바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology

  • KOREAN
  • P-ISSN1229-070X
  • E-ISSN2713-9581
  • KCI

The Validation of the Korean Version of the Psychological Well-Being-Post- Traumatic Changes Questionnaire

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology / The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, (P)1229-070X; (E)2713-9581
2016, v.21 no.1, pp.195-224
https://doi.org/10.17315/kjhp.2016.21.1.010


Abstract

The purpose of this study was to validate the Korean version of the Psychological Well-Being-Post-Traumatic Changes Questionnaire( PWB-PTCQ) with a Korean adult sample. This study also examined the relative influence of variables of changes in psychological well-being following a traumatic event. To achieve this purpose, this study conducts a research through the following procedures. First, eighteen items originally developed by Regal and Joseph and validated by Joseph et al(2012a), went through a translation and back-translation procedure to be adapted prior to data collection. Second, in the preliminary study, item analysis, reliability analysis, and exploratory factor analysis(EFA) were conducted in a 125 adult sample who had experienced traumatic events. Third, in the confirmatory factor analysis(CFA) an adult sample of 306 who had experienced traumatic events different from subjects were recruited for EFA. The result of the confirmatory factor analysis indicated that PWB-PTCQ consisted of 2 factors and sixteen. Fourth, Statistical analyses through the concurrent, convergent and discriminant validity test revealed that the PWB-PTCQ was a reliable and valid measure for changes in psychological well-being following a traumatic event of Korean adults. Concurrent validity was good with PTGI. Convergent validity with optimism, gratitude, cognitive reappraisal were verified respectively showing significantly positive correlation. Also, discriminant validity with distress after experiencing trauma showed a significantly negative correlation. In the next study of analysis on PWB-PTCQ related variables, the study examined the relative influence of variables of changes in psychological well-being following a traumatic event in a 222 adult sample who had experienced traumatic events. At first, changes in psychological well-being following a traumatic event showed a positive correlation with self-resilience and positive reaction to trauma disclosures, and showed a negative correlation with a negative reaction to trauma disclosures. Next, analysis of the variable affection the changes in psychological well-being following a traumatic event, the variable that exerted the most effect on changes in psychological well-being following a traumatic event was self-resilience followed by a positive reaction to trauma disclosures.

keywords
외상 후 안녕감 변화, 외상 후 성장, 타당화 연구, 자아탄력성, 외상경험 개방에 대한 사회적 반응, psychological well-Being-post-traumatic changes, post traumatic growth, validation, ego resilience, social response for disclosure of traumatic experiences

Reference

1.

권선중, 김교헌 (2007). 한국판 스트레스 관련 성장 척도(K-SRGS-R)의 타당화 연구. 연차학술발표대회 논문집, 2007.

2.

권선중, 김교헌, 이홍석 (2006). 한국판 감사성향 척도(K-GQ-6)의 신뢰도 및 타당도, 한국심리학회지:건강, 11(1), 117-190.

3.

김나정 (2015). 외상경험 개방에 대한 사회적 반응과 우울의 관계에서 외상 후 인지의 매개효과. 이화여자대학교 석사학위논문.

4.

김명소, 김혜원, 차경호 (2001). 심리적 안녕감의 구성개념분석: 한국 성인 남녀를 대상으로, 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 15(2), 19-39.

5.

김미영, 김금순 (2005). 뇌혈관 수술 환자의 삶의 질과관련 요인. 재활간호학회지, 8(1), 5-12.

6.

김보라 (2010). 자아탄력성과 삶의 의미가 외상 후 성장에 미치는 영향: 의미추구와 의미발견의 매개효과, 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 22(1), 117-136.

7.

김에스더 (2014). 감사성향이 외상 후 성장에 미치는 영향: 사회적 지지와 자아탄력성의 매개효과. 성신여자대학교 석사학위논문.

8.

김현옥 (2010). 아동의 사회적 관계망이 역량지각 및 자아탄력성과 심리적 안녕감에 미치는 영향. 동덕여자대학교 박사학위논문.

9.

박예슬 (2013). 외상에 대한 의도적 반추와 심리적 수용이 외상 후 성장에 미치는 영향. 가톨릭대학교 석사학위논문.

10.

박은희 (1997). 자아탄력성, 지능 및 학업성취도와의 관계연구. 충남대학교 석사학위논문.

11.

단두리 (2013). 자아탄력성 및 자기노출이 외상 후 성장에 미치는 영향: 의도적 반추의 매개효과를 중심으로. 성신여자대학교 석사학위논문.

12.

손재민 (2005). 정서조절방략 사용에서의 개인차. 서울대학교 석사학위논문.

13.

송승훈, 이홍석, 박준호, 김교헌 (2009). 한국판 외상 후성장 척도의 타당도 및 신뢰도 연구. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 14(1), 193-214.

14.

송주연, 이희경 (2010). 소아암 환아 어머니의 희망과삶의 의미가 외상 후 성장에 미치는 영향: 삶의 의미를 매개로. 상담학연구 11(4), 1501-1517.

15.

신선영, 정남운 (2012). 삶의 의미와 사회적 지지가 외상 후 성장에 미치는 영향: 성장적 반추를 매개변인으로. 人間理解, 33(2), 217-235.

16.

신우열, 김민규, 김주환(2009). 회복탄력성 검사 지수의개발 및 타당도 검증. 한국청소년 연구, 20(4), 105-131.

17.

신현숙 (2005). 청소년의 낙관성 및 비관성과 심리적 적응의 관계에서 대처의 매개효과. 청소년학연구, 12(3), 165-192.

18.

심기선, 안현의 (2014). 한국판 외상경험 개방에 대한사회적 반응 척도(K-SRQ) 타당화. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 26(2), 271-298.

19.

안현의, 주혜선 (2012). 외상 후 스트레스 장애와 관련된 자서전적 외상 기억의 조직화 특성. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 31(1), 197-220.

20.

양계령 (2008). 심리적 학대와 자아탄력성이 복합 PTSD 에 미치는 효과: 가정폭력 피해여성을 중심으로. 강원대학교 석사학위논문.

21.

양귀화, 김종남 (2014). 외상 후 성장 과정에 대한 분석:정서조절곤란, 침습적 반추, 의도적 반추의 삼중매개효과와 낙관성의 조절효과. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 19(4), 1041-1065.

22.

오수미 (2014). 간호사의 근로환경, 자아탄력성과 외상후 스트레스 증후군(PTSS)과의 관계. 경상대학교 석사학위논문.

23.

우종필 (2012). 구조방적식모델 개념과 이해. 한나래출판사.

24.

위종희, 조규판 (2014). 아동이 지각한 가족건강성, 서울: 사회적 지지, 스트레스 대처행동 및 심리적 안녕감 간의 구조관계분석. 학습자중심교과연구, 14(8), 237-264.

25.

유란경 (2012). 낙관성이 외상 후 성장에 미치는 영향:사건-관련 반추 및 대처의 조절효과를 중심으로. 아주대학교 석사학위논문.

26.

유효정 (2012). 만성화 된 외상 후 스트레스 장애를 가진 참전군인의 사회적응과 외상 후 성장에 미치는심리적 요인 : 대처전략, 용서, 사회적 지지를 중심으로. 덕성여자대학교 석사학위논문.

27.

은헌정, 권태완, 이선미, 김태형, 최말례, 조수진 (2005). 한국판 사건충격척도 수정판의 신뢰도 및 타당도연구. J Korean Neuropsychiatre Assoc, 44(3).

28.

이수림 (2013). 외상 유형이 외상 후 성장 및 지혜에 미치는 영향: 사회적 지지와 대처의 매개효과. 한국심리학회지 사회문제, 19(3), 319-341.

29.

임선영, 권석만 (2013). 역경 후 성장에 이르는 인지적처리방략과 신념체계의 특성. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 32(3), 567-588.

30.

정인명 (2009). 의도적 반추와 낙관성이 외상 후 성장에미치는 영향. 계명대학교 석사학위논문.

31.

정지혜 (2014). 사회적 지지, 심리적 유연성, 반추가 외상후 성장에 미치는 영향. 경상대학교 석사학위논문.

32.

조금진 (2014). 중환자실 간호사의 외상 후 스트레스장애(PTSD) 증상 및 영향요인. 동아대학교 석사학위논문.

33.

최보라 (2007). 사회적 바람직성 척도 타당화. 이화여자대학교 석사학위논문.

34.

최승미 (2008). 외상 후 성장 관련 변인의 탐색. 고려대학교 박사학위 논문.

35.

한덕웅, 이창호, 탁진국 (1993). Spiellberger의 상태-특성 불안 검사의 표준화. 한국 심리학회 93 연차대회 학술발표 논문집, 505-512.

36.

Abraido-Lanza, A. F., Guier, C., & Colon, R. M. (1998). Psychological thriving among Latinas with chronic illness. Journal of Social Issues, 54, 405-424.

37.

Affleck, G., & Tennen, H. (1996). Construing benefits from adversity: Adaptational significance and dispositional underpinnings. Journal of Personality, 64(4), 899-922.

38.

Ahrens, C. A., Campbell, R., Ternier-Thames, K., Wasco, S., & Sefl, T. (2007). Deciding whom to tell: Expectations and outcomes of sexual assault survivors' first disclosures. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 38-49.

39.

Allen, J. (2005). Coping with trauma: Hope through understanding. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc.

40.

Aldwin, C. M. (1994). Transformational coping. Stress, coping and development, 240-269.

41.

Aspinwall, L. G., Richter, L., & Hoffman III, R. R. (2001). Understanding how optimism works: An examination of optimists' adaptive moderation of belief and behavior. In E. C. Chang(Ed.).

42.

Block, J., & kremen A. M. (1996). IQ and egoresiliency:Conceptual and empirical connections and seperateness, Jounal or Personality and Social Psychology. 70(2), 349-361.

43.

Bonanno, G. A. (2004). Loss, trauma, and human resilience: Have we underestimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely aversive events? American Psychologist, 59, 20-28.

44.

Breitkopf, C. R. (2006). Coping with experience of rape. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 106-116.

45.

Buyukasik-Colak, C., Gundogdu-Akturk, E., & Bozo, O. (2012). Mediating Role of Coping in the Dispositional Optimism-Posttraumatic Growth Relation in Breast Cancer Patients. The Journal of Psychology, 146(5), 471-483.

46.

Campbell, R., Ahrens, C. E., Sefl. T., Wasco, S. M., & Baenes, H. E. (2001). Social reactions to sexual assault victim: Healing and hurtful effects on psychological and physical health outcomes. Violence and Victims, 16, 287-301.

47.

DePrince, A. P., Zurbriggen, E. L., Chu, A. T., & Smart, L. (2010). Development of the Trauma Appraisal Questionnaire. Journal of Aggression, maltreatment & Trauma, 19(3), 275-299.

48.

Foynes, M. M., & Freyd, J. J. (2012). An exploratory study evaluation responses to the disclosure of stressful life experiences as they occurred in real time. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 5, 295-300.

49.

Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes:implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 348-362.

50.

Hassija, C. M., & Gray, M. J., (2012). Negative social reactions to assault disclosure as a mediator between self-blame and posttraumatic stress symptoms among survivors of interpersonal assault. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 27, 3425-3441.

51.

Horowitz M., Wilner N., & Alvarez W. (1997). Impact of Event Scale: a measure of subjective stress. Psychosom Med. 41, 209-218.

52.

Joseph, S & Linley, P. A. (2008). Psychological assessment of growth following adversity: A review(Eds.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

53.

Joseph, S., Linley, P. A., Andrews, L., Harris, G., Howle, B., Woodward, C., & Shevlin, M. (2005). Assessing positive and negative changes in the aftermath of adversity: Psychometric evaluation of the Changes in Outlook Questionnaire. Psychological Assessment, 17, 70-80.

54.

Joseph, S., Maltby, J., Wood, A. M., Stockon, H., Hunt, N., & Regel, S. (2012a). The Psychological Well-Being―Post-Traumatic Changes Questionnaire (PWB-PTCQ): Reliability and validity. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 4(4), 420–428.

55.

Joseph, S., Murphy, D., & Regel, S. (2012b). An Affective-Cognitive Processing Model of Post-Traumatic Growth. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 19, 316-325.

56.

Joseph, S., Williams, R., & Yule, W. (1993). Changes in outlook following disaster: The preliminary development of a measure to assess positive and negative responses. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 6(2), 271-279.

57.

Littleton, H. L., & Breitkopf, C. R. (2006). Coping with experience of rape. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 106-116.

58.

Linley, P. A., & Joseph, S. (2004). Toward a Theoretical foundation for positive psychology in practice. In P. A. Linley & S. Joseph(Eds.), Positive psychology in practice (pp. 713-731). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

59.

Luthar, S. S., Cicchetti, D., & Becker, B. (2000). The construct of resilience: A critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Development, 71(3), 543-562.

60.

Mauss, I. B., Crystal L. C., Jennifer Y. J.,& Gross, J. J. (2007) Individual difference in cognitive reappraisal. Experimental and Psychological Responses to an Anger Provocation, 116-124.

61.

McCullough, M. E., Emmons, R. A., & Tsang, J. (2002). The grateful disposition: A conceptual and empirical topography. Journal of personality &Social Psychology, 82(1), 112-127.

62.

McMillien, J. C., & Fisher, R. H. (1998). The Perceived Benefit Scales: Measuring perceived positive life changes after negative events. Social Work Research, 22(3), 173-187.

63.

Nishi, D., Matsuoka, K., & Kim, Y. (2010). Posttraumatic growth, posttraumatic stress disorder and resilience of motor vehicle accident survivors. Biopsychosocial Medicine, 4, 1-6.

64.

Park, C. L., Cohen, L. H., & Murch, R. L. (1996). Assessment and prediction of stress‐elated growth. Journal of personality, 64(1), 71-105.

65.

Park, C. L., & Helgeson, V. S. (2006). Growth following highly stressful life events: Current status and future directions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74, 791-796.

66.

Paulhus, D. L. (1984). Two-component models of social desirable responding. Journal or Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 598-609.

67.

Regel, S., & Joseph, S. (2010). Posttraumatic stress:The fact. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

68.

Roesch S. C., Rowley A. A. (2005). Evaluating and developing a multidimensional, dispositional measure of appraisal. J Pers Assess, 85(2), 188-196.

69.

Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069-1081.

70.

Scheier, M. F., Carver, C. S., & Bridges, M. W. (1994). Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem):a reevaluation of the Life Orientation Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 1063-1078.

71.

Spielberger C. D. (1983). State-Trait Anxiety Inventory(Form Y) Manual. Redwood City CA:Consulting Psychologists Press.

72.

Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (1996). The posttraumatic growth inventory: Measuring the positive legacy of trauma. Journal of traumatic stress, 9(3): 455-471.

73.

Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L., G. (2004). Posttraumatic growth: Conceptual foundation and empirical evidence. Psychological Inquiry, 15, 1-18.

74.

Ullman, S. E. (2000). Psychometric Characteristics of the social reactions questionnaire. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 257-271.

75.

Ullman, S. E. (2007). Relationship to perpetrator, disclosure, social reactions, and PTSD symptoms in child sexual abuse survivors, Journal of Child Sexual Abuse: Research, Treatment & Program Innovations victims, Survivors, & Offenders, 16, 19-36.

76.

Weiss D. S., & Marmer C. R. (1997) The impact of Event Scale-Revised. Assessing psychological trauma and PTSD(Eds.). New York: Guilford Press, 399-411.

77.

Weiss, T. (2002). Posttraumatic growth in women with breast cancer and their husbands: An intersubjective validation study. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 20, 65-80.

78.

Wilson, J. P., & Keane, T. M. (2004). Assessing Phychological Trauma and PTSD. 2nd ed New York: The Guilford Press.

79.

Woodward, C., & Joseph, S. (2003). Positive change processes and post‐traumatic growth in people who have experienced childhood abuse:Understanding vehicles of change. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 76, 267-283.

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology