바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

안구운동 추적장비를 통한 거짓말자의 동공크기 및 안구운동 연구

The study of pupil size and eye movement during deception using eye tracker

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격 / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2016, v.30 no.2, pp.63-76
https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2016.30.2.004
이연실 (중앙대학교 심리학과)
이상현 (대검찰청 심리분석실)
방철 (대검찰청)
최훈 (대검찰청 심리분석실)
김석찬 (대검찰청 심리분석실)
이장한 (중앙대학교)

초록

본 연구는 동공크기와 안구운동을 통해 거짓말자와 진실자의 특성과 차이를 확인하였다. 실험참가자의 자발적인 선택에 따라 유죄(25명)와 무죄(27명) 집단으로 나눠 모의범죄를 수행한 후, 비교질문검사를 실시하여 동공크기 및 응시횟수와 응시시간을 측정하였다. 비교질문검사는 9개의 문장(범죄관련 질문 2개, 비교질문 3개, 무관련 질문 4개)으로서 안구운동 추적장비의 모니터를 통해 글자로 제시되었다. 실험결과, 유죄집단은 범죄관련 질문에서 무죄집단에 비해 동공크기가 유의미하게 확장되었으며, 범죄관련 자극에 대한 응시횟수와 응시시간은 집단 간 차이가 없었다. 본 연구를 통해 거짓말 시 동공확장을 확인하였는데, 이는 향후 동공크기를 통한 거짓말의 탐지 가능성을 시사한다.

keywords
Deception detection, Pupil dilation, Eye movements, Eye tracker, 거짓말 탐지, 동공 확장, 안구운동, 안구운동 추적장비(eye tracker)

Abstract

The present study aimed to examine a change in pupil size and the eye movement during deception. Participants were recruited for either guilty (25 people) or innocent (27 people) group and performed a mock crime. After the mock crime, participants' pupil size and eye movements (fixation count and dwell time) were measured during the comparison question test. During the comparison question test, nine sentences (two crime-related questions, three comparison questions, four irrelevant questions) were presented on the monitor connected with eye tracker. The findings indicated that the guilty group showed significantly larger pupil size when the crime-relevant questions were given than did the innocent group while two groups showed no difference in fixation count and dwell time. The findings revealed that pupil dilation was different between liars and truth tellers, and thus, pupil dilation can be a useful measurement to detect deception and may contribute to an increase of the accuracy of lie detection.

keywords
Deception detection, Pupil dilation, Eye movements, Eye tracker, 거짓말 탐지, 동공 확장, 안구운동, 안구운동 추적장비(eye tracker)

참고문헌

1.

고성룡, 윤낙영 (2007). 우리 문장 읽기에서 안구 운동의 특성: 어절 길이, 단어 빈도 및 착지점 관련 효과. 인지과학, 18(4), 325-350.

2.

김민경, 이장한 (2010). 기만/조종 척도개발 및 타당화 연구. Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society, 12(3B), 1339-1349.

3.

한덕웅, 이장호, 전겸구 (1996). Spielberger의 상태-특성 불안검사 Y형의 개발. 한국심리학회지: 건강. 1(1), 1-14.

4.

Ben-Shakhar, G. (2002). A critical review of the control questions test (CQT). In M. Kleiner (Ed.), Handbook of polygraph testing (pp. 103-126). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

5.

Cook, A. E., Hacker, D. J., Webb, A. K., Osher, D., Kristjansson, S. D., Woltz, D. J., & Kircher, J. C. (2012). Lyin' eyes: Ocular-motor measures of reading reveal deception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 18(3), 301-313.

6.

DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. J., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129(1), 74-118.

7.

Derrick, D. C., Moffitt, K., & Nunamaker, J. F. (2010). Eye gaze behavior as a guilty knowledge test: Initial exploration for use in automated, kiosk-based screening. In Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Koloa, HI.

8.

Dionisio, D. P., Granholm, E., Hillix, W. A., & Perrine, W. F. (2001). Differentiation of deception using pupillary responses as an index of cognitive processing. Psychophysiology, 38(2), 205-211.

9.

Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1969). Nonverbal leakage and clues to deception. Psychiatry, 32(1), 88-106.

10.

Ekman, P. (1996). Why don't we catch liars? Social Research, 63(3), 801-818.

11.

Frank, M. G., & Ekman, P. (1997). The ability to detect deceit generalizes across different types of high-stake lies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(6), 1429-1439.

12.

Gombos, V. A. (2006). The cognition of deception: The role of executive processes in producing lies. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 132(3), 197-214.

13.

Gozna, L. F., Vrij, A., & Bull, R. (2001). The impact of individual differences on perception of lying in everyday life in a high stake situation. Personality and Individual Difference, 31(7), 1203- 1216.

14.

Grubin, D., & Madsen, L. (2005). Lie detection and the polygraph: A historical review. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 16(2), 357-369.

15.

Hartwig, M., Granhag, P. A., Strömwall, L. A., & Vrij, A. (2005). Detecting deception via strategic disclosure of evidence. Law and Human Behavior, 29(4), 469-484.

16.

Hartwig, M., Granhag, P. A., & Strömwall, L. A. (2007). Guilty and innocent suspects’ strategies during police interrogations. Psychology, Crime & Law, 13(2), 213-227.

17.

Horowitz, S. W., Kircher, J. C., Honts, C. R., & Raskin, D. C. (1997). The role of control questions in physiological detection of deception. Psychophysiology, 34, 108-115.

18.

In-Albon, T., Kossowsky, J., & Schneider, S. (2010). Vigilance and avoidance of threat in the eye movements of children with separation anxiety disorder. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38(2), 225-235.

19.

Lubow, R. E., & Fein, O. (1996). Pupillary size in response to a visual guilty knowledge test: New technique for the detection of deception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2(2), 164-177.

20.

Lykken, D. T. (1981). A tremor in the blood. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

21.

Mann, S., Vrij, A., Leal, S., Granhag, P. A., Warmelink, L., & Forrester, D. (2012). Windows to the soul? Deliberate eye contact as a cue to deceit. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 36(3), 205-251.

22.

Mann, S., Vrij, A., Shaw, D., Leal, S., Ewans, S., Hillman, J., Granhag, P. A., & Fisher, R. P. (2012). Two heads are better than one? How to effectively use two interviewers to elicit cues to deception. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 18(2), 324-340.

23.

Mann, S., Ewens, S., Shaw, D., Vrij, A., Leal, S., & Hillman, J. (2013). Lying eyes: Why liars seek deliberate eye contact. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 20(3), 452-461.

24.

Matsumoto, D., Hwang, H. S., Skinner, L., & Frank, M. (2011). Evaluating truthfulness and detecting deception. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 80, 1-8.

25.

National Research Council (2003). The polygraph and lie detection. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

26.

Orne, M. T. (1975). Implication of laboratory research for the detection of deception. In N. Ansley (Ed.), Legal admissibility of the polygraph. Springfield, IL: C. C. Thomas.

27.

Saxe, L. (1991). Science and the CQT polygraph: A theoretical critique. Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science, 26(3), 223-231.

28.

Sip, K. E., Roepstorff, A., McGregor, W., & Frith, C. D. (2008). Detecting deception: The scope and limits. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(2), 48-53.

29.

Sokolov, E. N. (1963). Perception and the conditioned reflex. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

30.

Spielberger, C. D. (1983). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory: STAI (Form Y). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

31.

Steinhauer, S. R., Siegle, G. J., Condray, R., & Pless, M. (2004). Sympathetic and parasympathetic innervation of pupillary dilation during sustained processing. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 52(1), 77-86.

32.

Verschuere, B., Crombez, G., & Koster, E. (2004). Orienting to guilty knowledge. Cognition and Emotion, 18(2), 265-279.

33.

Wang, J. T. (2011). Pupil dilation and eye tracking. In M. Schulte-Mecklenbeck, A. Kuhberger, & R. Ranyard (Eds.), A handbook of process tracing methods for decision research: A critical review and user’s guide. New York, NY: Psychology Press.

34.

Warmelink, L., Vrij, A., Mann, S., Leal, S., Forrester, D., & Fisher, R. P. (2011). Thermal imaging as a lie detection tool at airports. Law and Human Behavior, 35(1), 40-48.

35.

Webb, A. K., Honts, C. R., Bernhardt, P., Kircher, J. C., & Cook, A. E. (2009). Effectiveness of pupil diameter in a probable-lie comparison question test for deception. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 14(2), 279-292.

36.

Zuckerman, M., DePaulo, B. M., & Rosenthal, R. (1981). Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 14(1), 1-59.

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격