바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

An Exploratory Study of the Cognitive and Motive Changes in the Natural Recovery from a Gambling Addiction

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology / The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, (P)1229-070X; (E)2713-9581
2017, v.22 no.4, pp.1113-1126
https://doi.org/10.17315/kjhp.2017.22.4.015




  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

This study aims at researching the cognitive change processes of a natural recovery group from gambling addiction, by examining the change patterns of cognitive and motive factors(irrational gambling belief, gambling attitude, gambling motives for monetary, excitement and avoidance) according to time, by investigating an adult natural recovery group whose gambling problem level was decreased without receiving treatment/counseling service within a year, and a maintenance group whose gambling problem level was maintained at a problematic/dangerous level. The research participants participated in two annual online surveys measuring their CPGI, irrational gambling belief and gambling motive, and the data of 514 adult online panels were analyzed. By taking the matter of maintaining a gambling problem as a between-group variable, time as a within-group variable, and an irrational gambling belief, gambling attitude, and monetary motive, excitement motive, avoidance motive as dependent variables, an analysis of mixed-variance was conducted. In the results, the interaction between time and group was significant for irrational gambling belief, gambling attitude, monetary motive, excitement motive, and avoidance motive. In the results of analyzing the simple main effects of each variable, the irrational gambling belief, and monetary motive, excitement motive, and avoidance motive were significantly decreased in the natural recovery group. Lastly, the application of the cognitive variables having an effect on the natural recovery, for the prevention of a gambling problem, was discussed.

keywords
gambling addiction, natural recovery, irrational gambling belief, gambling motives, 도박중독, 자발적 회복, 비합리적 도박신념, 도박동기

Reference

1.

강준혁 (2016). 도박중독자의 회복과정과 실존체험. 성균관대학교 대학원 박사학위 청구논문.

2.

권선중 (2014). 도박 관련 신념과 문제성 도박의 관계에대한 재탐색: 잠재성장모형을 활용한 단기 종단 연구. 청소년학연구, 21(4), 359-376.

3.

권선중, 김예나 (2017). 실제 인터넷 도박행동을 예측하는 인지-정서 모형 개발. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 22(2), 457-470.

4.

김교헌 (2006). 도박행동의 자기조절모형. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 11(2), 243-274.

5.

김아영, 차정은, 권선중, 이순묵 (2011). CPGI의 한국판제작 및 타당화. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 30(4), 1011-1038.

6.

김영훈, 이영호 (2006). 병적 도박자의 단도박에 영향을미치는 심리적 요인. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 25(3), 697-710.

7.

김정연 (2005). 병적 도박자의 회복(recovery)에 영향을미치는 요인. 경북대학교 대학원 박사학위 청구논문.

8.

남순희 (2017). 도박중독의 회복과정 탐색 및 척도개발. 대구가톨릭대학교 대학원 박사학위 청구논문.

9.

사행산업통합감독위원회 (2016). 2016년 사행산업 이용실태 조사. 서울: 사행산업통합감독위원회.

10.

사행산업통합감독위원회 (2017). 2016년 사행산업 관련통계. 서울: 사행산업통합감독위원회.

11.

신성만 (2017). 중독행동의 이해를 위한 동기균형이론. 한국심리학회지: 중독, 2(1), 1-12.

12.

이민규, 김교헌, 성한기, 권선중 (2009). 도박성 스포츠게임이 지역민의 삶의 질에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 14(4), 911-927.

13.

이흥표 (2002). 비합리적 도박신념, 도박동기 및 위험감수 성향과 병적 도박의 관계. 고려대학교 대학원박사학위 청구논문.

14.

이흥표 (2003). 도박동기와 병적 도박의 관계. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 8(1), 169-189.

15.

이흥표 (2004). 5요인 도박동기의 검증과 도박동기가 도박 심각도에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 9(3), 555-568.

16.

임숙희, 신현지, 최영임 (2017). 도박 중독의 자발적 회복, 실재의 현상인가?. 한국심리학회 학술대회 자료집, pp. 387-387. 8월 18일. 서울: 세종대학교.

17.

채정아 (2014). 단도박자의 회복유지과정에 관한 연구. 숭실대학교 대학원 박사학위 청구논문.

18.

한영옥, 김현정, 이연숙, 김한우, 김태우, 이재갑 (2012). 도박중독치료기관을 방문한 도박자의 심리적 특성. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 17(2), 353-369.

19.

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.

20.

American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5). Washington, DC: APA.

21.

Anglin, M. D., Brecht, M. L., Woodward, J. A., & Bonett, D. G. (1986). An empirical study of maturing out: Conditional factors. International Journal of the Addictions, 21(2), 233-246.

22.

Burman, S. (1997). The challenge of sobriety: natural recovery without treatment and self-help groups. Journal of Substance Abuse, 9, 41-61.

23.

DiClemente, C. C., & Prochaska, J. O. (1982). Self-change and therapy change of smoking behavior: A comparison of processes of change in cessation and maintenance. Addictive Behaviors, 7(2), 133-142.

24.

Ferris, J. A., & Wynne, H. J. (2001). The Canadian problem gambling index. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.

25.

Heyman, G. M. (2013). Addiction and choice: theory and new data. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 4, 31. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2013.00031.

26.

Hodgins, D. C., & El-Guebaly, N. (2000). Natural and treatment‐assisted recovery from gambling problems: A comparison of resolved and active gamblers. Addiction, 95(5), 777-789.

27.

Johansson, A., Grant, J. E., Kim, S. W., Odlaug, B. L., & Götestam, K. G. (2009). Risk factors for problematic gambling: A critical literature review. Journal of Gambling Studies, 25(1), 67-92.

28.

Kendell, R. E., & Staton, M. C. (1966). The fate of untreated alcoholics. Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 27(1), 30-41.

29.

Ladouceur, R., Sylvain, S., Boutin, C., Lachance, S., Doucet, C., Leblond, J., & Jacques, C. (2001). Cognitive treatment of pathological gambling. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 189(11), 774-780.

30.

Langer, E. J. (1975). The illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(2), 311.

31.

Lindberg, A., Fernie, B. A., & Spada, M. M. (2011). Metacognitions in problem gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 27(1), 73-81.

32.

McCartney, J. (1996). A community study of natural change across the addictions. Addiction Research, 4(1), 65-83.

33.

Myrseth, H., Brunborg, G. S., & Eidem, M. (2010). Differences in cognitive distortions between pathological and non-pathological gamblers with preferences for chance or skill games. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26(4), 561-569.

34.

Petry, N. M., Ammerman, Y., Bohl, J., Doersch, A., Gay, H., Kadden, R., . . . Steinberg, K. (2006). Cognitive–.Behavioral Therapy for Pathological Gamblers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74(3), 555–567.

35.

Raylu, N., & Oei, T. P. (2004). The Gambling Related Cognitions Scale (GRCS): Development, confirmatory factor validation and psychometric properties. Addiction, 99(6), 757-769.

36.

Rumpf, H. J., Bischof, G., Hapke, U., Meyer, C., & John, U. (2000). Studies on natural recovery from alcohol dependence: sample selection bias by media solicitation?. Addiction, 95(5), 765-775.

37.

Russell, M., Peirce, R. S., Chan, A. W., Wieczorek, W. F., Moscato, B. S., & Nochajski, T. H. (2001). Natural recovery in a community-based sample of alcoholics: Study design and descriptive data. Substance Use & Misuse, 36(11), 1417-1441.

38.

Sobell, L. C., Cunningham, J. A., & Sobell, M. B. (1996). Recovery from alcohol problems with and without treatment: prevalence in two population surveys. American Journal of Public Health, 86(7), 966-972.

39.

Steenbergh, T. A., Meyers, A. W., May, R. K., & Whelan, J. P. (2002). Development and validation of the Gamblers' Beliefs Questionnaire. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 16(2), 143-149.

40.

Tucker, J. A., Vuchinich, R. E., & Gladsjo, J. A. (1994). Environmental events surrounding natural recovery from alcohol-related problems. Addictions Nursing, 6(4), 117-128.

41.

Walters, G. D. (1996). The natural history of substance misuse in an incarcerated criminal population. Journal of Drug Issues, 26(4), 943-959.

42.

Walters, G. D. (2000). Spontaneous remission from alcohol, tabacco, and other drug abuse: seeking quantitative answers to qualitative questions. American Journal of Drug Alcohol Abuse, 26(3), 443-460.

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology