바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

ISSN : 1229-0653

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.21 No.2
Citation Share

경찰단계에서의 범죄소년 다이버젼을 위한 비행성 평가절차의 재범예측력 연구

Recidivism Prediction Based on Risk Assessment Procedure for Juvenile Diversion at Police

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격 / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2007, v.21 no.2, pp.47-57
https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2007.21.2.004
이수정 (경기대학교)
이수정. (2007). 경찰단계에서의 범죄소년 다이버젼을 위한 비행성 평가절차의 재범예측력 연구. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 21(2), 47-57, https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2007.21.2.004
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수
PDF 다운로드

Abstract

Juvenile diversion at police has been attempted with expert intervention since 2003. However, legislation for this system has not been made in Korea. A preliminary risk assessment procedure for juvenile offenders has been performed from 2003 to early 2004 at two police stations. This risk evaluation system is very important for determining the level of expert intervention for juvenile diversion. From late 2004 to early 2005, three more police stations have been involved. Now, fifty police stations are applied this juvenile risk evaluation and aftercare system nation-widely. This study explored the effectiveness of the risk evaluation system to predict juvenile recidivism. Data collected from 2003 to 2005 at five police stations were analyzed for this study. The recidivism data were searched at the end of 2006. The results showed criminal records of juveniles significantly predicted the number of committing crime. When the time to the first recidivism was controlled family brokenness was a facilitating factor pushing juveniles into crime. ROC analysis presented that predictive power was statistically significant but weak.

keywords
Juvenile Diversion at Police, Risk Assessment for Juvenile Offenders, Recidivism Prediction, 경찰 소년다이버젼, 비행성평가, 재범예측, Juvenile Diversion at Police, Risk Assessment for Juvenile Offenders, Recidivism Prediction

참고문헌

1.

김영환, 오상우, 홍상황, 박은영 (2002). PAI의 임상적 해석. 학지사.

2.

김은경 (2006). 21세기 소년사법 개혁의 발전방향과 과제. 형사정책연구소식, 98, 15-23.

3.

김지선 (2006). 청소년범죄의 발생과 처리실태. 형사정책연구소식, 98, 2-7.

4.

법무부 (2005). 외국의 소년사법제도.

5.

이수정 (2007). 비행청소년 선도를 위한 전문가 참여 1：1 멘토링 프로그램의 효과성 보고. 미출판 보고서：경찰청.

6.

이수정, 조은경 (2005). 경찰단계에서의 소년범 위험성 평가를 위한 비행촉발요인 조사도구 개발. 한국심리학회지：사회 및 성격, 19(1), 27-42.

7.

이순래 (2006). 미국 소년사법과 비행예방국(OJJDP)의 최근 동향. 형사정책연구소식, 98, 44-49.

8.

김희주, 공은경, 이수정 (2005). 소년사법처리 절차에 있어 경찰의 역할：미국 선도 경찰관을 통한 한국의 소년보호정책. 한국공안행정학회보, 20, 187-221.

9.

Carroll, J. S., Wiener, R. L., Coates, D., Galegher, J., & Alibrio, J. J. (1982). Evaluation, diagnosis, and prediction in parole decision making. Law & Society Review, 17(1), 199-228.

10.

Chaiken, M. R., & Chaiken, M. (1983). Redefining the Career Criminal: Priority Prosecution of High- Rate Dangerous Offenders. Issues and Practices Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, April.

11.

Dembo, R. & Walters, W. (2003). Innovative approaches to identifying and responding to the needs of high risk youth. Substance Use & Misuse, 38(11), 1713- 1738.

12.

Morey, L. C. (1991). Personality Assessment Inventory- Professional Manual. Florida, USA: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.

13.

Reynolds, A. J., Suh-Ruu, O., Topitzes, J. W. (2004). Paths of effects of early childhood intervention on edu- cational attainment and delinquency: A confirmatory analysis of the Chicago child-parent centers. Child Development, 75(5), 1299-1328.

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격

논문 투고 OA 정책