바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

  • P-ISSN1229-0653
  • KCI

ISSN : 1229-0653

논문 상세

이전
논문 투고

Vol.32 No.1

Citation Share

배우자이상화와 결혼만족도: 의사소통 패턴의 매개효과

Partner-Idealization and Marital Satisfaction: The Mediating Role of Communication Patterns

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격 / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2018, v.32 no.1, pp.65-81
https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2018.32.1.004
박유빈 (토론토대학교)
한그림 (고려대학교)
정연우 (고려대학교)
박선웅 (고려대학교)
박유빈, 한그림, 정연우, & 박선웅. (2018). 배우자이상화와 결혼만족도: 의사소통 패턴의 매개효과. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 32(1), 65-81, https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2018.32.1.004

초록

본 연구에서는 배우자이상화(배우자를 배우자 자신이 평가하는 것보다 더 이상적 배우자에 가깝다고 평가하는 것)가 본인 및 배우자의 결혼만족도와 어떤 상관이 있는지 살펴보고, 그 과정에서 세 가지 의사소통 패턴(건설적 의사소통, 남편요구-아내철회, 아내요구-남편철회)의 역할을 확인하고자 하였다. 78쌍의 부부가 자기 자신, 배우자, 그리고 이상형의 성격에 대해 응답하고, 의사소통 패턴과 결혼만족도에 대한 척도에 답변하였다. 연구 결과 남녀 모두 배우자를 이상화하는 것은 본인과 배우자의 높은 결혼만족도와 관련이 있었다. 또한 남편의 배우자이상화와 아내의 배우자이상화는 각각 아내가 지각하는 부부의 건설적 의사소통을 통해 두 사람의 높은 결혼만족도로 이어지는 것으로 나타났다. 아내의 배우자이상화와 결혼만족도 간의 정적 관계는 아내가 지각하는 낮은 남편요구-아내철회 및 낮은 아내요구-남편철회 패턴이 매개하였다. 아내의 배우자이상화와 남편의 결혼만족도 간의 정적 관계는 아내가 지각한 낮은 아내요구-남편철회 패턴을 통해 매개되었다. 종합해보면, 사람들은 자신이 이상화하거나 자신을 이상화하는 배우자와의 결혼생활에서 더 만족감을 느끼며 이 과정에서 아내가 부부의 의사소통 방식을 어떻게 지각하는지가 중요한 역할을 하고 있었다. 본 연구의 결과는 배우자에 대한 지각이 결혼만족도에 장․단기적으로 미칠 수 있는 영향에 대한 시사점을 제공한다.

keywords
idealization, positive illusions, romantic relationship, marital satisfaction, conflict communication, 이상화, 긍정적 환상, 연인관계, 결혼만족도, 갈등 의사소통

Abstract

The aim of the present research was to examine whether partner-idealization (i.e., perceiving one's partner more closely to one's ideal partner than partner's own self-perception) is related to one's own and the partner's marital satisfaction and to explore the role of communication patterns (constructive communication, husband demand-wife withdraw, and wife demand-husband withdraw) in that process. Seventy-eight married couples rated themselves, their partner, and an ideal partner on interpersonal qualities, and responded to measures of communication patterns and marital satisfaction. The results showed that for both husbands and wives, higher partner-idealization was related to one's own and the partner's greater marital satisfaction. We also found that either partner's partner-idealization was related to wife's report of more constructive communication, which in turn was related to both partners' greater marital satisfaction. The positive relation between wife's partner-idealization and her own marital satisfaction was mediated by low wife-perceived husband demand-wife withdraw and wife demand-husband withdraw patterns. The positive relation between wife's partner-idealization and husband’s marital satisfaction was mediated by low wife-perceived wife demand-husband withdraw pattern. Taken together, individuals who idealized their partner or were idealized by their partner were more satisfied in their relationship, and how wives came to perceive the communication patterns played an important role in this process. We discussed the implications of this study for the short- and long-term effects of partner perceptions on marital satisfaction.

keywords
idealization, positive illusions, romantic relationship, marital satisfaction, conflict communication, 이상화, 긍정적 환상, 연인관계, 결혼만족도, 갈등 의사소통

참고문헌

1.

김희진 (2004). 한국 부부의 결혼만족에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구. 상담학연구, 5, 839-853.

2.

박영화, 고재홍 (2005). 부부의 자존감, 의사소통 방식, 및 갈등대처행동과 결혼만족도간의 관계: 자기효과와 상대방효과. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 19, 65-83.

3.

이숙희, 고재홍 (2012). 부부의 긍정적 착각과 결혼만족도: 자기효과와 배우자효과. 한국심리학회지: 여성, 17, 149-170.

4.

장문선 (2002). 부부 의사소통패턴과 특징적 갈등대처방식. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 21, 331- 347.

5.

정고운, 조민수, 박선웅 (2017). 메타지각의 부정적 왜곡과 우울. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 31, 1-14.

6.

Anderson, N. H. (1968). Likableness ratings of 555 personality-trait words. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 272-279.

7.

Baucom, D. H., Epstein, N. B., Kirby, J. S., & LaTaillade, J. J. (2010). Cognitive-behavioral couple therapy. In K.S. Dobson (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive-behavioral therapy (pp. 411-444). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

8.

Bloch, L., Haase, C. M., & Levenson, R. W. (2014). Emotion regulation predicts marital satisfaction: More than a wives’ tale. Emotion, 14, 130-144.

9.

Bradbury, T. N., & Fincham, F. D. (1990). Attributions in marriage: Review and critique. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 3-33.

10.

Campbell, L., Lackenbauer, S. D., & Muise, A. (2006). When is being known or adored by romantic partners most beneficial? Self- perceptions, relationship length, and responses to partner's verifying and enhancing appraisals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1283-1294.

11.

Caughlin, J. P., & Huston, T. L. (2002). A contextual analysis of the association between demand/withdraw and marital satisfaction. Personal Relationships, 9, 95-119.

12.

Caughlin, J. P., & Vangelisti, A. L. (1999). Desire for change in one's partner as a predictor of the demand/withdraw pattern of marital communication. Communications Monographs, 66, 66-89.

13.

Christensen, A. (1987). Detection of conflict patterns in couples. In K. Hahlweg & M. J. Goldstein (Eds.), Understanding major mental disorder: The contribution of family interaction research (pp. 250-265). New York, NY: Family Process Press.

14.

Christensen, A., & Heavey, C. L. (1993). Gender differences in marital conflict: The demand/withdraw interaction pattern. In S. Oskamp & M. Costanzo (Eds.), Claremont symposium on applied social psychology, Vol. 6. Gender issues in contemporary society (pp. 113-141). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

15.

Crenshaw, A. O., Christensen, A., Baucom, D. H., Epstein, N. B., & Baucom, B. R. (2017). Revised scoring and improved reliability for the Communication Patterns Questionnaire. Psychological Assessment, 29, 913-925.

16.

Downey, G., Freitas, A. L., Michaelis, B., & Khouri, H. (1998). The self-fulfilling prophecy in close relationships: Rejection sensitivity and rejection by romantic partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 545-560.

17.

Eldridge, K. A., & Christensen, A. (2002). Demand-withdraw communication during couple conflict: A review and analysis. In P. Noller & J. A. Feeney (Eds.), Understanding marriage: Developments in the study of couple interaction (pp. 289-322). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

18.

Fincham, F. D. (2004). Communication in marriage. In A. Vangelisti (Ed.), Handbook of family communication (pp. 83-103). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

19.

Floyd, K. (2006). Communicating affection: Interpersonal behavior and social context. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

20.

George-Levi, S., Vilchinsky, N., Tolmacz, R., & Liberman, G. (2014). Testing the concept of relational entitlement in the dyadic context: Further validation and associations with relationship satisfaction. Journal of Family Psychology, 28, 193-203.

21.

Gordon, A. M., Impett, E. A., Kogan, A., Oveis, C., & Keltner, D. (2012). To have and to hold: Gratitude promotes relationship maintenance in intimate bonds. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 257-274.

22.

Gottman, J. M., Coan, J., Carrere, S., & Swanson, C. (1998). Predicting marital happiness and stability from newlywed interactions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 5-22.

23.

Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R. W. (2000). The timing of divorce: Predicting when a couple will divorce over a 14‐year period. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 737-745.

24.

Haring, M., Hewitt, P. L., & Flett, G. L. (2003). Perfectionism, coping, and quality of intimate relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 143-158.

25.

Heaton, T. B., & Blake, A. M. (1999). Gender differences in determinants of marital disruption. Journal of Family Issues, 20, 25-45.

26.

Heavey, C. L., Layne, C., & Christensen, A. (1993). Gender and conflict structure in marital interaction: A replication and extension. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 16-27.

27.

Hojjat, M. (2000). Sex differences and perceptions of conflict in romantic relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17, 598-617.

28.

Huston, T. L. (1994). Courtship antecedents of marital satisfaction and love. In R. Erber & R. Gilmore (Eds.), Theoretical frameworks for personal relationships (pp. 43-65). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

29.

John, O. P., & Robins, R. W. (1994). Accuracy and bias in self-perception: Individual differences in self-enhancement and the role of narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 206-219.

30.

Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). The analysis of dyadic data. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

31.

Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480-498.

32.

Laurenceau, J. P., Barrett, L. F., & Rovine, M. J. (2005). The interpersonal process model of intimacy in marriage: A daily-diary and multilevel modeling approach. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 314-323.

33.

Lawrence, E., Bunde, M., Barry, R. A., Brock, R. L., Sullivan, K. T., Pasch, L. A., ... & Adams, E. E. (2008). Partner support and marital satisfaction: Support amount, adequacy, provision, and solicitation. Personal Relationships, 15, 445-463.

34.

Mackinnon, S. P., Sherry, S. B., Antony, M. M., Stewart, S. H., Sherry, D. L., & Hartling, N. (2012). Caught in a bad romance: Perfectionism, conflict, and depression in romantic relationships. Journal of Family Psychology, 26, 215-225.

35.

Mak, L., & Marshall, S. K. (2004). Perceived mattering in young adults’ romantic relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 469-486.

36.

McLeod, J. M., & Chaffee, S. H. (1973). Interpersonal approaches to communication research. American Behavioral Scientist, 16, 469-499.

37.

Merton, R. K. (1948). The self-fulfilling prophecy. Antioch Review, 8, 193-210.

38.

Miller, P. J., Niehuis, S., & Huston, T. L. (2006). Positive illusions in marital relationships: A 13-year longitudinal study. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1579-1594.

39.

Murray, S. L. (1999). The quest for conviction: Motivated cognition in romantic relationships. Psychological Inquiry, 10, 23-34.

40.

Murray, S. L., Griffin, D. W., Derrick, J. L., Harris, B., Aloni, M., & Leder, S. (2011). Tempting fate or inviting happiness? Unrealistic idealization prevents the decline of marital satisfaction. Psychological Science, 22, 619-626.

41.

Murray, S. L., & Holmes, J. G. (1997). A leap of faith? Positive illusions in romantic relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 586-604.

42.

Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., & Griffin, D. W. (1996). The self-fulfilling nature of positive illusions in romantic relationships: Love is not blind, but prescient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1155-1180.

43.

Neff, L. A., & Karney, B. R. (2005). To know you is to love you: The implications of global adoration and specific accuracy for marital relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 480-497.

44.

Noller, P., & Feeney, J. A. (1998). Communication in early marriage: Responses to conflict, nonverbal accuracy, and conversational patterns. In T. N. Bradbury (Ed.), The developmental course of marital dysfunction (pp. 11-43). New York: Cambridge University Press.

45.

Overall, N. C., Fletcher, G. J., & Simpson, J. A. (2006). Regulation processes in intimate relationships: The role of ideal standards. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 662-685.

46.

Park, S. W., & Colvin, C. R. (2014). Narcissism and discrepancy between self and friends' perceptions of personality. Journal of Personality, 82, 278-286.

47.

Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S., Sarkar, D., & R Core Team. (2014). nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R package Version 3.1-117. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/ package=nlme

48.

Preacher, K. J., & Selig, J. P. (2012). Advantages of Monte Carlo confidence intervals for indirect effects. Communication Methods and Measures, 6, 77-98.

49.

Rusbult, C. E., Martz, J. M., & Agnew, C. R. (1998). The investment model scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5, 357-387.

50.

Sprecher, S. (1988). Investment model, equity, and social support determinants of relationship commitment. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51, 318-328.

51.

Stanley, S. M., Markman, H. J., & Whitton, S. W. (2002). Communication, conflict, and commitment: Insights on the foundations of relationship success from a national survey. Family Process, 41, 659-675.

52.

Stoeber, J. (2012). Dyadic perfectionism in romantic relationships: Predicting relationship satisfaction and long-term commitment. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 300-305.

53.

Stoeber, J., & Otto, K. (2006). Positive conceptions of perfectionism: Approaches, evidence, challenges. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 295-319.

54.

Thoemmes, F. (2015). Reversing arrows in mediation models does not distinguish plausible models. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 37, 226-234.

55.

Tolmacz, R., & Mikulincer, M. (2011). The sense of entitlement in romantic relationships-Scale construction, factor structure, construct validity, and its associations with attachment orientations. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 28, 75-94.

56.

Tomlinson, J. M., Aron, A., Carmichael, C. L., Reis, H. T., & Holmes, J. G. (2014). The costs of being put on a pedestal: Effects of feeling over-idealized. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 31, 384-409.

57.

Waller, W., & Hill, R. (1951). The family: A dynamic interpretation. Ft Worth, TX: Dryden Press.

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격

논문 투고 OA 정책