바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

이성자극의 존재가 도박성 게임의 손실만회행동에 미치는 영향: 성의 조절효과

The Effect of Opposite Sex Stimuli on Chasing Behavior in Gambling Game

한국심리학회지: 건강 / The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, (P)1229-070X; (E)2713-9581
2016, v.21 no.4, pp.741-749
https://doi.org/10.17315/kjhp.2016.21.4.004
정창현 (한국도박문제관리센터)
김교헌 (충남대학교)
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

Abstract

According to evolutionary perspective theory, this research aimed at investigating how the sex and opposite sex stimuli influence on chasing behavior in gambling game. For this, the researcher planned a design between subjects 2(male, female) x 2(opposite sex, neutral stimulation) A total of 60 people consisted of each 30 of male and female university students in their twenties were collected as research targets, and 15 of them were randomly categorized into neutral stimulation group or opposite-sex stimulation group. A slot machine was used to measure chasing behavior. While Korean UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale was used as a tool to evaluate impulsivity, which is known to have an effect on chasing behavior. As an analysis result, male showed more chasing behavior when opposite-sex stimulation is presented than when neutral stimulation is presented. But there was not significant difference in chasing behavior when opposite-sex stimulation is presented or neutral stimulation is presented in female. Also, male showed more chasing behavior in comparison with female. And more chasing behavior was manifested when opposite-sex stimulation is presented than when neutral stimulation is presented. In addition, the meanings and application of this study in therapy and prevention for gambling addicts were discussed.

keywords
손실만회행동, 성별, 이성자극, chasing behavior, evolutionary psychology, sex, opposite sex

참고문헌

1.

김교헌 (2013). 건강에 대한 심리적 개입의 새로운 지평: 융합접근에서 심리학의 역할과 마음모형. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 18(2), 251-269.

2.

김교헌 (2015). 한국인의 심리적 행복. 국정관리연구, 10(1), 41-67.

3.

신현지 (2015). 도박게임에서 돈을 잃은 경험과 충동성이 손실만회행동에 미치는 효과. 충남대학교 대학원 석사학위청구논문.

4.

임선영, 이영호 (2014). 한국판 다차원적 충동성 척도(UPPS-P)의 타당화 연구: 대학생 집단을 대상으로. 한국임상심리학회지: 임상, 33(1), 51-71.

5.

Baker, M. J., & Maner, J. K. (2008) Risk-taking as a situationally sensitive male mating strategy. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 391–395.

6.

Breen, R. B., & Zuckerman, M. (1999). ‘Chasing’ in gambling behavior: personality and cognitive determinants. Personality and Individual Differences, 27(6), 1097-1111.

7.

Buss, David M. (2005). 마음의 기원. (김교헌, 권선중, 이흥표 역). 서울: 나노미디어. (원전은 2004에 출판)

8.

Byrnes, J. P., Miller, D. C., & Schafer, W. D. (1999). Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Psychological bulletin, 125(3), 367.

9.

Daly, M., & Wilson, M. I. (1994). Some differential attributes of lethal assaults on small children by stepfathers versus genetic fathers. Ethology and sociobiology, 15(4), 207-217.

10.

Dickerson, M. (1993). Internal and external determinants of persistent gamling: problems in generalizing form one form to another. Journal of Gambling Studies, 9(3), 225-245.

11.

Frankenhuis, W. E., Dotsch, R., Karremans, J. C., & Wigboldus, D. H. J. (2010). Male physical risk-taking in a virtual environment. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 8, 75–86.

12.

Jianakoplos, N. A., & Bernasek, A. (1998). Are women more risk averse?. Economic inquiry, 36(4), 620.

13.

Kelly, S., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2001). Who dares, wins: Heroism versus altruism in women’s mate choice. Human Nature, 12, 89–105.

14.

Levin, I. P., Snyder, M. A., & Chapman, D. P. (1988). The interaction of experiential and situational factors and gender in a simulated risky decision-making task. The Journal of Psychology, 122(2), 173-181.

15.

McAlvanah, P. S. (2008). Time and Chance Happen to Us All: Essays on Temporal and Probability Discounting. (Doctoral Dissertation, Washington University, St. Louis).

16.

McClure, S. M., & Bickel, W. K. (2014). A dualsystems perspective on addiction: contributions from neuroimaging and cognitive training. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1327(1), 62-78.

17.

Pawlowski, B., Atwal, R., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2008). Sex differences in everyday risktaking behavior in humans. Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 29-42.

18.

Robert, T. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. Sexual Selection & the Descent of Man, Aldine de Gruyter, New York, 136-179.

19.

Ronay, R., & Von Hippel, W. (2010). The presence of an attractive woman elevates testosterone and physical risk taking in young men. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1, 57–64.

20.

Roney, J. R. (2003). Behavioral and hormonal responses of men to brief interactions with women. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 365-375.

21.

Saad, G. (2011). The consuming instinct: What juicy burgers, Ferraris, pornography, and gift giving reveal about human nature. Prometheus Books.

22.

Shostak, R. (1981). Deciding linear inequalities by computing loop residues. Journal of the ACM, 28(4), 769-779.

23.

Van den Bergh, B., & Dewitte, S. (2006). Digit ratio (2D: 4D) moderates the impact of sexual cues on men's decisions in ultimatum games. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 273(1597), 2091-2095.

24.

Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (2004). Do pretty women inspire men to discount the future?. Biology Letters, 271, S177-S179.

한국심리학회지: 건강