ISSN : 1229-0653
본 논문은 타인에게 피해를 끼친 행위자의 책임판단과 처벌판단을 다룬 기존 연구들을 3가지 유목으로 분류했다. 기존의 책임판단연구들의 문제점, 특히 종속변인(책임)외 다의미성을 지적하였고 그 개선책으로 잘못판단, 책임판단 처벌크기 결정은 서로 다른 판단들이고 이것들은 3단계에 걸쳐 이루어 진다고 제안했다. 또한 처벌판단에 관한 가상적인 3단계 모형으로부터 도출된 가설과 추론들을 근거와 함께 제시했다. 마지막으로 처벌판단을 다루는 연구에서 고려해야 할 사항들과 각 가설 및 추론들의 검증방안에 대해 논의했다.
The present paper is purposed to categorize and summarize researches related to the attribution of responsibility and the assignment of punishment for an accident, and to propose a hypohetical model of punishment assignment. Since Heider(1958) suggested that the attribution of personal responsibility varies with the relative contribution of environmental factors to the outcome, many researchers have tried to identify the variables contributing to the attribution of responsibility and the assignment of punishment. But there are the possibility that the meaning of the dependent variable(eg, responsibility) used in these researches-were varied to the research contexts. Thus I tried to clarify the concept of responsibility by dividing it into fault, responsibility, and punishment. And these three concepts are connected in a model. I mention the important psychological mechanisms in each judgments and several hypotheses driven from the model.