Dysfunction of Legalized Internet Gambling: Exploring the Risk of Pathological Gambling and Possibility of Spread to Illegal Gambling

& (2010). Dysfunction of Legalized Internet Gambling: Exploring the Risk of Pathological Gambling and Possibility of Spread to Illegal Gambling. The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, 15(2), 215-225, https://doi.org/10.17315/kjhp.2010.15.2.003

copy

Downloaded
Viewed

PDF Download

Abstract

This study aimed to explore the risk of pathological gambling of legalized Internet gamblers and their possibilities of spread to illegal gambling. In addition, we hoped to shed light on understanding the dysfunction of increasing Internet gambling. To explore the risk of pathological gambling, this study examined the relationships between frequency of gambling behavior and level of problem gambling using a sample of 177 panel members who were selected from an online Internet survey firm. The sample consisted of 108 panel members who participated in legalized Internet gambling and 69 panel members who participated in illegal gambling. The results indicate that the dose-response relationships between frequency of gambling behavior of the legalized Internet gambling group and the level of problem gambling based on DSM-Ⅳ(APA, 1994) were insignificant(r=.061, p>.05), but these relationships in the illegal gambling group were statistically significant(r=.326, p<.01). Furthermore, the index representing symptoms of urge to gamble indicate that both Internet gambling groups were statistically significant(legalized gambling: r=.234, p<.05; illegalized gambling: r=.339, p<.01). In addition, to explore the possibility of gamblers’ spread to illegal gambling, this study examined the relationships between frequencies of both legal and illegal Internet gambling behavior by both types of Internet gambling groups and the results indicated insignificance(r=-.004, p>.05). Differences in starting age of gambling between legal and illegal Internet gambling groups were also investigated, and the results also indicated insignificance(t=-.257, p>.05). Thus, it is concluded that the two types of gambling behavior(legal and illegal) were independent of each other. Finally, we discussed the findings from the results associated with risk management of Internet gambling.

keywords: 인터넷 도박, 병적 도박, 불법 도박, 위험 관리, legalized Internet gambling, pathological gambling, illegal Internet gambling, risk management

Reference

권선중, 김교헌, 성한기, 이민규, 강성군 (2007). 성인과 남자 청소년의 불법 인터넷 도박 문제와 위험요인 그리고 예방전략. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 12, 1-20.

김현정, 김진훈, 신영철, 신호철, Grant, J. E., 이태경(2005). 한국어판 병적도박증상평가척도의 신뢰도와 타당도. 신경정신의학, 44, 682-689.

뉴스토마토 (2009. 10. 16). (국감)이경재 “H게임 환전, 유사도박화 조장”, 법적 제제 강화 시급. http://news.etomato.com/news/etomato_news_read.asp?no=66183 (2010. 4. 2. 접속)

이충기, 이봉구 (2009). 인터넷 갬블러에 대한 갬블링열정척도(GPS)의 적용. 관광학연구, 33, 53-72.

이흥표 (2003). 비합리적 도박신념, 도박동기 및 위험감수 성향과 병적 도박의 관계. 고려대학교 박사 학위 청구논문.

정찬모, 유지연, 황지연 (2007). KISDI 이슈리포트: 온라인 도박의 현황 및 쟁점. 한국정보통신정책연구원.

American Psychiatric Association (1994). DSM-Ⅳ: Diagnostic and Statistical Mannual of Mental Disorders (4rd ed.). Washington, DC: APA.

Grant, J. E., & Kim, S. W. (2001). Demographic and clinical features of 131 adult pathological gamblers. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 62, 957-962.

Griffiths, M. D., & Barnes, A. (2008). Internet gambling:An online empirical study among student gamblers. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 6, 194-204.

10.

Kim, S. W., Grant, J. E., Adson, D., & Shin, Y. C. (2001). Double-blind naltrexone and placebo comparison study in the treatment of pathological gambling. Biological Psychiatry, 49, 914-921.

11.

Ladd, G. T, & Petry, N. M. (2002). Disordered gambling among university-based medical and dental patients: A focus on Internet gambling. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 16, 76–79.

12.

LaPlante, D. A., Schumann, A., LaBrie, R. A., & Shaffer, H. J. (2008). Population trends in internet sports gambling. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 2399-2414.

13.

McNally, R. J. (2003). Progress and controversy in the study of posttraumatic stress disorder. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 229-252.

14.

National Research Council. (1999). Pathological Gambling: A critical review. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

15.

Rousseau, F. L., Vallerand, R. J., Ratelle, C. F., & Provencher, P. J.(2002). Passion and gambling: On the validation of the gambling passion scale (GPS). Journal of Gambling Studies, 18, 45-66.

16.

Shaffer, H. J., LaBrie, R., Scanlan, K. M., & Cummings, T. N. (1994). Pathological gambling among adolescents: Massachusetts Gambling Screen (MAGS). Journal of Gambling Studies, 10, 339-362.

17.

Shaffer, H. J., Peller, A., J., LaPlante, D. A., Nelson, S. E., & LaBrie, R. A. (2010). Toward a paradigm shift in Internet gambling research: From opinion and self-report to actual behavior. Addiction Research & Theory. 18, 270-283.

18.

Wong, I. L. K. (2010). Internet gambling: A school-based survey among Macau students. Social Behavior & Personality, 38, 365-372.

바로가기메뉴

Article Contents

Vol.15 No.2

Dysfunction of Legalized Internet Gambling: Exploring the Risk of Pathological Gambling and Possibility of Spread to Illegal Gambling

Abstract

Reference

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology