바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology

ISSN : 1229-0653

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.26 No.4

Citation Share

A Comparative Study on the Traits of Sex Offences according to Crime Scene Actions by Ages of Victims

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2012, v.26 no.4, pp.107-126
https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2012.26.4.007


& (2012). A Comparative Study on the Traits of Sex Offences according to Crime Scene Actions by Ages of Victims. Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 26(4), 107-126, https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2012.26.4.007

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to distinguish the sex offences based on crime scene actions by different ages of victims. For performing this study, the 143 sex crimes were gathered, and then coded into 25 crime scene actions belonged to the 4 behavior themes(hostility, control, involvement, theft) based on advanced research by Canter et al(2003). Next, ANOVA, and Multi Correspondence Analysis were used for exploring the differences and interrelation of sex crime scene actions between age groups of victims. As the results of this study, it was found in significant differences in the theme of 4 sex crime scene actions by each group of victims. Especially, in the case of hostility, control, involvement, the frequency of crime scene actions were highest in younger victims and the frequency of crime scene actions related to thefts were highest in middle aged victims. And, 2 dimensions were produced between 25 crime scene actions and 5 age groups of victims by multi correspondence analysis,one is psychological stability to avoiding the threat of arrest, the other is sexual-anger to the degree of offenders’sexual needs directly and indirectly. These findings would suggest that as younger victims are treated as a reactive individual for sex, sex offenders become more absorbed in doing sexual behavior with them, but victims of other ages are treated as a vehicle of sex, sex offenders are more using both the additional behaviors not just for the direct satisfaction of the rape. These findings are useful in understanding different motives and behavior for the sex crime and helpful for investigation of sex offenders.

keywords
성범죄, 성범죄 피해자, 범죄현장 행동, 범죄자 프로파일링, sex crime, rape victims, crime scene actions, criminal profiling

Reference

1.

고선영, 김경옥, 정연대, 최대호 (2010). 범죄현장 행동에 근거한 연쇄 강간범죄자의 유형 분류. 한국심리학회지: 법정 1(3). 171-183.

2.

경찰청 (2011). 2011년 범죄통계. 경찰청.

3.

김우곤 (1998). 한국, 일본, 홍콩, 중국을 방문한 미국인 관광객의 사회통계학적 특성 분석. 관광학연구, 24(1), 259-280.

4.

김지영, 박지선, 박현호 (2009). 연쇄성폭력범죄자 프로파일링과 프로파일링 제도 연구. 서울: 한국형사정책연구원

5.

김지선, 박지선, 최수형 (2009). 청소년 대상 성범죄자 유형분류와 프로파일링. 서울: 한국형사정책연구원

6.

곽대경 (2001). 경찰수사를 위한 범죄연구의 활용방안, 한국경찰학회보 12, 12-53.

7.

노형진 (2008). 대응분석의 이론과 실제. 서울, 한울출판사

8.

대검찰청 (2011). 범죄분석. 144호, 대검찰청.

9.

배현정 (2002). 범죄현장 분석을 통한 강간범 프로파일링:예비연구. 충북대학교 일반대학원 심리학과 석사학위 논문.

10.

서종한, 김경일 (2011). 성범죄자 군집유형분석과 프로파일링 연구. 한국심리학회지: 사회및성격 25(1), 155-172.

11.

신기숙 (2011). 성폭력 피해아동의 피해경험. 한국심리학회지: 일반 30(4), 1255-1287.

12.

이수정, 전주희 (2007). 성범죄자의 위험유형 별 처우 방안 연구. 한국심리학회지: 사회및성격 21(3). 117-131.

13.

전영실, 강은영, 박형민, 김혜정, 황태정, 정유희 (2007). 성폭력 범죄의 유형과 재범억제방안, 서울: 한국형사정책연구원

14.

최용석 (2001). SAS 대응분석의 이해와 응용. 서울:자유아카데미.

15.

허경미 (2004). 노인의 범죄 피해 특징 및 대책에 관한연구. 한국공안행정학회보 17, 423-452.

16.

황흥선 (2002). 일반화된 제약다중대응분석을 이용한 범주형 마케팅 자료 분석. 한국심리학회지:소비자.광고 3(1). 53-62

17.

