바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

ISSN : 1229-0653

논문 상세

이전
논문 투고

Vol.34 No.4
Citation Share

행복의 시공간적 분포에 대한 믿음과 주관적 안녕감

Belief in the distribution of happiness and subjective well-being

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격 / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2020, v.34 no.4, pp.37-61
https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2020.34.4.003
설선혜 (부산대학교)
최종안 (강원대학교)
최인철 (서울대학교)
설선혜, 최종안, & 최인철. (2020). 행복의 시공간적 분포에 대한 믿음과 주관적 안녕감. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 34(4), 37-61, https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2020.34.4.003
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수
PDF 다운로드

초록

내재 이론(Lay theory)은 개인이 지니고 있는 사회적 세상에 대한 암묵적 가정으로 개인의 경험과 행동에 영향을 미친다. 내재 이론과 행복 경험 간의 관계를 조사한 선행 연구들은 행복과 관련된 다양한 내재 이론들이 행복의 개인차와 관련되어 있음을 제안한다. 본 연구에서는 행복의 시간적, 공간적 분포에 대한 믿음이 개인의 행복 수준과 어떻게 관련되어있는지 알아보았다. 연구 1에서는 행복의 공간적 분포와 시간적 분포에 대한 전반적 믿음을 자기보고 설문을 통해 측정하고 행복감과의 관련성을 살펴보았다. 연구 2와 연구 3에서는 사람들이 타인의 행복을 지각하는 양상을 공간적 차원과 시간적 차원에서 각각 측정하고 주관적 안녕감과의 관련성을 살펴보았다. 연구 1-3의 결과, 행복이 시간적, 공간적으로 불균등하게 분포되어 있다는 믿음이 강한 사람들이 행복감을 덜 경험하고, 삶의 만족도가 낮은 것으로 나타났다. 연구 4에서는 경제적 부의 분포에 대한 믿음이 삶의 만족도와 관련이 없음을 확인하였다. 본 연구의 결과는 행복의 불균등 분포에 대한 믿음이 개인의 행복 수준과 부적으로 관련되어있음을 보여주며, 이러한 관련성은 자원 분포에 대한 일반적 믿음보다는 행복에 영역 특정적임을 시사한다.

keywords
subjective well-being, life satisfaction, lay theory, happiness distribution, 주관적 안녕감, 삶의 만족도, 내재 이론, 행복 분포

Abstract

Lay theory is implicit assumptions about the social world that individuals hold, which influences personal experiences and behaviors. Previous research on the relationship between lay theories and happiness suggested various lay theories are associated with individual differences in experiencing happiness. In the present study, we investigated how the belief in the temporal and spatial distribution of happiness is related to individuals’ happiness. In Study 1, belief in happiness distribution was measured by self-reported survey and then correlated with participants’ self-reported feeling of happiness, In Study 2 and Study 3, participants performed behavioral tasks in which they predicted others’ levels of happiness on spatial and temporal dimensions. Participants’ beliefs on the happiness distribution were estimated based on their responses in the tasks and were correlated with subjective well-being measures. Results of Study 1-3 revealed that participants who believed happiness is not equally distributed across space and time tended to feel lower level of happiness and have lower life satisfaction. In Study 4, we found that belief in the economic distribution is not related to life satisfaction or other subjective well-being measures. Our findings suggest that belief in unequal distribution of happiness is negatively linked to individuals’ level of happiness and this relationship may not be domain-general but be specific to the domain of happiness.

keywords
subjective well-being, life satisfaction, lay theory, happiness distribution, 주관적 안녕감, 삶의 만족도, 내재 이론, 행복 분포

참고문헌

1.

구자영, 서은국 (2007). 행복의 양이 한정되어 있다는 믿음과 주관적 안녕감. 한국심리학회지:사회 및 성격, 21(4), 1-19. doi: 10.21193/kjspp.2007.21.4.001

2.

무라카미 하루키 (1987). 노르웨이의 숲. 서울: 민음사.

3.

Appel, H., Crusius, J., & Gerlach, A. L. (2015). Social comparison, envy, and depression on Facebook: A study looking at the effects of high comparison standards on depressed individuals. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 34(4), 277-289. doi: 10.1521/jscp.2015.34.4.277

4.

Borooah, V. K. (2006). How much happiness is there in the world? A cross-country study. Applied Economics Letters, 13(8), 483-488. doi:10.1080/13504850500400652

5.

Brandts, J., Riedl, A., & Van Winden, F. (2009). Competitive rivalry, social disposition, and subjective well-being: An experiment. Journal of Public Economics, 93(11-12), 1158-1167. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2009.07.010

6.

Burnette, J. L., O'Boyle, E. H., Van Epps, E. M., Pollack, J. M.,& Finkel, E. J. (2013). Mind-sets matter: A meta-analytic review of implicit theories and self-regulation. Psychological Bulletin, 139(3), 655-701. doi: 10.1037/a0029531

7.

Busseri, M. A., Choma, B. L., & Sadava, S. W. (2009). Functional or fantasy? Examining the implications of subjective temporal perspective “trajectories”for life satisfaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(3), 295-308. doi:10.1177/0146167208327215

8.

Buttrick, N. R., Heintzelman, S. J., & Oishi, S. (2017). Inequality and well-being. Current opinion in psychology, 18, 15-20.

9.

Chiu, C.-y., Hong, Y.-y., & Dweck, C. S. (1997). Lay dispositionism and implicit theories of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(1), 19-30. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.73.1.19

10.

Choi, I., Koo, M., & Choi, J. A. (2007). Individual differences in analytic versus holistic thinking. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(5), 691-705.

11.

Crum, A. J., Salovey, P., & Achor, S. (2013). Rethinking stress: The role of mindsets in determining the stress response. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(4), 716-733. doi: 10.1037/a0031201

12.

Deaton, A. (1997). The analysis of household surveys:a microeconometric approach to development policy. The World Bank. doi: 10.1596/0-8018-5254-4

13.

Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542-575.

14.

Diener, E. D., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., &Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of personality assessment, 49(1), 71-75.

15.

Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi. D., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2009). New measures of well-being: Flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 39, 247-266.

16.

Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C. Y., & Hong, Y. Y. (1995). Implicit theories: Elaboration and extension of the model. Psychological Inquiry, 6(4), 322-333. doi: 10.1207/s15327965pli0604_12

17.

Feldman, G., Chandrashekar, S. P., & Wong, K. F. E. (2016). The freedom to excel: Belief in free will predicts better academic performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 90, 377-383. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.11.043

18.

Fredrickson, B. L.,& Joiner, T. (2002). Positive emotions trigger upward spirals toward emotional well-being. Psychological Science, 13(2), 172-175. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00431

19.

Furnham, A., & Cheng, H. (2000). Lay theories of happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1(2), 227-246. doi: 10.1023/A:1010027611587

20.

Gainer, M. (2013). Assessing happiness inequality in the welfare state: Self-reported happiness and the Rawlsian difference principle. Social Indicators Research, 114(2), 453-464. doi: 10.1007/s11205-012-0155-0

21.

Grasseni, M., & Origo, F. (2018). Competing for Happiness: Attitudes to Competition, Positional Concerns and Wellbeing. Journal of Happiness Studies, 19(7), 1981-2008. doi: 10.1007/s10902-017-9906-6

22.

Harris, H., & Busseri, M. A. (2019). Is there an ‘end of history illusion’ for life satisfaction? Evidence from a three-wave longitudinal study. Journal of Research in Personality, 83, 103869. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2019.103869

23.

Hong, Y. Y., Chiu, C. Y., Dweck, C. S., Lin, D. M.-S., & Wan, W. (1999). Implicit theories, attributions, and coping: A meaning system approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(3), 588-599. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.77.3.588

24.

Ji, L. J., Nisbett, R. E., & Su, Y. (2001). Culture, change, and prediction. Psychological Science, 12(6), 450-456. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00384

25.

Joshanloo, M., & Weijers, D. (2014). Aversion to happiness across cultures: A review of where and why people are averse to happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(3), 717-735. doi: 10.1007/s10902-013-9489-9

26.

Kondratowicz-Nowak, B., & Zawadzka, A. M. (2018). Does belief in free will make us feel good and satisfied. Health Psychology Report, 6(2), 109-117. doi: 10.5114/hpr.2018.73053

27.

Koo, M., Choi, J., & Choi, I. (2018). Analytic vs. Holistic Cognition: Construct and Measurement. In J. Spencer-Rogers & K. Peng (Ed.), The Psychological and Cultural Foundations of Dialectical Thinking (pp. 105-134). Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.

28.

LeDoux, J. E.(1989). Cognitive-emotional interactions in the brain. Cognition & Emotion, 3(4), 267-289. doi: 10.1080/02699938908412709

29.

Lyubomirsky, S. (2001). Why are some people happier than others? The role of cognitive and motivational processes in well-being. American Psychologist, 56(3), 239-249. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.239

30.

Lyubomirsky, S., & Ross, L. (1997). Hedonic consequences of social comparison: a contrast of happy and unhappy people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(6), 1141-1157. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.6.1141

31.

Molden, D. C., & Dweck, C. S. (2006). Finding “meaning” in psychology: a lay theories approach to self-regulation, social perception, and social development. American Psychologist, 61(3), 192-203. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.61.3.192

32.

Murphy, M. C., & Dweck, C. S. (2010). A culture of genius: How an organization’s lay theory shapes people’s cognition, affect, and behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(3), 283-296. doi: 10.1177/0146167209347380

33.

Na, J., Grossmann, I., Varnum, M. E., Kitayama, S., Gonzalez, R., & Nisbett, R. E. (2010). Cultural differences are not always reducible to individual differences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(14), 6192-6197. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1001911107

34.

Norenzayan, A., Choi, I., & Nisbett, R. E. (2002). Cultural similarities and differences in social inference: Evidence from behavioral predictions and lay theories of behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(1), 109-120. doi: 10.1177/0146167202281010

35.

Oishi, S. (2002). The experiencing and remembering of well-being: A cross-cultural analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(10), 1398-1406.

36.

Oishi, S., & Kesebir, S. (2015). Income inequality explains why economic growth does not always translate to an increase in happiness. Psychological Science, 26, 1630-1638.

37.

Oshio, T., & Urakawa, K. (2014). The association between perceived income inequality and subjective well-being: Evidence from a social survey in Japan. Social Indicators Research, 116(3), 755-770.

38.

Robinson, M. D., & Ryff, C. D. (1999). The role of self-deception in perceptions of past, present, and future happiness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(5), 596-608. doi: 10.1177/0146167299025005005

39.

Ross, L. D. (2001). Getting down to fundamentals:Lay dispositionism and the attributions of psychologists. Psychological Inquiry, 12(1), 37-40. doi: 10.2307/1449302

40.

Różycka-Tran, J., Boski, P., & Wojciszke, B. (2015). Belief in a zero-sum game as a social axiom:A 37-nation study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46(4), 525-548. doi: 10.1177/0022022115572226

41.

Różycka-Tran, J., Piotrowski, J. P., Żemojtel-Piotrowska, M.,Jurek, P., Osin, E. N., Adams, B. G., ... & Cieciuch, J. (2019). Belief in a zero-sum game and subjective well-being across 35 countries. Current Psychology, 1-10. doi: 10.1007/s12144-019-00291-0

42.

Schimmack, U. (2008). The structure of subjective well-being. The Science of Subjective Well-being, 54, 97-123.

43.

Sjåstad, H., Skard, S., Thorbjørnsen, H., & Norman, E. (2019, June 7). Self-serving optimism in hedonic prediction: People believe in a bright future for themselves and their friends, but not for their enemies. doi: 10.31234/osf.io/wgc3z

44.

Spencer-Rodgers, J., Peng, K., Wang, L., & Hou, Y. (2004). Dialectical self-esteem and East-West differences in psychological well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(11), 1416-1432.

45.

Tanaka,T., Yamamoto, T., & Haruno, M. (2017). Brain response patterns to economic inequity predict present and future depression indices. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(10), 748-756. doi:10.1038/s41562-017-0207-1

46.

Uchida, Y. (2010). A holistic view of happiness:Belief in the negative side of happiness is more prevalent in Japan than in the United States. Psychologia, 53(4), 236-245.

47.

Van Tongeren, D. R., & Burnette, J. L. (2018). Do you believe happiness can change? An investigation of the relationship between happiness mindsets, well-being, and satisfaction. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 13(2), 101-109. doi: 10.1080/17439760.2016.1257050

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격

논문 투고 OA 정책