1), 51-74.

10.

문광수, 이충원, 오세진 (2007). 과업 상호의존성과 성과급 형태가 임금 만족에 미치는 효과. 한국심리학회 연차대회 발표논문집, pp. 360-361.

11.

박세영, Harrison, W. (1998). 형평이론에서 투입과 성과요인의 가중치와 분배원칙 선호: 한국과 미국의 비교문화 연구. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 11(1), 155-177.

12.

박승진, 최혜라, 이훈진 (2011). 성취 지향적․관계 지향적 우울성향자의 암묵적․명시적 자존감. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 30(1), 305-323.

13.

박영화, 고재홍 (2005). 부부의 자존감, 의사소통 방식, 및 갈등대처행동과 결혼만족도간의 관계: 자기효과와 상대방효과. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 19(1), 65-83.

14.

박정열, 허태균 (2006). 인상형성에 있어 사회범주 정보(우리-남)와 성격특성 정보(따뜻한-차가운)의 영향. 한국심리학회지: 문화 및 사회문제, 12(4), 55-75.

15.

배재창, 안상수, 한규석 (2004). 암묵적 연합검사를 통한 지역정체감 연구: 광주의 사례. 한국사회 및 성격심리학회 동계학술대회 발표논문집, pp. 41-49.

16.

배재창, 정재훈, 한규석 (2011). 참견하는 사람들의 상황판단과 개입동기. 한국심리학회 연차대회 발표논문집, p. 429.

17.

배재창, 한규석 (2015). 우리성과 개별성 점화가 대인평가에 미치는 영향의 암묵적 측정. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 29(4), 39-62.

18.

손영미, 최상진 (1999). 심정적 대화상황분석을 통한 심정심리분석. 한국심리학회 연차대회 발표논문집, pp. 13-16.

19.

송은주, 이지연, 이채희 (2012). 청소년용 타인에 의한 타당화 욕구 척도개발 및 타당화. 한국심리학회지: 학교, 9(2), 209-226.

20.

양미라 (2012). 무시 행위의 의사소통적 기능 분석. 전남대학교 일반대학원 석사학위 청구논문.

21.

염시창, 박현주 (2005). 일반계 여고생의 완벽주의, 학업적 자기효능감 및 시험불안의 관계모형 검증. 한국심리학회지: 학교, 2(1), 19-35.

22.

오성호 (2003). 지방공무원의 성과급제 실시에 따른 문제점과 개선 방안. 한국행정연구, 12(4), 219-247.

23.

윤혜영, 권정혜 (2011). 사회불안장애 환자의 주의편향 및 암묵적 자존감. 한국심리학회 연차대회 발표논문집, p. 336.

24.

이종숙 (1991). 최소 집단 상황에서의 집단구분과 집단간 차별이 자아존중감에 미치는 효과. 한국심리학회지: 사회, 6(1), 47-57.

25.

장성수 (1984). 분배정의와 절차정의가 보상의 불만족에 미치는 효과. 사회심리학연구, 2(1), 193-218.

26.

장성수 (1985). 비경제적 보상이 불형평 보수분배의 만족에 미치는 영향. 사회심리학연구, 2(2), 261-287.

27.

최봉영 (2012). 한국인에게 나는 누구인가. 경기도 파주: 지식산업사.

28.

최상진 (1997). 당사자심리학과 제 3자심리학: 인간관계 조망의 두 가지 틀. 한국심리학회 추계심포지움 발표논문집, pp. 131-143.

29.

최상진 (2011). 한국인의 심리학. 서울: 학지사.

30.

최상진, 김기범 (1999a). 한국인의 심정심리(心情心理): 심정의 성격, 발생과정, 교류양식 및 형태. 한국심리학회 연차대회 발표논문집, pp. 17-23.

31.

최상진, 김기범 (1999b). 한국인의 심정심리(心情心理): 심정의 성격, 발생과정, 교류양식 및 형태. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 18(1), 1-16.

32.

최상진, 김기범 (2000). 체면의 심리적 구조. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 14(1), 185-202.

33.

최상진, 김기범, 강오순, 김지영 (2005). 한국문화에서 대인관계 신뢰-불신의 기반과 심리적 기능에 대한 문화심리학적 분석. 한국심리학회지: 사회문제, 11(특집호), 1-20.

34.

최상진, 유승엽 (1992). 한국인의 체면에 대한 사회심리학적 한 분석. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 6(2), 137-157.

35.

최상진, 유승엽 (1995). 정의 심리적 구조에 대한 경험적 분석. 국제여성연구소 연구논총, 5(1), 107-132.

36.

한규석, 최상진 (2008). 마음의 연구와 심리학: 마음의 문화심리적 분석에 바탕한 심리의 작용 틀. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 27(2), 281- 307.

37.

한규석, 최송현, 정 욱, 배재창 (2004). 한국사회에서의 사람 판단의 준거: 된 사람과 난 사람의 평가를 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 18(1), 23-39.

38.

허태균, 박정열, 최상진 (2002). 호오(好惡)/화친(和親)차원 인상형성에 있어 집단정보(우리-남)와 중심특질(따뜻한-차가운)의 점화효과 비교. 한국심리학회 연차대회 발표논문집, pp. 738-743.

39.

Aspinwall, L. G., & Taylor, S. E. (1993). Effects of social comparison direction, threat, and self-esteem on affect, self-evaluation, and expected success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(5), 708-722.

40.

Austin, W., & Walster, E. (1974). Participants' reactions to “Equity with the World”. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10(6), 528-548.

41.

Averill, J. R. (1983). Studies on anger and aggression: Implications for theories of emotion. American Psychologist, 38(11), 1145-1160.

42.

Bargh, J. A. (1989). Conditional automaticity: Varieties of automatic influence in social perception and cognition. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 3-51). New York: Guilford Press.

43.

Barnlund, D. C. (1975). Public and private self in Japan and the United States: Communicative styles of two cultures. Tokyo: Simul Press.

44.

Baumeister, R. F., Tice, D. M., & Hutton, D. G. (1989). Self-presentational motovations and personality differences in self-esteem. Journal of Personality, 57(2), 547-579.

45.

Billig, M., & Tajfel. H. (1973). Social categorization and similarity in intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 3(1), 27-52.

46.

Bosson, J. K., Swann, W. B., Jr., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2000). Stalking the perfect measure of implicit self-esteem: The blind men and the elephant revisited? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(4), 631-643.

47.

Brewer, M. B. (1979). In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 307-324.

48.

Brewer, M. B., & Gardner, W. (1996). Who is this “we”? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(1), 83-93.

49.

Campbell, J. D. (1990). Self-esteem and clarity of the self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(3), 538-549.

50.

Cappelen, A. W., Eichele, T., Hugdahl, K., Specht, K., Sørensen, E. Ø., & Tungodden, B. (2014). Equity theory and fair inequality: A neuroeconomic study. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(43), 15368-15372.

51.

Chen, S., Boucher, H. C., & Tapias, M. P. (2006). The relational self revealed: Integrative conceptualization and implications for interpersonal life. Psychological Bulletin, 132(2), 151-179.

52.

Choi, S-C., Han, G., & Kim, C-W. (2007). Analysis of cultural emotion: understanding of indigenous psychology for universal implications. In J. Valsiner & A. Rosa (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Sociocultural Psychology (pp.318-342). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

53.

Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(1), 5-18.

54.

Dijksterhuis, A. (2004). I like myself but I don’'t know why: Enhancing implicit self-esteem by subliminal evaluative conditioning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(2), 345-355.

55.

Fazio, R. H., Jackson, J. R., Dunton, B. C., & Williams, C. J. (1995). Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(6), 1013-1027.

56.

Fazio, R. H., & Olson, M. A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology, 54(1), 297-327.

57.

Ferguson, M. J., & Bargh, J. A. (2004). Liking is for doing: the effects of goal pursuit on automatic evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(5), 557-572.

58.

Fishbach, A., & Shah, J. Y. (2006). Self-control in action: Implicit dispositions toward goals and away from temptations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 820-832.

59.

Gawronski, B., & LeBel, E. P. (2008). Understanding patterns of attitude change: When implicit measures show change, but explicit measures do not. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(5), 1355-1361.

60.

Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Pyszczynski, T., Rosenblatt, A., Burling, J., Lyon, D., Simon, L., & Pinel, E. (1992). Why do people need self-esteem? Converging evidence that self-esteem serves an anxiety-buffering function. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(6), 913-922.

61.

Greenier, K. D., Kernis, M. H., McNamara, C. W., Waschull, S. B., Berry, A. J., Herlocker, C. E., & Abend, T. A. (1999). Individual Differences in Reactivity to Daily Events: Examining the Roles of Stability and Level of Self-Esteem. Journal of Personality, 67(1), 187-208.

62.

Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(1), 4-27.

63.

Greenwald, A. G., Banaji, M. R., Rudman, L. A., Farnham, S. D., Nosek, B. A., & Mellott, D. S. (2002). A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. Psychological Review, 109(1), 3-25.

64.

Greenwald, A. G., & Farnham, S. D. (2000). Using the Implicit Association Test to measure self-esteem and self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 1022-1038.

65.

Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1464-1480.

66.

Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 197-216.

67.

Heatherton, T. F., & Vohs, K. D. (2000). Interpersonal evaluations following threats to self: Role of self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(4), 725-736.

68.

Heine, S. J., Lehman, D. R., Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1999). Is there a universal need for positive self-regard? Psychological Review, 106(4), 766-794.

69.

Hui, C. H., Triandis, H. C., & Yee, C. (1991). Cultural differences in reward allocation: Is collectivism the explanation? British Journal of Social Psychology, 30(2), 145-157.

70.

Karpinski, A., & Steinman, R. B. (2006). The Single Category Implicit Association Test as a Measure of Implicit Social Cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(1), 16-32.

71.

Kemper, T. D. (1987). How many emotions are there? Wedding social and autonomic components. American Journal of Sociology, 93(2), 263-289.

72.

Kliewer, D. (1986). A life-cycle approach to anger management training. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 5(4), 30-39.

73.

Lemyre, L., & Smith, P. M. (1985). Intergroup discrimination and self-esteem in the minimal group paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(3), 660-670.

74.

Leung, K., & Bond, M. H. (1984). The impact of cultural collectivism on reward allocation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(4), 793-804.

75.

Leung, K., & Park, H. J. (1986). Effects of interactional goal on choice of allocation rule: a cross-national study. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37(1), 111-120.

76.

Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224-253.

77.

Rosenberg, M. (1962). Self-Esteem and Concern With Public Affairs. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 26(2), 201-211.

78.

Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.

79.

Rosenberg, M., Schooler, C., Schoenbach, C., & Rosenberg, F. (1995). Global Self-Esteem and Specific Self-Esteem: Different Concepts, Different Outcomes. American Sociological Review, 60(1), 141-156.

80.

Steele, C. M., Spencer, S. J., & Lynch, M. (1993). Self-image resilience and dissonance: The role of affirmational resources. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(6), 885-896.

81.

Suh, E. M. (2002). Culture, identity consistency, and subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1378-1391.

82.

Suh, E. M., Diener, E., & Updegraff, J. A. (2008). From culture to priming conditions self-construal influences on life satisfaction judgments. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39(1), 3-15.

83.

Tabibnia, G., Satpute, A. B., & Lieberman, M. D. (2008). The sunny side of fairness: Preference for fairness activates reward circuitry (and disregarding unfairness activates self-control circuitry). Psychological Science, 19(4), 339-347.

84.

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp.33-48). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

85.

Taylor, S. E., & Lobel, M. (1989). Social comparison activity under threat: Downward evaluation and upward contacts. Psychological Review, 96(4), 569-575.

86.

Tom, S. M., Fox, C. R., Trepel, C., & Poldrack, R. A. (2007). The neural basis of loss aversion in decision-making under risk. Science, 315(5811), 515-518.

87.

Updegraff, J. A., Emanuel, A. S., Suh, E. M., & Gallagher, K. M. (2010). Sheltering the Self From the Storm: Self-Construal Abstractness and the Stability of Self-Esteem. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(1), 97-108.

88.

White K., & Lehman D. R. (2005). Culture and social comparison seeking: The role of self-motives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(2), 232-242.

89.

Williams, L. E., & Bargh, J. A. (2008). Experiencing physical warmth promotes interpersonal warmth. Science, 322(5901), 606-607.

90.

Yuki, M. (2003). Intergroup comparison versus intragroup relationships: A cross-cultural examination of social identity theory in North American and East Asian cultural contexts. Social Psychology Quarterly, 66(2), 166-183.

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology