바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology

  • KOREAN
  • P-ISSN1229-070X
  • E-ISSN2713-9581
  • KCI

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.25 No.1

Citation Share

Reliability, Validity, and Classification Accuracy of the DSM-5 Diagnostic Criteria for Gambling Disorder: Comparison to DSM-IV

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology / The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, (P)1229-070X; (E)2713-9581
2020, v.25 no.1, pp.115-123
https://doi.org/10.17315/kjhp.2020.25.1.007

(2020). Reliability, Validity, and Classification Accuracy of the DSM-5 Diagnostic Criteria for Gambling Disorder: Comparison to DSM-IV. The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, 25(1), 115-123, https://doi.org/10.17315/kjhp.2020.25.1.007

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability, validity and classification accuracy of the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for Gambling Disorder and to compare the DSM-5 and DSM-IV in terms of reliability, validity, and classification accuracy. Participants were recruited from among clients receiving gambling treatment services to represent the group with a GD and from the community to represent the group without a GD (clients n=99, community n=118). All participants were administered a standardized measure of diagnostic criteria. As a result, the DSM-5 yielded satisfactory reliability, validity, and classification accuracy. On comparing the DSM-5 with the DSM-IV, most comparisons of reliability, validity and classification accuracy showed more similarities. There was evidence of modest deterioration in false positive errors for DSM-5 over DSM-IV. Finally, the limitations of this study and future research directions were discussed.

keywords
DSM-IV PG, DSM-5 GD, reliability, validity, classification accuracy, ROC, DSM-IV 병적 도박, DSM-5 도박장애, 신뢰도, 타당도, 진단적 분류의 정확성, ROC

Reference

1.

American Psychiatric Association. (1980). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

2.

American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

3.

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

4.

Black, D. W., Monahan, P. O., Temkit, M. H., & Shaw, M. (2006). A family study of pathological gambling. Psychiatry Research, 141(3), 295-303.

5.

Blanco, C., Hasin, D. S., Petry, N., Stinson, F. S., & Grant, B. F. (2006). Sex differences in subclinical and DSM-IV pathological gambling: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Psychological medicine, 36(7), 943-953.

6.

Cichetti, D. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6, 284–290.

7.

Denis, C., Fatseas, M., & Auriacombe, M. (2012). Analyses related to the development of DSM-5criteria for substance use related disorders: 3. An assessment of Pathological Gambling criteria. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 122, 22–27.

8.

Ferris, J., & Wynne, H. (2001). The Canadian problem gambling index: Final report. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.

9.

Jiménez-Murcia, S., Stinchfield, R., Alvarez-Moya, E., Jaurrieta, N., Bueno, B., Granero, R., & Vallejo, J. (2009). Reliability, validity, and classification accuracy of a Spanish translation of a measure of DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for pathological gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 25(1), 93-104.

10.

Kessler, R. C., Hwang, I., LaBrie, R., Petukhova, M., Sampson, N. A., Winters, K. C., & Shaffer, H. J. (2008). DSM-IV pathological gambling in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Psychological medicine, 38(9), 1351-1360.

11.

Lorains, F. K., Cowlishaw, S., & Thomas, S. A. (2011). Prevalence of comorbid disorders in problem and pathological gambling: Systematic review and meta‐analysis of population surveys. Addiction, 106(3), 490-498.

12.

Nalpas, B., Yguel, J., Fleury, B., Martin, S., Jarraud, D., & Craplet, M. (2011). Pathological gambling in treatment-seeking alcoholics: a national survey in France. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 46(2), 156-160.

13.

Petry, N. M. (2010). Pathological gambling and the DSM-V. International Gambling Studies, 10, 113-115.

14.

Petry, N. M., Stinson, F. S., & Grant, B. F. (2005). Comorbidity of DSM-IV pathological gambling and other psychiatric disorders: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. The Journal of clinical psychiatry, 66(5), 564-574.

15.

Stinchfield, R. (2003). Reliability, validity, and classification accuracy of a measure of DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for pathological gambling. American Journal of Psychiatry, 160(1), 180-182.

16.

Stinchfield, R., Govoni, R., & Frisch, G. R. (2005). DSM-IV Diagnostic criteria for pathological gambling: Reliability, validity, and classification accuracy. The American Journal on Addictions, 14(1), 73-82.

17.

Stinchfield, R., McCready, J., Turner, N. E., Jimenez-Murcia, S., Petry, N. M., Grant, J., Welte, J., Chapman, H., & Winters, K. C. (2016). Reliability, validity, and classification accuracy of the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for gambling disorder and comparison to DSM-IV. Journal of Gambling Studies, 32(3), 905–922. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-015-9573-7

18.

Temcheff, C. E., Derevensky, J. L., & Paskus, T. S. (2011). Pathological and disordered gambling: A comparison of DSM-IV and DSM-V criteria. International Gambling Studies, 11(2), 213–220.

19.

Toce‐Gerstein, M., Gerstein, D. R., & Volberg, R. A. (2003). A hierarchy of gambling disorders in the community. Addiction, 98(12), 1661-1672.

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy