바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

ISSN : 1229-0653

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.30 No.2

Citation Share

일화기억 회상 시 질문의 순서 바꾸기가 정보인출에 미치는 영향

The Effect of Different Orders of Question on the Recalling Episodic Memory

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격 / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2016, v.30 no.2, pp.43-61
https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2016.30.2.003
홍유진 (경기대학교 일반대학원 범죄심리학과)
김시업 (경기대학교)
홍유진, & 김시업. (2016). 일화기억 회상 시 질문의 순서 바꾸기가 정보인출에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 30(2), 43-61, https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2016.30.2.003

초록

본 연구에서는 기억을 촉진시키는 면담 기법인 인지면담에서 제안하고 있는 질문의 순서 바꾸기 기법이 일화기억의 회상에 미치는 영향을 알아보았다. 화자의 거짓말 의도 여부에 따라 진실하게 진술하였을 때와 거짓으로 진술하였을 때, 회상 방향을 달리 한 질문의 순서 바꾸기 기법이 어떠한 효과를 나타내는지 살펴보았다. 이를 위해 심리학을 수강하는 대학생 총 80명을 대상으로 실험을 실시하였다. 참가자들은 절도 범죄에 대한 영상을 시청한 후 영상의 내용을 진실하게 진술할 것인지 거짓으로 진술할 것인지에 따라 두 집단으로 분류되었으며, 각 집단의 참가자들은 특정 부분에 대한 회상 시 순차순 질문순서에 따라 진술할 것인지 순차순과 역순이 혼합된 혼합순 질문순서에 따라 진술할 것인지에 따라 또 다시 무작위 분류되어 면담이 진행되었다. 그 결과, 진실 집단은 혼합순 질문순서를 따랐을 때가 순차순 질문순서를 따랐을 때에 비해 더 많은 정보를 보고하였으며, 거짓 집단은 질문순서에 따른 차이가 나타나지 않았다. 또한, 보고된 정보를 진실 정보와 거짓 정보로 나누어 살펴본 결과, 두 집단 모두 혼합순 질문순서를 따랐을 때가 순차순 질문순서를 따랐을 때에 비해 진실 정보는 더 많이, 거짓 정보는 더 적게 보고하였다. 이러한 결과를 토대로 수사면담 시 정보가(價)를 갖는 정보의 획득 방안에 대하여 논의하였다.

keywords
일화기억, 순차순․역순 회상, 인지면담, 순서 바꾸기 기법, 인지적 부하, 진실․거짓 정보, episodic memory, forward․backward recall, cognitive interview, recalling of events in a variety of different orders, cognitive load, lie

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the effect of forward and mixed-ordered question in the true and deceptive group on the recalling of episodic event. 80 college students were sorted into two(true vs. deceptive) groups. And again, they were randomly classified into forward question group and mixed-ordered question group. They were shown the video clip of theft, and interviewed according to 2 types of question-order. In first interview, they were free-recalling of the full contents of event, and in second interview, they were recalling of additional information about specific parts of video. All the interviews were recorded and written and analyzed written files. Major results are as follows: First, in second interview, new information in true group were more in mixed-ordered question than forward question. But deceptive group had no difference of acquired information between in mixed-ordered and forward question. Second, both true and deceptive group had more true information in mixed-ordered question than forward question. And deceptive group had more new untrue information in forward question than mixed-ordered question. This study found that mixed-ordered question would get more new true information than forward question in truth teller and liar in investigative interview.

keywords
일화기억, 순차순․역순 회상, 인지면담, 순서 바꾸기 기법, 인지적 부하, 진실․거짓 정보, episodic memory, forward․backward recall, cognitive interview, recalling of events in a variety of different orders, cognitive load, lie

참고문헌

1.

강선 (2014). 사건에 대한 정기기억에서 역순회상의 인출 연구: 복합탐색과 인지적 부담을 중심으로. 경기대학교 대학원.

2.

김미영, 김경하, 전우병, 김시업 (2004). 인지면담의 네 가지 기법간 효과 비교 연구. 한국심리학회 연차 학술발표논문집, 2, 19-30.

3.

김시업, 문옥영, 김기민 (2010). 수사면담 시 라포가 진술의 양에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 24(1), 149-166.

4.

김시업, 전우병, 김미영 (2006). 효율적인 수사면담을 위한 단축형 인지면담의 개발. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 20(1), 21-38.

5.

문옥영, 김시업, 전우병, 김범준 (2011). 한국어 진술서에서 책임회피 시 나타나는 거짓의 언어ㆍ심리적 특징. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 25(2), 91-111.

6.

왕경수 (2009). 인지 부하와 교수 설계. 초등교육연구, 22(1). 491-522.

7.

조은경 (2002). 거짓말의 특징과 탐지. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 21(2). 33-65.

8.

Anna E., Mariëlle, S., & Ilja van, B. (2014). Limited capacity to lie: Cognitive load interferes with being dishonest. Judgment & Decision Making, 9(3), 199-206.

9.

Bireta, T. J., Fry, S. E., Jalbert, A., Neath, I., Surprenant, A. M., Tehan, G., & Tolan, G. A., (2010). Backward recall and benchmark effects of working memory, Memory & Cognition, 38(3), 279-291.

10.

Boon, J. C. W., & Noon, E. (1994). Changing perspectives in cognitive interviewing. Psychology, Crime and Law, 1, 59-69.

11.

Bower, G. H., Black, J. B., & Turner, T. J., (1979). Scripts in Memory for Text. Cognitive Psychology, 11, 177-218.

12.

Clifford, B. R., & George, R. (1996). A field investigation of training in three methods of witness/victim investigative interviewing. Psychology, Crime and Law, 2, 231-248.

13.

Conrad, R. (1972). Short-Term memory in the deaf: A test for speech coding. British Journal of Psychology, 63, 173-180.

14.

Conrad, R., & Hull, A. J. (1964). Information, acoustic confusion and memory span. British Journal of Psychology, 55, 429-432.

15.

Davis, M. R., McMahon, M., & Greenwood, K. M. (2005). The efficacy of mnemonic components of the cognitive interview: towards a shortened Variant for time-critical investigative. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 75-93.

16.

DePaulo, B. M., Kirkendol, S. E., Tang, J., & O'Brien, T. P. (1988). The motivational impairment effect in the communication of deception: Replications and extensions. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 12, 177-202.

17.

Depaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. J., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 74-118.

18.

Eaves, R. (1992). An evaluation of the efficacy of the mnemonic components of the cognitive interview. Unpublished undergraduate dissertation, Department of Psychology, University of Middlesex.

19.

Ekman, P. (1989). Why kids lie: how parents can encourage truthfulness. New York: Scribner.

20.

Ekman, P. (2001). Telling lies: Clues to deceit in the marketplace, politics and marriage. New York: W. W. Norton.

21.

Fisher, Ronald P., & Geiselman, R. Edward (1992). Memory-enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing: the cognitive interview, Charles C Tomas.

22.

Geiselman, R. E., & Callot, R. (1990). Reverse and forward recall of script-based texts. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 4, 141-144.

23.

Geiselman, R. E., & Fisher, R. P. (1989). The cognitive interview technique for victims and witnesses of crime. In D. Raskin(Ed.), Psychological Methods in Criminal Investigation and Evidence. New York: Springer Publishing Company, 191-215.

24.

Geiselman, R. E., Fisher, R. P., Firstenberg, I., Hutten L. A., Sullivan, S. J., Avetissian, I. V., & Prosk, A. L. (1984). Enhancement of eyewitness memory: An empirical evaluation of the cognitive interview. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 12, 74-80.

25.

George, R. (1991). A field evaluation of the cognitive interview. Unpublished manuscript. Polytechnic of East London. London.

26.

Healy, A. F. (1975). Coding of temporal-spatial patterns in short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and verbal Behavior, 14, 481-495.

27.

Holliday, R. E. (2003). The effect of prior cognitive interview on children's acceptance of misinformation. Applied cognitive psychology, 17, 443-457.

28.

Jensen, A. G. (1964). Individual differences in learning: Interference factors. Final Report, 1964. Office of Education, Cooperative Research Project No. 1897.

29.

Johnston, W. A., Greenberg, S. N., Fisher, R. P., & Martin, D. W., (1970). Divided Attntion: A Vehicle for Monitoring Memory Processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83(1), 164-170.

30.

Kahana, M. J., (1996). Associative Retrieval Process in Free Recall. Memory & Cognition, 24(1), 103- 108.

31.

Kent C. H. L., & Roger B. (2009). Trips Down Memory Lane: Recall Direction Affects the Subjective Distance of Past Events. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 230-243.

32.

Loftus, E. F., & Fathi, D. (1985). Retrieving Multiple Autobiographical Memories. Social Cognition, 3(3), 280-294.

33.

Longford, G. (1996). The use of the cognitive interview by police officers trained on the National Investigative Interviewing Course. Unpublished Masters dissertation, Institute of Police and Criminological Studies, University of Portsmouth.

34.

Li, S., & Lewandowsky, S. (1995). Forward and backward recall: Different retrieval process. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning memory and cognition, 21(4), 837-847.

35.

McAdams, D. P. (2006). The problem of narrative coherence. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 19, 109-125.

36.

Memon, A., Cronin, O., Eaves, R., & Bull, R. (1996). An empirical test of the mnemonic components of the cognitive interview. In G. Davies, S. Lloyd Bostock, M. McMurran & C. Wilson (Eds), Berlin: De Gruyter.

37.

Milne, R., & Bull, R. (2002). Back to Basics: A Componential Analysis of the Original Cognitive Interview Mnemonics with Three Age Groups. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 743-752.

38.

Murdock Jr, B. B. (1962). The Serial Position Effect of Free Recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(5), 482-488.

39.

O'Connor, N., & Hermelin, B. (1976). Backward and forward recall by deaf and hearing children. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 28, 83-92.

40.

Page, M. P. A., & Norris, D., (1998). The Primacy Model: A New Model of Immediate Serial Recall. Psychological Review, 105(4), 761-778.

41.

Richard, R., Adriel, B., & Eric, D. (2011). Applying cognitive models of deception to national security investigations: Considerations of psychological research, law, and ethical practice. Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 39(2), 339-364.

42.

Sentis, K. P., & Burnstein, E. (1979). Remembering schema-consistent information: Effects of a balance schema on recognition memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(12), 2200-2211.

43.

Singer, J. A., & Blagov, P. (2004). The integrative function of narrative processing: Autobiographical memory, self-defining memory, and the life story of identity. In D. R. Beike, J. M. Lampinen, & D. A. Behrend (Eds.), New York: Psycology Press.

44.

Skowronski, J. J., & Walker, W. R. (2004). How describing autobiographical events can affect autobiographical memories. Social Cognition, 22, 555-590.

45.

Thomas, J. G., Milner, H. R., & Haberlandt, K. F. (2003). Forward and backward recall: Different response time patterns, Same retrieval order. Psychological Science, 14(2), 169-174.

46.

Virginia, M. R., & Randall, W. E. (1997). Forward and backward serial recall. Intelligence, 25(1), 37-47.

47.

Vrij. A., Edward, K., Roberts, K. P., & Bull, R. (2000). Detecting deceit via analysis of verbal and nonverbal behavior. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 24(4), 239-263.

48.

Vrij, A., Leal, S., Mann, S. A., and Fisher, R. P. (2012), Imposing cognitive load to elicit cues to deceit: Inducing the reverse order technique naturally. Psychology, Crime & Law, 18(6), 579-594.

49.

Vrij, A., Mann, S. A., Fisher, R. P., Leal, S., Milne, R. and Bull, R. (2008). Increasing cognitive load to facilitate lie detection: The benefit of recalling an event in reverse order. Law and Human Behaviour, 32, 253-265.

50.

Whitten Ⅱ, W. B., & Leonard, J. M. (1981). Directed Search Through Auto- biographical Memory. Memory & Cognition, 9(6), 566-578.

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격

논문 투고 OA 정책