바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

ISSN : 1229-0653

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.24 No.4

Citation Share

단축형 인지면담이 노인목격자의 회상에 미치는 효과

The Effects of the Shortened Cognitive Interview on Older Eyewitness Recall

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격 / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2010, v.24 no.4, pp.95-112
https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2010.24.4.005
김시업 (경기대학교)
문옥영 (경기대학교)
김시업, & 문옥영. (2010). 단축형 인지면담이 노인목격자의 회상에 미치는 효과. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 24(4), 95-112, https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2010.24.4.005

초록

본 연구는 노화로 인해 자연스럽게 인지능력이 저하된 노인 역시 인지면담을 통해 면담을 받을 경우 표준면담을 받은 노인보다 더 많은 정확정보를 보고하여 수사면담시 신뢰성 있는 진술을 할 수 있을 것이라는 가설을 검증하고자 실시되었다. 독립변인은 면담방법으로, 실험집단인 노인집단과 비교집단인 성인집단은 각각 단축형 인지면담과 표준면담을 받는 2집단으로 나누어졌다. 종속변인은 실험참여자가 보고한 정확정보의 양과 오류정보의 양, 그리고 총정보(정확정보＋오류정보)의 양이다. 이를 위해 실험참여자들은 동일한 비디오영상을 시청하고 난 뒤, 간섭효과를 일으킬 수 있는 처치를 받고 단축형 인지기능검사인 K-MMSE를 시행하고 난 뒤 각 집단별로 면담을 시행하였다. 연구 결과, 노인-인지면담 집단이 노인-표준면담 집단에 비해 더 많은 정확정보와 총정보를 보고하였고, 오류정보에 유의한 차이가 나타나지 않았다. 그리고 노인집단은 성인집단에 비해 더 적은 정확정보와 오류정보, 그리고 총정보를 보고하였다. 수사실무에서의 의의와 연구의 제한점을 기술하고 추후 연구에 대한 제언을 하였다.

keywords
older adults, shortened cognitive interview(SCI), standard interview(SI), 노인, 단축형 인지면담, 표준면담

Abstract

This study examined that the effects of shortened cognitive interview(SCI) on the recall of normal intelligent older(over 65 years old) eyewitness. Independent variables were age (younger adults/older adults.) and interviewing techniques(SCI: SI). Dependent variables were amount of informations(correct, incorrect, total). Participants watched same video clip, then they were tested by Korea Mini-Mental State Examination(K-MMSE). And they were divided by age(older/younger), each 2 groups were divided by different techniques(older*SCI, older*SI, younger*SCI, younger*SI). Then each 4 groups were interviewed. As a result, older*SCI group recalled significantly more correct, total informations than older*SI group, but there were not significantly difference in incorrect information. And 2 older adults groups recalled significantly less correct, incorrect, and total information than 2 younger adults groups. Implications of investigative practice, limitations of study, directions for future research were discussed.

keywords
older adults, shortened cognitive interview(SCI), standard interview(SI), 노인, 단축형 인지면담, 표준면담

참고문헌

1.

강연욱,나덕렬(2003).서울신경심리검사(SeoulNeuropsychological Screening Battery; SNSB). 휴브알 엔씨 (http://www.humanbrainkorea.com/).

2.

권영민(2004).아동의 사건 회상에서 '모델링'인지 면접의 효과.가톨릭대학교 대학원 박사학위 논문.

3.

김시업,전우병,김미영 (2006).효율적인 수사면담을 위한 단축형 인지면담 개발.한국심리학회지:사회 및 성격,20(1),21-38.

4.

대검찰청 (2003).2002범죄분석.서울:대검찰청.

5.

대검찰청 (2007).2006범죄분석.서울:대검찰청.

6.

대검찰청 (2009).2008범죄분석.서울:대검찰청.

7.

박종한(2005).연령 증가에 따른 노인인지기능의 감퇴양상.노인병,9(3),210-214.

8.

장준오(2009).노인범죄와 범죄피해에 대한 실태연구. 형사정책연구,20(1),215-255.

9.

통계청(2009).2009년 통계 연보.서울:통계청.

10.

WorldHealthOrganization(2010).2010년 세계보건통계.

11.

Bartlett, J. C., & Leslie, J. E. (1986). Aging and memory for faces versus single views of faces. Memory & Cognition,14,371-381.

12.

Boon, J., & Noon, E. (1994). Changing perspective sincognitive interviewing. Psychology, Crimeand Law,1,59-69.

13.

Bower, G. (1967). Amulticomponent theory of the memory trace. Psychology of Learning and Motivation,1, 229-325.

14.

Brimacombe, C. A., Jung, S., Garrioch, L., & Allison, M. (2003). Perceptions of older adult eye witnesses: Will you believe me when I'm 64? Law and Human Behaviour,27,507-522.

15.

Brown, C. L., & Geiselman, R. E. (1990). Eye witness testimony of mentally retarded: Effect of the Cognitive Interview. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 6,14-22.

16.

Coxon, P., & Valentine, T. (1997). The effects of the age of eye witnesses on the accuracy and suggestibility of their testimony. Applied Cognitive Psychology,11,415-430.

17.

Coyne, A. C. (2001). The relationship between dementia and elder abuse. Geriatric Times, 11(4). www.geriatrictimes.com/g010715.html

18.

Craik, F. I. M., & Jennings, J. M. (1992). Human memory. In F. I. M. Craik & T. A. Salthouse (Eds.), Handbook of aging and cognition. Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.

19.

Dent, H. (1986). An experimental study of the effectiveness of differen techniques of questioning mentally handicapped child witnesses, British Journal of Clinical Psychology,25,13-17.

20.

Fisher, R .P., Chin, D. M. & MaCauley, M. R. (1990). Enhancing eye witness recollection with the cognitive interview. National Police Research UnitReview,6,3-11.

21.

Fisher, R. P. & Geiselman, R. E. (1992). Memory-enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing: The cognitive interview.Springfield,I.L:CharlesC.Thomas.

22.

Fisher, R. P., Geiselman, R. E., Raymond, D. S. (1987). Critical analysis of police interviewing techniques. Journal of Police Science and Administration,15,177-185.

23.

Geiselman, R. E., Fisher, R., Firstenberg, I., Hutton, L., Sullivan, S., Avetissina, I. V., & Prosk, A. L. (1984). Enhancement of eye witness memory: Anempirical evaluation of the cognitive interview. Journal of Police Science and Administration,12,74-80.

24.

Gudjonsson, G. H. & Henry L. (2003). Child and adult witnesses with intellectual disability : The importance of suggestibility. Legal and Criminological Psychology,8, 241-252.

25.

Gudjonsson, G. H., ClareI., R. S. & Pearse, J. (1993). Persons at risk during interviews in police custody: The identification of vulnerabilities. Royal Commissionon Criminal Justice. London: H.M.S.O.

26.

Gwyer, P., & Clifford, B. R. (1997). The effects of the cognitive interview on recall, identification and the confidence/accuracy relationship. Applied Cognitive Psychology,11,121-145.

27.

Herman, J. F., & Coyne, A. C. (1980). Mental manipulation of spatial information in young and elderly adults. Developmental Psychology,16,377-378.

28.

Holliday, R. E. (2003). The effect of prior cognitive interview on children's acceptance of mis informations. Applied Cognitive Psychology,17,443-457.

29.

Kebbell, M. R., & Hatton, C. (1999). People with mental retardation as witnesses in court: A review. Mental Retardation,37,179-187.

30.

Kohnken, G., Milne, R., Memon, A., & Bull, R. (1999). The cognitive interview: A meta-analysis. Psychology, Crimeand Law,5,3-28.

31.

Kohnken. G., Thurer, C., & Zoberbier, D. (1994). The cognitive interview : Are the interviewer's memories enhanced too? Applied Cognitive Psychology,8,13-24.

32.

Lachs, M. S., Williams, C., O’Brien, S., Hurst, L., & Horwitz, R. (1997). Risk factors for reported elder abuse and neglect: A nine-year observational cohort study. The Gerontologist,37,469-474.

33.

List, J. A. (1986). Ageandschematic differencesin the reliability of eyewitness testimony. Developmental Psychology,22,50-57.

34.

Madden, D. J. (1992). Four to ten milli seconds per year: Age-related slowing of visual word identification. Journal of Gerontology: Psychologicalsciences,47,59-68.

35.

McCauley, M. R., & Fisher, R. P. (1995). Facilitating children's recall with revised cognitive interview. Journal of Applied Psychology,80,510-516.

36.

Mello, E. M., & Fisher, R. P. (1996). Enhancing older adult eyewitness memory with the cognitive interview. Applied Cognitive Psychology,10,403-417

37.

Milne, R., & Bull, R. (1996). Interviewing children with mild learning disability with the cognitive interview. In N. K. Clark & G. M. Stephenson(Eds.), Investigative and forensic decision-making [Issuesin Criminological Psychology,No.26].Leicester,UK:British Psychological Society.

38.

Milne, R., Clare, I. C. H., & Bull, R. (1999). Using the cognitive interview with adults with mild learning disabilities. Psychology, Crimeand Law,5,81-99.

39.

Milne, R., Clare, I. C. H. & Bull, R. (2002) Interrogative suggestibility among witnesses with mild intellectual disabilities: The use of an adaptation of the GSS. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities,15,8?17.

40.

Perlman N. B., Ericson K. I., Esses V. M. & Issacs B. J. (1994) The developmentally handicapped witness:Competency as a function of question format. Law and Human Behavior,18(2),171-187.

41.

Poon, L. W. (1985). Differencesin human memory with aging: Nature, causes, and clinical implications. In J. E. Birren & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of the psychologyofaging(2nd ed.).NY:Van Nostrnd Reinhold.

42.

RandCorporation.(1997).The criminal investigation process, Vols 1-3. Rand Corporation Technical Report R1777_DOJ.SantaMonica.

43.

Sanders, G. S. (1986). The usefulness of eyewitness research from the perspective of police investigators. Unpublished manuscript, State UniversityofNew York.

44.

Saywitz, K. J., Geiselman, R. E., & Bornstein, G. K. (1992). Effects of cognitive interviewing and practice on children's recall performance. Journal of Applied Psychology,77,744-756,

45.

Smith, V. L., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1987). The social psychology of eyewitness accuracy:Misleading questions and communicator expertise. Journalof Applied Psychology,72,294-300.

46.

Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review 80,353-370.

47.

Westcott, H. L. (1991). The abuse of disabled children:A review of the literature. Child: Care, Health and Development,17,243-258.

48.

Williams, C.(1995). Invisible victims: Crime against people with learning disabilities. London: Jessica Kingsley.

49.

Wright. A, Holliday. R.(2007). Interviewing cognitively impaired older adults: How usefulisa cognitive interview? Psychology Press, Memory,15(1),17-33.

50.

W right. A, Holliday. R. (2007). Enhancing the recall of young, young?old and old ?old adults with cognitive interviews. Applied Cognitive Psychology,21,19-43.

51.

Yarmey, A. D., & Kent, J. (1989). Eyewitness identification by elderly and young adults. Law and Human Behaviour,4,359-371.

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격

논문 투고 OA 정책