한국판 균형적 시간조망척도(K-BTPS)의 타당화 연구: 대학생을 중심으로
A Validation Study of the Korean Version of Balanced Time Perspective Scale(K-BTPS) involving Undergraduate Students
이정미 (용문상담심리대학원대학교)
- 다운로드 수
- 조회수
초록
본 연구는 Webster(2011)가 균형적 시간조망을 측정하기 위해 개발한 Balanced Time Perspective Scale(BTPS)을 한국판 척도로 타당화 하고자 하였다. 이를 위하여 먼저 원척도 문항들에 대해 번역과 역번역을 진행하였고, 전문가의 내용검토과정을 거쳐 문항을 수정하였으며, 이를 바탕으로 예비척도를 제작하였다. 다음으로 예비척도로 질문지를 구성하여 수도권 소재 대학교에 재학 중인 남녀 학생 663명(M=21.53세)을 대상으로 자료를 수집하였다. 표본 1(232명)의 자료에 대해 탐색적 요인분석을 실시한 결과 ‘미래긍정 시간조망’과 ‘과거긍정 시간조망’의 2개 요인이 추출되었고 총 26개 문항으로 이루어진 한국판 균형적 시간조망척도(K-BTPS)가 구성되었다. 이어 구성타당도와 2주 간격의 검사-재검사 신뢰도를 확인하여 양호한 결과를 얻었다. 관련 척도와의 상관분석을 통한 준거타당도 역시 양호한 수준의 타당도를 확인하였다. 다음으로, 표본 2(431명)의 자료에 대해 확인적 요인분석을 실시한 결과 앞 선 분석에서 제안된 2요인 측정모형이 수용할만한 정도의 적합도를 보여주었다. 덧붙여 평균을 기준으로 구분한 균형적 시간조망 하위집단별 행복, 삶의 만족, 자존감을 비교하여 척도의 유용성을 살펴보았다. 끝으로 K-BTPS의 한국 타당화 과정에서 발견된 연구의 한계점이 논의되었고, 후속연구를 위한 제언과 본 연구의 의의를 밝혔다.
- keywords
- Time Perspective, Balanced time perspective, Exploratory factor analysis, Confirmatory factor analysis, 시간조망, 균형적 시간조망, 척도타당화, 탐색적 요인분석, 확인적 요인분석
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to validate the Korean version of Balanced Time Perspective Scale (K-BTPS) involving undergraduate students. Typically, 663 college students (M=21.53) were recruited from several universities in Seoul, South Korea. The study sample included 271 men (32.73%) and 446 women (67.27%), randomly divided data into two groups for analysis. Data from Sample 1 (N=232) was analyzed for EFA (Explanatory Factor Analysis) and data from Sample 2 (N=431) was analyzed for CFA (Confirmatory Factor Analysis). The results were as follows; First, the two-factor structure of K-BTPS was applicable for use on Korean college students. Second, the K-BTPS showed moderate reliability with scales of happiness (OHQ), life satisfaction (SWLS), self-esteem (RSES) and with two subscales (ZTPI) of the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory. Third, the K-BTPS showed a good test-retest reliability with respect to two-week intervals. Forth, based on the mean of K-BTPS score, participants were allocated to four sub-groups as time restrictive, futurist, reminisces, and time expansive category and the relevance between balanced time perspective and other related variables were discussed. Finally, the implications and limitations of this study and suggestions for future studies are discussed in the present work.
- keywords
- Time Perspective, Balanced time perspective, Exploratory factor analysis, Confirmatory factor analysis, 시간조망, 균형적 시간조망, 척도타당화, 탐색적 요인분석, 확인적 요인분석
참고문헌
고려대학교 부설 행동과학연구소 (2001). 심리척도 핸드북Ⅰ. 서울: 학지사.
권대훈 (2016). 통제소제, 미래시간조망, 그릿(grit)과 지연의 관계분석. 교육학연구, 54(4), 21-43.
김외숙 (2003). 한국과 미국 대학생의 시간전망에 대한 비교연구. 한국가정관리학회지, 21(4), 1-10.
류연지 (1996). 성격 및 욕구수준이 주관적 안녕감에 미치는 영향. 연세대학교 대학원 석사학위 청구논문.
서수균, 권석만 (2002). 자존감 및 자기애 성향과 공격성의 관계. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 21(4), 809-826.
송명자 (2015). 발달심리학. 서울: 학지사.
윤소정, 김정섭 (2012). 한국형 Zimbardo 시간관 척도 타당화. 한국교육심리학회, 26(2), 587-606.
이순묵 (1990). 공변량구조분석. 서울: 성원사.
이순묵 (2000). 요인분석의 기초. 서울: 교육과학사.
이영자 (1996). 스트레스, 사회적 지지, 자아존중감과 우울 및 불안과의 관계. 서울여자대학교 박사학위 청구논문.
이훈진, 원호택 (1995). 편집증 척도의 신뢰도, 타당도 연구. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 14(1), 83-94.
전병재 (1974). Self-esteem: A test of its measurability. 연세논총, 11, 109-129.
정보라 (2004). 사회적 바람직성 구인탐색. 이화여자대학교 대학원 석사학위 청구논문.
정혜경, 노승혜, 조현주 (2017). 마음챙김 자비 프로그램(MLCP)이 우울경향 대학생의 우울, 반추, 마음챙김, 자기자비 및 사회적 유대감에 미치는 효과. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 22(2), 271-287.
최요원, 이수정 (2004). 대학생의 정서인식의 개인차가 정신건강에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 9(4), 887-901.
한경훈, 김병조, 노수림 (2017). 삶의 의미가 미래시간 조망에 미치는 영향-정적 정서와 부적 정서의 매개효과. 사회과학연구, 28(1), 41-60.
홍세희 (2000). 구조 방정식 모형의 적합도 지수 선정기준과 그 근거. 한국 심리학회지: 임상, 19(1), 43-55.
Barsics, C., Robetez, M. L., Rochat, L., Argembeau, A. D., & Linden, M. (2017). A French Version of the Balaced Time Perspective Scale: Factor Structure and Relation to Cognitive Reappraisal. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 49(1), 51-57.
Berzonsky, M. D. (1990). Self-construction over the life-span: A process perspective on identity formation. Advances in personal construct psychology, 1(1), 155-186.
Bishop, S. R., Lau, M., Shapiro, S., Carlson, L., & Anderson, N. D. (2004). Mindfulness A proposed operational definition. Clinical Psychology Science and Practice, 11(3), 230-241.
Boniwell, I. (2009). Perspectives on Time. In S. Lopez (Ed.), Handbook of Positive Psychology (pp. 295-302). New York: Oxford University Press.
Boniwell, I., & Zimbardo, P. (2003). Time to find the right balance. The Psychologist, 16(3), 4-5.
Boniwell, I., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2004). Balancing one's time perspective in pursuit of optimal functioning. In P. A. Linley & S. Joseph (Eds.), Positive Psychology in practice (pp. 165-179). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Boniwell, I., Osin, E., Linley, P. A., & Ivanchenko, G. V. (2010). A question of balance: Time perspective and well-being in British and Russian samples. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5(1), 24-40.
Bryant, F. B., Smart, C. M., & King, S. P. (2005). Using the past to enhance the present: Boosting happiness through positive reminiscence. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6(3), 227-260.
Cappeliez, P., O'Rourke, N., & Chaudhury, H. (2005). Function of reminiscence and mental health in later life. Aging Ment Health, 9(4), 295-301.
Carstensen, L. L. (1992). Social and emotional patterns in adulthood: Support for socioemotional selectivity theory. Psychology and Aging, 7(3), 331-338.
Coudin, G., & Lima, M. L. (2011). Being well as Time Goes By: Future time Perspective and Well-Being. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 11(2), 219-232.
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction With Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71-75.
Drake, L., Duncan, E., Sutherland, F., Abernethy, C., & Henry, C. (2008). Time Perspective and Correlates of Wellbeing. Time & Society, 17(1), 47-61.
Erikson, E. (1968). Identity: youth and crisis. Oxford, England: Norton & Co.
Hendricks, J., & Peters, C. B. (1986). The times of our lives: An integrative framework. American Behavioral Scientist, 29(5), 662-678.
Hills, P., & Argyle, M. (2002). The Oxford Happiness Questionnaire: A compact scale for the measurement of psychological well-being. Personality and individual differences, 33(7), 1073-1082.
Husman, J., & Shell, D. F. (2008). Beliefs and perceptions about the future: A measurement of future time perspective. Learning and Individual Differences, 18(2), 166-175.
Lennings, C. J., & Gow, K. (1997). Time perspective, self-efficacy and academic achievement in nursing students. Journal of Applied Social Behavior, 4(1), 37-51.
Lennings, C. J., & Burns, A. M., & Cooney, G. (1998). Profiles of time perspective and personality: Considerations. Journal of Psychology, 132(6), 629-641.
Liniauskaite, A., & Kairys, A. (2009). The Lithuanian version of the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory (ZTPI). Psichologija, 40, 66-87.
Litvinovic, G. (1999). Perceived change, time orientation and subjective well-being through the life span in Yugoslavia and the United States (Doctoral dissertation). University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
Luyckx, K., Lens, W., Smits, I., & Goossens, L. (2010). Time perspective and identity formation: Short-term longitudinal dynamics in college students. Journal of Behavioral Development, 34(3), 238-247.
Luyckx, K., Schwartz, S. J., Berzonsky, M. D., Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Smits, I., & Goossens, L. (2008). Capturing ruminative exploration: Extending the four-dimensional model of identity formation in late adolescence. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(1), 58-82.
Lyubomirsky, S., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1995). Effects of Self-Focused Rumination on Negative Thinking and Interpersonal Problem Solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(1), 176-190.
Mehta, P. H., Sundberg, N. D., Rohila, P. K., & Tyler, L. E. (1972). Future time perspectives of adolescents in India and in the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 3(3), 293-302.
Paulhus, D. L. (1984). Two component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(3), 589-609.
Paulhus, D. L. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 17-59). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Paulhus, D. L. (2002). Socially desirable responding: The evolution of a construct. In H. Braun, D. N. Jackson, & D. E. Wiley (Eds.), The role of constructs in psychological and educational measurement (pp. 67-88). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Rothspan, S., & Read, S. J. (1996). Present versus future time perspective and HIV risk among heterosexual college students. Health Psychology, 15(2), 131-134.
Seijts, G. H. (1998). The importance of future time perspective in theories of work motivation. Journal of Psychology, 132(2), 154-169.
Vowinckel, J. C. (2012). Balanced time perspectives and mindfulness (Bachelor's thesis). University of Twente, Netherland.
Webster, J. D. (2011). A New Measure of Time Perspective: Initial Psychometric Findings for the Balanced Time Perspective Scale (BTPS). Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 43(2), 111-118.
Webster, J. D. (2016). Reminiscence and anticipationL How a balanced time perspective predicts psychosocial strenghts. The International Journal for Reminiscence and Life Review, 3(1), 1-7.
Webster, J. D., & Ma, X. (2013). A balanced time perspective in adulthood: Well-being and developmental effects. Canadian Journal on Aging/La Revue canadienne du vieillissement, 32(4), 433-442.
Webster, J. D., Bohlmeijer, E. T., & Westerhof, G. J. (2014). Time to flourish: the relationship of temporal perspective to well-being and wisdom across adulthood. Aging & Mental Health, 18(8), 1046-1056.
Zhang, J. W., Howell, R T., & Stolarski, M. (2013). Comparing Three Methods to Measure a Balanced Time Perspective: The Relationship between a Balanced Time Perspective and Subjective Well-Being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(1), 169-184.
Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individualdifferences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1271-1288.
Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (2008). The Time Paradox: The New Psychology of Time That Will Change Your Life. New York: Simon & Schuster.
- 다운로드 수
- 조회수
- 0KCI 피인용수
- 0WOS 피인용수