- 권한신청
- P-ISSN1229-0653
- KCI
ISSN : 1229-0653
논문 상세
- 2024 (38권)
- 2023 (37권)
- 2022 (36권)
- 2021 (35권)
- 2020 (34권)
- 2019 (33권)
- 2018 (32권)
- 2017 (31권)
- 2016 (30권)
- 2015 (29권)
- 2014 (28권)
- 2013 (27권)
- 2012 (26권)
- 2011 (25권)
- 2010 (24권)
- 2009 (23권)
- 2008 (22권)
- 2007 (21권)
- 2006 (20권)
- 2005 (19권)
- 2004 (18권)
- 2003 (17권)
- 2002 (16권)
- 2001 (15권)
- 2000 (14권)
- 1999 (13권)
- 1998 (12권)
- 1997 (11권)
- 1996 (10권)
- 1995 (9권)
- 1994 (8권)
- 1993 (7권)
- 1992 (6권)
- 1991 (6권)
- 1990 (5권)
- 1989 (4권)
- 1988 (4권)
- 1987 (3권)
- 1986 (3권)
- 1985 (2권)
- 1984 (2권)
- 1983 (1권)
- 1982 (1권)
사랑의 점화와 지각편향
Love Priming and Perception Bias
김민식 (연세대학교)
초록
사랑은 대상의 지각에 어떤 영향을 주는가? 본 연구에서는 긍정적인 정서가 대상의 전체 지각을 촉진한다는 선행연구들을 토대로 긍정적인 정서의 한 예로 볼 수 있는 사랑의 점화가 전체지각을 수월하게 하는지를 살펴보고자 하였다. 또한 한 개인이 추구하는 사랑의 유형에 따라 전체/부분지각에서 자기조절과정의 초점이 달라지는지를 탐색해보고자 하였다. 실험 1에서는 사랑의 점화조건에서 통제조건에 비해 전체지각이 부분지각보다 빨라지는 경향이 나타났다. 이 결과는 사랑의 점화가 무의식적으로 전체지각에 영향을 주는 것으로 해석할 수 있다. 실험 2에서는 현재 이성친구와 교제를 하는 대학생들을 대상으로 이성친구의 이름으로 사랑을 점화하고, 전체/부분 지각과제를 수행하도록 했다. 그 후 질문지를 실시하여, 낭만적 사랑과 우애적 사랑의 유형으로 구분하고, 사랑의 유형에 따라 전체 지각과 부분 지각의 반응시간에서 차이가 나타나는지를 비교하였다. 그 결과, 낭만적인 사랑의 유형에서는 전체지각이 부분지각보다 더 빨리 진행되었으나, 우애적 사랑의 유형에서는 전체지각과 부분지각 간에 유의한 차이가 나타나지 않았다. 이 결과는 사랑이 점화되는 유사한 상황에서도 개인이 현재 추구하는 사랑의 상이한 유형이 전체 또는 부분지각에 다른 영향을 주게 되는 것으로 해석할 수 있다. 논의에서는 후속연구의 진행방향과 지각의 자기조절과정에 영향을 줄 수 있는 변인들을 다루었다.
- keywords
- 사랑, 점화, 전체지각, 부분지각, 자기조절 초점, love priming, global perception, local perception, self-regulatory focus
Abstract
On the basis of previous research showing that positive emotion like love facilitates global perception, two experiments were carried out to answer, whether the love priming always has a positive impact on global processing, and whether global versus local perception varies with the self-regulatory focus associated with love styles. In Experiment 1, participants were primed by either imagining a walk with a person they were in love with (love priming condition) or a walk alone (control condition). Then, they were shown large letters made of small letters and decided if either of two specific letters appeared on the screen. In contrast to this, in Experiment 2, love was primed subliminally with the name of the loved person and the participants had to do the letter task as in the previous experiment. In addition, they had to fill out the love style scales and were divided into two groups (romantic love and companionate love). Experiment 1 showed that the love priming condition reduced the reaction time for the global perception compared to the control condition. In Experiment 2, love priming also facilitated global perception in the group of romantic love. However, in the group of companionate love, global processing benefits decreased after the love priming trials. The results implicated that various love styles could be differentiated in regard to different goals which might have an impact on the self-regulatory focus in perception.
- keywords
- 사랑, 점화, 전체지각, 부분지각, 자기조절 초점, love priming, global perception, local perception, self-regulatory focus
참고문헌
박선희, 박태진(2011). 전역/국지 처리과제에서 정서적 자극이 시각적 주의범위에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물, 23, 139-151.
박선희, 박태진(2012). 유도된 기분의 정서가와 각성수준이 전역/국지처리에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물, 24, 1-18.
Berscheid, E. (2010). Love in the fourth dimension. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 1-25.
Carver, C. S., Sutton, S. K., & Scheier, M. F. (2000). Action, emotion, and personality: Emerging conceptual integration. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 741-751.
Derryberry, D., & Reed, M. A. (1998). Anxiety and attentional focusing: Trait, state and hemispheric influences. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 745-761.
Förster, J., & Higgins, E. T. (2005). How global versus local perception fits regulatory focus. Psychological Science, 16, 631-636.
Förster, J. (2009). Relation between perceptual and conceptual scope: How global versus local processing fits a focus on similarity versus dissimilarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 88-111.
Förster, J., Özelsel, A., & Epstude, K. (2010). How love and lust change people’s perception of relationship partners. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 631-636.
Fredrickson, B. L., & Branigan, C. (2005). Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought-action repertoires. Cognition and Emotion, 19, 313-332.
Friedman, R. S., & Förster, J. (2001). The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1001-1013.
Friedman, R. S., & Förster, J. (2005). Effects of motivational cues on perceptual asymmetry:Implications for creativity and analytical problem solving. Journal of Personality and social Psychology, 88, 263-275.
Gasper, K., & Clore, G. L. (2002). Attending to the big picture: Mood and global versus local processing of visual information. Psychological Science, 13, 34-40.
Gasper, K. (2004). Do you see what I see? Affect and visual information processing. Cognition and Emotion, 18, 405-421.
Gonzaga, G. C., Keltner, D., Londahl, E. A., & Smith, M. D. (2001). Love and the commitment problem in romantic relations and friendship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 247-262.
Hegi, K. E., & Bergner, R. M. (2010). What is love? An empirically-based essentialist account. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27, 620-636.
Hendrick, C., & Hendrick, S. (1986). A theory and method of love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 392-402
Hendrick, C., & Hendrick, S. (1989). Research on love: Does it measure up? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 784-794.
Higgins, E. T.(1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280-1300.
Higgins, E. T.(2000). Making a good decision: Value from fit. American Psychologist, 55, 1217-1230.
Higgins, E. T., Shah, J., & Friedman, R. S. (1997). Emotional responses to goal attainment: Strength of regulatory focus as a moderator. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 515-525.
Kühnen, U., & Oyserman, D. (2002). Thinking about the self influences thinking in general: cognitive consequences of salient self-concept. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 492-499.
Marguc, J., Förster, J., & Van Kleef, G. A. (2011). Stepping back to see the big picture: When obstacles elicit global processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 883-901.
Mikulincer, M. (1998). Attachment working models and the sense of trust: An exploration of interaction goals and affect regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1209-1224.
Neff. L. A., & Karney, B. R. (2005). To know you is to love you: The implications of global adoration and specific accuracy for marital relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 480-497.
Rohr, M., Degner, J., & Wentura, D. (2012). Masked emotional priming beyond global valence activations. Cognition & Emotion, 26, 224-244.
Shah, J. Y. (2003). Automatic for the people: How representations of significant others implicitly affect goal pursuit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 661-681
Titchner, E. (1909). Experimental psychology of the thought process. New York: Macmillan.
Wertheimer, M. (1967). Gestalt theory. In W. D. Ellis (Ed.), A source book of Gestalt psychology (pp.1-11). New York: Humanities Press.
- 다운로드 수
- 조회수
- 0KCI 피인용수
- 0WOS 피인용수