바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

강점의 군집유형에 따른 행복과 우울의 차이

Differences in Happiness and Depression by Clusters of Character Strengths

한국심리학회지: 건강 / The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, (P)1229-070X; (E)2713-9581
2018, v.23 no.3, pp.657-675
https://doi.org/10.17315/kjhp.2018.23.3.004
김지영 (서울사이버대학교)
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

초록

이 연구에서는 성격강점이 자연발생적으로 어떠한 군집을 형성하는지 한국 성인을 대상으로 탐색하고, 분류된 군집에 따른 행복과 우울의 차이 및 인구사회학적 변인의 특성을 분석하였다. 군집분석을 통해 만 20세 이상 827명의 참여자를 5개 집단으로 구분하였다. 의지적 강점이 뛰어난 ‘의지집단’은 삶의 만족도와 행복 점수가 가장 높고 우울 점수가 가장 낮았으며, 다른 집단보다 연령이 유의하게 높았다. 반면 절제 및 정의 관련 강점이 뛰어난 ‘사회집단’은 삶의 만족도와 행복 점수가 가장 낮고 우울 점수가 유의하게 높았으며, 남성과 기혼, 무교, 전일제 근무자 비율이 가장 많았다. 지식 관련 강점이 뛰어난 ‘지성집단’은 우울 점수가 가장 높았으며, 연령이 어리고 미혼과 학생 비율이 가장 많았다. 대인관계적 강점이 뛰어난 ‘관계집단’은 행복 점수가 유의하게 낮았으며, 여성과 시간제 근무자 비율이 가장 많았다. 초월적 강점이 뛰어난 ‘초월집단’은 삶의 만족도, 행복, 우울에서 평균 수준을 보였으며, 연령이 가장 높고 기독교와 전업주부 비율이 가장 많았다. 이 연구는 성격강점의 자연발생적인 군집을 경험적으로 확인했다는 점에서 의의가 있으며, 성인의 심리적 건강 증진 개입에 유용한 기초자료가 될 수 있을 것이다. 마지막으로 이 연구의 한계점과 후속 연구를 위한 제언을 논의하였다.

keywords
character strengths, cluster analysis, happiness, depression, 성격강점, 군집분석, 행복, 우울

Abstract

This study explored the natural groups based on Korean adult's character strengths using cluster analysis and examined the differences in happiness, depression, and demographic variables among the groups. The combinations of six virtues drawn from 827 adults over 20 years old formed five clusters. The 'Willing' group with high willing strengths showed the highest scores on satisfaction with life, happiness and ages and the lowest scores on depression. The 'Social' group with high temperance and justice showed the lowest scores on satisfaction with life and happiness and significantly high scores on depression. This group had the highest ratio of male, married, no religion, and full-time workers. The 'Intelligent' group with high knowledge showed the highest scores on depression and had the highest ratio of young, unmarried, and student. The 'Interpersonal' group with high interpersonal strengths showed the significantly low score on happiness and had the highest ratio of female and part-time workers. The 'Transcendent' group with high transcendence showed the mean scores on satisfaction with life, happiness, and depression. This group had the highest ratio of old people, Christians, and homemakers. The current study is considered as significant as it empirically identified the natural clusters based on the strengths of the adult Koreans and is believed to be useful for the intervention of adult's psychological health promotion. Finally, the limitations of the present study and suggestions for future research are discussed in the present study.

keywords
character strengths, cluster analysis, happiness, depression, 성격강점, 군집분석, 행복, 우울

참고문헌

1.

권석만, 김지영 (2011). 행복 삼각형 척도의 개발. 미발표 논문.

2.

권석만, 유성진, 임영진, 김지영 (2010). 성격강점검사-전문가 지침서. 서울: 학지사 심리검사연구소.

3.

김지영 (2011). 성격강점이 긍정적 정신건강에 미치는 영향. 서울대학교 박사학위 청구논문.

4.

김지영 (2014). 대학생의 성격강점비교: 인구통계학적 변인 및 만족도를 중심으로. 미래사회, 5(1), 79-95.

5.

김지영 (2016). 성격강점과 행복의 관계: 초·중·고등학생의 비교를 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 21(4), 845-859.

6.

류승아, 한민 (2016). 한국 여성의 연령별 행복수준 비교와 관련 변인들. 젠더와 문화, 9(1), 45-73.

7.

임영진 (2010). 성격강점과 긍정심리치료가 행복에 미치는 영향. 서울대학교 박사학위 청구논문.

8.

임영진 (2012). 성격강점과 정신적 웰빙의 관계. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 31(3), 713-730.

9.

전겸구, 최상진, 양병창 (2001). 통합적 한국판 CES-D 개발. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 6, 59-76.

10.

조명한, 차경호 (1998). 삶의 질에 대한 국가 간 비교. 서울: 집문당.

11.

한민, 이훈진, 최인철, 김범준 (2013). 60대 한국인의 심리적 특성: 정서, 사고방식, 가치관의 연령대별 비교. 한국노년학, 33(3), 661-679.

12.

Adler, A. (1956). The individual psychology of Alfred Adler: A systematic presentation in selections from his writings. In H. L. Ansbacher & R. R. Ansbacher (Eds.). New York: Basic Books.

13.

Ardelt, M., Landes, S. D., Gerlach, K. R., & Fox, L. P. (2013). Rediscovering internal strengths of the aged: The beneficial impact of wisdom, mastery, purpose in life, and spirituality on aging well. In J. D. Sinnott (Eds.), Positive Psychology (pp. 97-119). New York, NY: Springer.

14.

Depp, C. A., Glatt, S. J., & Jeste, D. V. (2007). Recent advances in research on successful and health aging. Current Psychiatry Reports, 9, 7-13.

15.

Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75.

16.

Erickson, E. (1982). The life cycle completed. New York: Norton.

17.

Freidlin, P., Littman-Ovadia, H., & Niemiec, R. M. (2017). Positive psychopathology: Social anxiety via character strengths underuse and overuse. Personality and Individual Differences, 108, 50-54.

18.

Gillham, J., Adams-Deutsch, A., Werner, J., Reivich, K., Coulter-Heindl, V., Linkins, M., . . . Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Character strengths predict subjective well-being during adolescence. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 6(1), 31-44.

19.

Goldman, B. M., & Kernis, M. H. (2002). The role of authenticity in healthy functioning and subjective well-being.. Annuals of the American Psychotherapy Association, 5, 18-20.

20.

Hair, J. F., & Black, W. C. (2000). Cluster analysis. In L. G. Grim & P. R. Yamold (Eds.), Reading and understanding more multivariate statistics (pp. 147-205). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

21.

Harding, S. R., Flannelly, K. J., Weaver, A. J., & Costa, K. G. (2005). The influence of religion on death anxiety and death acceptance. Mental Health, Religion, & Culture, 8(4), 253-261.

22.

Heintz, S., Kramm, C., & Ruch, W. (2017). A meta-analysis of gender differences in character stregnths and age, nation, and measure as moderators. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(1), 1-10.

23.

Isaacowitz, D. M., Vaillant, G. E., Seligman, M. E. P. (2003). Strengths and satisfaction across the adult lifespan. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 57(2), 181-201.

24.

Keyes, C. L. (1998). Social well-being. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61(2), 121-140.

25.

Krause, N. (2006). Gratitude toward God, stress, and health in late life. Research on Aging, 28(2), 163-183.

26.

Krause, N., Pargament, K. I., & Ironson, G. (2016). In the shadow of death: Religious hope as a moderator of the effects of age on death anxiety. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences. 73(4), 696-703.

27.

Lopez, S. J., & Snyder, C. R. (2003). Positive psychological assessment: A handbook of models and measures. Washington, DC: APA.

28.

Margelisch, K. (2017). Character strengths, their valuing and their association with well-being in middle and older age. Abschlussarbeit CAS Positive Psychologie, 8, 1-35.

29.

McGrath, R. E. (2014). Character strengths in 75 nations: An update. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 10(1), 41-52.

30.

McGrath, R. E. (2015). Integrating psychological and cultural perspectives on virtue: The hierachical structure of character strengths. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 10(5), 407-424.

31.

Mongrain, M., & Anselmo-Matthews, T. (2012). Do Positive Psychology Exercises Work? A Replication of Seligman et al.(2005). Journal of Clinical Psychology, 68(4), 382-389.

32.

Norton, P. J., & Weiss, B. J. (2009). The role of courage on behavioral approach in a fear-eliciting situation: A proof- of-concept pilot study. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 23, 212-217.

33.

Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2006). Moral competence and character strengths among adolescents: The development and validation of the Values in Action Inventory of Strengths for Youth. Journal of Adolescence, 29, 891-909.

34.

Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2009). Character strengths: Research and practice. Journal of College and Character, 10(4), 1-10.

35.

Park, N., Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004a). Strengths of character and well-being. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23(5), 603-619.

36.

Park, N., Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004b). Reply strengths of character and well-being: a closer look at hope and modesty. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23(5), 628-634.

37.

Park, N., Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2006). Character strengths in fifty-four nations and the fifty US states. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 1, 118-129.

38.

Peterson, C. (2006). A primer in positive psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.

39.

Peterson, C. Ruch, W., Beermann, U., Park, N., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2007). Strengths of character, orientations to happiness, and life satisfaction. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 2(3), 149-156.

40.

Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. New York: Oxford University Press.

41.

Proctor, C., Tsukayama, E., Wood, A. M., Maltby, J., Eades, J. F., & Linley, P. A. (2011). Strengths Gym: The impact of a character strengths-based intervention on the life satisfaction and well-being of adolescents. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 6(5), 377-388.

42.

Proyer, R. T., Gander, F., Wellenzohn, S., & Ruch, W. (2013a). What good are character strengths beyond subjective well-being?: The contribution of the good character on self-reported health-orientated behavior, physical fitness, and the subjective health status. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 8(3), 222-232.

43.

Radloff. L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological measurement, 1, 385-401.

44.

Robinson, M. D., Johnson, J. T., & Shields, S. A. (1995). On the advantages of modesty: The benefits of the balanced self-presentation. Communication Research, 22, 575-591.

45.

Rogers, C. R. (1971). Interview with Carl Rogers. In W. B. Frick (Ed.), Humanistic psychology: Interviews with Maslow, Murphy and Rogers (pp. 24-47). Columbus, OH: Merrill.

46.

Ruch, W., Proyer, R. T. & Weber, M. (2010). Humor as a character strength among the elderly. Theoretical considerations. Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 43, 8-12.

47.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78.

48.

Ryan, R. M., & Fredrick, C. (1997). On energy, personality, and health: Subjective vitality as a dynamic reflection of well-being. Journal of Personality, 65, 529-565.

49.

Sadler-Smith, E. (2012). Before virtue: biology, brain, behavior, and the "moral sense". Business Ethics Quarterly, 22, 351-376.

50.

Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Authentic Happiness. New York: Free Press.

51.

Seligman, M. E. P. (2015). Chris Peterson's unfinished masterwork: The mental illness. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 10(1), 3-6.

52.

Seligman, M. E. P., Rashid, T., & Parks, A. C. (2006). Positive psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 55, 5-14.

53.

Seligman, M. E. P., Steen, T. A., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2005). Positive psychology progress: Empirical validation of interventions. American Psychologist, 60(5), 410-421.

54.

Shimai, S., Otoke, K., Park, N., Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2006) Convergence of character strengths in American and Japaneese young adults. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7, 311-322.

55.

Toner, M., Haslam, N., Robinson, J., & Williams, P. (2012). Character strengths and wellbeing in adolescence: Structure and correlates of the Values in Action inventory of strengths for children. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 637-642.

56.

Vallerand, R. J., Salvy, S., Mageau, G. A., Elliot, A. J., Denis, P. L., Grouzet, F. M. E., & Blanchard, C. (2007). On the role of passion in performance. Journal of Personality, 75(3), 505-533.

57.

Wood, A. M., Linley, P. A., Maltby, J., Baliousis, M., & Joseph, S. (2008). The authentic personality: A theoretical and empirical conceptualization and the development of the Authenticity Scale. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 55(3), 385-399.

58.

World Health Organization (2004). Promoting mental health: concepts, emerging evidence, practice. Geneva: Author.

59.

Young, Y., Frick, K. D., & Phelan, E. A. (2009). Can successful aging and chronic illness coexist in the same individual? A multidimensional definition of successful aging. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 10(2), 87-92.

한국심리학회지: 건강