바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

행복과 종교적 태도의 개념관계 모형들에 대한 비교 검증

A compared testifying for the conceptual relation model about happiness and religious attitudes

한국심리학회지: 건강 / The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, (P)1229-070X; (E)2713-9581
2007, v.12 no.2, pp.347-365
https://doi.org/10.17315/kjhp.2007.12.2.004
김동기 (강남대학교)
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

초록

본 연구는 인간의 행복과 종교적 태도 간의 상관적 개념관계에서 영향력의 방향성을 파악하고, 그에 따른 관계 모형들에 대한 비교 검증을 고찰하는 것이 그 목적이다. 본 연구의 가설적 모형은 다음 5가지 모델이다. 즉, 두 요인 간에 서로 관계가 없다는 이중과정 모델, 두 요인이 상반된 설정의 전제를 하는 대립 모델, 행복하니까 초월적 종교성이 강화된다는 행복감→종교성의 일방향 모델, 종교에 몰입하다보면 행복의 독특한 가치를 느낄 것이라는 종교성→행복감의 일방향 모델, 서로 영향을 주고받는 양방향의 관계를 가정하는 상호작용 모델 등이다. 본 연구의 대상자는 총 633명(남자 197명, 여자 436명)이었고, 개신교인이 245명 천주교인이 388명으로 분포되었다. 접근 방법으로는 관계성을 중심으로 비교하고자 하는 모델들의 타당도를 검증하였다. 확인적 요인 분석과 국소적 최소 제약법의 접근으로 상호관계 비교를 수행하였다. 본 연구의 가설적 모형에 따른 검증의 분석결과를 종합하면, 상호작용모델, 일방향(행복감➔종교성)모델, 일방향(종교성➔행복감)모델, 이중과정모델, 대립모델의 순으로 적합도의 우열이 가려진 것으로 나타났다.

keywords
행복, 종교적 태도, 심리적 안녕감, 심리적 안녕감 척도, 종교정향. 종교정향 척도, happiness, religious attitudes, psychological well-being, psychological well-being scales, religious orientations, religious orientations scales.

Abstract

This study is designed to recognize the orientation of the effectiveness in the conceptual relations of models about happiness and religious attitudes, and to consider comparative testifying about relation models. The hypothetic models of this study are as follows; dual process model that there is no relation between two factors, confronting model that the two factors are opposite, happiness-to-religious orientation one way model that happiness reinforces transcendental religion, religious orientation-to-happiness one way model that the absorbing religion reinforces the value of happiness, and interactive model that religion and happiness are interactive. The participant are 633 persons(197 males, 436 females), who are 245 protestants and 388 catholics. The approach method is to testify the validity of models which focus on the relations between two factors and to conduct correlation comparison through confirmatory factor analysis and local minimums. The analysis result of testifying according to the five models is as follows: the fits is the highest in interactive model and the rest are in the order of happiness-to-religious orientation one way model, religious orientation-to-happiness one way model, dual process model, and confronting model.

keywords
행복, 종교적 태도, 심리적 안녕감, 심리적 안녕감 척도, 종교정향. 종교정향 척도, happiness, religious attitudes, psychological well-being, psychological well-being scales, religious orientations, religious orientations scales.

참고문헌

1.

김동기 (2005). 종교인들의 심리적 안녕감(행복)에 대한 종교적 내재성 및 종교정향의 상호작용 연구. 한국종교학회 종교연구, 39, 107-133.

2.

김동기 (2003). 종교심리학. 학지사.

3.

김동기, 김은미 공역 (2005). 행복심리학. 학지사.

4.

이순묵 (1990). 공변량 자료분석. 성원사.

5.

Allport, G. W., & Ross, J. M. (1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 432-443.

6.

Andrews, F. M. (1991). Stability and change in levels and structure of subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 25, 1-30.

7.

Andrews, F. M., & McKennell, A. C. (1980). Measures of self-reported well-being. Social Indicators Research, 25, 1-30.

8.

Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being. New York: Plenum.

9.

Argyle, M. (2001). The psychology of happiness. London: Routledge.

10.

Argyle, M., & Hills, P. (2000). Religious experiences and their relationships with happiness and personality. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 10, 157-172.

11.

Batson, C. D., & Ventis, W. L. (1982). The religious experience: A Social-psychological perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.

12.

Batson, C. D., Schoenrade, P., & Ventis, W. L. (1993). Religion and the Individual. New York: Oxford University Press.

13.

Battista, J., & Almond, R. (1973). The development of meaning inlife. Psychiatry, 36, 409-427.

14.

Bentler, P. M., & Chou. C. P. (1987). Practical Issues in Structural Modeling. Sociological Methods and Research, 16. 78-117.

15.

Birren, J. E., & Renner, V. J. (1980). Concepts and issues of mental health and aging. In J. E. Birren & R. B. Sloane (Eds.), Handbook of mental health and aging (pp. 3-33). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

16.

Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables. New York: Wiley.

17.

Bradburn, N. M. (1969). The structure of psychological well-being. Chicago: Aldine.

18.

Brown, L. B. (1994). Religion, Personality, and Mental Health. New York: Springer-Verlag.

19.

Bryant, F. B., & Veroff, J. (1982). The structure of psychological well-being: A sociohistorical analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 653-673.

20.

Burris, C. T. (1994). Curvilinearity and religious types: a second look at Intrinsic, Extrinsic, Quest relations. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 4, 245-260.

21.

Burris, C. T., & Jackson, L. M. (2000). Social identity and the true believer: Responses to threatened self stereotypes among the intrinsically religious. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 257-278.

22.

Chamberlain, K. & Zika, S. (1989). Religiosity, life memory, and well-being: Some relationships in a sample of women. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 28, 411-420.

23.

Delbridge, J., Headey, B., & Wearing, A. J. (1994). Happiness and Religious Belief. In L. B. Brown, Religion, Personality, and Mental Health. (pp. 50-68). New York: Springer-Verlag.

24.

Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542-575.

25.

Diener, E., & Emmons, R. A. (1984). The independence of positive and negative affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1105-1117.

26.

Diener, E., Larsen, R. J., Levine, S., & Emmons, R. A. (1985). Intensity and frequency: Dimensions underlying positive and negative affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1253-1265.

27.

Donahue, M. J. (1985). Intrinsic and extrinsic religiousness: Review and meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(2), 400-419.

28.

Ellison, C. G. (1991). Religious involvement and subjective well-being, Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 32, 80-99.

29.

Francis, L. F., & Katz, Y. J. (2003). Religiosity and Happiness: A Study among Israeli female undergraduates. In R. L. Piedmont, & D. O. Moberg, Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion Vol. 13 (pp. 75-86). Boston: Brill.

30.

Genia, V. (1996). I. E. Quest, and fundamentalism as predictors of psychological and spiritual well-being. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 35, 56-64.

31.

Hadaway, C. K., & Roof, W. C. (1978). Religious commitment and quality of life in American society. Review of Religious Research, 19, 295-307.

32.

Headey, B. W., & Wearing, A. (1992). Understanding Happiness. Melbourne, Australia: Longman Cheshire.

33.

Headey, B. W., Holmstrom, E. L., & Wearing, A. J. (1984). Well-being and ill-being: different dimensions. Social Indicators Research, 14, 115-139.

34.

Headey, B. W., Holmstrom, E. L., & Wearing, A. J. (1985). Models of well-being and ill-being. Social Indicators Research, 17, 211-234.

35.

Hoyle, R. H., & Panter. A. T. (1995). Writng about Structural Equation Models." pp. 158-176 in R. H. Hoyle (ed.), Structural Equation Modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

36.

Inglehart, R. (1990). Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

37.

Joreskog, K. G., & Sörbom. D. (1997). LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language. Chicago: SSI Inc.

38.

Kirkpatrick, L. A., & Hood, Jr., R. W. (1990). Intrinsic-extrinsic orientations: Boon or bane? Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 20, 442-462.

39.

Kirkpatrick, L. A. (1989). A psychometric analysis of the Allport-Ross and Feagin measures of intrinsic-extrinsic religious orientation. In M. Lynn & D. Moberg (Eds.), Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion, Vol. 1, (pp.1-31). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

40.

Kirkpatrick, L. A. (1992). An attachment-theory approach to psychology of relation. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2. 3-28.

41.

Maltby, J., Lewis, C. A., & Day, L. (1999). "Religious orientation and psychological well-being: the role of the frequency of personal prayer", British Journal of Health Psychology 4, pp.363-378.

42.

Peterson, L. R., & Roy, A. (1985). Religiosity, anxiety, and meaning and purpose: Religion's consequences for "psychological well-being". Review of Religious Research, 27, 49-62.

43.

Piedmont, R. L., & Moberg, D. O. (2003). Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion, Vol. 13. Boston: Brill.

44.

Pollner, M. (1989). Divine relations, social relations, and well-being. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 30, 92-104.

45.

Ryff, C. D.(1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 6, 1069-1081.

46.

Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 4, 719-727.

47.

Smith, D. A., Mar, C. M., & Turoff, B. K. (1998). The Structure of Schizophrenic Symptoms: a Meta-analytic Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Schizophrenia Research 31, 57-70.

48.

St. George, A., & McNamara, P. H. (1984). Religion, race, and psychological well-being, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 23, 351-363.

49.

Steinitz, L. Y. (1980). Religiosity, well-being, and weltanschauung among the elderly. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 19, 60-67.

50.

Veenhoven, R. (1994). Correlates of Happiness (3 Vols.). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: RISBO, Center for Socio-Cultural Transformation.

51.

Williams, L. J., & Podsakoff. P. M. (1989). Longitudinal Field Methods for Studying Reciprocal Relationships in Organizational Behavior Research: Toward Improved Casual Analysis. Research in Organizational Behavior 11, 247-292.

52.

Witter, R. A., Stock, W. A., Okum, W. A., & Haring, M. J. (1985). Education and subjective well-being: a meta-analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 6, 165-173.

한국심리학회지: 건강