바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology

  • KOREAN
  • P-ISSN1229-070X
  • E-ISSN2713-9581
  • KCI

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.14 No.3

Citation Share

Developing a Tool to Assess Competency to Consent to Treatment in the Mentally Ill Patient: Reliability and Validity

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology / The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, (P)1229-070X; (E)2713-9581
2009, v.14 no.3, pp.579-596
https://doi.org/10.17315/kjhp.2009.14.3.007







& (2009). Developing a Tool to Assess Competency to Consent to Treatment in the Mentally Ill Patient: Reliability and Validity. The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, 14(3), 579-596, https://doi.org/10.17315/kjhp.2009.14.3.007

Abstract

This study aimed to develop the Korean tool of competency to consent to psychiatric treatment and to analyze the reliability and validity of this tool. Also the developed tool's efficiency in determining whether a patient possesses treatment consent competence was checked using the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve and the relevant indices. A total of 193 patients with mental illness, who were hospitalized in a mental hospital or were in community mental health center, participated in this study. We administered a questionnaire consisting of 14 questions concerning understanding, appreciation, reasoning ability, and expression of a choice to the subjects. To investigate the validity of the tool, we conducted the K-MMSE, insight test, estimated IQ, and BPRS. The tool's reliability and usefulness were examined via Cronbach's alpha, ICC, and ROC analysis, and criterion related validation was performed. This tool showed that internal consistency and agreement between raters was relatively high(ICC .80~.98, Cronbach‘s alpha .56~.83)and the confirmatory factor analysis for constructive validation showed that the tool was valid. Also, estimated IQ, and MMSE were significantly correlated to understanding, appreciation, expression of a choice, and reasoning ability. However, the BPRS did not show significant correlation with any subcompetences. In ROC analysis, full scale cutoff score 18.5 was suggested. Subscale cutoff scores were understanding 4.5, appreciation 8.5, reasoning ability 3.5, and expression of a choice 0.5. These results suggest that this assessment tool is reliable, valid and efficient diagnostically. Finally, limitations and implications of this study were discussed.

keywords
informed consent, consent competency to treatment, mental illness, ROC analysis, informed consent, consent competency to treatment, mental illness, ROC analysis, 동의, 치료동의능력, ROC, 고지된 동의, 정신장애인

Reference

1.

보건복지부 (2007). 2007년 중앙정신보건사업지원단 사업보고서.

2.

김문근, 김이영 (2008). 재가 정신장애인 및 가족의 생활실태 조사 연구. 2008년도 정신장애인권 국가보고서 실태조사 연구용역보고서.

3.

문국진 (1994). Informed Consent. 대한법의학회지, 18(1), 1-2.

4.

서미경 (1998). 정신보건영역에서의 고지된 동의과정에 관한 연구. 한국정신보건사회사업학회지, 6, 5-24.

5.

윤충한 (1993). 정신과 연구대상 환자의 동의능력에 대한 조사. 신경정신의학, 32(2), 231-239.

6.

이선규, 전효숙, 장욱 (2003). 동의능력에 있는 미성년자의 치료의사결정. 연세학술논집, 38, 179-200.

7.

이명우 (1998). 의료행위에 있어서 환자의 동의능력. 건국대학교 대학원 논문집, 47, 125-142.

8.

전우택 (1993). 정신의학과 윤리. 신경정신의학, 32(1), 14-27.

9.

정인원, 신철진, 손정우, 서동우 (2003). 정신보건신판위원회의 계속입원치료 심사에 관한 연구. 신경정신의학, 42(4), 520-527.9

10.

Appelbaum, P. S., Mirkin, S. A., & Bateman, A. L. (1981). Empirical Assessment of Competency to Consent to Psychiatric Hospitalization. American Journal of Psychiatry, 138(9), 1170-1176.

11.

Appelbaum, P. S., & Roth, L. H. (1982). Competency to Consent to Research: A Psychiatric Overview. Archives of General Psychiatry, 39, 951-958.

12.

Appelbaum, P. S., & Grisso, T. (1995). The MacArthur Treatment Competence StudyⅠ. Law and Human Behavior, 19(2), 105-126.

13.

Appelbaum, P. S. (2007). Assessment of Patients' Competence to Consent to Treatment. The New England Journal of Medicine, 357, 1834-1840.

14.

Bean, G., Nishisato, S., Rector, N. A., & Glancy, G. (1994). The Psychometric Property of The Competency Interview Schedule. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 39(8), 368-376.

15.

Cairns, R., Clementine, M., Alec, B., Anthony, S. D., Peter, H., Genevra, R., George, S., & Matthew, H. (2005a). Reliability of mental capacity assessments in psychiatric in-patients. British Journal of Psychiatry, 187, 372-378.

16.

Cairns, R., Clementine, M., Alec, B., Anthony, S. D., Peter, H., Genevra, R., George, S., & Matthew, H. (2005b). Prevalence and predictors of mental incapacity in psychiatric in-patients. British Journal of Psychiatry, 187, 379-385.

17.

Carpenter, W. T., James, M. G., Andrienne, C. L., Caleb, A. Q., Robert, R. C., John, J. B., Jeffrey K., & Paul, S. A. (2000). Decisional Capacity for Informed Consent in Schizophrenia Research. Archives of General Psychiatry, 57, 533-538.

18.

Dunn, L. B., Milap, A. N., Barton, W. P., Dilip, V. J., & Elyn, R. S. (2006). Assessing Decisional Capacity for Clinical Research or Treatment: A Review of Instruments. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 163, 1323-1334.

19.

Etchells, E., Peteris, D., Michel, S., Peter, A. S., Julia, M., Gary, N., Mark, K., Gordon, H. G., William, M., & David, S. (1999). assessment of Patient Capacity to Consent to Treatment. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 14, 27-34.

20.

Fan, X., B. Thompson., & L. Wang. (1999). Effects of sample size, estimation method, and model specification on structural equation modeling fit indexes. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 56-83.

21.

Fraguas, D., Fernando, G. S., Esther, C., Sara, T., Juan, J. P., & Alfredo, C. B. (2007). Do psychiatric patients improve their competency to consent to hospitalization after admission? A prospective study in an acute inpatient ward. General Hospital Psychiatry, 29, 54-62.

22.

Grisso, T., & Appelbaum, P. S. (1991). Mentally Ill and Non-Mentally-Ill Patients' Abilities to Understand Informed Consent Disclosures for Medication. Preliminary Date. Law and Human Behavior, 15(4), 377-388.

23.

Grisso, T., & Appelbaum, P. S. (1995). The MacArthur Treatment Competence StudyⅢ. Law and Human Behavior, 19(2), 149-174.

24.

Grisso, T., & Appelbaum, P. S. (1995). Comparison of Standards for assessing patients capacities to make treatment decisions. American Journal of Psychiatry, 152, 1033-1037.

25.

Grisso, T., Appelbaum, P. S., Edward, P. M., & Kenneth, F. (1995). The MacArthur Treatment Competence StudyⅡ. Law and Human Behavior, 19(2), 127-148.

26.

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424–453

27.

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55.

28.

Janofsky, J. S., McCarthy, R. J., & Folstein, M. F. (1992). The Hopkins Competency Assessment Test : A Brief Method for Evaluating Patients' Capacity to Give Informed Consent. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 43(2), 132-136.

29.

Kim, S. Y. H., & Caine, E. D. (2002). Utility and Limits of the Mini Mental State Examination in Evaluating Consent Capacity in Alzheimer's Disease. Psychiatric Services, 53(10), 1322-1324.

30.

Kitamura, F., Atsuko, T., Kazumi, T., Makoto, T., Ikuko, K., Shuuichi, M., & Toshinori, K. (1998). Method for Assessment of Competency to Consent in the Mentally Ill: Rationale, Development, and Comparison with the Medically Ill. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 21(3), 223-244.

31.

Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. A very readable introduction to the subject, with good coverage of assumptions and SEM's relation to underlying regression, factor, and other techniques. NY: Guilford Press.

32.

Palmer, B. W., Nayak, G. V., Dunn, L. B., & Appelbaum, P. S. (2002). Treatment-Related Decision-Making Capacity in Middle-Aged and Older Patients With Psychosis. A Preliminary Study Using the MacCAT-T and HCAT. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 10(2), 207-211.

33.

Palmer, B. W., Dunn, L. B., Depp, C. A., Eyler, L. T., & Jeste, D. V. (2007). Decisional capacity to consent to research among patients with bipolar disorder: comparison with schizophrenia patients and healthy subjects. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 68(5), 689-696.

34.

Schumacker, R. E., & Richard, G. L. (2004). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling, Second edition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

35.

Sturman, E. D. (2005). The capacity to consent treatment and research: A review of standardized assessment tools. Clinical Psychology Review, 25, 954-974.

36.

Vollmann, J., Bauer, H., D. H., & Helmchen, H. (2003). Competence of mentally ill patients: a comparative empirical study. Psychological Medicine, 33, 1463-1471.

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy