바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology

ISSN : 1229-0653

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.23 No.1

Citation Share

Process Model of Marital Intimacy on Sharing Daily Events：Mediating Effects of Perceived Partner Responsiveness

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2009, v.23 no.1, pp.17-32
https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2009.23.1.002


& (2009). Process Model of Marital Intimacy on Sharing Daily Events：Mediating Effects of Perceived Partner Responsiveness. Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 23(1), 17-32, https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2009.23.1.002

Abstract

his study examined the effects of sharing daily events on marital intimacy. Laurenceau et al. (1998; 2005)’s process model of intimacy was selected as a research model. The results were analyzed by the bootstrap and a multi-group analysis. The Bootstrap analysis demonstrated that perceived partner responsiveness mediate the effects of self-disclosure and partner disclosure on intimacy. The multi-group analysis demonstrated that process of marital intimacy differed by gender and the type of the shared experience. While a model for sharing positive events could be applied for both genders, models for sharing negative events varied by gender. There are gender differences. For husbands, sharing negative events had a significant mediating effect on self disclosure, but for wives, sharing negative events had a significant mediating effect on partner disclosure.

keywords
Positive event, Negative event, Self-disclosure, Intimacy, Perceived partner responsiveness, Bootstrap, Multi-group analysis, 사건공유, 자기개방, 지각된 반응, 친밀감, 부부관계, 부츠트랩 분석, 다집단 분석

Reference

1.

김주환, 김은주, 홍세희 (2006). 한국 남녀 중학생 집단에서 자기결정성이 학업성취도에 주는 영향. 한국교육심리학회지：교육심리연구, 20(1), 243-264.

2.

박의순 (1997). 애착과정으로 본 한국 부부의 사랑. 이화여자대학교 박사학위논문.

3.

박지원 (1985). 사회적 지지 척도의 개발을 위한 일 연구. 연세대학교 박사학위논문.

4.

이경희 (1995). 부부간 친밀감 척도개발에 관한 연구. 대한가정학회지, 33(4), 235-249.

5.

이종한 (2000). 한국인의 대인관계의 심리사회적 특성：집단주의적 성향과 개인주의적 성향으로의 변화. 한국심리학회지：사회문제, 6(3), 특집호, 201-219.

6.

최상진 (1993). 한국인의 심정 심리학：정과 한에 대한 현상학적 한 이해. 한국심리학회, 대외심포지움, 1993 (3), 3-21.

7.

한소영, 신희천 (2007). 커플 기본 심리적 욕구 중요성 척도의 다집단 요인분석과 잠재평균 분석. 한국심리학회지：상담 및 심리치료, 19(2), 447-465.

8.

홍세희 (2000). 구조방정식 모형의 적합도 지수 선정기준과 그 근거. 한국심리학회지：임상, 19(1), 243-264.

9.

홍세희 (2001). 구조 방정식 모형의 기초와 응용. 미발간 워크샵 교재.

10.

홍세희 (2006). 한국 남녀 중학생 집단에서 자기결정성이 학업성취도에 주는 영향. 교육심리연구, 20(2), 243- 264.

11.

홍세희, 유숙경 (2004). Autoregressive Crosslagged Model을 적용한 내외통제성과 학업성취의 종단관계 연구. 교육심리연구, 18(1), 381-392.

12.

Antonucci, T. C. (1990). Social support and social relationships. In Binstock, R. H., & Geroge, L. K. (Ed) Handbook of aging and the social science (205-226), NY：Academic Press.

13.

Bolger, N., Zuckerman, A., & Kesseler, R. C. (2000). Invisible support and adjustment to stress. Journal of Personal and Social Psychology, 79(6), 953-961.

14.

Collins, N., L., & Feeney, B. C. (2000). A safe haven：An attachment theory perspective on support seeking and caregiving in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(6), 1053- 1073.

15.

Cutrona, C. E. (1986). Behavioral manifestations of social support：A microanalytic investigation. Journal of Personal and Social Psychology, 51, 201-208.

16.

Feeney, B. C. (2004). A secure base：Responsive support of goal strivings and exploration in adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 27-54.

17.

Fincham, F. D., & Bradbury, T. N., (1990). Social support in marriage：Role of social cognition. Journal of Social Clinical Psychology, 9, 31-42.

18.

Fisher, J. D., Nadeler, A., & Whitcher-Alagna, S. (1982). Recipient reactions to aid. Psychological Bulletin, 91(1), 27-54.

19.

Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56 (3), 218-226.

20.

Gable, S. L., Gonzaga, G. C., & Strachmanr, A. (2006). Will you be there for me when things go right? Supportive responses to positive event disclosure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91 (5), 904-917.

21.

Gable, S. L., & Nezlek, J. B. (1998). Level and insta- bility of day to day psychological well-being and risk for depression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 129-138.

22.

Gable, S. L., Reis, H. T., Impett, E. A., & Asher, E. R. (2004). What do you when things go right? The intrapersonal and interpersonal benefits of sharing positive events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(2), 228-245.

23.

Gottman, J. M., & Silver, N., 임주현 역(2002). The 7 Principles for Making Marriage Work. 행복한 부부 이혼하는 부부. 서울：문학사상사.

24.

Greenberg, L., & Johnson, S. (1986). Affect in marital therapy. Journal of Marital Therapy, 12, 1-10.

25.

Jacobson, N. S., & Christensen, A. (1996). Acceptance and change in couple therapy：A therapist's guide to transforming relations. New York：Norton.

26.

Jacobson, N. S., Christensen, A., Prince, S. E., Cordova, J., & Eldridge, K. (2000). Integrative behavioral couple therapy：An acceptance based, promising new treatment for couple discord. Journal of Coun- seling and Clinical Psychology, 68, 351-355.

27.

Johnson, S. M., & Greenberg, L. S. (1986) Psycho- therapy：Theory, research, practice, training. 24 (3S), Fal 1987. Special issue：Psychotherapy with families, 552-560.

28.

Jullian, D., & Markman, H. J., (1991). Social support and social networks as determinants of individual and marital outcomes. Journal of Social and Per- sonal Relationships, 8, 549-568.

29.

Langston, C. A. (1994). Capitalizing on and coping with daily-life events：Expressive reponses to positive events. Journal of Personal and Social Psychology, 67(6), 1112-1125.

30.

Laurenceau, J. P., Barrett, L. F., & Paula R. P. (1998). Intimacy as an interpersonal model：The importance of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and perceived partner responsiveness in interpersonal exchanges. Journal of Family Psychology, 19(2), 314-323.

31.

Laurenceau, J. P., Barrett, L. F., & Rovine, M. J. (2005). The interpersonal process model of intimacy in marriage：A daily diary and multilevel modeling approach. Journal of Family Psychology, 19(2), 314-323.

32.

Magolin, G., & Weinstein, C. (1983). The role of affect in behavioral therapy. In L. R. Wolberg & M. C. Aronson(Eds.), Group and family therapy, New York：Brunner/Mazel.

33.

Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., & Graffin, D. W. (2000). Self-esteem and the quest for felt security：How perceived regard regulates attachent processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 478-498.

34.

Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., Podchaski, E. J., Bellavia, G., & Graffin, D. W. (2005). Putting the partner within reach：A Dyadic perspective on felt security in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 327-347.

35.

Patton, D., & Waring, E. M. (1984). The quality and quantity of marital intimacy in the marriages of psychiatric patients. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 10(3), 201-206.

36.

Prager, K. J., & Buhrmester, D. (1998). Intimacy and need fulfillment inn couple relationship. Journal of Social and Personal Relationship, 15(4), 462-467.

37.

Reis, H. T. (2003). A self-report measure of perceived partner responsiveness. Unpublished data, univerdity of Rochester.

38.

Reis, H. T., Clark, M. S., & Holmes, J. G. (2004). Perceived partner responsiveness as an organizing construct in the study of intimacy and closeness. In D. J. Mashek & A. P. Aron(Eds.), Handbook of closeness and intimacy, 201-225. Mahwah, NJ：Erlbaum.

39.

Patton, D., & Waring, E. M. (1984). The quality and quantity of marital intimacy in the marriages of psychiatric patients. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 10(3), 201-206.

40.

Prager, K. J., & Buhrmester, D. (1998). Intimacy and need fulfillment inn couple relationship. Journal of Social and Personal Relationship, 15(4), 462-467.

41.

Reis, H. T. (2003). A self-report measure of perceived partner responsiveness. Unpublished data, univerdity of Rochester.

42.

Reis, H. T., Clark, M. S., & Holmes, J. G. (2004). Perceived partner responsiveness as an organizing construct in the study of intimacy and closeness. In D. J. Mashek & A. P. Aron(Eds.), Handbook of closeness and intimacy, 201-225. Mahwah, NJ：Erlbaum.

43.

Reis, H. T., & Shaver, P. (1988). Intimacy as an interper-sonal process. In S. Duck & D. F. Hay(Eds), Hand- book of personal relationships：Theory, research, and interventions, 367-389. New York：Wiley.

44.

Russell, Kahn, Spoth, & Altmaier (1998). Analyzing data from experimental studies：A latent variable structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45(1), 18-29.

45.

Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experi- mental and nonexperimental studies：New proce- dures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422-445.

46.

Sternberg, R. J. (1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review, 119-135.

47.

Yalom, I. D., & Leszcz, M. (2005). The theory and practice of group psychotherapy(5th ed.), 134-135. New York：Basic Books.

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy