The Korean Journal of Health Psychology
- KOREAN
- P-ISSN1229-070X
- E-ISSN2713-9581
- KCI
The Effect of Anxiety Levels and Risk Perception on Attentional Process of Criminal Stimulus: Focusing on Attentional Bias
Abstract
This study administered (a)Change Detection Task, which consists of criminal words and neutral words, and (b)Comparison Blindness Task with three types of pictures(Risk+Risk Change, Risk+Neutral Stimulus, Neutral Stimulus+ Neutral Stimulus Change) to find the effect of anxiety levels and risk perception on attentional bias, compared with a control group, and conducted Comparison Blindness Task by presenting pictures as an alternative of words to supplement limits of Change Detection Task. Also, BAI and DOSPER were conducted among 432 undergraduate students and more than 20% of DOSPER scores was classified as the Risk Perception Group, out of which participants with more than 22 BAI scores were selected as a group with a high level of both anxiety and risk perception. The Anxiety&Risk Perception Group(n=21), Risk Perception Group(n=21), and Control Group(n=21) conducted Change Detection Task. Thereafter, there is not a significant difference between the Anxiety&Risk Perception Group and the Risk Perception Group, while the main effect among three groups is significant. However, the interaction between emotional conditions and words stimuli is significant and responses to criminal words are faster in case of positive emotion. These results indicated that as information increases, decision ability decreases by the effect of emotion, and the Anxiety & Risk Perception Group responded slowly in the condition of negative emotion and did not display any significant difference from the Risk Perception Group. In Experiment 2, attentional bias was tested through three types of pictures in Comparison Blindness Task. However, there was no significant difference in response time between the Anxiety+Risk Perception Group and the Risk Perception Group because of avoidant responses to anxiety. In the aspect of different conditions of picture stimuli types, the results showed response time was fast in Risk+Risk Change, Risk+Neutral Stimulus Change, Neutral+Neutral Stimulus Change in order. Finally, through response time analysis, results demonstrated the group with anxiety tendencies and the Risk Perception Group had attentional bias to risky stimuli and these attentional characteristics distinguished those groups from the control.
- keywords
- 위험지각, 위험감수, 불안, 범죄, 주의편향, 변화탐지, 비교맹시, risk perception, anxiety, crime, attention bias, change detection, comparison blindness
Reference
곽호완, 박창호, 이태연, 김문수, 진영선 (2008). 실험심리학 용어사전. 서울: ㈜시그마프레스.
권석만 (1996). 우울과 불안의 관계: 유발 생활사건과 인지내용에 있어서의 공통점과 차이점. 심리과학, 5(1), 13-38.
권석만 (1997). 불안장애의 정신병리 평가. 정신 병리학, 6(1), 37-51.
김보라 (2010). 한국어 정서유발 단어집의 개발. 연세대학교 의학과 석사학위 청구논문.
김상순 (2014). 기억 지시 조건과 단어 정서가가 노인과 대학생의 기억 수행에 미치는 영향: 억제적 통제능력과 정서의 긍정성 효과. 한림대학교 일반대학원 석사학위 청구논문.
박선희 (2010). 자극과 맥락의 정서성이 기억 수행에 미치는 영향. 전남대학교 심리학과 박사학위 청구논문.
박소영, 정은경, 손영우 (2012). 개인적 특성이 위험감수 의사결정에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 26(2), 51-67.
서미숙 (2004). 정서와 사고의 신경생리학적 기초. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 9(1), 53-68.
송해룡, 김원제 (2005). 위험 커뮤니케이션과 위험수용. 서울: 커뮤니케이션북스.
송해룡, 김찬원, 김원제 (2013). 미디어의존과 미디어 보도태도에 대한 수용자의 신뢰성 연구-원자력기술(발전소 포함) 을 중심으로. 정치커뮤니케이션 연구, 29, 115-147.
안서원, 도경수 (2005). 위험에 관한 형용사 어휘와 위험 대상의 분류과제에서 도출한 위험의 의미 구조. 한국심리학회지: 실험, 17(2), 203-222.
유성진, 신민섭, 김중술 (2003). 위협에 대한 재평가와 걱정증상, 상태불안 및 인지평가차원의 관계. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 22(2), 303-319.
육성필, 김중술 (1997). 한국판 Beck Anxiety Inventory의 임상적 연구: 환자군과 비환자군의 비교. Korea Joural of clinical psychology, 16(1), 185-197.
윤정선, 임성문 (2015). 자기애와 위험감수의 관계. 한국심리학회지: 문화 및 사회문제, 21(3), 419-455.
