바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.22 No.2

Citation Share

The Moderating Effects of Near Miss on the Relation Between Risk Taking Tendency, Gambling Behavior and Irrational Gambling Belief

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology / The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, (P)1229-070X; (E)2713-9581
2017, v.22 no.2, pp.339-354
https://doi.org/10.17315/kjhp.2017.22.2.007


& (2017). The Moderating Effects of Near Miss on the Relation Between Risk Taking Tendency, Gambling Behavior and Irrational Gambling Belief. The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, 22(2), 339-354, https://doi.org/10.17315/kjhp.2017.22.2.007

Abstract

Using the expectancy theory, this study investigated the effects of risk taking tendency and near miss experience on gambling behavior, and the change in irrational gambling belief after near miss experience. Totally, 459 male university students in their 20’s were surveyed. Among those who agreed to participate, 28 students were selected for the high risk-taking tendency group(M+1SD) and 28 students for the low risk tendency group(M-1SD). A 2(low risk taking tendency, high risk taking tendency) x 2(near miss, full miss) design was planned for the subjects. Furthermore, a slot machine program was developed to measure their gambling behavior through total number of games and the total amount of money wagered. In order to investigate changes, the researcher compared the irrational gambling beliefs of the participants, measured before and after the near miss experience on the slot machine. Analysis revealed that in the high risk taking tendency group, the total amount of money wagered was significantly high in cases of near miss as compared to full miss. However, in the group of low risk taking tendency group, there were no significant differences based on near miss or full miss. Also, the irrational gambling belief appeared significantly high in cases of near miss in the high risk taking tendency group, as compared to full miss. However, with lower risk taking tendency, there was no difference in irrational gambling belief according to near miss. This study is meaningful as we believe it is the first experimental study to explain gambling behaviors using the expectancy theory. Furthermore, risk taking tendency and near miss may influence gambling behavior through irrational gambling beliefs as a mediator.

keywords
gambling behavior, risk taking tendency, near miss, irrational gambling belief, expectancy theory, 도박행동, 위험감수성향, 승리접근경험, 비합리적 도박신념, 기대유인가 이론

Reference

1.

김교헌 (2009). 한국 도박중독 문제의 책임과 대처. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 14(1), 27-39.

2.

김교헌, 권선중 (2003). 병적 도박자의 심리적 특성 및 예측요인. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 8(2), 261-277.

3.

박은아, 이종한 (2015). 귀인양식과 귀인편향, 비합리적도박신념에서의 차이. 한국심리학회지: 문화 및 사회문제, 21(2), 177-203.

4.

사행산업통합감독위원회 (2016). 2015 사행산업 관련 통계. http://www.ngcc.go.kr/data/pdsView.do에서 2016, 10, 12 인출.

5.

송강영 (2001). 스포츠도박으로서 경마 참여정도와 중독성향 및 사회적응의 관계. 한국스포츠사회학회지, 14(2), 601-615.

6.

신현지 (2015). 도박게임에서 돈을 잃은 경험과 충동성이 손실만회행동에 미치는 효과. 충남대학교 대학원 석사학위청구논문.

7.

양국희, 곽호완, 장문선, 구본훈 (2012). 비합리적 도박신념 및 타인의 승리에 대한 정보가 도박행동에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 17(2), 371-384.

8.

이선경, 한성열 (2014). 대학생의 감각추구성향이 도박에 미치는 영향 : 생활 스트레스의 조절 효과. 한국여가문화학회, 12(1), 1-20.

9.

이흥표 (2002). 비합리적 도박신념, 도박동기 및 위험감수 성향과 병적 도박의 관계. 고려대학교 대학원박사학위청구논문.

10.

이흥표 (2003). 비합리적 도박신념이 병적 도박에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 22(2), 415-434.

11.

홍영오, 박성훈, 김민영, 조성현 (2015). 도박범죄의 사회적 비용추계 연구. http://academic.naver.com/openUrl.nhn?doc_id=157667223&linkType=doclink에서 2016, 11, 3 인출.

12.

홍지연, 조용현 (2011). 위험감수 성향과 비합리적 게임신념이 사행성 게임 행동에 미치는 영향. 관광학연구, 35(8), 367-388.

13.

Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Coups, E. J. (2012). 행동과학과 사회과학을 위한 통계학입문 [Statistics for the Behavioural and Social Sciences, a Brief Cours e. The fifth Edition.]. (신현정 역). 서울: 시그마프레스. (원전은 2010에 출판).

14.

Clark, L., Lawrence, A. J., Astley-Jones, F., & Gray, N. (2009). Gambling near-misses enhance motivation to gamble and recruit win-related brain circuitry. Neuron, 61(3), 481-490.

15.

Coventry, K. R., & Brown, R. (1993). Sensation seeking, gambling and gambling addictions. Addiction, 88(4), 541-554.

16.

Dixon, M. R., & Schreiber, J. E. (2011). Near-miss effects on response latencies and win estimations of slot machine players. The Psychological Record, 54(3), 1.

17.

Gabour, A., & Ladouceur, R. (1988). Irrational thinking and gambling. In W. R. Eadington(Ed.), Gambling research : Proceedings of the seventh international conference on gambling and risk behavior(Vol. 3): Gamblers and gambling behavior(pp.142-163). Reno, Nevara: University of Nevada-Reno.

18.

Joukhador, J., Blaszczynski, A., & Maccallum, F. (2004). Superstitious beliefs in gambling among problem and non-problem gamblers: Preliminary data. Journal of gambling studies, 20(2), 171-180.

19.

Joukhador, J., Maccallum, F., & Blaszczynski, A. (2003). Differences in cognitive distortions between problem and social gamblers. Psychological reports, 92(3 Pt 2), 1203-1214.

20.

Knowles, E. S., Cutter, H. S., Walsh, D. H., & Casey, N. A. (1973). Risk-taking as a personality trait. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 1(2), 123-136.

21.

Langer, E. J. (1975). The illusion of control. Journal of personality and social psychology, 32(2), 311.

22.

Langer, E. J., & Roth, J. (1975). Heads I Win, Tails It's Chance: The Illusion of Control as a Function of the Sequence of Outcomes in a Purely Chance Task. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(6), 951-955.

23.

Mcbride, J., & Derevensky, J. (2012). Internet gambling and risk-taking among students: An exploratory study. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 1(2), 50-58.

24.

Myrseth, H., Brunborg, G. S., & Eidem, M. (2010). Differences in cognitive distortions between pathological and non-pathological gamblers with preferences for chance or skill games. Journal of gambling studies, 26(4), 561-569.

25.

O’Connor, R. M., Stewart, S. H., & Watt, M. C. (2009). Distinguishing BAS risk for university students’ drinking, smoking, and gambling behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(4), 514-519.

26.

Porter, L. W., & Lawler, E. E. (1968). Management attitudes and performance. Homewood IL.:Richard D. Irwin Company.

27.

Powell, J., Hardoon, K., Derevensky, J. L., & Gupta, R. (1999). Gambling and risk-taking behavior among university students. Substance use &misuse, 34(8), 1167-1184.

28.

Reid, R. L. (1986). The psychology of the near miss. Journal of Gambling Behavior, 2(1), 32-39.

29.

Steel, Z., & Blaszczynski, A. (1998). Impulsivity, personality disorders and pathological gambling severity. Addiction, 93(6), 895-905.

30.

Steenbergh, T. A., Meyers, A. W., May, R. K., & Whelan, J. P. (2002). Development and validation of the Gamblers' Beliefs Questionnaire. Psychology of addictive behaviors, 16(2), 143.

31.

Toneatto, T., Blitz-Miller, T., Calderwood, K., Dragonetti, R., & Tsanos, A. (1997). Cognitive distortions in heavy gambling. Journal of gambling studies, 13(3), 253-266.

32.

Van Holst, R. J., Veltman, D. J., Büchel, C., van den Brink, W., & Goudriaan, A. E. (2012). Distorted expectancy coding in problem gambling: is the addictive in the anticipation?. Biological psychiatry, 71(8), 741-748.

33.

Vroom, V. H. (1959). Some personality determinants of the effects of participation. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 59(3), 322.

34.

Weatherly, J. N., Sauter, J. M., & King, B. M. (2004). The "big win" and resistance to extinction when gambling. The Journal of Psychology, 138(6), 495-504.

35.

Wickwire, E. M., Whelan, J. P., & Meyers, A. W. (2010). Outcome expectancies and gambling behavior among urban adolescents. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 24(1), 75.

36.

Young, M. M., Wohl, M. J., Matheson, K., Baumann, S., & Anisman, H. (2008). The desire to gamble:The influence of outcomes on the priming effects of a gambling episode. Journal of Gambling Studies, 24(3), 275-293.

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy