바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.20 No.3

Citation Share

순차적 자기조절 상황에서 ‘하기’와 ‘중단하기’ 조절틀의 효과

Effects of 'Action/Inaction' Frame-Fit on Sequential Self-Regulation

한국심리학회지: 건강 / The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, (P)1229-070X; (E)2713-9581
2015, v.20 no.3, pp.515-526
https://doi.org/10.17315/kjhp.2015.20.3.002
조혜연 (성균관대학교 심리학과)
최훈석 (성균관대학교)
조혜연, & 최훈석. (2015). 순차적 자기조절 상황에서 ‘하기’와 ‘중단하기’ 조절틀의 효과. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 20(3), 515-526, https://doi.org/10.17315/kjhp.2015.20.3.002

초록

개인이 선행 자기조절과 후속 목표 수행을 순차적으로 실행하는 상황에서 선행 자기조절 과제(게임)와 후속 목표(실험과제) 모두를 ‘하기’로 틀짓기한 조절틀 부합조건(예: ‘10분간 게임하고 과제하기’)과 선행 자기조절 과제는 ‘중단하기’로 그리고 후속 목표 수행은 ‘하기’로 틀짓기한 조절틀비부합조건(예: ‘10분 후 게임 중단하고 과제하기’)의 자기조절 효과성을 실험연구를 통해서 검증했다. 총 31명의 남녀 대학생들을 조절틀 부합 조건과 비부합 조건에 무선배정하고, 자기조절 과제와 후속 과제의 지시문을 통해 조절틀 부합(‘하기’-‘하기’, ‘중단하기’-‘하기’)을 조작했다. 실험결과, 남자 참가자들의 경우 선행 자기조절 과제에 해당하는 게임에서 조절틀 부합 조건이 비부합 조건보다 게임 지속 시간이 짧아서 조절 수행이 우수한 것으로 나타났다. 반면에, 여자 참가자들에서는 실험 조건 간 차이가 없었다. 본 연구 결과의 시사점과 연구의 제한점 및 장래 연구 방향을 논의하였다.

keywords
자기조절, 순차적 자기조절, 조절틀, 조절틀 부합, Self-regulation, sequential regulation, regulatory frame, frame-fit

Abstract

The present study investigated the effects of 'action/inaction' frame-fit on individuals' sequential self-regulation. We employed a situation where individuals engaged in two actions that require self-regulation in a sequential manner (i.e., playing a game, then working on an experimental task). We induced a frame-fit('action'-'action') or a frame-misfit ('inaction'-'action') using task instructions ("play the game for 5 min., then work on the task" vs. "stop the game after 5 min., then work on the task"). A total of 31 college students were randomly assigned to the two conditions of the experiment. Results indicated that male participants regulated the amount of time spent on the game more effectively in the frame-fit condition than in the frame-misfit condition. No significant effects were observed among female participants. Implications and limitations of this finding along with future research direction are discussed.

keywords
자기조절, 순차적 자기조절, 조절틀, 조절틀 부합, Self-regulation, sequential regulation, regulatory frame, frame-fit

참고문헌

1.

최훈석, 김교헌, 용정순, 김금미 (2009). 적응적 게임활용 척도 개발 및 타당화. 한국심리학회지: 문화 및사회문제, 15(4), 565-588.

2.

최훈석, 용정순, 김교헌 (2011), 청소년 게임이용에 대한학부모의 인식 조사 연구. 한국심리학회지: 문화 및사회문제, 17(4), 435-459.

3.

Albarracin, D., Handley, I. M., Noguchi, K., McCulloch, K. C., Li, H., Leeper, J., Brown, R. D., Earl, A., & Hart, W. (2008). Increasing and decreasing motor and cognitive output: A model of general action and inaction goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 510-523.

4.

Albarracin, D., Hepler, J., & Tannenbaum, M. (2011). General action and inaction goals: Their behavioral, cognitive, and affective origins and influences. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 119-123.

5.

Albarracin, D., Wang, W., & Leeper, J. (2009). Immediate increase in food intake following exercise messages. Obesity, 17, 1451-1452.

6.

Baumeister, R. F. (2002). Yielding to Temptation:Self-Control Failure, Impulsive Purchasing, and Consumer Behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 670-676.

7.

Baumeister, R. F., Schmeichel, B. J., & Vohs, K. D. (2007). Self-regulation and the executive function:The self as controlling agent. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social Psychology: Handbook of basic principles(2nd ed., pp. 1-70). New York: Guilford.

8.

Bianco, A. T., Higgins, E. T., & Klem, A. (2003). How “fun/importance" fit impacts performance:Relating implicit theories to instructions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1091-1103.

9.

Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1981). Attention and Self-Regulation: A Control-Theory Approach to Human Behavior, NewYork: Springer.

10.

Hepler, J., Albarracin, D., McCulloch, K. C., & Noguchi, K. (2012). Being active and impulsive:The role of goals for action and inaction in self-control. Motivation and Emotion. 36, 416-424.

11.

Higgins, E. T. (1998). Promotion and prevention:Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 1-46.

12.

Higgins, E. T. (2007). Regulatory Fit. In Shah, James, Y., Gardner, & Wendi, L. (Eds.), Handbook of Motivation Science(pp. 356-372). New York:Guilford.

13.

Hong, J., & Lee, A. Y. (2008). Be Fit and Be Strong:Mastering Self‐Regulation through Regulatory Fit. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(5), 682-695.

14.

Krishnamurthy, P., Carter, P., & Blair, E. (2001). Attribute framing and goal framing effects in health decisions. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 85(2), 382-399.

15.

Krishnamurthy, P., & Prokopec, S. (2010). Resisting that triple-chocolate cake: Mental Budgets and Self-Control. Journal Of Consumer Research, 37, 68-79.

16.

Levin, P., Schneider, L., & Gaeth, J. (1998). All Frames Are Not Created Equal: A Typology and Critical Analysis of Framing Effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 76(2), 149-188.

17.

Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1994). Goal setting theory. In H. F. O'Neil, Jr., & M. Drillings (Eds.), Motivation: Theory and research (pp. 13-29). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

18.

McElroy, T., & Seta, J. J. (2003). Framing effects:An analytic–holistic perspective. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(6), 610-617.

19.

Sanna, L. J., Parks, C. D., Chang, E. C., & Carter, S. E. (2005). The Hourglass Is Half Full or Half Empty: Temporal Framing and the Group Planning Fallacy. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 9(3), 173-188.

20.

Tversky, R. H., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The Framing of Decision and Rationality of Choice. Science, 211, 453-458.

21.

Vohs, K. D., & Baumeister, R. F. (2011). Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications. Guilford Press.

한국심리학회지: 건강

논문 투고 OA 정책