바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

자기 양가감, 사고-실제 융합과 강박 경향성의 관계

Relations of Self-Ambivalence, Thought-Reality Fusion, and Obsessive-Compulsive Tendency

한국심리학회지: 건강 / The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, (P)1229-070X; (E)2713-9581
2012, v.17 no.1, pp.181-199
https://doi.org/10.17315/kjhp.2012.17.1.010
윤경희 (국립서울병원)
박기환 (가톨릭대학교)
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

초록

본 연구는 자기 양가감과 사고-실제 융합이 침투적 인지, 이에 대한 평가, 통제방략을 포함하는 강박 경향성의 전 과정과 어떻게 관련을 맺고 있는지 알아보고자 하였다. 자기 양가감과 사고-실제 융합이 강박 경향성에 대하여 가지는 영향력, 강박 경향성에 대한 자기 양가감 및 사고-실제 융합의 상호작용 등을 탐색하였다. 대학생과 대학원생, 대학 졸업생 314명을 대상으로 자기 양가감 척도, 사고-실제 융합 척도, 침투적 인지 질문지, 침투 해석 질문지 단축형, 불안 증상 질문지, 우울 증상 질문지, 자기 존중감 질문지를 실시하였다. 이를 위해 우선 Bhar(2004)의 자기 양가감 척도를 번안하여 타당화 하였다. 상관 분석 및 위계적 회귀 분석을 통해 나타난 연구 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 자기 양가감 및 사고-실제 융합은 침투적 인지의 발생, 이에 대한 평가, 통제방략을 포함하는 강박 경향성의 전 과정과 유의한 정적상관을 보였으며, 상관은 자존감, 불안, 우울을 통제하고도 유의하였다. 둘째, 자기 양가감과 사고-실제 융합은 강박 경향성의 전 과정에서 불안, 우울, 자존감을 통제하고도 유의한 고유 변량을 나타내었다. 셋째, 자기 양가감이 강박 경향성에 미치는 효과는 사고-실제 융합의 정도에 따라 달라지지 않았다. 이와 같은 연구 결과의 임상적 함의와 본 연구의 제한점을 논의하였다.

keywords
자기 양가감, 사고-실제 융합, 강박 경향성, 침투적 인지, 평가, 통제방략, self-ambivalence, thought-reality fusion, obsessive-compulsive tendency, intrusive thought, appraisal, control strategy

Abstract

This study was purposed to verify relations of self-ambivalence, thought-reality fusion, and obsessive-compulsive tendency, and the interaction of self-ambivalence and thought-reality fusion. The association was investigated between self-ambivalence, thought-reality fusion and obsessive-compulsive tendency, including intrusive thoughts, appraisal and control strategies to them. Before that, the Self-Ambivalence Measure (SAM) was translated into Korean which was validated to measure self-ambivalence. A total of 314 university students and graduates responded to the questionnaire, which contained Self-Ambivalance Measure (SAM), Thought-Reality Fusion Scale (TRFS), Revised Obsessional Intrusions Inventory (ROII), shortened form of Interpretation of Intrusions Inventory (III), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and Self-Esteem Scale(SES). Relation analysis and hierarchical multiple regression were used to analyze the data. The results were as follows: (1) self-ambivalence and thought-reality fusion were related significantly to obsessive-compulsive tendency and the relations were significant, even after controlling the variables, such as self-esteem, depression, and anxiety. (2) Self-ambivalnce and thought- reality fusion had significant main effects on obsessive-compulsive tendency, which includes intrusive thoughts, appraisal and control strategies even after controlling the variables, such as self-esteem, depression, and anxiety. (3) The interaction of self-ambivalence and thought-reality fusion was not significant to the effect on the obsessive-compulsive tendency. Additionally, implications and limitations of this study were discussed.

keywords
자기 양가감, 사고-실제 융합, 강박 경향성, 침투적 인지, 평가, 통제방략, self-ambivalence, thought-reality fusion, obsessive-compulsive tendency, intrusive thought, appraisal, control strategy

참고문헌

1.

권석만 (1992). Differential roles of dysfunctional attitudes and automatic thoughts in depression: an inegrated cognitive model of depression. Queensland 대학교 박사학위 논문.

2.

국립국어연구원 (1999). 표준국어대사전. 서울: 두산동아.

3.

김기환 (2006). 사고-행위 융합과 사고-사건 융합의 측면에서 본 강박사고의 하위유형. 서울대학교석사학위논문.

4.

김기환 (2008). 사고-행위 융합과 사고-사건 융합의 측면에서 본 강박사고의 하위유형. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 27(1), 167-189.

5.

이영호, 송종용 (1991). BDI, SDS, MMPI-D 척도의 신뢰도 및 타당도에 대한 연구. 한국심리학회지:임상, 10(1), 98-113.

6.

이한주 (1999). 자생성 강박사고와 반응성 강박사고에대한 평가와 통제방략의 차이. 서울대학교 석사학위논문.

7.

이한주 (2002). 자생성 강박사고와 반응성 강박사고; 임상집단 연구. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 21(1),57-74.

8.

이훈진, 원호택 (1995). 자기개발과 편집증적 경향. 서울대학교 사회과학대학 심리과학연구소 4(2),15-29.

9.

American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed..). Washington, DC.: Author.

10.

Beck, A., Ward, C. H., Mendalson, M., Mock, J. & Erbaugh, J. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4, 561-571.

11.

Beck, A., Epstein, N., Brown, G., & Steer, R. (1988). An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: Psychometric properties. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 56, 893-897.

12.

Berle, D., & Starcevic, V. (2005). Thought-action fusion: Review of the literature and future directions. Clinical Psychology Review, 25, 263-284.

13.

Bhar, S. (2004). Self-Ambivalence in Obsessive- Compulsive Disorder. Unpublished Ph. D. thesis, University of Melbourne. Melbourne, Australia.

14.

Bhar, S., & Kyrios, M. (2000). Ambivalent selfesteem as meta-vulnerability for obsessivecompulsive disorder. In R. G. Craven & H. W. Marsh (Eds.), Self-concept theory, research and practice: Advances from the new millennium(pp. 143-156). Sydney, Australia: Self-concept Enhancement and Learning Facilitation Research Centre, University of Western Sydney.

15.

Bhar, S., & Kyrios, M. (2007). An investigation of self-ambivalence in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, 1845-1857.

16.

Clark, D. A. (1989). A schema control model of negative thoughts. Paper presented at the World Congress of Cognitive Therapy, Oxford, UK.

17.

Clark, D. A., & Purdon, C. L. (1993). New perspectives for a cognitive theory of obsessions. Australian Psychologist, 28, 161-167.

18.

Clark, D. M. (2004). Cognitive-behavioral therapy for OCD. New York, New York: The Guilford Press.

19.

Doron, G., Kyrios, M., & Moulding, R. (2007). Sensitive domain of self-concept in obsessive-compulsive disorder(OCD): Further evidence for a multidimensional model of OCD. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 21, 433-444.

20.

Freeston, M. H., Ladouceur, R., Rhéaume, J., & Leger, E. (1998). Applications of cognitive models of obsessive-compulsive disorder to clinical practice. Behavior and Cognitive Therapy Today (First Edition) (pp. 117-126). Selected Proceedings of the XXVII Congress of the European Association for Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies, Venice 1997.

21.

Freeston M. H., & Ladouceur, R. (1997). What do patient do with their obsessive thoughts? Behavior Research and Therapy, 35, 335-348.

22.

Guidano V., & Liotti, G. (1983). Cognitive processes and emotional disorders. New York, New York: The Guilford Press.

23.

Julien, D., O'Connor, K. P., & Aardema, F. (2007). Intrusive thoughts, obsessions, and appraisals in obsessive-compulsive disorder: a critical review. Clinical Psychology Review, 27, 366-383.

24.

Markus, H. (1977). Self-schemata and processing information about the self. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 35, 63-78.

25.

Lee, H. J., & Kwon, S. M. (2003). Two different types of obsession: autogenous obsessions and reactive obsessions. Behavior Research and Therapy, 41, 11-19.

26.

Obsessive Compulsive Cognitions Working Group(OCCWG) (1997). Cognitive assessment ofobsessive-compulsive disorder. BehaviorResearch and Therapy, 35, 667-681.

27.

Obsessive Compulsive Cognitions Working Group(OCCWG) (2001). Development and initialvalidation of the Obsessive BeliefsQuestionnaire and the Interpretation ofIntrusions Inventory. Behavior Research andTherapy, 39, 987-1006.

28.

Purdon, C. L., & Clark, D. A. (1993). Obsessive intrusive thoughts in nonclinical subjects. part I. Content and relation with depressive, anxious and obsessional symptoms. Behavior Research and Therapy, 31, 713-720.

29.

Purdon, C. L., & Clark, D. A. (1994). Perceived control and appraisals of obsessional intrusive thoughts: A replication and extension. Behavioral and Cognitive Psychology, 22, 269-285.

30.

Purdon C. L., & Clark, D. A. (1999). Metacognition and obsessions. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 6, 102-110.

31.

Rachman, S. J. (1993). Obsessions, responsibility and guilt. Behavior Research and Therapy, 31, 149-154.

32.

Rachman, S. J. (1997). A cognitive theory of obsessions. Behavior Research and Therapy, 35, 793-802.

33.

Rachman, S. J. (1998). A cognitive theory of obsessions: elaborations. Behavior Research and Therapy, 36, 385-401.

34.

Rachman, S. J. (2003). The treatment of obsessions. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

35.

Rachman, S. J., & de Silva, P. (1978). Abnormal and normal obsessions. Behavior Research and Therapy, 16, 233-248.

36.

Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

37.

Rowa, K., Purdon, C., Summerfeldt, L. J., & Antony, M. M. (2005). Why are some obsessions more upsetting than others? Behavior Research and Therapy, 43, 1453-1465.

38.

Safran, J., Segal, Z., Hill, C., & Whiffen, V. (1990). Refining strategies for research on self-representations in emotional disorders. Cognitive Therapy and Research 14, 143-160.

39.

Salkovskis, P. M. (1985). Obsessional-compulsive problem: A cognitive-behavioral analysis. Behavior Research and Therapy, 23, 571-583.

40.

Salkovskis, P. M., & Harrison, J. (1984). Abnormal and normal obsessions: A replicaion. Behavior Research and Therapy, 22, 1-4.

41.

Turner, S. M., Beidel, D. C., Stanley, M. A., & Heiser, N. (2000). Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder. In P. B. Sutker & H. E. Adams(Eds.), Comprehensive Handbook of Psychopathology, 3rd ed(pp. 155-182). New York, New York: Springer.

42.

Waterman, A. S. (1982). Identity development from adolescence to adulthood: An extension of theory and a review of research. Developmental Psychology, 18, 341-358.

43.

Wells, A. (1997). Cognitive therapy of anxiety disorders: A practice manual and conceptual guide. Chichester, UK: Wiley.

44.

Wells, A., & Matthews, G. (1994). Attention and emotion: A clinical perspective. Hove, UK: Erlbaum..

한국심리학회지: 건강