ISSN : 1229-0653
본 연구에서는 차별경험이 내외집단에 대한 평가와 내외집단 성원에 대한 평가에 미치는 영향을 살펴보았다. 이를 위해 실험 1에서는 내외집단의 바람직한 성원이나 바람직하지 않은 성원에 대한 정보를 제시하고 이들에 대한 전반적인 인상을 평가하도록 하였다. 그 결과 차별경험으로 외집단의 바람직한 인물은 더 긍정적으로, 바람직하지 않은 인물은 더 부정적으로 평가됨을 볼 수 있었다. 반면 내집단 성원에 대한 평가에는 영향을 미치지 않았다. 실험 2에서는 차별경험에 따라 내외집단에 대한 평가와 그 성원에 대한 평가가 다른 방향으로 이루어진다는 것을 보다 직접적으로 알아보았다. 이를 위해 실험 1의 절차에 앞서 집단에 대한 평가를 실시하였다. 그 결과, 차별 경험이 외집단에 대한 평가를 더 부정적으로 함을 볼 수 있었다. 이에 반해 그 성원에 대한 평가는 실험 1과 같이 외집단의 바람직한 인물은 더 긍정적으로, 바람직하지 않은 인물은 더 부정적으로 평가되었다. 이 같은 결과는 차별경험에 따라 내외 집단에 대한 평가와 그 성원에 대한 평가가 이중적으로 이루어진다는 것을 나타낸다. 마지막으로 연구의 시사점과 제한점에 대해 논의하였다.
The present study examined the influence of discrimination experience on evaluation of in-group/ out-group and its member. For this aim, two experiments were conducted. In experiment 1, participants received information that described either a favorable or unfavorable in-group/out-group member and then evaluated the person whom they read about. The results showed that the participants who experienced discrimination evaluated the unfavorable out-group member more negatively and the favorable out-group member more positively than those in the non-discrimination condition. The evaluation of in-group member was not influenced by the discrimination experience. The procedure of Experiment 2 was the same as that of Experiment 1 except for adding evaluation of in-group/out group before its member. The result showed that participants who experienced discrimination evaluated the out-group more unfavorably than those in the non-discrimination condition. The evaluation of its member was the same with Experiment 1. This result suggests that information processing and evaluation of group and its member can differ. Implications and limits of the study are discussed.
(1997) 내집단 자존감과 차별경험이 내외집단에 대한 정보처리와 평가에 미치는 영향,
(2002) 성차별 경험이 여성의 사회적 정체감에 미치는 영향,
(1988) 지역간 고정관념과 편견의 실상 - 세대간 전이가 존재하는가? - 심리학에서 본 지역감정, 한국심리학회 편
(1996) 집단 구성원의 태도에 대한 사회적 가치와 내집단규범 집단극화의 동기적 기제의 탐색,
(2000) 투표에서의 연고주의 집단주의 경향성과의 관계 및 기저 동기,
(1996) 집단행동의 비판적 개관(Ⅱ): 집단간 관계 이론을 중심으로,
(1954) The nature of prejudice,
(1993) In-group or out-group extremity Impor- tance of the threatened social identity,
(2001) Blackwell handbook of social psychology:Intergroup process., Blackwell
(1989) The self-protective properties of stigma,
(1975) Women's reaction to discrimination from members of the same or opposite sex,
(1979) The social psychology of intergroup relation, Brooks/Cole
(1986) Responses to perceived discrimination and relative deprivation,
(2006) Social psychology, Norton & Company Inc
(1981) Cognitive process in stereotyping and intergroup behavior,
(1989) Implications for stereotypic theory and research, Springer-Verlag
(1996) Perceving person and groups,
(1983) The explanation of intergroup differences in Hong Kong,
(1982) European Journal of Social Psychology,
(1990) The effects of typicality and group heterogeneity Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
(1994) rejection of ingroup deviates and perception of group variability European review of social psychology,
(1988) Judgemental extremity toward ingroup members as a function of group identification European Journal of Social Psy- chology,
(2002) Stereotypes as explanations The formation of meaningful beliefs about social groups, Cambidge University Press
(1985) Exacerbation of extreme responses to an out-group,
(1992) Accuracy and expectancy-confirming processing orientations and the development of stereotypes and prejudice European Review of Social Psychology,
(1985) Handbook of social psychology, Random House
(1984) Processing time and the recall of inconsistent and consistent behaviors of individuals and groups Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
(1994) The effects of perceived target unity on trait judgments,
(1970) Experiments in intergroup discrimina-,
(1974) Ethnocentrism and causal attribution in a South Indian context,
(2006) 韓國心理學會誌: 社會 및 性格,
The Influence of Discrimination Experience on Evaluation of In-group/Out-group and Those Members, KyonggiYonsei National University
The present study examined the influence of discrimination experience on evaluation of in-group/ out-group and its member participants received information that described either a favorable or unfavorable in-group/out-group member and then evaluated the person whom they read about The results showed that the participants who experienced discrimination evaluated the unfavorable out-group member more negatively and the favorable out-group member more positively than those in the non-discrimination condition The evaluation of in-gr,