데이트 폭력에 대한 가부장/비대칭 패러다임과 성-포괄적 모델의 타당성 제고
The Appropriateness of Patriarchal/Asymmetry Paradigm and Gender-Inclusive Model of Dating Violence
김유정 (삼육대학교)
정구철 (중앙대학교)
양승애 (성신여자대학교)
김보연 (삼육대학교대학원)
- 다운로드 수
- 조회수
Abstract
This study examined the appropriateness of patriarchal/asymmetry paradigm and gender-inclusive model (post patriarchal/asymmetry paradigm) in dating violence. The participants were 341 college students (156 males and 185 females) who had the experience of heterosexual dating relationship, whose ages ranged from 18 to 47. The psychological tests used in this research included the following: Straus' Revised Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS-2), Korean Gender Egalitarianism Scale, Narcissistic Personality Inventory (NPI), and Manifest Needs Questionnaire (MNQ). Results revealed that approximately 97% of students reported the experience of inflicting psychological violence toward their dating partners, and almost half of them had the experience of inflicting physical dating violence. Females reported more frequently experience of inflicting physical dating violence than males, whereas they were more frequently received sexual dating violence than males did. People with experience of both inflicting and receiving of dating violence showed higher patriarchal sex role stereotypes than those who never experienced it and the only inflictors. Patriarchal sex role stereotypes were especially closely related to males' inflicting and receiving of dating violence. Although need for dominance was also predictor of dating violence, patriarchal sex role stereotypes was more determinant for dating violence. Sex role stereotypes in family life, for instance, accounted for the almost 16% of the variance of males' inflicting physical dating violence. This study revealed the appropriateness of patriarchal/asymmetry paradigm for dating violence of Korean college students.
- keywords
- 데이트 폭력, 성역할 고정관념, 자기애성, 군림성향, 가부장/비대칭 패러다임, 성-포괄적모델, dating violence, gender stereotypes, narcissism, need for dominance, patriarchal/asymmetry paradigm, gender-inclusive model
참고문헌
강유임(2002). 청소년의 자기애와 대인관계. 단국대학교 석사학위논문.
김경신, 박옥임, 정혜정(1999). 가부장적 관점에서의 가정폭력: 아내학대를 중심으로. 한국가족관계학회지, 4, 213-239.
김동기(2009). 가정폭력 경험이 대학생의 데이트폭력 가해행동에 미치는 영향: 폭력 허용도의 매개효과를 중심으로. 청소년학연구, 16, 135-159.
김동기, 사공은희(2007). 학교폭력 피해경험이 데이트폭력 가해행동에 미치는 영향과 사회적 지지의 조절효과에 관한 연구. 청소년학연구, 14, 99-124.
김양희, 정경아(2000). 한국형 남녀평등의식검사(Korean Gender Egalitarianism Scale) 개발. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 14, 23-44.
김예정, 김득성(1999). 대학생들의 데이팅 폭력에 영향을 미치는 변인들(I). 대한가정학회지, 37, 187-211.
김유정, 서경현(2009). 폭력적 데이트 관계에서의 충동성과 분노 및 분노조절. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 14, 383-402.
서경현(2001). 이성을 사귀면서도 폭력을 행사하는가? 삼육대학교 학생생활 연구, 5, 91-104.
서경현(2002). 청소년들의 데이트 폭력 가해 행동에 대한 사회학습적 변인들과 분노의 역할. 한국심리학회지: 사회문제, 8, 1-15.
서경현(2004). 고등학생과 대학생의 가정폭력 피해와 데이트 폭력간의 관계에 대한 성의 조절효과. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 9, 147-162.
서경현(2008). 공격적 데이트 폭력 피해 여성의 분노 및 분노표현, 정신병적 경향성, 중독성과 대처방식. 한국심리학회지: 사회문제, 14, 21-39.
서경현(2009). 이성관계에서 행해지는 데이트 폭력에 관한 연구의 개관. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 14, 699-727.
서경현, 안귀여루(2007). 데이트 폭력의 공격적 피해 여성들의 특성과 연인관계에 대한 개입. 한국심리학회지: 사회문제, 13, 77-95.
이영숙(2005). 이성교제중 발생한 폭력. 대한가정학회지, 36, 49-61.
정혜정(2003). 대학생의 가정폭력 경험이 데이팅 폭력가해에 미치는 영향. 대한가정학회지, 41, 73-91.
Aizeman, M., & Kelley, G. (1988). The incidence of violence and acquaintance rape in dating relationships among college men and women. Journal of College Student Development, 29, 305-311.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Washington D.C.: American Psychiatric Association.
Antonio, T., & Hokoda, A. (2009). Gender Variations in dating violence and positive conflict resolution among Mexican adolescents. Violence and Victims, 24, 533-545.
Archer, J. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: a meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126(5), 651-680.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. New York: General Learning Press.
Campbell, J. C., & Kendall-Tackett, K. A. (2004). Intimate partner violence: Implications for women’'s physical and mental health. In K. Kendall-Tackett (Ed.), Handbook of Women, Stress and Trauma (p. 256). New York: Brunner/Routledge.
Cate, R. M., Henton, L., Koval, J., Christopher, F. S., & Lloyd, S. (1982). Premarital abuse: A social psychological perspective. Journal of Family Issues, 3, 79-90.
FBI (2000). Crime in the United States, 1999. Uniform crime reports. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.
Felix, E. D., & McMahon, S. D. (2006). Gender and multiple forms of peer victimization: How do they influence adolescent psychosocial adjustment? Violence and Victims, 21, 707-724.
Foshee, V. (1996). Gender differences in adolescent dating abuse prevalence, types, and injuries. Health Education Research, 11, 275-286.
Foshee, V. A., Bauman, K. E., Arriaga, X .B., Helms, R. W., Koch, G. G., & Linder, G .F. (1998). An evaluation of Safe Dates, an adolescent dating prevention program. American Journal of Public Health, 88, 45-49.
Friedman, J., & Rosenbaum, D. P. (1988). Social Control Theory: The Salience of Components by Age, Gender, and Type of Crime. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 4, 363-381.
Hamel, J. (2009). Dating violence among high school students. International Journal of Men's Health, 8, 41-59.
Henton, J., Cate, R., Koval, J., Llyod, S., & Christopher, F. (1983). Romance and violence in dating relationships. Journal of Family Issues, 4, 467-482.
Hird, M. J. (2000). Am empirical study of adolescent dating aggression in the U. K. Journal of Adolescence, 23(1), 69-78.
Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of Delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Johnson, M., & Leone, J. (2005). The differential effects of intimate terrorism and situational couple violence: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Journal of Family Issues, 26(3), 322-349.
Kaufman, J., & Zigler, E. (1987). Do abused children become abusive parents? American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 57, 186-192.
Kumagai F., & O'Donoghue, G. (1978). Conjugal power and conjugal violence in Japan and the U.S.A. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 9, 211-222.
Kurz, D. (1993). Physical assults by husbands: A major social problem. In R. J. Gelles & D. R. Loseke (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Laner, M. R., & Thompson, J. (1982). Abuse and aggression in courting couples. Deviant Behavior, 3, 384-388.
Lanes, K., & Gwartney-Gibbs, P. (1985). Violence in context of dating and sex. Journal of Family Issues, 6, 45-59.
Levy, B. (1990). Abusive teen dating relationship: An emerging issue for the 1990s. Response, 13, 3-12.
Lichte, E. L., & McCloskey L. A. (2004). The effects of childhood exposure to marital violence on adolescent gender-role beliefs and dating violence. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 344-357.
Lloyd, S, Koval, J., & Cate, R. (1989). Conflict and violence in dating relationships. In M. A. Pirog-Good & J. E. Stets (eds.), Violence in Dating Relationships: Emerging Social Issues. New York: Praeger, 127-142.
Makepeace, James M. (1981). Courtship violence among college students. Family Relations, 30, 97-102.
Marshall, L. L., & Rose, P. (1988). Family of origin and courtship violence. Journal of Counseling and Development, 66, 414-18.
Molidor, C. E., & Tolman, R. M. (1998). Gender and contextual factors in adolescent dating violence. Violence Against Woman, 4, 119-134.
O'Keefe, M. (1997). Predictors of dating violence among high school student. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12, 546-568.
Plass, M. S., & Gessner, J. C. (1983). Violence in courtship relations: A southern sample. Free Inquiry in Creative Sociology, 11, 198-202.
Raskin, R .N., & Hall, C. S. (1979). A narcissistic personality inventory. Psychological Reports, 45, 590.
Raskin, R. N., & Terry, H. (1988). A principal-component analysis of the narcissistic personality inventory and further evidence of its construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 890-902.
Reiss, A. J. (1951). Delinquency as the failure of personal and social controls. American Sociological Review, 16, 196-207.
Riggs, D. S, & O'Leary, K. D. (1989). Intentional falsification in reports of interpartner aggression. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 4, 220-232.
Riggs, D. S., & O'Leary, K. D. (1996). Aggression between heterosexual dating partners: An examination of a causal model of courtship aggression. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 11, 519-540.
Russell, L. M. (1976). The Liberating Word: A Guide to Nonsexist Interpretation of the Bible. Philadelphia: Westminster Press.
Sabina, C., & Straus, M. A. (2008). Poly-victimization by dating partners and mental health among U.S. College Students. Violence and Victims, 23, 667-682.
Steers, R. M., & Braunstein, D. (1976). A Behaviorally-Based Measure of Manifest Needs in Work Settings. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 9, 251-266.
Stets, J. E., & Pirog-Good, M. A. (1987). Violence in dating relationship. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50, 530-548.
Straus, M. A. (1973). A general systems theory approach to a theory of violence between family members. Social Science Information, 12, 105-125.
Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D. B. (1996). The Revised Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues 17, 283-316.
Sugarman, D. B., & Hotaling, G. T. (1989). Dating violence: Prevalence, context and risk markers. In M. A. Pirog-Good & J. E. Sets (Ed.), Violence in dating relationships (pp. 3-33). New York: Preager Publishers.
Watson, P. J. (2005). Complexity of narcissism and a continuum of self-esteem regulation. In M. Maj, H. S. Akisal, J. E. Mezzich, & A. Okasha (Eds.), Personality disorders (pp. 336–338). New York: Wiley.
Yllo, K. A. (1993). Through a feminist lens: Gender, power, and violence. In R. J. Gelles & D. R. Loseke (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
- 다운로드 수
- 조회수
- 0KCI 피인용수
- 0WOS 피인용수