바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

  • P-ISSN1229-0653
  • KCI

ISSN : 1229-0653

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.24 No.2

Citation Share

부러움: 연합과 접근의 동기를 알리는 전략적 커뮤니케이션

Buroum: An Emotion Strategically Communicating Association and Approach Motives

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격 / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2010, v.24 no.2, pp.51-72
https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2010.24.2.003
차운아 (중앙대학교)
차운아. (2010). 부러움: 연합과 접근의 동기를 알리는 전략적 커뮤니케이션. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 24(2), 51-72, https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2010.24.2.003

초록

이 연구는 회귀분석과 가상 정서 상황에서의 정서 표현 대상에 대한 인상 평가의 비교를 통해 한국의 대표적 선망 관련 정서인 "부러움"과 "시샘"이 가지는 사회적 기능의 차이를 탐색하였다. 구체적으로 부러움이 시샘에 비해 상향 사회비교 대상에 대한 심리적 거리를 좁히고 다가가고자 하는 동기와 관련을 가지는지, 특히 정서 표현을 통해 이러한 사회적 동기를 신호하는 것이 가능한지를 살펴보고자 하였다. 연구 결과 사회비교 지향 성향이 높을수록 부러움을 많이 경험하였으며 부러움을 표현한 대상에 대해서는 시샘을 표현한 대상에 비해 우월함을 인정하면서도 심리적 거리를 가깝게 느끼고 호감을 보이는 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 결과는 시샘이 상향 사회 비교 상황 중에서도 심리적 거리가 멀거나 가깝게 지낼 필요가 없는 사람에 대해 느끼는 ‘분리’ 혹은 ‘회피’의 정서인 데 비해, 부러움은 가까운 혹은 가깝게 지낼 필요가 있는 대상에 대해 갖게 되는 ‘연합’ 혹은 ‘접근’의 정서임을 보여준다.

keywords
emotion, envy, Buroum, Sisem, admiration, social comparison, approach motive, 정서, 선망, 부러움, 시샘, 감탄, 사회비교, 접근 동기

Abstract

This study examined social functions of two envy-related emotions in Korea: Buroum (benign envy) and sisem (malicious envy). Although these two emotions might share some common features as members of envy family,it was hypothesized that they are associated with solving different social problems and thus serve different social functions. The results showed that buroum was uniquely predicted by high level of social comparison orientation and low level of prevention motives. In addition, experience of being envied in terms of buroum, compared to that in terms of sisem, evoked greater eciprocal sense of closeness and desire to be close with the person who envied. These findings suggest that experience of sisem is associated with and is based on ‘separation' or ‘avoidance’ motives and serves a social function of balancing unjustified unfairness whereas the experience of buroum is associated with and is based on ‘association' or ‘approach' motives and serves a social function of managing interpersonal harmony and strengthening social ties in collectivist and interdependent cultures.

keywords
emotion, envy, Buroum, Sisem, admiration, social comparison, approach motive, 정서, 선망, 부러움, 시샘, 감탄, 사회비교, 접근 동기

참고문헌

1.

박인조, 민경환 (2005). 한국어 감정단어의 목록 작성과 차원 탐색. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 19, 109-129.

2.

장은영, 한덕웅 (1999). 비교 대상의 선택에서 환류유형, 비교속성 및 통제력의 효과. 한국심리학회지: 사회및 성격, 13, 201-217.

3.

차운아 (2009). 부러움: 한국의 “무해한 선망.” 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 23, 171-189.

4.

표준국어대사전 (2010). 2010년 3월 5일 출력. http://124.137.201.223/search/List_dic.jsp. 국립국어원.

5.

한덕웅 (1999). 사회비교의 목표와 성공/실패 경험에 따른 비교 대상의 선택. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 13, 311-329.

6.

Algoe, S. B., & Haidt, J. (2009). Witnessing excellence in action: the 'other-praising' emotions of elevation, gratitude, and admiration. Journal of Positive Psychology, 4, 105-127.

7.

Cohen-Charash, Y., & Mueller, J. S. (2007). Does perceived unfairness exacerbate or mitigate interpersonal counterproductive work behaviors related to envy? Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 666-680.

8.

Copeland, L., & Griggs, L. (1986). Going international: How to make friends and deal effectively in the global market place. New York: Random House.

9.

Darwin, C. (1872/1998). The expression of the emotions in man and animals: Definitive edition. P. Ekman, (Ed.), New York: Oxford University Press.

10.

Diener, E., Fujita, E., & Seidlitz, L. (1991). Manual for the intensity and time affect survey (ITAS). Unpublished manuscript, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

11.

Dogan, K., & Veccio, R. P. (2001). Managing envy and jealousy in the workplace. Compensation Benefits Review, 33, 57-64.

12.

Doi, T. (1992). On the concept of Amae. Infant Mental Health Journal, 13, 7-11.

13.

Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7 117-140.

14.

Fiske, A. P. (1991). Structures of social life. New York: Free Press.

15.

Foster, G. M. (1972). The anatomy of envy: A study in symbolic behavior. Current Anthropology, 13, 165-202.

16.

Frijda, N. H., & Mesquita, B. (1994). The social roles and functions of emotions. In S. Kitayama & H. Marcus (Ed.), Emotion and culture: Empirical Studies of Mutual Influenced (pp. 51-87). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

17.

Gibbons, F. X., & Buunk, B. P. (1999). Individual differences in social comparison: Development of a scale of social comparison orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 129-142.

18.

Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond culture. Garden City: Anchor Press.

19.

Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280-1300.

20.

Higgins, E. T. (1998). Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 1-46). New York: Academic Press.

21.

Keltner, D., & Haidt, J. (1999). Social functions of emotions at four levels of analysis. Cognition and Emotion, 13, 515-521.

22.

Keltner, D., & Haidt, J. (2001). Social functions of emotions. In T. Mayne & G. A. Bonanno (Eds.), Emotions: Current Issues and Future Directions (pp. 192-213). NewYork: Guilford Press.

23.

Keltner, D., & Kring, A. (1998). Emotion, social function, and psychopathology. Review of General Psychology, 2, 320-342.

24.

Lockwood, P., Jordan, C. H.., & Kunda, Z. (2002). Motivation by positive or negative role models: Regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 854-864.

25.

Maruta, T. (1992). Does an American puppy Amaeru? A comment on Dr. Doi’s paper. Infant Mental Health Journal, 13, 12-17.

26.

Niiya, Y., Ellsworth, P. C., & Yamaguchi, S. (2006). Amae in Japan and the United States: An exploration of a “culturally unique” emotion. Emotion, 6, 279-295.

27.

Niiya, Y., Yamaguchi, S. Murakami, F., & Harihara, M. (2000). Converging evidence on the meaning of amae among Japanese. Paper presented at the International Congress of the International Association of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Pultusk, Poland.

28.

Ortony, A., Clore, G. L., & Collins, A. (1988). The cognitive structure of emotion. New York: Cambridge University Press.

29.

Parrott, W. G. (1991). The emotional experiences of envy and jealousy. In P. Salovey (Ed.), The psychology of jealousy and envy (pp. 3-30). New York: Guilford.

30.

Parrott, W. G., & Smith, R. H. (1993). Distinguishing the experiences of envy and jealousy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 906-920.

31.

Schaubroeck, J., & Lam, S. S. K. (2004). Comparing lots before and after: Promotion rejectees' invidious reactions to promotees. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 94, 33-47.

32.

Silver, M., & Sabini, J. (1978). The perception of envy. Social Psychology, 41, 105-117.

33.

Smith, R. H., & Kim, S. H. (2007). Comprehending envy. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 46-64.

34.

Smith, R. H., Parrott, W. G., Diener, E. F., Hoyle, R. H., & Kim, S. H. (1999). Dispositional envy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1007-1020.

35.

Suls, J., Martin, R., & Wheeler, L. (2002). Social comparison: Why, with whom and with what effect? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 159-163.

36.

Van de Ven, N., Zeelenberg, M., & Pieters, R. (2009). Leveling up and down: The experience of malicious and benign envy. Emotion, 9, 419-429

37.

Veccio, R. P. (2000). Negative emotion in the workplace: Employee jealousy and envy. International Journal of Stress Management, 7, 161-179.

38.

Veccio, R. P. (2005). Explorations in employee envy: Feeling envious and feeling envied. Cognition & Emotion, 19, 69-81.

39.

Yamaguchi, S. (1999). Nichijougo to shiteno Amae kara kangaeru [Thinking Amae from everyday usage of the word]. In O. Kitayama (Ed.), Amae ni tsuite kangaeru [Thinking about Amae]. Tokyo: Seiwa Shoten.

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격

논문 투고 OA 정책