바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

ISSN : 1229-0653

논문 상세

이전
논문 투고

Vol.31 No.3

Citation Share

일반인의 세월호 참사 간접 경험으로 인한 신념체계와 안녕감 간 관계에서 집단역량 인식의 매개효과: 종단연구

The mediating effects of community resilience in the relationship between world assumption and well being of the Sewol ferry disaster in the public: Longitudinal analysis

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격 / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2017, v.31 no.3, pp.37-60
https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2017.31.3.003
이나빈 (이화여자대학교)
주혜선 (이화여자대학교)
안현의 (이화여자대학교)
이나빈, 주혜선, & 안현의. (2017). 일반인의 세월호 참사 간접 경험으로 인한 신념체계와 안녕감 간 관계에서 집단역량 인식의 매개효과: 종단연구. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 31(3), 37-60, https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2017.31.3.003

초록

본 연구는 세월호 참사로 인해 신념 변화에 상당한 영향을 받았다고 보고한 일반 시민들을 대상으로 사건에 대한 신념이 장기적으로 개인의 안녕감에 어떤 영향을 미치는지를 검토하고, 그 과정을 집단역량 인식 수준이 매개하는지 확인하는 것을 목표로 하였다. 이를 위하여, 전국 20대에서 60대의 성인을 대상으로 21개월의 간격으로 총 2회 온라인 서베이를 실시하였으며 1차와 2차 설문에 모두 응답한 이들 중에서 세월호 사건 생존자, 목격자, 가까운이가 생존했거나 희생되었다고 응답하거나 현장목격 및 현장직무수행에 참여했다고 응답한 이들을 제외한 간접경험자 중에서도 세월호로 인해 현재 신념에 상당한 영향을 받았다고 응답한 이들 307명의 데이터를 최종 분석에 사용하였다. 모형 검증 결과, 1차시 세상에 대한 무의미감 모형의 경우, 1차시 무의미감과 2차시 안녕감 직접 경로가 유의하지 않았기 때문에 1, 2차시 집단역량 인식 변인이 완전 매개효과를 가지고 있음이 확인되었다. 1차시 세상에 대한 비우호성과 자기에 대한 무가치감 모형의 경우, 1차시의 비우호성 수준이 2차시 안녕감 수준에 직접적인 영향을 미치는 경로와 1,2차시 집단역량 인식 수준을 통한 간접경로 모두 유의했다. 또한, 과거 외상경험여부에 따른 차이를 확인하기 위해 다집단 분석을 실시한 결과, 과거외상경험 유무에 따라 유의한 차이를 보인 경로는 없었다. 본 연구 결과를 바탕으로 연구의 의의와 제한점 및 추후 연구에 대한 제안을 논의하였다.

keywords
세월호 참사, 일반 시민, 세상에 대한 신념, 집단역량 인식, 안녕감, 매개효과, 종단연구, Sewol ferry disaster, the public, world assumption, community resilience, well being, longitudinal analysis, mediating effect

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to verify whether community resilience is an important mediating factor in the relationship between world assumption and well being of the Sewol ferry disaster in general citizens. Particularly, in the long term, we tried to confirm the mediating effects of community resilience. To do this, we carried out two online surveys at 21month intervals for adults in 20s to 60s. A total of 1156 data were collected at the first time point, and a total of 485 data were collected at the second time point. In this study 307 respondents who reported that they were significantly affected by the change in beliefs due to the Sewol ferry disaster were used, except for those directly related to the Sewol ferry disaster. As a result, in the case of the meaninglessness of world model, community resilience factor had a full mediation effect because the direct path of the primary meaninglessness of world and the secondary well being was not significant. In the case of the unbenevolence of world and unworthiness of the self model, community resilience factor had a partial mediation effect. In addition, a multiple group analysis was performed to confirm the difference according to previous trauma. As a result, the longitudinal mediating effects of community resilience was significant in both group, but there was no significant difference in path coefficients of study model between non-previous trauma and previous trauma group. Based on the results of this study, implications and limitations of the study and suggestions for future research were discussed.

keywords
세월호 참사, 일반 시민, 세상에 대한 신념, 집단역량 인식, 안녕감, 매개효과, 종단연구, Sewol ferry disaster, the public, world assumption, community resilience, well being, longitudinal analysis, mediating effect

참고문헌

1.

YTN. 세월호 참사 ‘집단 트라우마’ 어떻게 막을까?. 2014.05.05.

2.

중앙일보. [세월호 참사]‘집단 우울증’ 극복 어떻게...“일상 복귀 노력해야”. 2014.04.30.

3.

한겨례. 대형참사 트라우마로 가득찬 거대 병동, ‘한국호’. 2014.04.21.

4.

김명소, 김혜원, 차경호. (2001). 심리적 안녕감의 구성개념분석. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 15(2), 19-39.

5.

민지원, 주혜선, 안현의. (2016). 재난 자원봉사인력의 소진 양상에 따른 이차외상스트레스와 세상에 대한 신념의 차이. 한국심리학회지: 문화 및 사회문제, 22(3), 363-385.

6.

임영진, 고영건, 신희천, 조용래. (2012). 정신적 웰빙 척도 (MHC-SF)의 한국어판 타당화 연구. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 31(2), 369-386.

7.

이주일. (2004). 노인의 대인애착 경향과 심리적 안녕감, 사회적 활동 및 지지적 관계 추구. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 18(2), 11-29.

8.

Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (2012). Social indicators of well-being: Americans' perceptions of life quality. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.

9.

Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual review of psychology, 52(1), 1-26.

10.

Beck, A. T., & Dozois, D. J. (2011). Cognitive therapy: current status and future directions. Annual review of medicine, 62, 397-409.

11.

Benight, C. C., & Harper, M. L. (2002). Coping self-efficacy perceptions as a mediator between acute stress response and long-term distress following natural disasters. Journal of traumatic stress, 15(3), 177-186.

12.

Boyden, J. (2003). Children under fire: challenging assumptions about children's resilience. Children Youth and Environments, 13(1), 1-29.

13.

Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of personality and social psychology, 84(4), 822.

14.

Brown, K., & Westaway, E. (2011). Agency, capacity, and resilience to environmental change: lessons from human development, well-being, and disasters. Annual review of environment and resources, 36, 321-342.

15.

Cohen, O., Leykin, D., Lahad, M., Goldberg, A., & Aharonson-Daniel, L. (2013). The conjoint community resiliency assessment measure as a baseline for profiling and predicting community resilience for emergencies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(9), 1732-1741.

16.

Cutter, S. L., Barnes, L., Berry, M., Burton, C., Evans, E., Tate, E., & Webb, J. (2008). A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Global environmental change, 18(4), 598-606.

17.

Curran, P. J., West, S. G., & Finch, J. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological methods, 1(1), 16.

18.

Ehlers, A., & Clark, D.M. (2000). A cognitive model of posttraumatic stress disorder. Behavior Research and Therapy, 38, 319-345.

19.

Eriksson, N. G., & Lundin, T. (1996). Early traumatic stress reactions among Swedish survivors of the m/s Estonia disaster. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 169(6), 713-716.

20.

Fiske, S. T, & Taylor, S. E. (1984). Social cognition. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

21.

Foa, E. B., Ehlers, A., Clark, D. M., Tolin, D. F., & Orsillo, S. M. (1999). The posttraumatic cognitions inventory: Development and validation. Psychological assessment, 11(3), 303.

22.

Graesser, A. C., & Nakamura, G. V. (1982). The impact of a schema on comprehension and memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 59-109). New York: Academic Press.

23.

Gutierrez, I. A., & Park, C. L. (2015). Emerging adulthood, evolving worldviews: How life events impact college students’ developing belief systems. Emerging Adulthood, 3(2), 85-97.

24.

Harris, H. N., & Valentiner, D. P. (2002). World assumptions, sexual assault, depression, and fearful attitudes toward relationships. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17(3), 286-305.

25.

Helliwell, J. F., & Putnam, R. D. (2004). The social context of well-being. Philosophical transactions- royal society of London series B biological sciences, 1435-1446.

26.

Janoff-Bulman, R., & Frieze, I.H. (1983). A theoretical perspective for understanding reactions to victimization. Journal of Social Issues, 39(2), 1-17.

27.

Janoff-Bulman, R. (1985). The aftermath of victimization: Rebuilding shattered assumptions. Trauma and its wake, 1, 15-35.

28.

Janoff-Bulman, R. (1989). Assumptive worlds and the stress of traumatic events: Applications of the schema construct. Social Cognition, 7, 113-136.

29.

Janoff-Bulman, R. (1992). Shattered assumptions—towards a new psychology of trauma. New York: The Free Press.

30.

Kaniasty, K., & Norris, F. H. (2004). Social support in the aftermath of disasters, catastrophes, and acts of terrorism: Altruistic, overwhelmed, uncertain, antagonistic, and patriotic communities. Bioterrorism: Psychological and public health interventions, 3, 200-229.

31.

Kawachi, I., & Berkman, L. F. (2001). Social ties and mental health. Journal of Urban health, 78(3), 458-467.

32.

Keyes, C. L. M. (1998). Social well-being. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61(2), 121-140.

33.

Keyes, C. L., Wissing, M., Potgieter, J. P., Temane, M., Kruger, A., & van Rooy, S. (2008). Evaluation of the mental health continuum-short form (MHC-SF) in Setswana-speaking South Africans. Clinical psychology and psychotherapy, 15(3), 181.

34.

Koopman, C., Classen, C., Cardeña, E., & Spiegel, D. (1995). When disaster strikes, acute stress disorder may follow. Journal of traumatic stress, 8(1), 29-46.

35.

Lamers, S., Westerhof, G. J., Bohlmeijer, E. T., ten Klooster, P. M., & Keyes, C. L. (2011). Evaluating the psychometric properties of the mental health continuum‐short form (MHC‐SF). Journal of clinical psychology, 67(1), 99-110.

36.

Leykin, D., Lahad, M., Cohen, O., Goldberg, A., & Aharonson-Daniel, L. (2013). Conjoint community resiliency assessment measure-28/10 items (CCRAM28 and CCRAM10): A self-report tool for assessing community resilience. American journal of community psychology, 52(3-4), 313-323.

37.

Magwaza, A.S. (1999). Assumptive world of traumatized South African adults. Journal of Social Psychology, 139(5), 622-630.

38.

Mikkelsen, E. G. E., & Einarsen, S. (2002). Basic assumptions and symptoms of post-traumatic stress among victims of bullying at work. European journal of work and organizational psychology, 11(1), 87-111.

39.

Mäkikangas, A., & Kinnunen, U. (2003). Psychosocial work stressors and well-being: Self-esteem and optimism as moderators in a one-year longitudinal sample. Personality and individual differences, 35(3), 537-557.

40.

Nash, W. P., & Litz, B. T. (2013). Moral injury: A mechanism for war-related psychological trauma in military family members. Clinical child and family psychology review, 16(4), 365-375.

41.

Norris, F. H., & Stevens, S. P. (2007). Community resilience and the principles of mass trauma intervention. Psychiatry: Interpersonal and Biological Processes, 70(4), 320-328.

42.

Norris F, Stevens S, Pfefferbaum B, Wyche K, Pfefferbaum R. (2008). Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities, and strategy for disaster readiness. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41:127-50

43.

Park, C. L. (2010). Making sense of the meaning literature: An integrative review of meaning making and its effects on adjustment to stressful life events. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 257-301.

44.

Paton, D., & Johnston, D. (2006). Disaster resilience: An integrated approach. Springfield IL: Charles C. Thomas Publisher.

45.

Piaget, J. (1971). The construction of reality in the child. New York: Basic Books.

46.

Pyevich, C. M., Newman, E., & Daleiden, E. (2003). The relationship among cognitive schemas, job‐related traumatic exposure, and posttraumatic stress disorder in journalists. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 16(4), 325-328.

47.

Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of personality and social psychology, 69(4), 719.

48.

Scheier, M. F., & Carver, C. S. (1992). Effects of optimism on psychological and physical well-being: Theoretical overview and empirical update. Cognitive therapy and research, 16(2), 201-228.

49.

Sherrieb, K., Norris, F. H., & Galea, S. (2010). Measuring capacities for community resilience. Social indicators research, 99(2), 227-247.

50.

Solomon, Z., Iancu, I., & Tyano, S. (1997). World assumptions following disaster. Journal of applied social psychology, 27(20), 1785-1798.

51.

Sprang, G. (1999). Post-disaster stress following the Oklahoma City bombing: An examination of three community groups. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14(2), 169-183.

52.

Steinglass, P., & Gerrity, E. (1990). Natural Disasters and Post‐traumatic Stress Disorder Short‐Term versus Long‐Term Recovery in Two Disaster‐Affected Communities. Journal of applied social psychology, 20(21), 1746-1765.

53.

Sumner A. 2010. Child poverty, well-being and agency: What does a ‘3-D well-being’ approach contribute?Journal of International Development, 22:1064- 75.

54.

Taylor, S. E, & Crocker, J. (1981). Schematic bases of social information processing. In E. T. Higgins, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Social cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

55.

Taylor, S. E., Wood, J. V, & Lichtman, R. R. (1983). It could be worse: Selective evaluation as a response to victimization, Journal of Social Issues, 39(2), 19-40.

56.

Triplett, K. N., Tedeschi, R. G., Cann, A., Calhoun, L. G., & Reeve, C. L. (2012). Posttraumatic growth, meaning in life, and life satisfaction in response to trauma. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 4, 400-410.

57.

Young, J. E., Klosko, J. S., & Weishaar, M. E. (2003). Schema therapy: A practitioner's guide. New York: Guilford Press.

58.

Walker, B., Holling, C. S., Carpenter, S., & Kinzig, A. (2004). Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecology and society, 9(2).

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격

논문 투고 OA 정책