이영애 (2005). 위험지각 연구의 최근 동향. 한국심리학회지: 실험, 17(3), 265-277.
이영애, 이나경 (2005). 위험지각의 심리적 차원. 인지과학, 16(3), 199-211.
이은경, 이양희 (2006). 아동용 정서경험척도의 신뢰도 및 타당도 검증: 긍정적 정서와 부정적 정서를 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 발달, 19(4), 93-115.
조민경, 곽호완 (2010). 변화맹시과제 제시방법에 따른 성인 ADHD 성향군의 주의력 결함. 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물, 22(3), 355-368.
조은경 (1995). 정서와 인지: 정서가 정보처리과정에 대해 가지는 기능에 대해서. 한국심리학회 세미나 자료, 1995(1), 35-41.
조항민 (2011). 디지털미디어 등장과 새로운 위험유형에 관한 연구: 스마트폰의 위험특성과 이용자 위험인식분석을 중심으로. 성균관대학교 박사학위 청구논문.
최유연, 손정락 (2012). 긍정 심리치료가 사회 공포증 경향이 있는 대학생의 사회 불안, 낙관성 및 주관적 안녕감에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 17(3), 573-588.
최효임, 송한수, 신미연, 김인석, 현명호 (2005). 특성불안에 따른 공포/비공포 자극이 과제수행에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 10(1), 31-46.
Bar-Haim, Y., Lamy, D., Pergamin, L., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M., & vanIjzendoorn, M. (2007). Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: a meta-analytic study. Psychological Bulletin, 133(1), 1–24.
Beck, A. T., & Emery, G. (1985). Anxiety disorders and phobias: A cognitive perspective. New York: Basic Books.
Beck, A. T., Emery, G., & Greenberg, R. L. (1985). Anxiety disorders and phobias: a cognitive perspective. New York: Basic Books.
Beck, A. T., Epstein, N., Brown, G., & Steer, R. A. (1988). An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: Psychometric properties. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56(6), 893-897.
Bell, D. (1996). 정보화사회와 문화의 미래[The Winding Passage: Essays and Sociological Journeys 1960-1980] (서균환 역). 서울: 디자인하우스. (원전은 1980에 출판).
Bishop, S. J., Duncan, J., & Lawrence, A. D. (2004). State anxiety modulation of the amygdala response to unattended threat-related stimuli. Journal of Neuroscience, 24(46), 10364-10368.
Blais, A. R., & Weber, E. U. (2006). A Domain-Specific Risk-Taking(DOSPERT) scale for adult populations. Judgment and Decision Making, 1(1), 33-47.
Borkovec, T. D. (1985). Worry: a potentially valuable concept. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 23(4), 481-482.
Borkovec, T. D., Wilkinson, L., Folensbee, R., & Lerman, C. (1983). Stimulus control applications to the treatment of worry. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 21(3), 247-251.
Butler, G., & Mathews, A. (1983). Cognitive processes in anxiety. Advances in Behavior Research and Therapy, 5(1), 51-62.
Butler, G., & Mathews, A. (1987). Anticipatory anxiety and risk perception. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 11(5), 551-565.
Cisler, J. M., & Koster, E. H. M. (2010). Mechanisms of attentional biases towards threat in anxiety disorders: An integrative review. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(2), 203-216.
Dobson, K. S. (1985). The relationshop between anxiety and depression. Clinical Psychology Review, 5(4), 307-324.
Douglas, M., & Wildavsky, A. (1983). Risk and culture: An essay on the selection of technological and environmental dangers. Berkeley and Los Angeles: Univ of California Press.
Ferguson, M. A., Valenti, J. M., & Melwani, G. (1991). Communicating with risk takers: A public relations perspective. Public Relations Research Annual, 3(1-4), 195-224.
Finucane, M. L., Alhakami, A., Slovic, P., & Johnson, S. M. (2000). The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13(1), 1-17.
Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., Lichtenstein, S., Read, S., & Combs, B. (1978). How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits. Policy sciences, 9(2), 127-152.
Fox, E., Russo, R., Bowles, R., & Dutton, K. (2001). Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(4), 681-700.
Frijda, N. H. (1986). The emotions: Studies in emotion and social interaction. Paris: Maison de Sciences de l'Homme.
Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public-domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In I. Mervielde, I. J. Deary, F. De Fruyt, & F. Ostendorf (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe (Vol. 7, pp. 7-28). Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.
Haase, C. M., Tomasik, M. J., & Silbereisen, R. K. (2011). Effects of positive affect on risk perceptions in adolescence and young adulthood. Journal of Adolescence, 34(1), 29-37.
Highhouse, S., & Yuce, P. (1996). Perspectives, perceptions and risk-taking behaviour. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65(2), 159-167.
Johnson, B. B., & Covello, V. T. (Eds.). (1987). The social and cultural construction of risk. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-291.
Kraus, N. N., & Slovic, P. (1988). Taxonomic analysis of perceived risk: Modelling individual and group perceptions. Risk Analysis, 8(2), 177-187.
Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2005). International Affective Picture System(IAPS): Affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual. Technical report A-6. University of Florida, Gainesville. FL.
Loewenstein, G. F., Weber, E. U., Hsee, C. K., & Welch, N. (2001). Risk as feelings. Psychological bulletin, 127(2), 267-286.
MacLeod, C., Mathews, A., & Tata, P. (1986). Attentional bias in disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95(1), 15-20.
Marks, I. M. (1987). Fears, phobias and rituals. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Mogg, K., & Bradley, B. P. (1998). A cognitive-motivational analysis of anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 36(9), 809-848.
Nicholson, N., Soane, E., Fenton-O'Creevy, M., & Willman, P. (2005). Personality and domainspecific risk taking. Journal of Risk Research, 8(2), 157-176.
Rachman, S. (1998). Anxiety. Hove, UK: Psychology press.
Rapee, R. M., & Heimberg, R. G. (1997). A cognitive-behavioral model of anxiety in social phobia. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35(8), 741-756.
Rohner, J. (2002). The time-course of visual threat processing: High trait anxious individuals eventually avert their gaze from angry faces. Cognition and Emotion, 16(6), 837-844.
Salkovskis, P. M. (1996). The cognitive approach to anxiety: threat beliefs, safety-seeking behavior, and the special case of health anxiety and obsessions. In P. M. Salkovskis (Ed.), Frontiers of cognitive therapy (pp. 48-74). New York: The Guilford Press.
Schwarz, N., & Bless, H. (1991). Happy and mindless, but sad and smart? The impact of affective states on analytic reasoning. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Emotion and social judgments (pp. 55-77). Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.
Scott-Brown, K. C., Baker, M. R., & Orbach, H. S. (2000). Comparison blindness. Visual Cognition, 7(1-3), 253-267.
Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science, 236(4799), 280-285.
Slovic, P. (2000). The Perception of Risk. London, Sterling, Va.: Earthscan.
Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., & Lichtenstein, S. (1979). Rating the risks. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 21(3), 14-39.
Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., & Lichtenstein, S. (1984). Behavioral decision theory perspectives on risk and safety. Acta psychologica, 56(1-3), 183-203.
Slovic, P., Kunreuther, H., & White, G. F. (1974). Decision processes, rationality and adjustment to natural hazards. UK: Earthscan Publications.
Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2004). Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk analysis, 24(2), 311-322.
Soane, E., Dewberry, C., & Narendran, S. (2010). The role of perceived costs and perceived benefits in the relationship between personality and riskrelated choices. Journal of Risk Research, 13(3), 303-318.
Spielberger, C. D. (1972), Anxiety as an Emotional State, In C. D. Spielberger (Ed.), Anxiety : Current Trends in Theory and Research (pp. 23-49). New York: Academic Press.
Spielberger, C. D. (1977a). Theory and Measurement of Anxiety State. In R. B. Cattel & R. M. Dreger (Eds.), Handbook Modern Personality Theory (pp. 239-253). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Spielberger, C. D. (1977b). Anxiety : Theory and Research, International Encyclopedia of Neurology, Psychiatry, Psychoanalysis and Psychology. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Starr, C. (1969). Social benefit versus technological risk. Science, 165(3899), 1232-1238.
Terpstra, T. (2011). Emotions, Trust and Perceived Risk: Affective and Cognitive Routes to Flood Prepardness Behavior. Risk Analysis, 31(10), 1658-1675.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Journal of business, 59(4), S251-S278.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 297-323.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Carey, G. (1988). Positive and negative affect and their relation to anxiety and depressive disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 97(3), 346-353.
Weber, E. U., Blais, A. R., & Betz, N. E. (2002). A domain-specific risk-attitude scale: measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15(4), 263-290.
Wildavsky, A. (1987). Choosing preferences by constructing by institutions: A cultural theory of preference formation. American Political Science Review, 81(1), 3-21.
Williams, J. M. G., Watts, F. N., MacLeod, C., & Mathews, A. (1997). Cognitive psychology and emotional disorders (2nd ed.). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Yaxley, R., & Zwaan, R. A. (2005). Attentional bias affects change detection. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(6), 1106-1111.
- Downloaded
- Viewed
- 0KCI Citations
- 0WOS Citations