바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

  • P-ISSN1229-0653
  • KCI

ISSN : 1229-0653

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.29 No.2

Citation Share

판단자의 부정적 감정과 거짓말 판단과의 관계에서 확실성의 매개효과 검증: 분노와 슬픔을 중심으로

Mediating effect of Certainty on the Relationship between negative affect and the detection of deception: The differential impact of anger and sadness

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격 / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2015, v.29 no.2, pp.57-70
https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2015.29.2.004
박희정 (대구지방경찰청 과학수사계)
박희정. (2015). 판단자의 부정적 감정과 거짓말 판단과의 관계에서 확실성의 매개효과 검증: 분노와 슬픔을 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 29(2), 57-70, https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2015.29.2.004

초록

본 연구는 판단 확실성이 부정적 감정과 거짓말 판단과의 관계를 매개하는지 알아보고자 진행되었다. 본 연구의 실험은 분노와 슬픔을 경험한 에피소드를 작성하게 하는 것으로 감정을 유도하였으며, 중성조건의 경우 분노도 슬픔도 유도되지 않는 아침에 일어나서 한 일을 작성하도록 하였다. 감정 에피소드 작성을 마친 후 모든 조건의 참가자들에게 진실영상과 거짓영상을 시청하게 하고 각 영상의 진실유무를 판단하도록 하였다. 분석결과, 분노를 느낄수록 거짓말 판단 정답율이 더 낮게 나타났다. 이러한 관계를 판단 확실성이 매개하는지 검증하기 위해 Baron과 Kenny(1986)가 제안한 절차에 따라 매개분석을 실시한 결과 완전매개효과가 나타났다. 즉 분노상태에서는 자신의 판단에 대해서 확신이 높기 때문에 더 체계적으로 정보를 처리할 필요성이 낮아져 정답율이 저하되는 반면, 슬픔상태에서는 자신의 판단에 대한 확신이 떨어지기 때문에 보다 체계적으로 정보를 처리하고자하여 정답율이 높아진 것으로 해석된다. 본 연구는 감정과 거짓말 판단과의 관계에서 판단 확실성의 매개효과를 보여줌으로써 감정이 어떠한 프로세스로 거짓말 판단에 영향을 주는지 그 과정에 대해서 명확히 하고자 하였다. 이러한 연구결과는 향후 거짓말 탐지 연구에 유용한 정보를 제공할 것으로 판단된다.

keywords
거짓말 판단, 분노, 슬픔, 확실성, 정보처리방식, 매개효과, detection of deception, anger, sadness, certainty, information-processing strategies, mediating effect

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the influence of negative affect on the detection of deception and how certainty would mediate the relationship. In the experiment, participants were instructed to recall and write about anger and sad episodes. In the neutral conditions, participants were asked to write the mundane events of the previous day. After affect induction, participants viewed deceptive or truthful interviews films. They made judgments about the targets’ truthfulness. As predicted, anger individuals achieved lower accuracy rates than sad individuals. Moreover, mediation analysis demonstrated that anger individuals would have comparatively lower accuracy rates on judgments because they had higher certainty about their judgments. Sad individuals, in contrast, had less confidence when making judgments so they led to systematic processing and achieved higher accuracy rates. These results show that there were the difference of judgmental accuracy rates in the condition of two negative affects and certainty mediated the relationship between negative affect and the detection of deception.. Theoretical and practical implications of these results are discussed.

keywords
거짓말 판단, 분노, 슬픔, 확실성, 정보처리방식, 매개효과, detection of deception, anger, sadness, certainty, information-processing strategies, mediating effect

참고문헌

1.

Ask, K., Granhag, P. A. (2007). Hot Cognition in investigative Judgments: The Differential Influence of Anger and Sadness. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 537-551.

2.

Aspinwall, L. G. (1998). Rethinking the role of positive affect in self-regulation. Motivation and Emotion, 22, 1-32.

3.

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.

4.

Bless, H., & Fiedler, K. (1995). Affective states and the influence of activated general knowledge. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 766-778.

5.

Bless, H., & Fiedler, K. (2006). Mood and the regulation of information processing and behavior. In J. P. Forgas. (Ed.), Hearts and minds: Affective influences on social cognition and behavior. New York: Psychology Press, pp. 65-84.

6.

Bodenhausen, G. V., Kramer, G. P., & Süsser, K. (1994). Happiness and Stereotypic Thinking in social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 621-632.

7.

Bodenhausen, G. V., Sheppard, L. A., & Kramer, G. P. (1994). Negative affect and social judgment:the differential impact of anger and sadness. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 45-62.

8.

Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116-131.

9.

Edwards, A. H., & Weary, G. (1993). Depression and the impression formation continuum:Piecemeal processing despite the availability of category information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 636-645.

10.

Ekman, P. (1992). An argument for basic emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 6, 169-200.

11.

Ekman, P. (2001). Telling lies: clues to deceit in the marketplace, politics and marriage. New York: W. W. Norton.

12.

Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1972). Hand movements. Journal of Communication, 11, 242-263.

13.

Ekman, P., O’Sullivan, M., Friesen, W. V., & Scherer, K. (1991). Face, voice, and body in detecting deceit. Journal of nonverbal behavior, 15, 125-135.

14.

Forgas, J. P. (1992). Mood and perception of unusual people: Affective asymmetry in memory and social judgments. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 531-547.

15.

Forgas, J. P. (1995). Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model (AIM). Psychological Bulletin, 116, 39-66.

16.

Forgas, J. P. (2002). Feeling and doing: Affective influences on interpersonal behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 13, 1-28.

17.

Forgas, J. P., & East, R. (2008). On being happy and gullible: Mood effects on skepticism and the detection of deception. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44, 1362-1367.

18.

Forrest, J. A., Feldman, R. S., & Tyler, J. M. (2004). When Accurate Beliefs Lead to Better Lie Detection. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 764-780.

19.

Granhag, P. A., & Stromwall, L. A. (2002). Repeated Interrogations: Verbal and non-verbal cues to deception. Applied cognitive psychology, 16, 243-257.

20.

Kuhl, J. (1983). Emotion, Kognition, und motivation II: Die funktionale Bedeutung der emotionen für das problemlösende Denke und für das konkrete Handeln’. Sprache & Kognition, 4. 228-253.

21.

Lane, J. D., & DePaulo, B. M. (1999). Completing Coyne’s cycle: Dysphorics’ ability to detect deception. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 311-329.

22.

Mackie, D. M., Asuncion, A. G., & Rosselli, F. (1992). The impact of positive affect on persuasion processes. In M. S. Clark(Ed.), Emotion and social behavior. Newbury Park, CA:sage.

23.

Park, H. J., & Daibo, I. (2013). Affect effects on the detection of deception. Technical report of IEICE, 112, 155-160.

24.

Park, J., & Banaji, M. R. (2000). Mood and heuristics: The influence of happy and sad states on sensitivity and bias in stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 1005-1023.

25.

Reinhard, M.-A. (2010). Need for Cognition and the process of lie detection. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 961-971.

26.

Reinhard, M-A., Schwarz, N. (2012). The Influence of Affective States on the Process of Lie Detection. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 377-389.

27.

Reinhard, M.-A., & Sporer, S. L. (2008). Verbal and nonverbal behaviour as a basis for credibility attribution: the impact of task involvement and cognitive capacity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 477-488.

28.

Reinhard, M-A., Sporer, S. L., Scharmach, M., & Marksteiner, T. (2011). Listening, not watching:Situational familiarity and the ability to detect deception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 467-484.

29.

Schwarz, N. (1990). Feelings as information:Informational and motivational functions of affective states. In E. T. Higgins, & R. M. Sorrentino. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition. vol. 2, New York: Guilford Press, pp.527-561.

30.

Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1996). Feelings and phenomenal experiences. In E. T. Higgins, & A. Krulanski. (Eds.), Social psychology: A handbook of basic principles. New York: Guilford Press, pp.433-465.

31.

Smith, C. A., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1985). Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 813-838.

32.

Soctt, J. P. (1980). The function of emotions in behavioral systems: A systems theory analysis. In R. Plutchik, & H. Kellerman. (Eds.), Emotion:Theory, Research, Experience. vol.1, Academic Press, New York, pp. 35-56.

33.

Tiedens, L. Z. (2001). The effect of anger on the hostile inferences of aggressive an nonaggressive people: Specific emotions, cognitive processing, and chronic accessibility. Motivation and Emotion, 25, 233-251.

34.

Tiedens, L. Z., & Linton, S. (2001). Judgment under emotional uncertainty: The effects of specific emotions son information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 973-988.

35.

Vrij, A. (2000). Detecting lies and deceit: The psychology of lying and implications for professional practice. Chichester; John Wiley & Sons.

36.

Vrij, A., Edward, K., Roberts, K. P., & Bull, R. (2000). Detecting deceit via analysis of verbal and nonverbal behavior. Journal of nonverbal behavior, 24, 239-263.

37.

Wada, S. (1996). Construction of the Big Five Scales of personality trait terms and concurrent validity with NPI. Japanese Journal of Psychology, 67, 61-67.

38.

Weary, G., & Jacobson, J. A. (1997). Causal uncertainty beliefs and diagnostic information seeking, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 839-848.

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격

논문 투고 OA 정책