바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.21 No.3
Citation Share

Effects of Regulatory Fit between Goal-Inhibiting vs. Facilitating Behavior in Sequential Self-Regulation

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology / The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, (P)1229-070X; (E)2713-9581
2016, v.21 no.3, pp.513-526
https://doi.org/10.17315/kjhp.2016.21.3.003


& (2016). Effects of Regulatory Fit between Goal-Inhibiting vs. Facilitating Behavior in Sequential Self-Regulation. The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, 21(3), 513-526, https://doi.org/10.17315/kjhp.2016.21.3.003
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

The present study examined the effects of regulatory fit between a goal-inhibiting behavior (playing a game) and a facilitating behavior (practicing the experimental task) in a situation where individuals manage the two behaviors in a sequential manner. Building on the regulatory fit hypothesis (Higgins, 2000), it was predicted that, compared to a non-fit between the two behaviors, a fit between the two would have a positive impact on individuals' ability to self-regulate. We analyzed data from a total of 63 Korean college students who were randomly assigned to conditions in a 2(goal-inhibiting behavior: promotion focus vs. prevention focus) x 2(goal-facilitating behavior: promotion focus vs. prevention focus) between participants design. Success of self-regulation was examined using two indices: The amount of time used on playing the game and the time spent to practice the experimental task. Results indicated, as expected, that on both indices self-regulation was more successful when the two behaviors were matched in terms of the regulatory focus than when the two mismatched. Questionnaire data revealed that the overall level of goal activation was higher in the fit condition than in the non-fit condition. Implications of these findings for research in health psychology and future directions are discussed.

keywords
self-regulation, goal-inhibiting, facilitating behavior, regulatory focus, regulatory fit, 자기조절, 목표 방해행동, 촉진행동, 조절초점, 조절초점 부합

Reference

1.

조혜연, 최훈석 (2015). 순차적 자기조절 상황에서 ‘하기’와 ‘중단하기’ 조절틀의 효과. 한국심리학회지:건강, 20(3), 515-526.

2.

Baumeister, R. F., Schmeichel, B. J., & Vohs, K. D. (2007). Self-regulation and the executive function:The self as controlling agent. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 516-539). New York: Guilford Press.

3.

Brass, M., & Haggard, P. (2007). To do or not to do:The neural signature of self control. Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 9141-9145.

4.

Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. New York:Cambridge University Press.

5.

Cesario, J., Grant, H., & Higgins, E. T. (2004). Regulatory fit and persuasion: Transfer from "feeling right." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 388 - 404.

6.

Crowe, E., & Higgins, E. T. (1997). Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decisionmaking. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69, 117-132.

7.

Förster, J., Higgins, E. T., & Idson, L. C. (1998). Approach and avoidance strength during goal attainment: Regulatory focus and the ‘goal looms larger effect’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1115–1131.

8.

Förster, J., Liberman, N., & Friedman, R. S. (2007). Seven principles of goal activation: A systematic approach to distinguishing goal priming from priming of non-goal construct. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 211-233.

9.

Freitas, A. L., & Higgins, E. T. (2002). Enjoying goal-directed action: The role of regulatory fit. Psychological Science, 13, 1-6.

10.

Freitas, A. L., Liberman, N., Salovey, P., & Higgins, E. T. (2002). When to begin? Regulatory focus and initiating goal pursuit. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 121–130.

11.

Fuglestad, P. T., Rothman, A. J., & Jeffrey, R. W. (2008). Getting there and hanging on: The effect of regulatory focus on performance in smoking and weight loss interventions. Health Psychology, 27, 260-270.

12.

Higgins, E. T. (1998). Promotion and prevention:Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. InM. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 1-46). San Diego, CA:Academic Press.

13.

Higgins, E. T. (2000). Making a good decision: Value from fit. American Psychologist, 55, 1217-1230.

14.

Higgins, E. T., Roney, C., Crowe, E., & Hymes, C. (1994). Ideal versus ought predilections for approach and avoidance: Distinct self-regulatory systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 276–286.

15.

Hong, J., & Lee, A. Y. (2008). Be Fit and Be Strong:Mastering Self‐Regulation through Regulatory Fit. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 682-695.

16.

Idson, L. C., Liberman, N., & Higgins, E. T. (2004). Imagining how you'd feel: The role of motivational experiences from regulatory fit. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 926–937.

17.

Karoly, P. (1993). Mechanisms of self-regulation: A systems view. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 23-52.

18.

Keppel, G., & Zedeck, S. (1989). Data analysis for research designs: Analysis of variance and multiple regression/correlation approaches. New York, NY: Freeman.

19.

Kuhn, S., & Brass, M. (2010). The cognitive representation of intending not to act: Evidence for specific non-action-effect binding. Cognition. 117, 9-16.

20.

Lockwood, P., Jordan, C. H., & Kunda, Z. (2002). Motivation by positive or negative role models:Regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 854-864.

21.

Mischel, W., Cantor, N., & Feldman, S. (1996). Principles of self-regulation: The nature of willpower and self-control. In E. T. Higgins &A. W. Kruglanski (Eds), Social Psychology:Handbook of Basic Principles (pp. 329-360). New York: Guilford.

22.

Richetin, J., Conner, M., & Perugini, M. (2011). Not doing is not the opposite of doing: Implications for attitudinal models of behavioral prediction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 40-54.

23.

Rothman, A. J., Baldwin, A. S., Hertel, A. W., & Fuglestad, P. T. (2011). Self-regulation and behavior change: Disentangling behavioral initiation and behavioral maintenance. In K. D. Vohs & R. F. Baumeister (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications (2nd ed, pp. 106-122). New York:Guilford Press.

24.

Scholer, A. A., & Higgins, E. T. (2011). Promotion and prevention systems: Regulatory focus dynamics within self-regulatory hierarchies. In K. D. Vohs & R. F. Baumeister (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications (2nd ed, pp. 143-161). New York:Guilford Press.

25.

Vohs, K. D., & Baumeister, R. F. (2011). Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications. Guilford Press.

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy