바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology

  • KOREAN
  • P-ISSN1229-070X
  • E-ISSN2713-9581
  • KCI

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.20 No.3

Citation Share

Effects of 'Action/Inaction' Frame-Fit on Sequential Self-Regulation

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology / The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, (P)1229-070X; (E)2713-9581
2015, v.20 no.3, pp.515-526
https://doi.org/10.17315/kjhp.2015.20.3.002


& (2015). Effects of 'Action/Inaction' Frame-Fit on Sequential Self-Regulation. The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, 20(3), 515-526, https://doi.org/10.17315/kjhp.2015.20.3.002

Abstract

The present study investigated the effects of 'action/inaction' frame-fit on individuals' sequential self-regulation. We employed a situation where individuals engaged in two actions that require self-regulation in a sequential manner (i.e., playing a game, then working on an experimental task). We induced a frame-fit('action'-'action') or a frame-misfit ('inaction'-'action') using task instructions ("play the game for 5 min., then work on the task" vs. "stop the game after 5 min., then work on the task"). A total of 31 college students were randomly assigned to the two conditions of the experiment. Results indicated that male participants regulated the amount of time spent on the game more effectively in the frame-fit condition than in the frame-misfit condition. No significant effects were observed among female participants. Implications and limitations of this finding along with future research direction are discussed.

keywords
자기조절, 순차적 자기조절, 조절틀, 조절틀 부합, Self-regulation, sequential regulation, regulatory frame, frame-fit

Reference

1.

최훈석, 김교헌, 용정순, 김금미 (2009). 적응적 게임활용 척도 개발 및 타당화. 한국심리학회지: 문화 및사회문제, 15(4), 565-588.

2.

최훈석, 용정순, 김교헌 (2011), 청소년 게임이용에 대한학부모의 인식 조사 연구. 한국심리학회지: 문화 및사회문제, 17(4), 435-459.

3.

Albarracin, D., Handley, I. M., Noguchi, K., McCulloch, K. C., Li, H., Leeper, J., Brown, R. D., Earl, A., & Hart, W. (2008). Increasing and decreasing motor and cognitive output: A model of general action and inaction goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 510-523.

4.

Albarracin, D., Hepler, J., & Tannenbaum, M. (2011). General action and inaction goals: Their behavioral, cognitive, and affective origins and influences. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 119-123.

5.

Albarracin, D., Wang, W., & Leeper, J. (2009). Immediate increase in food intake following exercise messages. Obesity, 17, 1451-1452.

6.

Baumeister, R. F. (2002). Yielding to Temptation:Self-Control Failure, Impulsive Purchasing, and Consumer Behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 670-676.

7.

Baumeister, R. F., Schmeichel, B. J., & Vohs, K. D. (2007). Self-regulation and the executive function:The self as controlling agent. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social Psychology: Handbook of basic principles(2nd ed., pp. 1-70). New York: Guilford.

8.

Bianco, A. T., Higgins, E. T., & Klem, A. (2003). How “fun/importance" fit impacts performance:Relating implicit theories to instructions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1091-1103.

9.

Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1981). Attention and Self-Regulation: A Control-Theory Approach to Human Behavior, NewYork: Springer.

10.

Hepler, J., Albarracin, D., McCulloch, K. C., & Noguchi, K. (2012). Being active and impulsive:The role of goals for action and inaction in self-control. Motivation and Emotion. 36, 416-424.

11.

Higgins, E. T. (1998). Promotion and prevention:Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 1-46.

12.

Higgins, E. T. (2007). Regulatory Fit. In Shah, James, Y., Gardner, & Wendi, L. (Eds.), Handbook of Motivation Science(pp. 356-372). New York:Guilford.

13.

Hong, J., & Lee, A. Y. (2008). Be Fit and Be Strong:Mastering Self‐Regulation through Regulatory Fit. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(5), 682-695.

14.

Krishnamurthy, P., Carter, P., & Blair, E. (2001). Attribute framing and goal framing effects in health decisions. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 85(2), 382-399.

15.

Krishnamurthy, P., & Prokopec, S. (2010). Resisting that triple-chocolate cake: Mental Budgets and Self-Control. Journal Of Consumer Research, 37, 68-79.

16.

Levin, P., Schneider, L., & Gaeth, J. (1998). All Frames Are Not Created Equal: A Typology and Critical Analysis of Framing Effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 76(2), 149-188.

17.

Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1994). Goal setting theory. In H. F. O'Neil, Jr., & M. Drillings (Eds.), Motivation: Theory and research (pp. 13-29). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

18.

McElroy, T., & Seta, J. J. (2003). Framing effects:An analytic–holistic perspective. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(6), 610-617.

19.

Sanna, L. J., Parks, C. D., Chang, E. C., & Carter, S. E. (2005). The Hourglass Is Half Full or Half Empty: Temporal Framing and the Group Planning Fallacy. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 9(3), 173-188.

20.

Tversky, R. H., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The Framing of Decision and Rationality of Choice. Science, 211, 453-458.

21.

Vohs, K. D., & Baumeister, R. F. (2011). Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications. Guilford Press.

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy