바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

심리거리와 목표상태 부합이 개인의 자기조절에 미치는 영향

Effects of Fit Between Psychological Distance and Goal State on Self-Regulation

한국심리학회지: 건강 / The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, (P)1229-070X; (E)2713-9581
2017, v.22 no.1, pp.123-136
https://doi.org/10.17315/kjhp.2017.22.1.007
유승현 (성균관대학교)
최훈석 (성균관대학교)
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

초록

실험을 통해서 사회적 거리에 따른 심리거리와 목표상태의 부합이 개인의 자기조절 행동 개시 및완료에 미치는 영향을 연구하였다. 총 79명의 남녀 대학생들에게 친구(가까운 심리거리) 또는 타인(먼 심리거리)이 조절목표를 추구하는 과정에서 실행한 구체적 행위(가까운 심리거리) 또는 목표에 도달하여 발생한 결과(먼 심리거리)를 묘사한 시나리오를 통해 사회적 거리와 목표상태를점화하고, 이 두 가지 차원에 각각 연합된 심리거리의 부합이 목표 과제의 개시와 완료에 미치는영향을 비교하였다. 실험 결과, 과제 개시 시간의 경우 사회적 거리가 가까운 친구가 자기조절 목표를 추구하는 과정에서 발생한 구체적 행위들이 점화되었을 때, 사회적 거리가 먼 타인의 목표완료에 따른 결과가 점화되었을 때보다, 과제 개시 시간이 빨랐다. 과제 정답률로 측정한 과제 완성도에서는 자기조절 목표를 완료한 타인이 점화되었을 때, 목표를 추구하고 있는 친구가 점화되었을 때보다, 정답률이 높았다. 자기조절에서 사회거리에 따른 해석수준과 목표상태에 연합된 해석수준 간의 부합효과와 관련하여 본 연구의 시사점 및 장래 연구 방향을 논의하였다.

keywords
자기조절, 해석수준, 사회적 거리, 심리거리, 목표상태, self-regulation, construal level, social distance, psychological distance, goal state

Abstract

The present study investigated how the fit between psychological distance associated with social distance and with goal state affects individuals' self-regulation. A total of 79 Korean undergraduates were randomly assigned to experimental conditions in a 2 (social distance: Friend vs. Stranger) X 2 (goal state: goal pursuit vs. goal completion) between-group design. Psychological distance was manipulated by priming either a friend (close) or a stranger (distant) who was either in the process of goal pursuit (close) or in the state of goal completion (distant). It was hypothesized that the fit in the direction of low-level construal (i.e., friend/pursuit) would have a facilitatory effect on the initiation of self-regulation, whereas the fit in the direction of high-level construal (i.e., stranger/completion) would facilitate the completion of the regulatory task. Results showed that, as expected, participants in the 'friend/pursuit' condition initiated the task more quickly than did those in the 'stranger/completion' condition. In contrast, participants in the 'stranger/completion' condition showed higher levels of task accuracy than did those in the 'friend/pursuit' condition. These results suggest that both low-level and high-level construal promote self-regulation but the effects are contingent upon the specific aspects of self-regulation. Implications of the findings and directions for future studies are discussed.

keywords
자기조절, 해석수준, 사회적 거리, 심리거리, 목표상태, self-regulation, construal level, social distance, psychological distance, goal state

참고문헌

1.

박혜리, 최훈석 (2010). 목표 행동의 개시와 완료에서해석 수준의 영향. 한국심리학회 연차학술발표대회논문집, 532-533.

2.

용정순, 최훈석(2007). 사회적배척/수용경험과 자기-확증 가능성이 개인의 수행에 미치는 영향. 한국 사회 및 성격심리학회 동계학술대회 발표논문집, 13-19.

3.

조혜연, 최훈석 (2015). 순차적 자기조절 상황에서 ‘하기’와 ‘중단하기’ 조절틀의 효과. 한국심리학회지:건강, 20(3), 515-526.

4.

현보라, 최훈석 (2010). 자기-고갈 상황에서 본보기 점화와 범주 점화가 자기-조절 수행에 미치는 영향. 한국 건강심리학회 동계학술대회 논문집, 78-82.

5.

Baumeister, R. F. (2002). Yielding to Temptation:Self-Control Failure, Impulsive Purchasing, and Consumer Behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 670-676.

6.

Baumeister, R. F. (2003). Ego Depletion and Self-Regulation Failure: A Resourse Mode of Self-Control. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental, 27, 281-284.

7.

Baumeister, R. F., Schmeichel, B. J., & Vohs, K. D. (2007). Self-regulation and the executive function:The self as controlling agent. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 516-539). New York: Guilford Press.

8.

Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P. R., & Zeidner, M. (2005). Handbook of Self-Regulation. CA: Academic Press.

9.

Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1981). Attention and self-regulation: A control theory approach to human behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag.

10.

Finkel, E. J., & Fitzsimons, G. M. (2011). The effects of social relationships on self-regulation. In K. D. Vohs & R. F. Baumeister (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications (2nd ed., pp. 390-406). New York:Guilford Press.

11.

Fitzsimons, G. M., & Finkel, E. J. (2010). Interpersonal Influences on self-regulation. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 101-105.

12.

Freitas, A. L., Gollwitzer, P., & Trope, Y. (2004). The influence of abstract and concrete mindsets on anticipating and guiding other’s self-regulatory efforts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 739-752.

13.

Fujita, K. (2008). Seeing the forest beyond the trees:A construal-level approach to self-control. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 1475-1496.

14.

Fujita, K., Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Levin-Sagi, M. (2006). Construal levels and self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 351-367.

15.

Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). Implementation intentions:Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54, 493-503.

16.

Higgins, E. T. (1998). Promotion and prevention:Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. Advances in experimental social psychology, 30, 1-46.

17.

Holtgraves, T., & Yang, J. N. (1992). Interpersonal underpinnings of request strategies: General principles and differences due to culture and gender. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 246-256.

18.

Jeffery, R. W., Drewnowski, A., Epstein, L. H., Stunkard, A. J., Wilson, G. T., Wing, R. R., & Hill, D. R. (2000). Long-term maintenance of weight loss: Current status. Health Psychology, 19, 5-16.

19.

Kim, K., Zhang, M., & Li, X. (2008). Effects of temporal and social distance on consumer evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(4), 706-713.

20.

Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Stephan, E. (2007). Psychological distance. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 353-383). New York: Guilford Press.

21.

Liviatan, I., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2008). Interpersonal similarity as a social distance dimension: Implications for perception of other’s actions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1256-1269.

22.

McCaul, K. D., Glasgow, R. E., & O’Neill, H. K. (1992). The problem of creating habits:Establishing health protective dental behaviors. Health Psychology, 11, 101-110.

23.

McCrea, S. M., Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Sherman, S. J. (2008). Construal Level and Procrastination. Psychological science, 19, 1308-1314.

24.

Mischel, W., & Ayduk, O. (2011). Willpower in a Cognitive-Affective Processing System: The dynamics of delay of gratification. In K. D. Vohs & R. F. Baumeister (Eds.), Handbook of selfregulation:Research, theory, and applications (2nd ed., pp.83–105). New York: Guilford Press.

25.

Rothman, A. J. (2000). Toward a theory-based analysis of behavioral maintenance. Health Psychology, 19, 64-69.

26.

Rothman, A. J., Baldwin, A. S., Hertel, A. W., & Fuglestad, P. T. (2011). Self-regulation and behavior change. In K. D. Vohs & R. F. Baumeister (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation:Research, theory, and applications (2nd ed., pp. 106-122). New York: Guilford Press.

27.

Rothman, A. J., & Salovey, P. (2007). The reciprocal relation between principles and practice: Social psychology and health behavior. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 826-849). New York: Guilford Press.

28.

Schmeichel, B. J., Vohs, K. D., & Duke, S. C. (2011). Self-control at high and low levels of mental construal. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2, 182-189.

29.

Smith, P., K., & Trope, Y. (2006). You focus on the forest when you’re in charge of the trees: Power priming and abstract information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 578-596.

30.

Stephan, E., Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (2010). Politeness and psychological distance: A constural level perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 268-280.

31.

Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117, 440-463.

32.

Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2012). Construal level theory. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 118-134). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.

33.

Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Wakslak, C. (2007). Construal levels and psychological distance:Effects on representation, prediction, evaluation, and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17, 83-95.

34.

Vallacher, R. R., & Wegner, D. M. (1987). What do people think they’re doing? Action identification and human behavior. Psychological Review, 94, 3-15.

35.

Vallacher, R. R., & Wegner, D. M. (1989). Levels of personal agency: Individual variation in action identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 660-671.

36.

Vohs, K. D., & Baumeister, R. F. (2011). Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications. New York: Guilford Press.

37.

Wood, W., & Neal, D. T. (2007). A new look at habits and the habit-goal interface. Psychological Review, 114, 843-863.

한국심리학회지: 건강