바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Dealing with Ethical Issues in the Fields of Health Psychology

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology / The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, (P)1229-070X; (E)2713-9581
2012, v.17 no.4, pp.767-780
https://doi.org/10.17315/kjhp.2012.17.4.001

  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Korean Health Psychological Association Ethics Code set forth enforceable rules for conduct as health psychologists in professional roles. In order to resolve ethical problems health psychologists encounter in various situations, they need to examine and understand the particular situations and their risks as well as the Ethics Code. In this article, ethical problems that occurred or are bound to occur in a variety of situations such as caring the elderly and terminally ill patients, telehealth, conflicts with organizations were discussed in terms of their nature and approaches toward resolution reviewing relevant principles and guidelines. This study intends to help health psychologists take an ethical course of action in difficult and complicated situations or when there are conflicts between the ethical and realistic demands.

keywords
윤리, 윤리강령, 현장윤리, 현장지침, ethics, ethical principles, ethics in practice, practice guidelines

Reference

1.

한국건강심리학회 상벌 및 윤리위원회 (2004). 한국건강심리학회 윤리강령 (2003, 2004년 8월 수정). Retrieved from http://www.healthpsy.or.kr/ sub01_rule2.htm

2.

American Psychological Association. (2009). APA Polices on End of Life Issues and Care: APA Resolution on Assisted Suicide. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/about/ policy/ assisted-suicide.aspx

3.

American Psychological Association. (2010). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct (2002, Amended June 1, 2010). Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspx

4.

American Psychological Association. (2010). More states reimburse for telehealth services. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/ monitor/2012/07-08/telehealth.aspx

5.

American Psychological Association. (2012). Guidelines for the evaluation of dementia and age-related cognitive change. American Psychologist, 67, 1-9.

6.

American Psychological Association Ethics committee.(2002). Rules and procedures. AmericanPsychologist, 57, 626-645.

7.

American Psychological Association Working Group on Assisted Suicide and End-of-Life Decisions. (2000). Report to the Board of Directors of APA from the Working Group on Assisted Suicide and End-of-Life Decisions. Retrieved from http://www.apa. org/ pubs/info/reports/aseol.aspx

8.

Bernard, J. L., Murry, M., & Little, M. (1987). The failure of clinical psychologists to apply understood ethical principles. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 18, 489-491.

9.

Graf, C., Wager, E., Bowman, A., Fiack, S., Scott-Lichter, D., & Robinson, A. (2007). Best Practice Guidelines on Publication Ethics: a Publisher’'s Perspective, International Journal of clinical practice, 61(Suppl. 152), 1-26.

10.

Mallen M. J. & Vogel, D. L. (2005). The Practical Aspects of Online Counseling: Ethics, Training, Technology, and Competency. The Counseling Psychologist, 33(6), 776-818.

11.

Pochard, F., Azoulay, E., Chevret, S., Lemaire, F., Hubert, P., Canoui, P., et al. (2001). Symptoms of anxiety and depression in family members of intensive care unit patients: Ethical hypothesis regarding decision-making capacity. Critical Care Medicine, 29(10), 1893-1897.

12.

Pope, K. S., Tabachnick, B. G., & Keith-Spiegel, P.(1987). Ethics of practice: The beliefs andbehaviors of psychologists as therapists.American Psychologist, 42, 993-1006.

13.

Winograd, R. (2012). The balance between providing support, prolonging suffering, and promoting death: Ethical issues surrounding psychological treatment of terminally ill client. Ethics & Behavior, 22, 44-59.

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology