바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology

ISSN : 1229-0653

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.32 No.1
Citation Share

Does Power Increase Moral hypocrisy?: Moderating Role of Moral Identity

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2018, v.32 no.1, pp.49-64
https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2018.32.1.003

(2018). Does Power Increase Moral hypocrisy?: Moderating Role of Moral Identity. Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 32(1), 49-64, https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2018.32.1.003
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

Based on the previous research on moral hypocrisy and power, this paper hypothesized that power increases moral hypocrisy and moral identity moderates the relationship between them. In study 1, 3 power conditions (high power, low power, control) and 2 self-relevance conditions(moral norm judging, actual moral behavior) were designed to test the effect of power on moral judging and behavior. In study 2, the three-way interaction of power conditions(high, low), self-relevance conditions(self, others), and moral identity (high, low) was explored. Results of study 1 showed whereas the low power group expressed more generous standard to others compared to the high power and the control groups, the high power group showed more unethical elf-interested behaviors than the other groups. However, the general morality of power priming groups was lower than the control group, whether it is high power or low power, which does not support the argument that the powerless show hypercrisy. Study 2 unveiled the moderating role of moral identity. In specific, the powerful showed moral hypocrisy in the group with low moral identity. However, the powerful were more strict to themselves than to others in the group with high moral identity. The implications and limitations of this study and the directions for the future research were discussed.

keywords
권력, 도덕적 위선, 도덕적 정체성, 자기 관련성, power, moral hypocrisy, moral identity, self-relevance

Reference

1.

이해원 (2016). 권력이 상황 판단에 미치는 영향: 자기관련성의 조절효과를 중심으로. 연세대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.

2.

정은경 (2013). 누가 결과주의적 결정을 내리는가? 권력이 윤리적/정책적 의사결정에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 32, 489-506.

3.

한규석 (2000). 한국인의 공과 사의 영역: 공정과 인정의 갈등. 한국심리학회지: 문화 및 사회문제, 6, 39-63.

4.

Anderson, C., & Berdahl, J. L. (2002). The experience of power: Examining the effects of power on approach and inhibition tendencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1362-1377.

5.

Aquino, K., & Reed II, A. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1423.

6.

Barker, J. L., & Barclay, P. (2016). Local competition increases people's willingness to harm others. Evolution and Human Behavior, 37(4), 315-322.

7.

Batson, C. D., Kobrynowicz, D., Dinnerstein, J. L., Kampf, H. C., & Wilson, A. D. (1997). In a very different voice: Unmasking moral hypocrisy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(6), 1335-1348.

8.

Batson, C. D., Thompson, E. R., & Chen, H. (2002). Moral hypocrisy: Addressing some alternatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(2), 330-339.

9.

Boegershausen, J., Aquino, K., & Reed II, A. (2015). Moral identity, Current Opinion in Psychology, 6, 162-166.

10.

Bryan, C. J., Adams, G. S., & Monin, B. (2013). When cheating would make you a cheater: Implicating the self prevents unethical behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(4), 1001.

11.

DeCelles, K. A., DeRue, D. S., Margolis, J. D., & Ceranic, T. L. (2012). Does power corrupt or enable? When and why power facilitates self-interested behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3), 681.

12.

Desmet, P. T., Hoogervorst, N., & Van Dijke, M. (2015). Prophets vs. profits: How market competition influences leaders' disciplining behavior towards ethical transgressions. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(6), 1034-1050.

13.

Ding, W., Xie., R., Sun, B., Li, W., Wang, D., & Zhen, R. (2016). Why does the “sinner” act prosocially? The mediating role of guilt and the moderating role of moral identity in motivating moral cleansing, Frontiers In Psychology, 7, 1317.

14.

Fischbacher, U., & Heusi, F. (2008). Lies in disguise. an experimental study on cheating, TWI Research Paper Series, 40.

15.

Fiske, S. T. (1993). Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. American Psychologist, 48, 621-628.

16.

Galinsky, A. D., Magee, J. C., Gruenfeld, D. H., Whitson, J. A., & Liljenquist, K. A. (2008). Power reduces the press of the situation: implications for creativity, conformity, and dissonance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(6), 1450.

17.

Halpin,A. W. (1957). Manual for the leader behavior description questionnaire. Columbus: The Ohio State University, Bureau of Business Research.

18.

He, H., Zhu, W., & Zheng, X. (2014). Procedural justice and employee engagement: Roles of organizational identification and moral identity centrality, Journal of Business Ethics, 122(4), 681-695.

19.

Jennings, P. L., Mitchell, M. S., & Hannah, S. T. (2014). The moral self: A review and integration of the literature, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36, 104-168.

20.

Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H, & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110, 265-284.

21.

Lammers, J., & Stapel, D. A. (2009). How power influences moral thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 279-289.

22.

Lammers, J., Stapel, D. A., & Galinsky, A. D. (2010). Power increases hypocrisy: Moralizing in reasoning, immorality in behavior. Psychological Science, 21(5), 737-744.

23.

Lammers, J. (2012). Abstraction increases hypocrisy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(2), 475-480.

24.

Lammers, J., Galinsky, A. D., Dubois, D., & Rucker, D. D. (2015). Power and morality. Current Opinion in Psychology, 6, 15-19.

25.

Monin, B., & Merritt, A. C. (2011). Moral hypocrisy, moral inconsistency, and the struggle for moral integrity. M. Mikulincer, P. R. Shaver (Eds.), The social psychology of morality: Exploring the causes of good and evil. Herzliya Series on Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 3, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.

26.

Naso, R. C. (2007). Beneath the mask: Hypocrisy and the pathology of shame. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 24(1), 113-125.

27.

Polman, E., & Ruttan, R. L. (2012). Effects of anger, guilt, and envy on moral hypocrisy. Personality and Social Psychology, 38(1), 129-139.

28.

Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1993). A theory of explanation-based decision making. In G. A. Klein, J. Orasanu, R. Calderwood, & C. E. Zsambok (Eds.), Decision making in action: Models and methods. Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.

29.

Rangell, L. (1980). The mind of Watergate: An exploration of the compromise of integrity. New York, NY: Norton.

30.

Halpin,A. W. (1957). Manual for the leader behavior description questionnaire. Columbus: The Ohio State University, Bureau of Business Research.

31.

Reynolds, S. J., & Ceranic, T. L. (2007). The effects of moral judgment and moral identity on moral behavior: An empirical examination of the moral individual. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1610-1624.

32.

Stevens, L. E., & Fiske, S. T. (2000). Motivated impressions of a powerholder: Accuracy under task dependency and misperception under evaluation dependency. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(8), 907-922.

33.

Tong, E. M. W., & Yang, Z. (2011). Moral hypocrisy: Of proud and grateful people. Psychological and Personality Science, 2(2), 159-165.

34.

Trivers, R. (1991). Deceit and self-deception: The relationship between communication and consciousness. Man and beast revisited, ed. M. Robinson & TL Tiger, 175-91.

35.

Valdesolo, P., & DeSteno, D. (2007). Moral hypocrisy social groups and the flexibility of virtue. Psychological Science, 18(8), 689-690.

36.

Wojciszke, B., & Struzynska-Kujalowicz, A. (2007). Power influences self-esteem. Social Cognition, 25(4), 472-494.

37.

Xu, Z. X., & Ma, H. K. (2016). How can a deontological decision lead to moral behavior? The moderating role of moral identity. Journal of Business Ethics, 137(3), 537-549.

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy