바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology

ISSN : 1229-0653

Article Contents

Prev
e-Submission

Vol.24 No.4

Citation Share

The Effects of Regulatory Focus-fits among Self, Partner and Task Demands upon Partner Choice in Collective Task

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2010, v.24 no.4, pp.113-131
https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2010.24.4.006



& (2010). The Effects of Regulatory Focus-fits among Self, Partner and Task Demands upon Partner Choice in Collective Task. Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 24(4), 113-131, https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2010.24.4.006

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate through a laboratory experiment the effects of regulatory focus-fits among dyad and task demands upon partner choice in collective task. It was hypothesized that the higher the regulatory focus among self, partner, and task demands, the higher the choice as the participant's partner. The experiment was performed with 2 self-regulatory focus(promotion vs. prevention) × ⑵ regulatory focus-fits between self and partner(fit vs. nonfit) × 3 task demands(promotion vs. prevention vs. mixed strategy) randomized mixed factorial design. Self-regulatory focus was measured by two self-regulation scales and the participants with high-promotion or high-prevention focus were selected. Regulatory focus of two potential partners were manipulated by two questionnaires. The task demands were framed in terms of the task performance strategies. Ninety eight participants were randomly assigned to 6 conditions. The results of this study showed that the main hypothesis of regulatory-fits were confirmed: ⑴Participants chose good-fit partners more than poor-fit partners. ⑵Higher choice of good-fit partners was consistently observed among the participants with high-promotion focus in spite of differences in task demands. But choice of good-fit partners was differently appeared according to the task demands. ⑶Three way interaction effect of self-regulatory focus, self-partner regulatory fits and task demands were also found. The results of this study were discussed in terms of the regulatory focus-fit hypotheses and the limitations of this study and the suggestions for further study were added.

keywords
dyad regulatory focus-fits, self-regulatory focus, promotion focus, prevention focus, task demands, collective task, partner choice, interpersonal attraction, social attraction, 양자관계, 조절초점부합, 조절초점이론, 향상조절초점, 예방조절초점, 과제요구, 공동수행 상대 선택, 대인매력, 사회매력

Reference

1.

강혜자?한덕웅(2005).자기차이에 따른 우울과 불안의 경험.한국심리학회지:건강,10(3),349-374.

2.

나영심?한덕웅(2005).자기지침과 조절초점의 불일치가 자기정서에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 10(4),431-453.

3.

표승연?한덕웅(2010).이성관계에서 관계만족과 결별의도를 설명하는 심리요인들.연차학술발표대회 논문집,

4.

한덕웅(2004).인간의 동기심리.박영사.

5.

한덕웅?황소정(1999).집단수행 상황에서 유사성-매력가설의 검증.한국심리학회지:사회 및 성격,13, 255-275.

6.

허태균(2001).사후가정사고의 활성화에서 조절적 동기의 역할.한국심리학회지:사회 및 성격,15(2),159-171.

7.

Byrne, D. (1961). Interpersonal attraction and attitude similarity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,62,713-715.

8.

Camacho, C. J., Higgins, E. T., & Luger, L. (2003). Moralvalue transfer from regulatory fit : What feels rightis rightand what feels wrong is wrong. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,84(3),498-510.

9.

Cesario, J., Grant, H., & Higgins, E. T.(2004). Regulatory Fit and Persuasion: Transfer from "Feeling Right". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,86(3),388-404.

10.

Coolsen, M. K.(2003). A self-regulatory focus model of couple well-being. A dissertation of the University of north Carolina at Chapel Hill for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.

11.

Crowe, E., & Higgins, E. T. (1997). Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,69,117-132.

12.

Evans, L. M., & Petty, R. E. (2003). Self-guide framing and persuasion: Responsibly increasing message processing to ideallevels. Personality and Social Psychology Bulleine,29,313-324.

13.

Freitas, A. L., & Higgins, E. T. (2002). Enjoying goal-directed actions: The role of regulatory fit. Psychologial Science,13(1),1-6.

14.

Freitas, A. L., Liberman, N., & Higgins, E. T. (2002). Regulatory fit and resisting temptation during goal pursuit. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,38,291-298.

15.

Grant, H., & Higgins, E. T. (1997). Are positive or negative messages more persuasive?: Regulatory focus as moderator. Unpublished manuscript, Columbia University.

16.

Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review,94,319-340.

17.

Higgins, E. T.(1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist,52,1280-1300.

18.

Higgins, E. T.(1998).Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. In M. P,, Zanna(Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology(Vol.30, pp.1-46).SanDiego,CA:Academic Press.

19.

Higgins, E. T.(2000b). Making a good decision: Value from fit. American Psychologist,55,1217-1230.

20.

Higgins, E. T.,Idson, L. C., Freitas, A. L., Spiegel, S., & Molden, D. C. (2003). Transfer of value from fit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,84(6),1140-1153.

21.

Higgins, E. T.,Shah, J., & Friedman, R. (1997). Emotional responses to goal attainment: Strength of regulatory focus as moderator.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,72,515-525.

22.

Idson, L. C., Liberman, N.,& Higgins, E. T. (2004). Imagining how you'd feel: The role of motivational experiences from regulatory fit. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,30, 926-937.

23.

Lee, A. Y., & Aaker, J. L. (2004). Bringing the frame into focus: The influence of regulatory fiton processing fluency and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,86,205-218.

24.

Plaks, J. E., & Higgins, E. T. (2000). Pragmaticuse of stereotyping in teamwork: Social loafing and compensation as function of inferred pertner-situation fit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6),962-974.

25.

Spigel, S., Grant, H., & Higgins, E. T. (2004). How regulatory fit enhances motivational strength during goal pursuit.European Journal of Social Psychology,34,39-54.

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy