바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

  • P-ISSN1229-0653
  • KCI

문화성향, 성역할 정체감 및 도덕적 지향성

Cultural Dispositions, Sex-Role Identity, and Moral Orientation

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격 / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2007, v.21 no.1, pp.105-126
https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2007.21.1.008
조긍호 (서강대학교)
이재영 (중동고등학교)

초록

문화성향에 따라 성역할 정체감과 도덕적 지향성이 달라진다는 사실을 고등학생을 대상으로 한 문화 내적 비교의 방법으로 분석하였다. 그 결과, 남성성 성역할 정체감과 정의지향적 도덕성 수준은 개인중심성향자가 집단중심성향자보다 높고, 반대로 여성성 성역할 정체감과 배려지향적 도덕적 수준은 집단중심성향자가 개인중심성향자보다 높았다. 또한 여성성 성역할 정체감은 집단중심성향이 배려지향적 도덕성에 영향을 미치는 과정에서 어느 정도 매개 역할을 함이 밝혀졌다. 이러한 결과는 두 문화성향 집단의 인간관과 대인관계 조망의 차이를 근거로 하여 논의되었다.

keywords
cultural disposition(idiocentric-allocentric), sex-role identity(masculinity-femininity), moral orientation(justice-caring), 문화성향(개인중심·집단중심), 성역할 정체감(남성성·여성성), 도덕성(정의지향·배려지향)

Abstract

This study was to investigate the differences of sex-role identity and of moral orientation between idiocentric and allocentric adolescents in Korea. From the total of 597 2nd-year high school students living in Seoul, 100 idiocentrics(20.8%) and 95 allocentrics(19.8%) were selected based on their INDCOL responses. As expected, (1) idiocentrics and allocentrics showed higher-levels of masculinity and of femininity sex-role identity than the other, respectively; (2) they reached higher-levels of justice-oriented and of care-oriented morality than the other, respectively; and (3) the overriding sex-role identity of each cultural-disposition-group mediates the development of their relevant moral orientation (especially femininity sex-role identity of allocentrics mediates the development of care-oriented morality level in this group). These results implicate that the pervasive type of moral orientation of a society is internalized as the sex-role identity level which is highly appreciated in that society is maturated.

keywords
cultural disposition(idiocentric-allocentric), sex-role identity(masculinity-femininity), moral orientation(justice-caring), 문화성향(개인중심·집단중심), 성역할 정체감(남성성·여성성), 도덕성(정의지향·배려지향)

참고문헌

1.

김기범 (1996). 대인관계 속에서의 도덕성과 내집단-외집단 구별:문화비교 분석 연구. 미간행 석사학위 논문, 중앙대학교.

2.

김정규, 박찬주 (1991). 도덕성 발달과 측정:인지발달론적 접근과 DIT. 서울:성원사.

3.

김호권 (1969). 도덕성의 발달과 교육. 정원식 편, 정의의 교육 (pp. 211-234). 서울:배영사.

4.

노명식 (1991). 자유주의의 원리와 역사:그 비판적 연구. 서울:민음사.

5.

문용린 (1986). 생활 문제 설문지:한국어판 DIT 설문지. 서울:한국교육개발원 도덕교육연구실.

6.

박전규 (1985). 아리스토텔레스의 실천적 지혜. 서울:서광사.

7.

박정현 (2005). 하얀 얼굴이 좋은 메트로 섹슈얼리즘:미남은 꽃보다 아름답다. LG경제연구원 편, 2010 대한민국 트렌드 (pp. 51-55). 서울:한국경제신문.

8.

박찬주 (1989). 한국인의 도덕 판단과 행동 선택에 관한 DIT 적용 연구. 미간행 박사학위 논문, 건국대학교.

9.

심미옥 (2001). 교직의 여성화와 교직에서의 여성. 2001년 한국교육사회학회 하계학술발표회 발표논문.

10.

심재호 (1992). 한국 청소년의 도덕성 발달 경향에 대한 분석연구:J. R. Rest의 DIT를 중심으로. 미간행 석사학위논문, 고려대학교.

11.

이수원 (1995a). 한국인의 인정:그 심리학의 함의 (Ⅰ). 임능빈 편, 동양사상과 심리학 (pp. 545-560). 서울:성원사.

12.

이수원 (1995b). 한국인의 인정:그 심리학의 함의 (Ⅱ). 임능빈 편, 동양사상과 심리학 (pp. 561-581). 서울:성원사.

13.

장성수, 이수원, 정진곤 (1990). 한국인의 인간관계에 나타난 분배정의에 관한 연구. 교육논총, 3, 217-265. 한양대학교 교육문제연구소.

14.

정옥분, 곽경화 (2003). 배려지향적 도덕성과 정의지향적 도덕성. 서울:집문당.

15.

정진경 (1990). 한국 성역할 검사(KSRI). 한국심리학회지:사회, 5(1), 82-92.

16.

조긍호 (1993). 대인평가의 문화간 차이:대인평가 이원모형의 확대 시론. 한국심리학회지:사회, 7(1), 124- 149.

17.

조긍호 (1996). 문화유형과 타인이해 양상의 차이. 한국심리학회지:일반, 15(1), 104-139.

18.

조긍호 (1997). 문화유형과 정서의 차이:한국인의 정서 이해를 위한 시론. 심리과학, 6(2), 1-43. 서울대학교 심리과학연구소.

19.

조긍호 (1998). 유학심리학:맹자․순자 편. 서울:나남출판.

20.

조긍호 (1999). 문화유형에 따른 동기의 차이. 한국심리학회지:사회 및 성격, 13(2), 233-273.

21.

조긍호 (2000). 문화유형과 동기의 차이:한국인의 동기 이해를 위한 시론. 한국심리학회지:사회 및 성격, 14(2), 83-122.

22.

조긍호 (2002). 문화성향과 허구적 독특성 지각 경향. 한국심리학회지:사회 및 성격, 16(1), 91-111.

23.

조긍호 (2003a). 한국인 이해의 개념틀. 서울:나남출판.

24.

조긍호 (2003b). 문화성향과 통제 양식. 한국심리학회지:사회 및 성격, 17(2), 85-106.

25.

조긍호 (2005). 문화성향에 따른 유사성 판단의 비대칭성. 한국심리학회지:사회 및 성격, 19(1), 45-63.

26.

조긍호 (2006). 이상적 인간형론의 동․서 비교:새로운 심리학의 가능성 탐색Ⅰ. 서울:지식산업사.

27.

조긍호, 김소연 (1998). 겸양편향자의 선호 현상. 한국심리학회지:사회 및 성격, 12(1), 169-189.

28.

조긍호, 김은진 (2001). 문화성향과 동조행동. 한국심리학회지:사회 및 성격, 15(1), 139-165.

29.

조긍호, 김지용, 홍미화, 김지현 (2002). 문화성향과 공감 및 고독의 수준. 한국심리학회지:사회 및 성격, 16(3), 15-34.

30.

조긍호, 명정완 (2001). 문화성향과 자의식의 유형. 한국심리학회지:사회 및 성격, 15(2), 111-139.

31.

朱 熹 (1177). 論語集註 (京城書籍組合 編, 原本備旨 論語集註. 서울:太山文化社, 1984.).

32.

최상진, 한규석 (2000). 문화심리학적 연구방법론. 한국심리학회지:사회 및 성격, 14(2), 123-144.

33.

한규석 (1991). 사회심리학 이론의 문화특수성:한국인의 사회심리학 연구를 위한 고찰. 한국심리학회지:사회, 6(1), 132-155.

34.

한규석 (2002). 사회심리학의 이해 (개정판). 서울:학지사.

35.

한규석, 오점조 (1993). 아동의 교류 양상에 대한 분석:집단주의-개인주의 이론의 적용. 한국심리학회지:사회 및 성격, 7(1), 185-197.

36.

Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence. San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.

37.

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator- mediator variable distinction in social psychological research:Conceptual, strategic, and statistical con- siderations. Journal of Personality and Social Psy- chology, 51, 1173-1182.

38.

Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155-162.

39.

Bergling, K. (1981). Moral development:The validity of Kohlberg’s theory. Stockholm:Almquist and Wiksell International.

40.

Bond, M. H. (1994). Into the heart of collectivism:A personal and scientific journey. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. C. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism:Theory, method, and applications (pp. 66-76). Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.

41.

Bordt, M. (1999). Platon. Freiburg:Verlag Herder. (한석환 역. 철학자 플라톤. 서울:이학사, 2003.)

42.

Clark, M. S., & Mills, J. (1993) The difference between communal and exchange relationships:What is and is not. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 684-691.

43.

Dweck, C. S. (1991). Self-theories and goals:Their role in motivation, personality, and development. In R. A. Dienstbier (Ed.), Perspectives on motivation:Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1990 (pp. 199- 235). Lincoln, NB:University of Nebraska Press.

44.

Edwards, C. (1981). The comparative study of the devel- opment of moral judgement and reasoning. In R. L. Munroe, R. H. Munroe, & B. Whiting (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural human development (pp. 501-531). New York:Garland.

45.

Fiske, A. P., Kitayama, S., Markus, H. R., & Nisbett, R. E. (1998). The cultural matrix of social psychology. In D. T. Gillbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 915-981). Boston, MA:McGraw-Hill.

46.

Geen, R. G. (1995). Human motivation:A social psycho- logical approach. Pacific Grove, CA:Brooks/Cole.

47.

Gielen, U. P., & Markoulis, D. C. (1994). Preference for principled moral reasoning:A developmental and cross-cultural perspective. In L. L. Adler & U. P. Gielen (Eds.), Cross-cultural topics in psychology (pp. 73-87). Westport, CT:Praeger.

48.

Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice:Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.

49.

Guthrie, W. K. C. (1960). The Greek philosophers:From Thales to Aristotle. New York:Harper & Row. (박종현 역. 희랍 철학 입문:탈레스에서 아리스토텔레스까지. 서울:서광사, 2003.)

50.

Hamilton, V. L., Blumenfeld, C., Akoh, H., & Miura, K. (1990). Credit and blame among American and Japanese children:Normative, cultural, and indi- vidual differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 442-451.

51.

Hilgard, E. R. (1980). The trilogy of mind:Cognition, affection, and conation. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 16, 107-117.

52.

Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences:Interna- tional differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA:Sage.

53.

Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations:Soft- ware of the mind. London:McGraw-Hill. (차재호, 나은영 역. 세계의 문화와 조직. 서울:학지사, 1995.)

54.

Hsu, F. L. K. (1971). Psychological homeostasis and jen:Conceptual tools for advancing psychological anthropology. American Anthropologist, 73, 23-44.

55.

Hui, C. H., & Triandis, H. C. (1986). Individualism and collectivism:A study of cross-cultural researchers. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 17, 225- 248.

56.

Kagitcibasi, C. (1997). Individualism and collectivism. In J. W. Berry, M. H. Segall, & C. Kagitcibasi (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 3, pp. 1-49). Boston, MA:Allyn & Bacon.

57.

Kenny, D. A. (2001). Mediation:Issues and questions. Retrieved from http://nw3.nai.net/~dakenny/mediate. htm

58.

Kittay, E. F., & Meyers, D. T. (Eds.). (1987). Women and moral theory. Totowa, NJ:Rowman & Littlefield.

59.

Kohlberg, S. (1976). Moral stages and moralization:The cognitive-developmental approach. New York:Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.

60.

Kohlberg, S. (1981). The philosophy of moral develop- ment, moral stage and the idea of justice. San Francisco, CA:Harper & Row.

61.

Kohlberg, S. (1984). The psychology of moral develop- ment:The nature and validity of moral stages. San Francisco, CA:Harper & Row.

62.

Kohlberg, L., Colby, A., Gibbs, J., & Speichere-Dubin, B. (1978). Standard form scoring manual. Cam- bridge, MA:Center for Moral Education, Harvard University.

63.

Laurent, A. (1993). Historie de l’individualisme. Paris:Presses Universitaires de France. (김용민 역. 개인주의의 역사. 서울:한길사, 2001.)

64.

Lukes, S. (1973). Individualism. New York:Harper & Row.

65.

Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self:Implications for cognition, emotion, and moti- vation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.

66.

Matsumoto, D. (2000). Culture and psychology:People around the world (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA:Wadsworth.

67.

Miller, J. G. (1984). Culture and the development of everyday social explanation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 961-978.

68.

Miller, J. G. (1991). A cultural perspective on the moral- ity of beneficence and interpersonal responsibility. International and Intercultural Communication Annual, 15, 11-23.

69.

Miller, J. G. (1994). Cultural diversity in the morality of caring:Individually-oriented versus duty-based interpersonal moral codes. Cross-Cultural Research, 28, 3-39.

70.

Miller, J. G. (1997). Cultural conceptions of duty. In D. Munro, J. F. Schumaker, & S C. Carr (Eds.), Motivation and culture (pp. 178-192). New York:Routledge.

71.

Miller, J. G., & Bersoff, D. M. (1992). Cultural and moral judgement:How are conflicts between justice and interpersonal responsibilities resolved? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 541-554.

72.

Miller, J. G., & Bersoff, D. M. (1994). Cultural influences on the moral status of reciprocity and the discount- ing of endogenous motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 592-602.

73.

Miller, J. G., Bersoff, D. M., & Harwood, R. L. (1990). Perceptions of social responsibilities in India and the United States:Moral imperatives or personal decision? Journal of Personality and Social Psy- chology, 58, 33-47.

74.

Miller, J. G., & Luthar, S. (1989). Issues of interpersonal responsibility and accountability:A comparison of Indians’ and Americans’ moral judgement. Social Cognition, 3, 237-261.

75.

Mills, J., & Clark, M. S. (1982). Exchange and communal relationships. In L. Wheeler (Ed.), Review of per- sonality and social psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 121-144). Beverly Hills, CA:Sage.

76.

Nisbett, R. E. (2003). The geography of thought:How Asians and Westerners think differently and why. New York:Free Press.

77.

Nunner-Winkler, G. (1984). Two moralities? A critical discussion of an ethics of care and responsiblility versus an ethics of rights and justice. In W. M. Kurtines & J. L. Gerwitz (Eds.), Morality, moral behavior and moral development (pp. 348-361). New York:Wiley.

78.

Parkinson, B., & Colman, A. M. (1995). Introduction. In B. Parkinson & A. W. Colman (Eds.), Emotion and motivation (pp. xi-xvi). London:Longman.

79.

Piaget, J. (1932). The moral judgement of the child. New York:Free Press. (M. Gabain, Transl., 1965.)

80.

Rest, J. R. (1979). Revised manual for Defining Issues Test. Minneapolis, MN:University of Minnesota Press.

81.

Sedikides, C., Gaertner, L., & Toguchi, Y. (2003). Pancul- tural self-enhancement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 60-79.

82.

Shweder, R. A., Mahapatra, M., & Miller, J. G. (1990). Culture and moral development. In J. W. Stigler, R. A. Shweder, & G. Herdt (Eds.), Cultural psychol- ogy:Essays on comparative human development (pp. 130-204). New York:Cambridge University Press.

83.

Singelis, T. M., Triandis, H. C., Bhawuk, D. P. S., & Gelfand, M. (1995). Horizontal and vertical dimen- sions of individualism and collectivism:A theoreti- cal and measurement refinement. Cross-Cultural Research, 29, 240-275.

84.

Skoe, E. E. (1987). The development and partial validation of a care-based measure of moral development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Simon Fraser University.

85.

Smith, P. B. (1995). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology:Looking to the future. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26, 588-590.

86.

Smith, P. B., Bond, M. H., & Kagitcibasi, C. (2006). Understanding social psychology across cultures. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.

87.

Snarey, J. R. (1985). Cross-cultural universality of social- moral development:A critical review of Kohlberg’s research. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 202-232.

88.

Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhardt (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 290- 312). Washington, DC:American Sociological Association.

89.

Sӧchting, I., Skoe, E. E., & Marcia, J. E. (1994). Care- oriented moral reasoning and prosocial behavior:A question of gender or sex role orientation. Sex Roles, 31, 131-147.

90.

Taylor, C. (1989). Soures of the self:The making of modern identities. Cambridge, MA:Harvard Uni- versity Press.

91.

Triandis, H. C. (1988). Collectivism versus individu- alism:A reconceptualization of a basic concept of cross-cultural psychology. In G. K. Verma & C. Bagley (Eds.), Cross-cultural studies of personality, attitudes and cognition (pp. 60-95). London:Mac- millan.

92.

Triandis, H. C. (1989). The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96, 506-520.

93.

Triandis, H. C. (1990). Cross-cultural studies of individu- alism and collectivism. In J. J. Berman (Ed.), Cross- cultural perspectives:Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1989 (pp. 41-133). Lincoln, NB:Uni- versity of Nebraska Press.

94.

Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO:Westview.

95.

Triandis, H. C., Bontempo, R., Villareal, M. J., Asai, M., & Lucca, N. (1988). Individualism and collec- tivism:Cross-cultural perspectives on self-ingroup relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 323-338.

96.

Triandis, H. C., & Gelfand, M. J. (1998). Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 118-128.

97.

Triandis, H. C., Leung, K., Villareal, M. J., & Clark, F. L. (1985). Allocentric versus ideocentric tenden- cies:Convergent and discriminant validation. Jour- nal of Research in Personality, 19, 395-415.

98.

Triandis, H. C., McCusker, C., Betancourt, H., Iwao, S., Leung, K., Salazar, J. M., Setiadi, B., Sinha, J. B. P., Touzard, H., & Zaleski, Z. (1993). An etic- emic analysis of individualism and collectivism. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 24, 366-383.

99.

Triandis, H. C., McCusker, C., & Hui, C. H. (1990). Multimethod probes of individualism and collectiv- ism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1006-1020.

100.

Tu, Wei-Ming (1985). Selfhood and otherness in Con- fucian thought. In A. J. Marsella, G. A. DeVos, & F. L. K. Hsu (Eds.), Culture and self:Asian and Western perspective (pp. 231-251). New York:Tavistock.

101.

Wiggins, J. S. (1992). Agency and communion as concep- tual coordinates for the understanding and measure- ment of interpersonal behavior. In W. M. Grove & D. Cicchetti (Eds.), Thinking clearly about psychol- ogy (pp. 89-113). Minneapolis, MN:University of Minnesota Press.

102.

Yeh, C. (1996). A cultural perspective on interdependence self and morality:A Japan-U. S. comparison. Unpub- lished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격