Burgess, A. W., Groth, A. N., & Holmstrom, L. (1978). Sexual Assault of Children and Adolescents. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

18.

Burgess, A. W., Commons, M. L., Safarik, M. E., Looper, R. R., & Ross, S. N. (2007). Sex offenders of the elderly: Classification by motive, typology, and predictors of severity of crime. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12, 582-597.

19.

Canter, D. V., Bennell, C., Alison, L. J., & Reddy, S. (2003). Differentiating sex offences; a behaviorally based thematic classification of stranger rapes. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 21, 157-174.

20.

Canter, D. V., & Fritzon, K. (1998). Differentiating arsonists: a model of fire-setting actions and characteristics. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 3, 73–96.

21.

Canter, D. V., & Heritage, R. (1990). A multivariate model of sexual offence behavior: Developments in ‘offender profiling’. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 1, 185-212.

22.

Canter, D. V., Hughes, D., & Kirby, S. (1998). Paedophilia: pathology, criminality, or both? The development of a multivariate model of offence behavior in child sexual abuse. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 9, 532-555.

23.

Canter, D. V. (2004). Offender profiling and investigative psychology. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 1, 1-15.

24.

Davis, L. J., & Brody, E. M. (1979). Rape and older women: A guide to prevention and protection. Philadelphia Geriatric Center, PA.

25.

Douglas, J. E., Burgess, A. W., Burgess, A. G., & Ressler, R. K. (Eds.). (1992). Crime classification manual: A standard system for investigating and classifying violent crimes. London: Lexington.

26.

Grant, L.(1994). Why do young men rape elderly woman? And why does nobody care? : A special report by Linda Grant on a shocking crime which it seems we all prefer to ignore. The Independent: London.

27.

Greenacre, M. J. (1984). Theory and Applications of Correspondence Analysis, New Yor: Academic Press.

28.

Groth, A. N. (1983). Treatment of the sexual offender in a correctional institution. In J. G. Greer & I.R. Stuart (Eds.), The sexual agressor: Current perspectives on treatment. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, Inc.

29.

Groth, A. N., & Birnbaum, H. J. (1978). Adult sexual orientation and attraction to underage persons. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 7, 175-181.

30.

Groth, A. N., & Burgess, A. W. (1977). Motivational intent in the sexual assault of children. Criminal Justice and Behaviour, 4, 253-271.

31.

Groth, A. N., Burgess, A. W., Holmstrom, L. (1977). Rape, Power, Anger and Sexuality. American Jornal of Psychiatry, 134, 1239-1243.

32.

Holmes, R. M., & Holmes, S. T. (2002). Profiling Violent Crime: An Investigation Tool(3 ed.). London: Sage

33.

Hoffman, D. L., & Franke, G. R. (1986). Correspondence analysis: Graphical representation of categorical data in marketing research. Journal of Marketing Research 23(August): 213-227.

34.

Lanning, K. V. (2001). Child molesters and cyber pedophiles - A behavioral perspective. In R. R. Hazelwood & A. W. Burgess. (Eds.), Practical aspects of rape investigation: A multidisciplinary approach (pp.3-27). Boca Raton: CRC Press.

35.

Marshall, W. L., & Barbaree. H. E. (1990). Handbook of sexual assault: Issues, theories, and treatment of the offender. New York: Plenum Press.

36.

Mokros, A., & Alison, L. J. (2002). Is offender profiling possible? Testing the predicted homology of crime scene actions and background characteristics in a sample of rapists. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 7, 25–3.

37.

Prentky, R. A., Lee, A. F. S., Knight, R. A., & Cerce, D. (1997). Recidivism rates among child molesters and rapists: A methodological analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 635-659.

38.

Porter, S., Fairweather, D., Drugge, J., Herve, H., Birt, A., & Boer, D. P. (2000). Profiles of psychopathy in incarcerated sexual offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27(2), 216-233.

39.

Warren, J. I., Reboussin, R., Hazelwood, R. R., Gibbs, N. A., Trumbertta, S. L., & Cummings, A. (1999). Crime scene analysis and the escalation of violence in serial rape. Forensic Science International, 100, 37-56.

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy