바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.12 No.1

Citation Share

Social Anxiety and Interpretation Bias of Ambiguous Social Situations

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology / The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, (P)1229-070X; (E)2713-9581
2007, v.12 no.1, pp.95-110
https://doi.org/10.17315/kjhp.2007.12.1.006




& (2007). Social Anxiety and Interpretation Bias of Ambiguous Social Situations. The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, 12(1), 95-110, https://doi.org/10.17315/kjhp.2007.12.1.006

Abstract

The present study investigated the interpretation of social anxiety regarding ambiguous social situations using a lexical decision task. In order to examine this, with SADS (Social Avoidance and Distress Scale) of 316 college students high socially anxious group (n=21)and low socially anxious group (n=25) were selected for the experiment. Participants were asked to make a decision as soon as possible whether the probe was a word or non-word regarding to the target word which was presented after priming stimulus(ambiguous social situation or control one). As a result, high socially anxious participants responded faster to the probe consistent with threatening meaning in an ambiguous context than in the control context, whereas low socially anxious group did not differ in the response latency across the context. As to the probes with non-threatening meaning, both groups all responded faster in an ambiguous condition than in a control context. It was found that high socially anxious participants tended to interpret ambiguous social situations in a more threatening way compared to the low socially anxious group, nevertheless the evidence could not tell strongly that socially anxious people showed a bias favoring threatening interpretation. In addition, Hirsch and Mathews(2000)'position that socially anxious people did not make any kind of on-line interpretation was not supported. The discussion of the present study and suggestions for the future research were presented.

keywords
사회불안, 모호한 사회적 상황, 해석편향, social anxiety, ambiguous social situation, interpretation bias

Reference

1.

권석만 (1996). 자기인지의 구조와 정보처리과정에 있어서 우울집단의 특성. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 15, 17-31.

2.

김은정, 원호택 (1997). 대인불안의 모델들: 개관. 심리과학, 6, 109-130.

3.

김향숙 (2001). 사회공포증 하위유형의 기억편향. 서울대학교 대학원 석사학위 청구논문.

4.

김현수 (1997). 사회불안과 성공실패 경험이 자기 관련 정보의 기억에 미치는 영향. 연세대학교 대학원 석사학위 청구논문.

5.

문수종 (2000). 사회불안이 표정 및 음성정보를 통한 타인의 정서인식에 미치는 영향. 연세대학교 대학원 석사학위 청구논문.

6.

손지혜 (2001). 사회적 스트레스, 역기능적 신념 및 부정적인 자동적 사고가 사회불안에 미치는 영향. 가톨릭대학교 대학원 석사학위 청구 논문.

7.

이재호, 김성일 (1998). 언어 이해과정의 연구 방법. 이정모, 이재호(공편), 인지심리학의 제 문제 II: 언어와 인지 (155-182쪽). 서울: 학지사

8.

이재호, 이정모 (1999). 정교화 추론의 온라인 생성 과정: 예견 추론. 한국심리학회지: 실험 및 인지 11, 261-276.

9.

이정윤, 최정훈 (1997). 한국판 사회공포증(K-SAD, K-FNE)의 신뢰도 및 타당도 연구. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 2, 251-264.

10.

Amir, N., Foa, E. B., & Coles, M. E. (1998). Negative interpretation bias in social phobia. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 36, 945-958.

11.

Beck, A. T., & Emery, G. (1985). Anxiety disorders and phobias: A cognitive perspective. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.

12.

Calvo, M. G., & Castillo, M. D. (2001). Bias in predictive inferences during reading. Discourse Processes, 32, 43-71.

13.

Calvo, M. G., Eysenck, M. W., & Castillo, M. D. (1997). Interpretative bias in test anxiety: The time course of predictive inferences. Cognition and Emotion, 11, 43-63.

14.

Calvo, M. G., Eysenck, M. W., & Estevez, A. (1994). Ego-threat interpretative bias in test anxiety: On-line inferences. Cognition and Emotion, 8, 127-146.

15.

Carrigan, M. H. & Randall, C. L. (2003). Self-medication in social phobia: A review of the alcohol literature. Addictive Behaviors, 28, 269-284.

16.

Clark, D. M. (2001). A cognitive perspective on social phobia. In W. R. Crozier & L. E. Alden(Eds.), International handbook of social anxiety: concepts, research and interventions relating to the self and shyness (pp. 405-430). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

17.

Clark, D. M., & McManus, F. (2002). Information processing in social phobia. Biological Psychiatry, 51, 92-100.

18.

Clark, D. M., & Wells, A. (1995). A cognitive model of social phobia. In R. G. Heimberg, M. Liebowitz, D. Hope, & F. Schneier (Eds.), Social phobia: Diagnosis, assessment & treatment (pp. 69-133). New York: Guilford Press.

19.

Constans, J. I., Penn, D. L., Ihen, G. H., & Hope, D. A. (1999). Interpretive biases for ambiguous stimuli in social anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 37, 643-561.

20.

Eysenck, M. W., Mogg, K., May, J., Richards, A., & Mathews, A. M. (1991). Bias in interpretation of ambiguous sentences related to threat in anxiety. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 144-150.

21.

Heinrichs, N., & Hofmann, S. G. (2001). Information processing in social phobia: A critical review. Clinical Psychology Review, 21, 751-770.

22.

Hirsch, C. R., & Mathews, A. (1997). Interpretative inferences when reading about emotional events. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35, 1123-1132.

23.

Hirsch, C. R., & Mathews, A. (2000). Impaired positive inferential bias in social phobia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 109, 705-712.

24.

Hirsch, C. R., Mathews, A., Clark, D.M., Williams, R., & Morrison, J.(2003). Negative self- imagery blocks inferences Behaviour Research and Therapy, 41 1383-1396..

25.

Huppert, J. D., Foa, E. B., Furr, J. M., Filip, J. C., & Mathews, A. (2003). Interpretation bias in social anxiety: A dimensional perspective. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 27, 569-577.

26.

Liebowitz, M. R., Gorman, J. M., Fye,r A. J., & Klein, D. F. (1985). Social phobia: Review of a neglected anxiety disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry, 42, 729-736.

27.

MacLeod, C., & Cohen, I. (1993). Anxiety and the interpretation of ambiguity: A text comprehension study. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 102, 238-247.

28.

Mathews, A., Richards, A., & Eysenck, M. (1989). Interpretation of homophones related to threat in anxiety states. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 98, 31-34.

29.

Mattick, R. P., Peters, L., & Clarke, J. C. (1989). Exposure and cognitive restructuring for social phobia: A controlled study. Behaviour Therapy, 20, 3-23.

30.

Rapee, R. M., & Heimberg, R. G. (1997). A cognitive-behavioral model of anxiety in social phobia. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35, 273-283.

31.

Schneier, F. R., Johnson, J., Hornig, C. D., Liebowitz, M. R., & Weissman, M. M. (1992). Social phobia: Comorbidity and morbidity in an epidemiologic sample. Archives of General Psychiatry, 49,282-288.

32.

Stopa, L., & Clark, D. M. (2000). Social phobia and interpretation of social events. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 38, 273-283.

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy