바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology

Attentional Bias Toward Relevant Stimuli in Tendencies of Smartphone Addiction: A Focus on the Emotional Stroop Task and the Dot-Probe Task

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology / The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, (P)1229-070X; (E)2713-9581
2017, v.22 no.1, pp.137-153
https://doi.org/10.17315/kjhp.2017.22.1.008




Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the effect of attentional bias for stimuli that are relevant in a group tending toward smartphone addiction using the Emotional Stroop Task and the Dot-Probe Task. The experiments were conducted with a general group (control group) included. Total 44 students participated in two tasks (22 addictive tendency group and 22 general group). Tendencies toward smartphone addiction were categorized by the Survey of Smartphone Addiction Scale (S-scale). In two experiments, Repeated ANOVA was used for statistical analysis. In experiment 1, the Emotional Stroop Task was performed, using smartphone-related and general words. There was no statistically significant difference between the subsamples, but the smartphone addictive tendency group displayed a slower reaction time for smartphone-related words, while the control group did for control words. In experiment 2, a modified Dot-Probe Task was conducted, using smartphone-related stimuli and control stimuli in pairs under 500 ms and 2,000 ms Stimulus-Onset Asynchrony (SOA) conditions. Under the SOA 500 ms condition, the smartphone addictive tendency group reacted more quickly to smartphone-relevant stimuli than to control stimuli which revealed an attentional bias for the former. The control group exhibited exactly the opposite response tendency: They reacted more quickly to the control stimuli than to the smartphone stimuli. There were no statistically significant results under the 2,000 ms SOA condition. This results can be interpreted as ‘Inhibition of Return(IOR)’. The findings suggest that the smartphone addictive tendency group has different attention characteristics than the control group. Such study results and related further research can be used for the evaluation of smartphone addiction.

keywords
스마트폰 중독, 주의 편향, 정서 스트룹 과제, 탐침 탐사 과제, smartphone addiction, attentional bias, emotional stroop task, dot-probe task

Reference

1.

강성군, 김교헌, 권선중, 이민규 (2011). 한국판 도박 갈망 척도(K-GUS)의 타당화 연구. 한국심리학회지:건강, 15(3), 569-581

2.

구훈정, 조성훈, 권정혜 (2015). 한국형 인터넷 중독 자가진단 척도(K-척도)의 진단적 유용성에 대한 연구: DSM-5 인터넷 게임 장애의 진단을 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 34(2), 335-352

3.

김세진, 김교헌 (2013). 인터넷 중독 개선을 위한 인지적 접근: 조절실패와 갈망에 대한 대책을 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 18(3), 421-443.

4.

미래창조과학부, 한국정보화진흥원 (2016) 2015년 인터넷 과의존 실태조사

5.

박용민 (2011). 성인들의 스마트폰 중독과 정신건강에관한 연구. 상지대학교 대학원 석사학위청구논문.

6.

오강탁, 이제은 (2012). 스마트 라이프 혁명의 실제와스마트폰 중독. Internet and Information Security, 394, 21-43.

7.

유지돈, 이익선, 양재호 (2014). 지역별 스마트폰 중독실태 및 인구·사회적 요인에 대한 연구. 사회과학연구, 40(3), 51-75

8.

이인혜, 김영주, 강성군 (2011). 억제기능 결함과 도박중독의 관계 : 카지노 도박중독자들을 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 16(3), 501-520

9.

정홍열 (2014). 흡연갈망이 흡연관련 자극에 대한 주의편향에 미치는 영향. 계명대학교 대학원 석사학위청구논문.

10.

최문기. (2005). 주의편향 효과 분석을 중심으로 한 정서 장애에 대한 정보처리학적 접근. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 24(1), 217-238.

11.

통계청 (2015). 2014 한국의 사회 지표.

12.

한국정보화진흥원 (2011). 스마트폰중독 진단척도 개발연구.

13.

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders(5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.

14.

Baker, T. B., Morse, E., & Sherman, J. E. (1986). The motivation to use drugs: a psychobiological analysis of urges. In Nebraska symposium on motivation. University of Nebraska Press, Nebraska

15.

Bar-Haim, Y., Lamy, D., Pergamin, L., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M.J., & Van Ijzendoom, M. H. (2007). Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: A meta-analytic study. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 1-24.

16.

Bradley, B. P., Mogg, K., Wright, T., & Field, M. (2003). Attentional bias in drug dependence:Vigilance for cigarette-related cues in smokers. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 17, 66-72

17.

Demakis, G. J. (2004). Frontal lobe damage and tests of executive processing: a meta-analysis of the category test, stroop test, and trail-making test. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 26, 441-450.

18.

Drummond, D. C., & Phillips, T. S. (2002). Alcohol urges in alcohol‐dependent drinkers: further validation of the Alcohol Urge Questionnaire in an untreated community clinical population. Addiction, 97, 1465-1472

19.

Duka, T., & Townshend, J. M. (2004). The priming effect of alcohol pre-load on attentional bias to alcohol-related stimuli. Psychopharmacology, 176, 353-361

20.

Field, M., & Cox, W. M. (2008). Attentional bias in addictive behaviors: A review of its development, causes, and consequences. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 97, 1-20.

21.

Franken, I. H., Kroon, L. Y., Wiers, R. W., & Jansen, A. (2000). Selective cognitive processing of drug cues in heroin dependence. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 14, 395-400.

22.

Fuentes, D., Tavares, H., Artes, R., & Gorenstein, C. (2006). Self-reported and neuropsychological measures of impulsivity in pathological gambling. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 12(06), 907-912.

23.

Goudriaan, A. E, Oosteriaan, J., de Beurs, E, & van den Brink, W. (2006). Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling: a comparison with alcohol dependence, Tourette syndrome and normal controls. Addiction, 101, 534-547.

24.

Hart, A. D. (2005). 참을 수 없는 중독 [Healing life’s hidden addictions: Overcoming the closet compulsions that waste your time and control your life]. (온누리 회복사역보부 역). 서울: 두란노. (원전은 1991에 출판)

25.

Hester, R., Dixon, V., & Garavan, H. (2006). A consistent attentional bias for drug-related material in active cocaine users across word and picture versions of the emotional Stroop task. Drug and alcohol dependence, 81, 251-257.

26.

Huey, E. D., & Wexler, B. E. (1994). Abnormalities in rapid, automatic aspects of attention in schizophrenia: blunted inhibition of return. Schizophrenia Research, 14, 57-63.

27.

Kertzman, S., Lowengrub, K., Aizer, A., Vainder, M., Kotler, M., & Dannon, P. N. (2008). Go–no-go performance in pathological gamblers. Psychiatry Research, 161(1), 1-10.

28.

Kowler, E., Anderson, E., Dosher, B., & Blaser, E. (1995). The role of attention in the programming of saccades. Vision Research, 35, 1897-1916.

29.

Kozlowski, L. T., & Wilkinson, D. A. (1987). Use and misuse of the concept of craving by alcoho, tobacco, and drug researchers. British Journal of Addiction, 82, 31-36

30.

Ludge, AM., & Wikler, A. (1974). “Craving” and relapse to drink. Q J Stud Alcohol, 35, 108-130

31.

MacLeod, C., Mathews, A., & Tata, P. (1986). Attentional bias in emotional disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95, 15-20

32.

Marlatt, G. A., & Gordon, J. R. (1985). Relapse Prevention: Maintenance Strategies in the Treatment of Addictive Behaviors. New York:Guilford Press.

33.

Mogg, K., Millar, N., & Bradley, B. P. (2000). Biases in eye movements to threatening facial expressions in generalized anxiety disorder and depressive disorder. Journal of abnormal psychology, 109, 695.

34.

Morton, J. (1969). Interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological review, 76, 165.

35.

Petry, N. M., Rehbein, F., Gentile, D. A., Lemmens, J. S., Rumpf, H. J., Mößle, T., ..., & O'Brien, C. P. (2014). An international consensus for assessing internet gaming disorder using the new DSM 5approach. Addiction. 109, 1399-1406.

36.

Pineles, S. L., Shipherd, J. C., Motoufi, S. M., Abramovitz, S. M., & Yovel, I. (2009). Attentional biases in PTSD: More evidence for interference. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 47, 1050-1057

37.

Raylu, N., & Oei, T. P. (2002). Pathological gambling:A comprehensive review. Clinical psychology review, 22, 1009-1061.

38.

Raylu, N., & Oei, T. P. (2004). The gambling urge scale: development, confirmatory factor validation, and psychometric properties. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 18, 100.

39.

Robinson, T.E., & Berridge, K. C. (1993). The neural basis of drug craving: An incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Research Reviews, 18, 247-291.

40.

Ryan, F. (2002). Detected, selected, and sometimes neglected: cognitive processing of cues in addiction. Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology, 10, 67.

41.

Sharma, D., Albery, I. P., & Cook, C. (2001). Selective attentional bias to alcohol related stimuli in problem drinkers and non‐problem drinkers. Addiction, 96, 285-295.

42.

Sharpe, L. (2002). A reformulated cognitive–behavioral model of problem gambling: A biopsychosocial perspective. Clinical psychology review, 22, 1-25.

43.

Tiffany, S. T., & Carter, B. L. (1998). Is craving the source of compulsive drug use?. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 12, 23-30.

44.

Tiffany, S. T., & Conklin, C. A. (2000). A cognitive processing model of alcohol craving and compulsive alcohol use. Addiction, 95, 145-153.

45.

Tiffany, S. T., & Drobes, D. J. (1991). The development and initial validaion of a questionnaire on smoking urges. British Journal of Addiction, 86, 1467-1476

46.

Townshend, J. M., & Duka, T. (2001). Attentional bias associated with alcohol cues: differences between heavy and occasional social drinkers. Psychopharmacology, 157, 67-74

47.

Warren, R. E. (1972). Stimulus encoding and memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 94, 90.

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology