바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

ISSN : 1229-0653

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.24 No.2

Citation Share

혼합동기 상황에서 경쟁/협동과 조절과제 수행상황에 따른 자기-조절 효과성

Self-Regulation Effectiveness: The Role of Cooperation/Competition and the Nature of Task Setting

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격 / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2010, v.24 no.2, pp.185-201
https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2010.24.2.011
고인정 (성균관대학교)
최훈석 (성균관대학교)
고인정, & 최훈석. (2010). 혼합동기 상황에서 경쟁/협동과 조절과제 수행상황에 따른 자기-조절 효과성. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 24(2), 185-201, https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2010.24.2.011

초록

사회적 상호작용 장면에서 협동 및 경쟁 선택을 수반하는 선행 자기-조절 경험이 후속 자기-조절 수행에 미치는 영향을 실험을 통해 검증하였다. 참가자들은 최후통첩게임에서 자신의 사회적 가치지향성에 부합하지 않는 방향으로 선택 행동을 취한 다음 후속 조절 과제를 집단 과제 혹은 개인 과제로 수행했다. 참가자들의 사회적 가치지향성은 분배 게임(Van Lange, Otten, De Bruin, & Joireman, 1997)에서의 선택에 따라서 협동주의자 또는 경쟁주의자로 구분하였다. 연구 결과 사회적 가치지향성과 선행 조절과제에서의 선택행동, 그리고 후속 조절과제 수행상황 간의 3원 상호작용효과가 유의했다. 협동주의자들은 선행 조절 과제에서 경쟁 선택을 취한 후에 후속 조절 과제를 집단 과제로 수행했을 때 개인 과제로 수행했을 때보다 수행이 우수했다. 반면 협동주의자들은 선행 조절 과제에서 협동을 선택한 후 개인 과제 상황보다 집단 과제 상황에서 후속 과제 수행이 저조했다. 경쟁주의자들의 경우에는 선행 조절과제에서 경쟁을 선택한 조건보다 협동을 선택한 조건에서 후속 과제 수행 상황에 관계없이 모두 수행이 저조하였다. 또한, 선행 조절 과제에서 경쟁을 선택한 경쟁주의자들은 후속 조절 과제를 개인 과제로 수행했을 때보다 집단 과제로 수행했을 때 수행이 저조했다. 본 연구 결과를 자기-조절 강도 모형과 비교하여 논의하였으며, 연구의 의의 및 장래 연구의 방향을 논의하였다.

keywords
self-regulation, ego-depletion, mixed-motive, social value orientation, regulatory task setting, 자기-조절, 자기-고갈, 혼합동기 상황, 사회적 가치지향성, 조절과제 수행상황

Abstract

The present study investigated how cooperation or competition in a mixed-motive setting affects subsequent self-regulatory performance of individuals. In so doing, the authors predicted that an individual's choice behavior in a previous mixed-motive setting (cooperation vs. competition) would have an impact upon his/her subsequent self-regulatory performance depending on the nature of the subsequent task setting. They also predicted that the presumed interaction effect would be moderated by individuals' social value orientation. Participants first performed the Ultimatum Game during which they repeatedly cooperated or competed. Participants were then given a second regulatory task which was presented as either a group task or an individual task. The main dependent variable was the level of performance on the second regulatory task. Results revealed a 3-way interaction effect. Specifically, cooperators who had competed during the Ultimatum Game performed better in the group task condition than in the individual task condition. They also reported higher levels of psychological discomfort associated with their competitive behavior in the Ultimatum Game. Interestingly, cooperators who had cooperated during the ultimatum game performed better in the individual task condition than in the group task condition. In contrast, competitors who had cooperated during the Ultimatum Game showed poor performance regardless of the nature of the second task. In addition, they performed poorly in the group task condition compared to the individual task condition. These results were discussed in light of ego-depletion in self-regulatory behavior. Implications of the study and suggestions for future direction are also discussed.

keywords
self-regulation, ego-depletion, mixed-motive, social value orientation, regulatory task setting, 자기-조절, 자기-고갈, 혼합동기 상황, 사회적 가치지향성, 조절과제 수행상황

참고문헌

1.

용정순, 최훈석(2007). 사회적 배척/수용 경험과 자기-확증 가능성이 개인의 수행에 미치는 영향. 한국 사회 및 성격심리학회 동계학술대회 논문집(pp. 13-19).

2.

조긍호(2007). 동아시아 집단주의의 유학사상적 배경: 심리학적 접근. 서울: 지식산업사.

3.

한덕웅(2003). 한국유학심리학: 한국유학의 심리학설과 유교문화에 관한 심리학적 접근. 서울: 시그마프레스.

4.

Alberts, H., Martijn, C., Greb, J., Merckelbach, H., & De Vries, N. K. (2007). Carrying on or giving in: The role of automatic processes in overcoming ego depletion. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 383-399.

5.

Baumeister, R. F. (1998). The self. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed, pp. 680-740). New York: McGraw-Hill.

6.

Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Muraven, M., & Tice, D. M. (1998). Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1252-1265.

7.

Baumeister, R. F., Schmeichel, B. J., & Vohs, K. D. (2007). Self-regulation and the executive function: The self as controlling agent. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles (2nd ed., pp. 516-539). New York: Guilford Press.

8.

Baumeister, R. F. & Vohs, K. D. (2004). Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications. New York: Guilford.

9.

Blount, S. (1995). When social outcomes arn’t fair: The effect of causal attributions on preferences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63, 131–44.

10.

Bogaert, S., Boone, C., & Declerk, C. (2008). Social value orientation and cooperation in social dilemmas: A review and conceptual model. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 453-480.

11.

Brown, J., & Rachlin, H. (1999). Self-control and social cooperation. Behavioral Processes, 47, 65-72.

12.

Caccioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Morris, K. J. (1983). Effects of need for cognition on message evaluation, recall, and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 805-818.

13.

Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1981). Attention and self-regulation: A control theory approach to human behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag.

14.

Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1997). Longitudinal stability of adult personality. In R. Hogan, J. A. Johnson, & S. Briggs (Eds.), Handbook of personality (pp. 269-290). San Diego: Academic Press.

15.

Ciarocco, N. J., Sommer. K. L., & Baumeister, R. F. (2001). Ostracism and ego depletion: The strains of silence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1156-1163.

16.

Dawes, R. M. (1980). Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 169-93.

17.

De Cremer, D., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2001). Why prosocials exhibit greater cooperation than proselfs: The roles of responsibility and reciprocity. European Journal of Personality, 15, 5-18

18.

De Dreu, C. K. W., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (1995). The impact of social value orientation on negotiator behavior and cognition. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1178-1188.

19.

De Lange, M. A., & Van Knippenberg, A. (2009). To err is human: How regulatory focus and action orientation predict performance following errors. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1192-1199.

20.

Dewitte, S., & De Cremer, D. (2001). Self-control and cooperation: Different concepts, similar decisions? A question of the right perspective. The Journal of Psychology, 135, 133-153.

21.

Dunton, B. C., & Fazio, R. H. (1997). An individual difference measure of motivation to control prejudiced reactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 316-326.

22.

Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

23.

Fishbach. A., & Labroo, A. A. (2007). Be better or be merry: How mood affects self-Control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 158-173.

24.

Gailliot, M. T., Plant, E. A., Butz, D. A., & Baumeister, R. F. (2007). Increasing self-regulatory strength can reduce the depleting effect of suppressing stereotypes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 281-294.

25.

Guth, W., Schmittberger, G., & Schwarze, B. (1982). An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3, 367-388.

26.

Hulbert, L. G., Correa da Silva, M. L., & Adegboyega, G. (2001). Cooperation in social dilemmas ans allocentrism: A social value approach. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 641-657.

27.

Kellly, H. H., & Stahelski, A. J. (1970). Errors in perceptions of intentions in a mixed-motive game. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 379-400.

28.

Kerr, N. L. (1983). Motivation losses in small groups: A social dilemma analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 819-828.

29.

Kerr, N. L., & Kaufman-Gilliland, C. (1997). "...and besides, I probably couldn't have made a difference anyway": Rationalizing defection in social dilemmas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 211-230.

30.

Kerr, N. L., & Park, E. S. (2003). Group performance in collaborative and social dilemma tasks: Progress and prospects. In M. A. Hogg & S. Tindale (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Group processes (pp. 107-138). MA:Blackwell.

31.

Ketelaar, T., & Au, W. T. (2003). The effects of feelings of guilt on the behaviour of uncooperative individuals in repeated social bargaining games: An affect-as-information interpretation of the role of emotion in social interaction. Cognition and Emotion, 17, 429-453.

32.

Komorita, S. S., & Parks, C. D. (1995). Interpersonal relations: Mixed motive interaction. Annual Review of Psychology, 46, 183-207.

33.

Kramer, R. M., McClintock, C. G., & Messick, D. M. (1986). Social values and cooperative response to a simulated resource conservation crisis. Journal of Personality, 54, 576–92.

34.

Kuhlman, D. M., & Marshello, A. F. J. (1975). Individual differences in game motivation as moderators of preprogrammed strategic effects in prisoner’s dilemma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 922–31.

35.

Larrick, R. P., & Blount, S. (1997). The claiming effect: Why players are more generous in social dilemmas than in ultimatum games. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 810-825.

36.

Martijn, C., Tenbült, P., Merckelbach, H., Dreezens, E., & de Vries, N. K. (2002). Getting a grip on ourselves: Challenging expectancies about loss of energy after self-control. Social Cognition, 20, 441-460.

37.

McClintock, C. G., & Van Avermaet, E. (1982). Social values and rules of fairness: A theoretical perspective. In V. J. Derlega & J. Grzelak (Eds.), Cooperation and helping behavior (pp. 43-71). New York: Academic Press.

38.

Messick, D. M., & McClintock, C. G. (1968). Motivational bases of choice in experimental games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4, 1-25.

39.

Muraven, M., & Baumeister, R. F. (2000). Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: Does self-control resemble a muscle? Psychological Bulletin, 126, 247–59.

40.

Muraven. M., Shmueli. D., & Burkely. E. (2006). Conserving self-control strength. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 91, 524-537.

41.

Muraven, M., & Slessareva, E. (2003). Mechanism of self-control failure: Motivation and limited resources. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 894-906.

42.

Muraven, M., Tice, D. M., & Baumeister, R. F. (1998). Self-control as a limited resource: Regulatory depletion patterns. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 774-789.

43.

Parks, C. D., & Vu, A. D. (1994). Social dilemma behavior of individuals from highly individualist and collectivist culture. Journal of Conflict Resoultion, 38, 708-718.

44.

Perugini, M., & Gallucci, M. (2001). Individual differences and social norms: The distinction between reciprocators and prosocials. European Journal of Personality, 15, 19-35.

45.

Pilluta, M. M., & Chen, Xio-Ping. (1999). Social norms and cooperation in social dilemmas: The effects of context and feedback. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 78, 81-103.

46.

Pillutla, M. M., & Murnighan, J. K. (2003). Fairness in bargaining. Social Justice Research, 16, 241– 262.

47.

Richeson, J. A., & Shelton, J. N. (2003). When prejudice does not pay: Effects of interracial contact on executive function. Psychological Science, 14, 287-290.

48.

Schelling, T. (1960). The strategy of conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

49.

Schlenker, B. R., & Goldman, H. J. (1978). Cooperators and competitors in conflict: A test of the "triangle model." Journal of Conflict Resolution, 22, 393-410.

50.

Schmeichel, B. J., & Baumeister, R. F. (2004). Self-regulatory strength. In R. F. Baumeister & K. D. Vohs (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications (pp. 84–98). New York: Guilford Press.

51.

Shah, J. Y., Kruglanski, A. W., & Thompson, E. P. (1998). Membership has its epistemic rewards: Need for closure effects on in-group bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 383-393.

52.

Thibaut J. W., & Kelly, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley

53.

Tice, D. M., Baumeister, R. F., Shmueli, D., & Muraven, M. (2007). Restoring the self: Positive affect helps improve self-regulation following ego-depletion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 379-384

54.

Trwalter, S., & Richeson, J. A. (2006). Regulatory focus and executive function after interracial interactions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 406-412.

55.

Van Dijk, E., De Cremer, D., & Handgraaf, M. J. J. (2004). Social value orientations and the strategic use of fairness in ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 697–707.

56.

Van Dijk, E. & Vermunt, R. (2000). Strategy and fairness in social decision making: Sometimes it pays to be powerless.. Journal of Experimental Socical Psychology, 36, 1-25.

57.

Van Lange, P. A. M. (1999). The pursuit of joint outcomes and equality in outcomes: An integrative model of social value orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77,337–49.

58.

Van Lange, P. A. M., & Kuhlman, D. M. (1994). Social value orientations and impressions of partner’s honesty and intelligence: A test of the morality effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 126–41.

59.

Van Lange, P. A. M., Otten, W., De Bruin, E. M. N., & Joireman, J. A. (1997). Development of prosocial, individualistic, and competitive orientations: Theory and preliminary evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 733-746.

60.

Vohs, K. D., & Baumeister, R. F. (2004). Understanding self-regulation. In R. F. Baumeister & K. D. Vohs (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and application (pp. 1-12). New York: Guilford Press.

61.

Vohs, K. D., Baumeister, R. F., & Ciarocco, N. J. (2005). Self-regulation and self-presentation: Regulatory resource depletion impairs impression management and effortful self-presentation depletes regulatory resources. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 632 - 657.

62.

Vohs, K. D., & Heatherton, T. F. (2000).Self-regulatory failure resource-depletion approach. Psychological Science, 11, 243-254.

63.

Vohs. K. D., & Schmeichel. B. J. (2007). Self-regulation: How and why people reach (and fail to reach) their goals. In C. Sedikides & S. Spencer (Eds.), Frontiers in social psychology:The self (pp. 139-162). Philadelphia, PA:Psychology Press.

64.

Wade-Benzoni, K. A., Okumura, T., Brett, J. M., Moore, D. A., Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Bazerman, M. H. (2002). Cognitions and behavior in asymmetric social dilemmas: A comparison of two cultures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 87–95.

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격

논문 투고 OA 정책