Associations Among Self-Reported Acceptance for Differences, Perception of Partner’s Acceptance for Differences, and Couples’ Relationship Quality

임아영; 이훈진

doi:10.17315/kjhp.2022.27.5.001

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology

KOREAN
P-ISSN1229-070X
E-ISSN2713-9581
KCI

Home

OA Policy

Article Contents

e-Submission

Vol.27 No.5

Citation Share

Associations Among Self-Reported Acceptance for Differences, Perception of Partner’s Acceptance for Differences, and Couples’ Relationship Quality

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology / The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, (P)1229-070X; (E)2713-9581

2022, v.27 no.5, pp.719-743

https://doi.org/10.17315/kjhp.2022.27.5.001

& (2022). Associations Among Self-Reported Acceptance for Differences, Perception of Partner’s Acceptance for Differences, and Couples’ Relationship Quality. The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, 27(5), 719-743, https://doi.org/10.17315/kjhp.2022.27.5.001

copy

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore the effect of self-reported Acceptance for Differences(AD) and perception of partners’ AD on the quality of couples’ relationship, and explored perceptual accuracy and bias in the perception of partners’ AD in a sample of 200 couples. The actor effects as well as partner effects of self-reported AD, as well as the perception of partners’ AD on couple relationship quality, were found among men and women. The actor effect was greater than the partner effect. Additionally, the Truth and Bias (T&B) model was administered to examine the associations between self-reported AD, as well as the perception of partners’ AD. Results indicate a perceptual similarity bias, as well as a perceptual accuracy in men and women. The gender difference in perceptual accuracy was insignificant, and males showed greater bias than females, in perceptual similarity bias. Negative directional bias was found only in women. Finally, the implications and limitations of the study discussed.

keywords: acceptance for differences in couple relationships, perceptual accuracy, perceptual bias, couple relationship quality, 커플관계 다름 수용 태도, 커플관계 질, 지각의 정확성, 지각의 편향

Reference

강지영, 이인수 (2017). 단절 및 거절도식이 부부친밀감에 미치는 영향에서 지각된 배우자지지의 매개효과: 자기-상대방효과. 상담학연구, 18(2), 351-373.

강혜숙, 김영희 (2012). 부부의 성격특성이 결혼만족도에 미치는 자기효과와 상대방효과. 상담학연구, 13(6), 2861-2880.

권정혜, 채규만 (1999). 한국판 결혼 만족도 검사의 표준화 및 타당화 연구1. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 18(1), 123-139.

김미숙, 김명자 (1989). 도시 부부의 결혼안정성 및 그관련변인 연구. 가정과삶의질연구, 8(1), 171-183.

김아영, 조영주 (2018). 자기분화가 부부갈등에 미치는자기효과와 상대방효과에서 건설적 및 역기능적 의사소통의 매개효과. 한국심리학회지: 여성, 23(4), 567-588.

박효경, 김은하 (2017). 미혼커플의 내현적 자기애와 정서표현 양가성이 이성관계 만족도에 미치는 영향:자기효과와 상대방효과. 상담학연구, 18(6), 203-217.

연수진, 서수균 (2013). 이성관계에서 안정애착이 갈등해결전략과 관계만족도에 미치는 영향: 자기효과와상대방효과. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 32(2), 411-431.

이경성, 한덕웅 (2005). 친밀한 이성관계에서 이상과 현재의 차이가 관계만족에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 19(1), 163-184.

이경희 (1998). 부인이 지각한 갈등과 친밀감에 따른 부부관계 유형. 서울대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.

10.

이기복 (2006). 결혼만족도 향상을 위한 수용 프로그램. 서울여자대학교 대학원 박사학위 논문.

11.

이선희, 임성문 (2013). 통합적 행동부부치료에 기초한기혼여성의 결혼만족도 향상 프로그램과 개발과 효과 검증. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 25(3). 449-476.

12.

이은지, 서영석, 백근영, 최바올, 김애란, 왕윤정 (2013). 커플의 성인애착과 관계만족: 관계진솔성의 매개효과 검증. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 25(2), 227-250.

13.

임아영, 이훈진 (2020). IBCT에 기반한 커플관계 다름수용 척도 개발 및 타당화. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 39(4), 599-632.

14.

임아영, 이훈진 (2021). 성격특성과 커플관계 만족도의관계에서 갈등해결전략과 다름 수용 태도의 매개효과. 한국심리학회지: 여성, 26(3), 123-149.

15.

장춘미 (2001). 스트레스가 결혼만족에 미치는 영향: 부부의 지지 및 갈등해결행동을 중심으로. 서울여자대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.

16.

정교영, 신희천 (2007). 부부치료의 주요 이론적 접근과최근 연구동향. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 19(1), 1-30.

17.

정은희 (2004). 원가족분화, 자아존중감과 부부 갈등대처방식에 따른 결혼안정성 연구. 성신여자대학교대학원 석사학위논문.

18.

조영주 (2017). 미혼 커플의 비난 및 철회 의사소통에서지각의 정확성과 편향. 한국심리학회지: 여성, 22(3), 417-443.

19.

조영주 (2019). 부부의 자기보고 결혼만족 및 지각된 배우자의 결혼만족 간의 관계: 성차를 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 여성, 24(1), 67-85.

20.

조영주 (2020). 파트너에 대한 공감, 지각된 파트너의공감과 커플 관계만족의 관계. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 32(4), 1941-1965.

21.

조영주, 심은정 (2017). 남녀 대학생의 성인애착이 관계만족에 미치는 영향에서 파트너에 대한 공감과 지각된 파트너의 공감의 매개효과. 상담학연구, 18(6), 179-202.

22.

한소영, 신희천 (2006). 커플 기본 심리적 욕구 중요성척도의 개발. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 18(4), 817-835.

23.

한소영, 신희천 (2007). 커플 기본 심리적 욕구 중요성척도의 다집단 요인분석과 잠재평균분석. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 19(2), 447-465.

24.

Berger, R., & Hannah, M. (1999). Handbook of preventive approaches in couple therapy. Brunner/Mazel.

25.

Booth, A., Johnson, D., & Edwards, J. N. (1983). Measuring marital instability. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45(2), 387-394.

26.

Caughlin, J. P., & Scott, A. M. (2010). Toward a communication theory of the demand/withdraw pattern of interaction in interpersonal relationships. In S. W. Smith & S. R. Wilson (Eds.), New directions in interpersonal communication research (pp. 180-200). Sage.

27.

Coleman, L., Mitcheson, J., & Lloyd, G. (2013). Couple relationships: Why are they important for health and wellbeing? Journal of Health Visiting, 1(3), 168-172.

28.

Cook, W. L., & Kenny, D. A. (2005). The actor-partner interdependence model: A model of bidirectional effects in developmental studies. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29(2), 101-109.

29.

Cramer, D., & Jowett, S. (2010). Perceived empathy, accurate empathy and relationship satisfaction in heterosexual couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27(3), 327-349.

30.

Christensen, A., & Jacobson, N. S. (1997). Frequency and acceptability of partner behavior inventory. Unpublished measure, University of California.

31.

Davis, M. H., & Oathout, H. A., (1987). Maintenance of satisfaction in romantic relationships: Empathy and relational competence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(2), 397-410.

32.

Fletcher, G. J., & Kerr, P. S. (2010). Through the eyes of love: reality and illusion in intimate relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 136(4), 627-658.

33.

Hall, J. A. (1984). Nonverbal sex differences:Communication accuracy and expressive style. Johns Hopkins University Press.

34.

Jackson, J. B., Miller, R. B., Oka, M., & Henry, R. G. (2014). Gender differences in marital satisfaction:A meta‐analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76(1), 105-129.

35.

Jacobson, N. S., & Christensen, A. (1996). Acceptance and change in couple therapy: A therapist's guide to transforming relationships. W.W. Norton & Company.

36.

Jacobson, N. S., Christensen, A., Prince, S. E., Cordova, J., & Eldridge, K. (2000). Integrative behavioral couple therapy: an acceptance-based, promising new treatment for couple discord. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68(2), 351-355.

37.

Javadivala, Z., Allahverdipour, H., Jafarabadi, M. A., Azimi, S., Gilani, N., & Chattu, V. K. (2021). Improved couple satisfaction and communication with marriage and relationship programs: are there gender differences?—a systematic review and meta-analysis. Systematic Reviews, 10(1), 1-14.

38.

Kenny, D. A. (1996). Models of non-independence in dyadic research. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 13(2), 279-294.

39.

Kenny, D. A. (2011). Commentary: Dyadic analyses of family data. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 36(5), 630-633.

40.

Kenny, D. A. (2015). An interactive tool for the estimation and testing the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model using multilevel modeling [software]. Available from https://davidakenny.shinyapps.io/APIM_MM/.

41.

Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. Guilford press.

42.

Kline, B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Press.

43.

Larned, A. G. (2006). Examining expressed empathy, received empathy, and a need for power as predictors of marital satisfaction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Lynch School of Education.

44.

Ledermann, T., & Kenny, D. A. (2017). Analyzing dyadic data with multilevel modeling versus structural equation modeling: A tale of two methods. Journal of Family Psychology, 31(4), 442-452.

45.

Lemay, E. P., Jr, Clark, M. S., & Feeney, B. C. (2007). Projection of responsiveness to needs and the construction of satisfying communal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(5), 834-853.

46.

Mairal, J. B. (2015). Integrative Behavioral Couple Therapy (IBCT) as a third-wave therapy. Psicothema, 27(1), 13-18.

47.

Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., Bellavia, G., Griffin, D. W., & Dolderman, D. (2002). Kindred spirits? The benefits of egocentrism in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(4), 563-581.

48.

Neff, L. A., & Karney, B. R. (2005). To know you is to love you: The implications of global adoration and specific accuracy for marital relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(3), 480-497.

49.

Priem, J. S., Solomon, D. H., & Steuber, K. R. (2009). Accuracy and bias in perceptions of emotionally supportive communication in marriage. Personal Relationships, 16(4), 531-552.

50.

Thomas, G., & Fletcher, G. J. (2003). Mind-reading accuracy in intimate relationships: assessing the roles of the relationship, the target, and the judge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(6), 1079-1094.

51.

West, T. V., & Kenny, D. A. (2011). The truth and bias model of judgment. Psychological Review, 118(2), 357-378.

바로가기메뉴

Article Contents

Vol.27 No.5

Associations Among Self-Reported Acceptance for Differences, Perception of Partner’s Acceptance for Differences, and Couples’ Relationship Quality

Abstract

Reference

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology